Type 2 DiabetesBEHOLD-16NCT03001999
Boosting Emotions & Happiness in Outpatients Living With Diabetes: Phase I
A study testing PP-MI health behavior intervention in people with Type 2 Diabetes and Emotions, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The focus of this study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of a customized, combined positive psychology and motivational interviewing (PP-MI) health behavior intervention in a group of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes, Emotions, Patient Compliance
- What is being tested?
- PP-MI health behavior intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2017to Nov 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- T2D. Eligible patients will be diagnosed with T2D, with diagnosis for at least 1 year, confirmed by their diabetes clinician or medical record review. Consistent with American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for T2D, participants must have HbA1c [A1C] of at least 6.5% within the last 6 months. The investigators will exclude patients with A1C>9% given that patients in this range will likely have more extreme nonadherence and/or require ongoing treatment adjustment, increasing the heterogeneity of this sample for this pilot project. If patients appear otherwise eligible, but do not have an A1C value within 6 months, they will be required to have a baseline A1C value of 6.5-9%.
- Low physical activity. The investigators will define low physical activity as ≤75 minutes/week of MVPA (representing ≤40% of ADA recommendations for moderate or greater intensity aerobic physical activity totaling 150 minutes per week). This cutoff allows adequate room for improvement on this key outcome. As an initial screen, the investigators will use a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) which has been extensively used/validated in medical cohorts, including T2D. Patients will complete the modified IPAQ regarding their activity in the past week (or a typical week, if the past 7 days atypical) to assess number of minutes spent performing MVPA. Patients reporting ≤60 minutes/week of MVPA will then wear accelerometers for 7 days to confirm low physical activity.
- Prescribed an oral glucose-lowering drug or choosing lifestyle interventions (diet and exercise) to manage T2D. To be eligible, patients must be prescribed a stable glucose-lowering medication regimen (or stable plan for control with diet/exercise alone) for at least 3 months with no anticipated adjustment. Including those whose T2D is managed by diet and exercise alone will allow inclusion of participants who may have high likelihood of engagement in a behavioral intervention. The investigators will exclude patients taking insulin to reduce heterogeneity of T2D severity in this initial trial.
Who cannot join
- Cognitive impairment precluding consent or meaningful participation, assessed using a six-item screen developed for this purpose.
- Lack of phone availability.
- Inability to read/write in English.
- Additional medical conditions (e.g., severe arthritis, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, class III or IV heart failure) that preclude physical activity.
- Enrollment in mind-body programs, lifestyle intervention programs (e.g., cardiac rehabilitation), or other clinical trials.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
Official title: A Novel Psychological-behavioral Intervention to Improve Activity in Type 2 Diabetes: Proof-of-concept Trial
The focus of this study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of a customized, combined positive psychology and motivational interviewing (PP-MI) health behavior intervention in a group of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Read the detailed description
The investigators are proposing a study that will specifically and innovatively focus on the development of a novel positive psychology intervention that is adapted for patients with T2D. The MGH Diabetes Center and MGH primary care clinics will serve as the source of subjects for the study, with patients who have a diagnosis of T2D serving as potential subjects. The investigators will enroll 12 T2D patients, who will take part in an 16-week PP-MI health behavior intervention.
In this project, the investigators plan to do the following:
- Test a 16-week, telephone-delivered health behavior intervention utilizing PP exercises and systematic goal-setting in a brief, non-randomized, proof-of concept trial (N=12).
- Determine whether this initial intervention is feasible in a small cohort of T2D patients.
- Explore potential benefits of the intervention on outcomes of interest (e.g., optimism, positive affect).
Baseline information about enrolled participants will be obtained from the patients, care providers, and the electronic medical record as required for characterization of the population. This information will include data regarding medical history (type 2 diabetes mellitus), current medical variables (conditions affecting physical activity), medications, and sociodemographic data (age, gender, race/ethnicity, living alone).
