Rotator Cuff TearNCT03001050
Rotator Cuff: Does the Vascularity Matter and the Role for PINPOINT
A study testing PINPOINT System in people with Rotator Cuff Tear, run by Nirav Amin, MD at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The overall goal of doing this study is to improve long term patient function and outcomes in the healing rates of Rotator Cuffs. The investigators would also like to see if this method can be more cost effective and time efficient for Rotator Cuff evaluation during arthroscopy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rotator Cuff Tear
- What is being tested?
- PINPOINT System
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Dec 2017to 20 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of requiring Rotator Cuff repair surgical treatment
- Willingness and ability to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements.
- Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent form to participate.
- Age range of ≥ 30 years old and ≤ 80 years old at time of surgery.
- Male or female.
Who cannot join
- Previous Rotator cuff repair or shoulder surgery.
- Active systemic infection or infection at the operative site.
- Co-morbid medical conditions of the upper extremities that may affect the neurological and/or pain assessment.
- History of an osteoporotic fracture.
- History of an endocrine or metabolic disorder (e.g., Paget's disease) known to affect bone and mineral metabolism.
- Taking medications that may interfere with bony/soft tissue healing including chronic steroid use.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease or a systemic disorder such as HIV, active hepatitis B or C or fibromyalgia.
- Insulin-dependent type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
- Medical condition (e.g., unstable cardiac disease, cancer) that may result in patient death or have an effect on outcomes prior to study completion.
- Pregnant, or intend to become pregnant, during the course of the study.
- Severe obesity (Body Mass Index > 40).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Loma Linda University Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Loma Linda, California, 92354
About this study
The overall goal of doing this study is to improve long term patient function and outcomes in the healing rates of Rotator Cuffs. The investigators would also like to see if this method can be more cost effective and time efficient for Rotator Cuff evaluation during arthroscopy.
Read the detailed description
Background or rationale for this study:
4.5 million Patient's seek medical care for shoulder pain annually in the United States.
250,000 patients receive rotator cuff surgery in the United States annually. Those rotator cuff surgeries produce a societal savings of $3.44 billion per year; averaging $13,771.00 per patient younger than age 61. In which case rotator cuff tears Increases with age.
The Societal and Economic Value of Rotator Cuff Repair (AAOS) 2015 Rotator cuff repairs result in a lifetime societal savings in the U.S. of approximately $3.44 billion annually. Societal savings offset the direct costs of treatment in patients younger than age 61, resulting in an average net savings of $13,771 per patient. This number significantly increased to $77,662.00 for patients younger than 40 years of age.
Common problem, a 55 year-old man injured his left arm. He uses a sling and has difficulties performing simple activities. 1 week later he falls develops immediate pain in his shoulder. On examination he is unable to move his left arm in any upward or sideways direction without supporting it with his other arm. Radiographs he brought show no signs of shoulder osteoarthritis, dislocation, or fracture.
Shoulder pain is the third most common musculoskeletal reason for seeking medical care. Although smaller tears are less likely to propagate, larger tears tend to progress with time and eventually may become irreparable because of significant tendon retraction, muscle atrophy, or both or when the tendons tissue quality does not allow repair.
In 1972-Neer proposed that 95% of rotator cuff injuries were caused by mechanical compression under the coracoacromial arch, others argued cuff tear caused spur formation.
- Type I-flat
- Type II-curved
- Type III-hooked
Multifactorial:
Extrinsic factors;
- Subacromial impingement
- Glenohumeral instability
- Internal impingement
- Trauma (acute/repetitive) Intrinsic Factors;
- Tendon vascular supply
- Collagen fiber abnormalities
A positive painful arc test result and positive external rotation resistance test result were the most accurate finding for detecting Rotator Cuff Disease; whereas the presence of a positive lag tests (external or internal rotation) result was most accurate for diagnosis of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Differentiating a full thickness tear from a partial tear, the most sensitive test was the belly-press test (56.8%), and the most specific was the lift-off test (96.95).
