Simulation TrainingNCT02998307
Optimal Training Frequency for Attainment and Maintenance of High-quality CPR on a High-fidelity Manikin
A study testing CPR Training in people with Simulation Training, run by Health Sciences North at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Objectives: The primary objective is to determine the least frequent CPR training interval associated with continued performance of guideline-compliant CPR. The secondary objective is to determine whether certain physical characteristics, such as age, gender, exercise tolerance, height, and weight may be able to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Simulation Training
- What is being tested?
- CPR Training
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 244 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to 8 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Practicing nurses from multiple clinical environments (operating room, intensive care unit, emergency room, medical and surgical wards) at Health Sciences North.
Who cannot join
- Refusal to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Optimal Serial Training Frequency for Attainment and Maintenance of High Quality CPR Using Real-Time Automated Performance Feedback Combined With Verbal Feedback From a CPR Instructor
Objectives: The primary objective is to determine the least frequent CPR training interval associated with continued performance of guideline-compliant CPR. The secondary objective is to determine whether certain physical characteristics, such as age, gender, exercise tolerance, height, and weight may be able to identify HCPs at high risk of being unable to perform high-quality CPR.
Design: Randomized trial to compare the effect of different training frequencies on long-term CPR performance.
Read more
Participants and setting: Nurses in all adult departments at Health Sciences North. Subjects will be randomly assigned to a group that undertakes short CPR assessment and training sessions either 1) every month, 2) every 3 months, 3) every 6 months, or 4) every 12 months (control group) over the course of a twelve-month period.
Analysis: The proportion of nurses in each group that is able to perform "excellent CPR" at the twelve-month time point will be determined. Excellent CPR is defined as a two-minute CPR session where 90% of compressions are performed with correct depth (50-60 mm), 90% with correct rate (100-120 /min), and 90% with full chest recoil. A subgroup analysis will also be performed where the demographic data of individuals who are unable to perform excellent CPR at the twelve-month time point regardless of intervention group are compared against those who are successful.
Conclusion: The results of our study will help determine the longest CPR training interval associated with maintenance of high-quality CPR skills to minimize training sessions required and decrease associated costs. The results will also generate hypotheses for future study about optimizing role assignments and team performance in resuscitation.
- Conditions
- Simulation Training
- Being tested
- CPR Training
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CPR TrainingProcedure or surgery
Brief CPR assessment and training done during working hours with real-time performance feedback
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly | Experimental | Receive bedside CPR training monthly Receives: Procedure: CPR Training |
| 3 months | Experimental | Receive bedside CPR training every 3 months Receives: Procedure: CPR Training |
| 6 months | Experimental | Receive bedside CPR training every 6 months Receives: Procedure: CPR Training |
| Control | No intervention | No additional training and only performance evaluation after 1 year |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of nurses in each group able to perform "excellent CPR" after completing CPR training programs of various frequencies
"Excellent CPR" is a dichotomous variable achieved if 90% of compressions are performed with correct depth (50-60 mm), 90% with correct rate (100-120 /min), and 90% with full chest recoil.
The proportion of nurses in each group able to perform "excellent CPR" after completing CPR training programs of various frequencies.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Predictors of inability to perform high-quality CPR
Comparison of the following factors in participants able to perform "excellent CPR" and those who are not at the twelve-month time point: percentage of participants who are female or have self-declared shortness of breath when climbing two flights of stairs, and average age, height and weight.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completion8 Jan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Simulation TrainingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 244 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Health Sciences North
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, University of Calgary
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02998307
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-010
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 13 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 15 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimal Serial Training Frequency for Attainment and Maintenance of High Quality CPR Using Real-Time Automated Performance Feedback Combined With Verbal Feedback From a CPR Instructor
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02998307
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 16-010
- Conditions
- Simulation Training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 244 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Health Sciences NorthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, University of Calgary
- Study start
- Apr 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objectives: The primary objective is to determine the least frequent CPR training interval associated with continued performance of guideline-compliant CPR. The secondary objective is to determine whether certain physical characteristics, such as age, gender, exercise tolerance, height, and weight may be able to identify HCPs at high risk of being unable to perform high-quality CPR.
Design: Randomized trial to compare the effect of different training frequencies on long-term CPR performance.
Participants and setting: Nurses in all adult departments at Health Sciences North. Subjects will be randomly assigned to a group that undertakes short CPR assessment and training sessions either 1) every month, 2) every 3 months, 3) every 6 months, or 4) every 12 months (control group) over the course of a twelve-month period.
Analysis: The proportion of nurses in each group that is able to perform "excellent CPR" at the twelve-month time point will be determined. Excellent CPR is defined as a two-minute CPR session where 90% of compressions are performed with correct depth (50-60 mm), 90% with correct rate (100-120 /min), and 90% with full chest recoil. A subgroup analysis will also be performed where the demographic data of individuals who are unable to perform excellent CPR at the twelve-month time point regardless of intervention group are compared against those who are successful.
Conclusion: The results of our study will help determine the longest CPR training interval associated with maintenance of high-quality CPR skills to minimize training sessions required and decrease associated costs. The results will also generate hypotheses for future study about optimizing role assignments and team performance in resuscitation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly | Experimental | Procedure: CPR TrainingReceive bedside CPR training monthly |
| 3 months | Experimental | Procedure: CPR TrainingReceive bedside CPR training every 3 months |
| 6 months | Experimental | Procedure: CPR TrainingReceive bedside CPR training every 6 months |
| Control | No intervention | –No additional training and only performance evaluation after 1 year |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Practicing nurses from multiple clinical environments (operating room, intensive care unit, emergency room, medical and surgical wards) at Health Sciences North.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Refusal to participate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CPR TrainingBrief CPR assessment and training done during working hours with real-time performance feedback | Procedure or surgery | 3 months, 6 months, Monthly |
Primary outcome
Proportion of nurses in each group able to perform "excellent CPR" after completing CPR training programs of various frequencies
Time frame: 12 months
"Excellent CPR" is a dichotomous variable achieved if 90% of compressions are performed with correct depth (50-60 mm), 90% with correct rate (100-120 /min), and 90% with full chest recoil. The proportion of nurses in each group able to perform "excellent CPR" after completing CPR training programs of various frequencies.
1 secondary outcome
Predictors of inability to perform high-quality CPR
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Mar 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Simulation Training
Not yet recruiting
SELF-ASSESSMENT AND KNOWLEDGE LEVEL OF NURSING STUDENTS' PATIENT SAFETY COMPETENCY
Simulation Training, Nursing Education
Active, not recruiting
Enhancing Male Nursing Students' Competence in Maternity Care: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Egypt
Maternity Nursing, Obstetric Nursing
Not yet recruiting
MAGICS - Multi-Agent Generative AI in Clinical Simulation for Clinical Deterioration Training
Clinical Reasoning in Nursing Education, Virtual Simulation
Not yet recruiting
Simulation-Based Subcutaneous Injection Training in Midwifery Students
Simulation Training, Midwifery Education
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality and Moulage Simulation in Diabetic Foot Wound Care Training
VR Simulation in Diabetic Foot Wound Care Training, Moulage Simulation in Diabetic Foot Wound Care Training
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CPR Training in people with Simulation Training, run by Health Sciences North at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of nurses in each group able to perform "excellent CPR" after completing CPR training programs of various frequencies (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.