Participants will undergo an initial screening visit during which they will meet with study staff in person. At this visit, study eligibility will be confirmed, and eligible and willing participants will be enrolled. Following enrollment, participants will complete self-report measures, and nurses in the Translational and Clinical Research Center will collect vital signs and draw blood for A1c. To ensure that participants have low baseline physical activity, they will then take home and wear accelerometers for 1 week.
Participants will undergo a second in-person visit to confirm that participants are eligible to complete the program and--if so--to initiate the program. During this session, A1c and accelerometer data will be reviewed. Participants will be required to have an A1c value between 6.5% and 9%, unless they have had an eligible A1c level in the past 6 months, in which case their current A1c may be between 6% and 9.5%. Furthermore, participants must have low physical activity (< 75 minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity over the past week, measured by accelerometer) to continue in the program. Upon confirmation of eligibility, participants will begin the study intervention.
During this second in-person visit, participants will receive a PP-MI treatment manual. For each session, a PP exercise will be described in the manual, with instructions and space to write about the exercise and its effects. Next, an MI section will outline specific MI-based topics (e.g., pros/cons, managing slips) and facilitate physical activity goal-setting. Interventionists will complete PP exercise 1 and MI session 1 together with participants to aid engagement. Interventionists will also explain/assign PP exercise 2 and discuss an MI-based activity goal matched to participants' stage of change and medical recommendations (and assign activity tracking).
Participants will complete the remaining sessions (14 in total) by phone over the next 16 weeks. Phone sessions will last for approximately 30 minutes, with PP and physical activity assignments completed between phone sessions. PP and MI components will be delivered stepwise within sessions (rather than intertwined) based on our experience, participant feedback, and pilot work. If a week is missed, the session will not be skipped, but rather the intervention will be completed sequentially (with participants who miss weeks then missing the final sessions), with the exception of the final visit, which skip to Planning for the Future in all cases.
Participants will undergo an in-person follow-up assessment at 16 weeks. At this session, participants will repeat self-report assessments that were administered at baseline. Vital signs and a blood sample will again be collected at this final in-person visit. Finally, prior to this assessment, participants will wear an accelerometer for an additional 7 days to measure moderate or vigorous physical activity. The investigators will allow a window of 3 weeks, to allow flexibility of scheduling such in-person appointments in Boston (and to allow coordination with other medical visits at MGH) while maintaining integrity of study findings.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes, Emotions, Patient Compliance
- Being tested
- PP-MI health behavior intervention
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Positive Psychology, Physical Activity
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Patient Compliance, Diabetes Mellitus, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PP-MI health behavior interventionBehavioural
The positive psychology exercises include 3 modules:
Gratitude-based activities, Strength-based activities, and Meaning-based activities. Various goal setting exercises will appear in each of the 14 study sessions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Experimental | Participants will all undergo a 16-week PP-MI health behavior intervention. Receives: Behavioral: PP-MI health behavior intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of recruitment procedures
Feasibility will be measured by rates of enrollment per month.
Measured: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Feasibility of study procedures
Feasibility will also be measured by rates of dropout (%of total enrolled).
Measured: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Secondary outcomes (12)
Feasibility of intervention exercises
Feasibility of intervention exercises will be measured by rates of completion of exercises.
Measured: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Ease of intervention
Ease of the intervention will also be measured by patient rating of the ease of PP-MI sessions on a 10-point Likert scale.
Measured: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Utility of intervention
Utility of the intervention will also be measured by patient rating of the utility of PP-MI sessions on a 10-point Likert scale.
Measured: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Moderate-Vigorous Physical activity
Physical activity changes will be measured by MVPA in mean minutes per day.
Measured: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Sedentary Time
Sedentary time will be measured in mean minutes per day.
Measured: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in PANAS Scores
The positive affect items on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), a well-validated scale used in other intervention trials and in patients with HF, will be used to measure positive affect.
Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in LOT-R Scores
Life Orientation Test-Revised is a well-validated 6-item instrument used to measure dispositional optimism.
Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in HADS Scores
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale will be used to measure depression and anxiety. This is a well-validated scale with few somatic symptom items that can confound mood/anxiety assessment in medically-ill patients.
Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in SEE Scores
The Self-Efficacy for Exercise scale will be used to identify factors that may affect participation in exercise.
Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in RS Scores
The Resilience Scale will be used to examine the impact of the intervention on resilience.
Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in MSPSS Scores
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support will be used to assess the intervention's impact on perceived social support.
Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in SDSCA Scores
The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities will be used to evaluate overall diabetes self-care (e.g., diet, medication, foot care).
Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2017
- Primary completionNov 2017
- Study completionNov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Diabetes Association
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jeff C. Huffman, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Jeff C Huffman, MD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03001999
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016P002523
- Acronym
- BEHOLD-16
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Millstein RA, Golden J, Healy BC, Amonoo HL, Harnedy LE, Carrillo A, Celano CM, Huffman JC. Latent growth curve modeling of physical activity trajectories in a positive-psychology and motivational interviewing intervention for people with type 2 diabetes. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022 Aug 4;10(1):713-730. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2104724. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35957957Zambrano J, Celano CM, Chung WJ, Massey CN, Feig EH, Millstein RA, Healy BC, Wexler DJ, Park ER, Golden J, Huffman JC. Exploring the feasibility and impact of positive psychology-motivational interviewing interventions to promote positive affect and physical activity in type 2 diabetes: design and methods from the BEHOLD-8 and BEHOLD-16 clinical trials. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020;8(1):398-422. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1815538. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
PubMed 33763296Feig EH, Harnedy LE, Celano CM, Huffman JC. Increase in Daily Steps During the Early Phase of a Physical Activity Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes as a Predictor of Intervention Outcome. Int J Behav Med. 2021 Dec;28(6):834-839. doi: 10.1007/s12529-021-09966-0. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
PubMed 33575971
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Novel Psychological-behavioral Intervention to Improve Activity in Type 2 Diabetes: Proof-of-concept Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03001999
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEHOLD-16 / 2016P002523
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes, Emotions, Patient Compliance
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Positive Psychology, Physical Activity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Diabetes Association
- Study start
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The focus of this study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of a customized, combined positive psychology and motivational interviewing (PP-MI) health behavior intervention in a group of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Detailed description
The investigators are proposing a study that will specifically and innovatively focus on the development of a novel positive psychology intervention that is adapted for patients with T2D. The MGH Diabetes Center and MGH primary care clinics will serve as the source of subjects for the study, with patients who have a diagnosis of T2D serving as potential subjects. The investigators will enroll 12 T2D patients, who will take part in an 16-week PP-MI health behavior intervention.
In this project, the investigators plan to do the following:
- Test a 16-week, telephone-delivered health behavior intervention utilizing PP exercises and systematic goal-setting in a brief, non-randomized, proof-of concept trial (N=12).
- Determine whether this initial intervention is feasible in a small cohort of T2D patients.
- Explore potential benefits of the intervention on outcomes of interest (e.g., optimism, positive affect).
Baseline information about enrolled participants will be obtained from the patients, care providers, and the electronic medical record as required for characterization of the population. This information will include data regarding medical history (type 2 diabetes mellitus), current medical variables (conditions affecting physical activity), medications, and sociodemographic data (age, gender, race/ethnicity, living alone).
Participants will undergo an initial screening visit during which they will meet with study staff in person. At this visit, study eligibility will be confirmed, and eligible and willing participants will be enrolled. Following enrollment, participants will complete self-report measures, and nurses in the Translational and Clinical Research Center will collect vital signs and draw blood for A1c. To ensure that participants have low baseline physical activity, they will then take home and wear accelerometers for 1 week.
Participants will undergo a second in-person visit to confirm that participants are eligible to complete the program and--if so--to initiate the program. During this session, A1c and accelerometer data will be reviewed. Participants will be required to have an A1c value between 6.5% and 9%, unless they have had an eligible A1c level in the past 6 months, in which case their current A1c may be between 6% and 9.5%. Furthermore, participants must have low physical activity (< 75 minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity over the past week, measured by accelerometer) to continue in the program. Upon confirmation of eligibility, participants will begin the study intervention.