Bone microvascularization of the footprint plays a role in rotator Cuff healing. The use of the Pinpoint may play a pivotal role in rotator Cuff healing, en lieu of Plasma Rich platelets with variable results based on concentration levels.
6 level randomized controlled trials showed no clinically significant differences in Constant scores, University of California, Los Angles shoulder rating (UCLA), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores between double-row and single-row rotator cuff repair. Overall odds ratio (OR) of intact rotator cuff tendon healing was 1.93 in patients treated with double-row versus single-row repair, and the difference was significant.
A statistically significant benefit of double-row repair in the ASES and UCLA scores was observed in the subgroup with tears greater than 3cm. The take home point; Double row may improve structural healing: Clinical Relevance?
9 studies in the meta-analysis, 5 of which were randomized prospective studies (LEVEL1).
Double-row rotator cuff repair techniques have a significantly lower re-tear rate, higher ASES score and greater range of motion of internal rotation compared with single-row repair techniques. Point: Especially in those rotator cuff tears with a size >30mm, the double-row technique is recommended for repair.
This was a Level 4 study out of the Cleveland Clinic which showed the majority of the tears occurred between 6 and 24 weeks. The role of a potential hand held device can assess the tendon quality in the office and change the rehab protocols based on tendon retraction.
Role for study interventions:
- Assessing the bony vascularity at the footprint and the tendon integrity.
- Current standard of care:
Steroid injection as a non-operatively treatment option. Could the steroid injections be affecting the tendon micro vascularization? Could using the Pinpoint assess tendon quality and long term healing a potential.
- Cystic osseous resorption and osteolysis.
- Breakdown products (PLLA) cause synovitis and chondrolysis.
- Breakdown products (PLLA) may interfere with healing-Complications of Bioabsorbable Suture anchors in the shoulder.
Why Medical Row Knots?
- Enhances Biology be sealing footprint from synovial fluid.
- Compared to knotless medical row, better biomechanics incl. load to failure, stiffness, less gap formation.
- A biomechanical comparison of 2 technical of double-row rotator cuff fixation: the importance of medical row knots.
Clinical Implications and Surgeon's Role;
- Choice of a tissue-penetrating instrument; smaller penetrating devices resulting in improves characteristics of stitch holding strength.
- Size of the tissue bite; bigger bite size being stronger.
- Most critical variable under a surgeons control during a rotator cuff repair is the choice of the stitch.
Role for Pinpoint:
In the re-tear and partial-repair groups, postoperative tendon preservation at the middle fact significantly affected the Japanese Orthopaedic Assocation (JOA) and UCLA scores (P=.014, respectively). Considering the patients with tendon healing had better clinical factors, the Pinpoint may help identify the tendon and footprint vascularity at time of surgery.
Goals for the Pinpoint:
To attempt to show that increased vascularity may have an effect of the muscle quality, therefore improving the strength and function long term.
Objective:
- This prospective study aims to obtain the accurate level within a range of a 95% CI imaging Rotator Cuff tendons and the footprint.
- Ensure the Vascularity of the tendon after the footprint and the tendon have been restored to the anatomic footprint. See if the level of the Rotator Cuff bite affects the vascular flow of the tendon.
- Does tying the medical row or excessive tension change the vascularity of the Rotator Cuff.
- We would like to see if by using the Pinpoint system it may be more cost effective then Plasma Rich Platelet.
- Decrease the number of the re-tear rates in Rotator cuff repairs.
Overall goals: Improve long term patient function and outcomes. Increase Rotator Cuff healing rates. Cost effective and time efficient method of Rotator Cuff evaluation during arthroscopy.
Procedures involved (Research Interventions)
Patients undergoing a Rotator Cuff Repair:
- Pre-operatively Questioners to be completed at pre-op American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), University California Los Angeles (UCLA), Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF-12) \& Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36)
- Operative Collect OR information
- Post-operative ASES, UCLA, DASH SF-12 \& SF-36
- Ultra sounds 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 24 months
The operative intervention will proceed as current standard protocol dictates for the described procedure. No changes in the operative technique will be undertaken apart from injection of the dye and visualization with the camera. The idea would be to place the Pinpoint probe within the subacrominal space, to check the vascular status of the tendon, and then take a bite of the tendon and place the pinpoint back to check if the vascularity has decreased. The Indocyanin Green dye kit will be used along with the PINPOINT system . Patients with potential allergies or a history of allergies or sensitivity to sodium iodide or iodinated contrast agents should not use this system, and will not be asked to participate. The possible adverse reactions are, anaphylaxis, Hypotension, tachycardia, dyspnea and urticarial. The duration of the procedure will be increased because of the study imaging; this could be 15 to 30 minutes.
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tear
- Being tested
- PINPOINT System
- Medical subject headings
- Rotator Cuff Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PINPOINT SystemDevice
To use the camera probe and identify the tendon and footprint vascularity at the time of surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PINPOINT system | Other | The operative intervention will proceed as current standard protocol dictates for the described procedure. No changes in the operative technique will be undertaken apart from injection of the dye and visualization with the camera. The idea would be to place the Pinpoint probe within the subacromial space, to check the vascular status of the tendon, and then take a bite of the tendon and place the pinpoint back to check if the vascularity has decreased. The Indocyanine Green dye kit will be used along with the PINPOINT system . Receives: Device: PINPOINT System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PINPOINT System-ASES
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire this will be used for scoring
Measured: Change from baseline at 24 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
PINPOINT System-UCLA
University California Los Angeles, shoulder rating scale
Measured: Change from baseline at 24 months
PINPOINT System-DASH
Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scores
Measured: Change from baseline at 24 months
PINPOINT System-SF-36
The short form heath survey with 36 questions to measure health status
Measured: Change from baseline at 24 months
PINPOINT System-SF-12
Short Form Health Survey with 12 questions to measure mental and physical status
Measured: Change from baseline at 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start20 Dec 2017
- Primary completion20 Dec 2017
- Study completion20 Dec 2017
Why it stopped: Investigator requested to close, lack of equipment available.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Rotator Cuff TearStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nirav Amin, MD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Nirav Amin, MD, Loma Linda University
- Investigators
- Nirav H Amin, MD, Principal investigator, Loma Linda University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03001050
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5160379
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 26 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Rotator Cuff: Does the Vascularity Matter and the Role for PINPOINT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03001050
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5160379
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tear
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Investigator requested to close, lack of equipment available.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nirav Amin, MDUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall goal of doing this study is to improve long term patient function and outcomes in the healing rates of Rotator Cuffs. The investigators would also like to see if this method can be more cost effective and time efficient for Rotator Cuff evaluation during arthroscopy.
Detailed description
Background or rationale for this study:
4.5 million Patient's seek medical care for shoulder pain annually in the United States.
250,000 patients receive rotator cuff surgery in the United States annually. Those rotator cuff surgeries produce a societal savings of $3.44 billion per year; averaging $13,771.00 per patient younger than age 61. In which case rotator cuff tears Increases with age.
The Societal and Economic Value of Rotator Cuff Repair (AAOS) 2015 Rotator cuff repairs result in a lifetime societal savings in the U.S. of approximately $3.44 billion annually. Societal savings offset the direct costs of treatment in patients younger than age 61, resulting in an average net savings of $13,771 per patient. This number significantly increased to $77,662.00 for patients younger than 40 years of age.
Common problem, a 55 year-old man injured his left arm. He uses a sling and has difficulties performing simple activities. 1 week later he falls develops immediate pain in his shoulder. On examination he is unable to move his left arm in any upward or sideways direction without supporting it with his other arm. Radiographs he brought show no signs of shoulder osteoarthritis, dislocation, or fracture.
Shoulder pain is the third most common musculoskeletal reason for seeking medical care. Although smaller tears are less likely to propagate, larger tears tend to progress with time and eventually may become irreparable because of significant tendon retraction, muscle atrophy, or both or when the tendons tissue quality does not allow repair.
In 1972-Neer proposed that 95% of rotator cuff injuries were caused by mechanical compression under the coracoacromial arch, others argued cuff tear caused spur formation.
- Type I-flat
- Type II-curved
- Type III-hooked
Multifactorial:
Extrinsic factors;
- Subacromial impingement
- Glenohumeral instability
- Internal impingement
- Trauma (acute/repetitive) Intrinsic Factors;
- Tendon vascular supply
- Collagen fiber abnormalities
A positive painful arc test result and positive external rotation resistance test result were the most accurate finding for detecting Rotator Cuff Disease; whereas the presence of a positive lag tests (external or internal rotation) result was most accurate for diagnosis of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Differentiating a full thickness tear from a partial tear, the most sensitive test was the belly-press test (56.8%), and the most specific was the lift-off test (96.95).
Bone microvascularization of the footprint plays a role in rotator Cuff healing. The use of the Pinpoint may play a pivotal role in rotator Cuff healing, en lieu of Plasma Rich platelets with variable results based on concentration levels.
6 level randomized controlled trials showed no clinically significant differences in Constant scores, University of California, Los Angles shoulder rating (UCLA), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores between double-row and single-row rotator cuff repair. Overall odds ratio (OR) of intact rotator cuff tendon healing was 1.93 in patients treated with double-row versus single-row repair, and the difference was significant.
A statistically significant benefit of double-row repair in the ASES and UCLA scores was observed in the subgroup with tears greater than 3cm. The take home point; Double row may improve structural healing: Clinical Relevance?
9 studies in the meta-analysis, 5 of which were randomized prospective studies (LEVEL1).
Double-row rotator cuff repair techniques have a significantly lower re-tear rate, higher ASES score and greater range of motion of internal rotation compared with single-row repair techniques. Point: Especially in those rotator cuff tears with a size >30mm, the double-row technique is recommended for repair.
This was a Level 4 study out of the Cleveland Clinic which showed the majority of the tears occurred between 6 and 24 weeks. The role of a potential hand held device can assess the tendon quality in the office and change the rehab protocols based on tendon retraction.
Role for study interventions:
- Assessing the bony vascularity at the footprint and the tendon integrity.
- Current standard of care:
Steroid injection as a non-operatively treatment option. Could the steroid injections be affecting the tendon micro vascularization? Could using the Pinpoint assess tendon quality and long term healing a potential.
- Cystic osseous resorption and osteolysis.
- Breakdown products (PLLA) cause synovitis and chondrolysis.
- Breakdown products (PLLA) may interfere with healing-Complications of Bioabsorbable Suture anchors in the shoulder.
Why Medical Row Knots?
- Enhances Biology be sealing footprint from synovial fluid.
- Compared to knotless medical row, better biomechanics incl. load to failure, stiffness, less gap formation.
- A biomechanical comparison of 2 technical of double-row rotator cuff fixation: the importance of medical row knots.
Clinical Implications and Surgeon's Role;
- Choice of a tissue-penetrating instrument; smaller penetrating devices resulting in improves characteristics of stitch holding strength.
- Size of the tissue bite; bigger bite size being stronger.
- Most critical variable under a surgeons control during a rotator cuff repair is the choice of the stitch.
Role for Pinpoint:
In the re-tear and partial-repair groups, postoperative tendon preservation at the middle fact significantly affected the Japanese Orthopaedic Assocation (JOA) and UCLA scores (P=.014, respectively). Considering the patients with tendon healing had better clinical factors, the Pinpoint may help identify the tendon and footprint vascularity at time of surgery.
Goals for the Pinpoint:
To attempt to show that increased vascularity may have an effect of the muscle quality, therefore improving the strength and function long term.
Objective:
- This prospective study aims to obtain the accurate level within a range of a 95% CI imaging Rotator Cuff tendons and the footprint.
- Ensure the Vascularity of the tendon after the footprint and the tendon have been restored to the anatomic footprint. See if the level of the Rotator Cuff bite affects the vascular flow of the tendon.
- Does tying the medical row or excessive tension change the vascularity of the Rotator Cuff.
- We would like to see if by using the Pinpoint system it may be more cost effective then Plasma Rich Platelet.
- Decrease the number of the re-tear rates in Rotator cuff repairs.
Overall goals: Improve long term patient function and outcomes. Increase Rotator Cuff healing rates. Cost effective and time efficient method of Rotator Cuff evaluation during arthroscopy.
Procedures involved (Research Interventions)
Patients undergoing a Rotator Cuff Repair:
- Pre-operatively Questioners to be completed at pre-op American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), University California Los Angeles (UCLA), Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF-12) \& Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36)
- Operative Collect OR information
- Post-operative ASES, UCLA, DASH SF-12 \& SF-36
- Ultra sounds 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 24 months
The operative intervention will proceed as current standard protocol dictates for the described procedure. No changes in the operative technique will be undertaken apart from injection of the dye and visualization with the camera. The idea would be to place the Pinpoint probe within the subacrominal space, to check the vascular status of the tendon, and then take a bite of the tendon and place the pinpoint back to check if the vascularity has decreased. The Indocyanin Green dye kit will be used along with the PINPOINT system . Patients with potential allergies or a history of allergies or sensitivity to sodium iodide or iodinated contrast agents should not use this system, and will not be asked to participate. The possible adverse reactions are, anaphylaxis, Hypotension, tachycardia, dyspnea and urticarial. The duration of the procedure will be increased because of the study imaging; this could be 15 to 30 minutes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PINPOINT system | Other | Device: PINPOINT SystemThe operative intervention will proceed as current standard protocol dictates for the described procedure. No changes in the operative technique will be undertaken apart from injection of the dye and visualization with the camera. The idea would be to place the Pinpoint probe within the subacromial space, to check the vascular status of the tendon, and then take a bite of the tendon and place the pinpoint back to check if the vascularity has decreased. The Indocyanine Green dye kit will be used along with the PINPOINT system . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of requiring Rotator Cuff repair surgical treatment
- Willingness and ability to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements.
- Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent form to participate.
- Age range of ≥ 30 years old and ≤ 80 years old at time of surgery.
- Male or female.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Previous Rotator cuff repair or shoulder surgery.
- Active systemic infection or infection at the operative site.
- Co-morbid medical conditions of the upper extremities that may affect the neurological and/or pain assessment.
- History of an osteoporotic fracture.
- History of an endocrine or metabolic disorder (e.g., Paget's disease) known to affect bone and mineral metabolism.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PINPOINT SystemTo use the camera probe and identify the tendon and footprint vascularity at the time of surgery | Device | PINPOINT system |
Primary outcome
PINPOINT System-ASES
Time frame: Change from baseline at 24 months
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire this will be used for scoring
4 secondary outcomes
PINPOINT System-UCLA
Time frame: Change from baseline at 24 months
PINPOINT System-DASH
Time frame: Change from baseline at 24 months
PINPOINT System-SF-36
Time frame: Change from baseline at 24 months
PINPOINT System-SF-12
Time frame: Change from baseline at 24 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Feb 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rotator Cuff Tear
Recruiting
SMR Stemless Reverse vs SMR Reverse Shoulder System
Arthroplasty, Replacement
Active, not recruiting
BioBrace® Implant for Arthroscopic Repair of Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
Rotator Cuff Tears
Active, not recruiting
Lyophilized Platelet-Rich Plasma Lysate vs Dextrose Prolotherapy for Partial Rotator Cuff Tears
Rotator Cuff Tear, Rotator Cuff Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Digital Therapeutics for Improving Shoulder Function After Rotator Cuff Repair
Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy, Repair of a Cuff Tear
Recruiting
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Long Head of Biceps Transposition and Acellular Dermal Matrix Augmentation for Large to Massive Incompletely Repairable Rotator Cuff Tears
Rotator Cuff Tears, Rotator Cuff Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nirav H Amin, MD principal investigator
Loma Linda University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PINPOINT System in people with Rotator Cuff Tear, run by Nirav Amin, MD at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PINPOINT System-ASES (time frame: Change from baseline at 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2018.