During this second in-person visit, participants will receive a PP-MI treatment manual. For each session, a PP exercise will be described in the manual, with instructions and space to write about the exercise and its effects. Next, an MI section will outline specific MI-based topics (e.g., pros/cons, managing slips) and facilitate physical activity goal-setting. Interventionists will complete PP exercise 1 and MI session 1 together with participants to aid engagement. Interventionists will also explain/assign PP exercise 2 and discuss an MI-based activity goal matched to participants' stage of change and medical recommendations (and assign activity tracking).
Participants will complete the remaining sessions (14 in total) by phone over the next 16 weeks. Phone sessions will last for approximately 30 minutes, with PP and physical activity assignments completed between phone sessions. PP and MI components will be delivered stepwise within sessions (rather than intertwined) based on our experience, participant feedback, and pilot work. If a week is missed, the session will not be skipped, but rather the intervention will be completed sequentially (with participants who miss weeks then missing the final sessions), with the exception of the final visit, which skip to Planning for the Future in all cases.
Participants will undergo an in-person follow-up assessment at 16 weeks. At this session, participants will repeat self-report assessments that were administered at baseline. Vital signs and a blood sample will again be collected at this final in-person visit. Finally, prior to this assessment, participants will wear an accelerometer for an additional 7 days to measure moderate or vigorous physical activity. The investigators will allow a window of 3 weeks, to allow flexibility of scheduling such in-person appointments in Boston (and to allow coordination with other medical visits at MGH) while maintaining integrity of study findings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Experimental | Behavioral: PP-MI health behavior interventionParticipants will all undergo a 16-week PP-MI health behavior intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- T2D. Eligible patients will be diagnosed with T2D, with diagnosis for at least 1 year, confirmed by their diabetes clinician or medical record review. Consistent with American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for T2D, participants must have HbA1c [A1C] of at least 6.5% within the last 6 months. The investigators will exclude patients with A1C>9% given that patients in this range will likely have more extreme nonadherence and/or require ongoing treatment adjustment, increasing the heterogeneity of this sample for this pilot project. If patients appear otherwise eligible, but do not have an A1C value within 6 months, they will be required to have a baseline A1C value of 6.5-9%.
- Low physical activity. The investigators will define low physical activity as ≤75 minutes/week of MVPA (representing ≤40% of ADA recommendations for moderate or greater intensity aerobic physical activity totaling 150 minutes per week). This cutoff allows adequate room for improvement on this key outcome. As an initial screen, the investigators will use a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) which has been extensively used/validated in medical cohorts, including T2D. Patients will complete the modified IPAQ regarding their activity in the past week (or a typical week, if the past 7 days atypical) to assess number of minutes spent performing MVPA. Patients reporting ≤60 minutes/week of MVPA will then wear accelerometers for 7 days to confirm low physical activity.
- Prescribed an oral glucose-lowering drug or choosing lifestyle interventions (diet and exercise) to manage T2D. To be eligible, patients must be prescribed a stable glucose-lowering medication regimen (or stable plan for control with diet/exercise alone) for at least 3 months with no anticipated adjustment. Including those whose T2D is managed by diet and exercise alone will allow inclusion of participants who may have high likelihood of engagement in a behavioral intervention. The investigators will exclude patients taking insulin to reduce heterogeneity of T2D severity in this initial trial.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Cognitive impairment precluding consent or meaningful participation, assessed using a six-item screen developed for this purpose.
- Lack of phone availability.
- Inability to read/write in English.
- Additional medical conditions (e.g., severe arthritis, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, class III or IV heart failure) that preclude physical activity.
- Enrollment in mind-body programs, lifestyle intervention programs (e.g., cardiac rehabilitation), or other clinical trials.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PP-MI health behavior interventionThe positive psychology exercises include 3 modules: Gratitude-based activities, Strength-based activities, and Meaning-based activities. Various goal setting exercises will appear in each of the 14 study sessions. | Behavioural | Intervention Arm |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of recruitment procedures
Time frame: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Feasibility will be measured by rates of enrollment per month.
Feasibility of study procedures
Time frame: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Feasibility will also be measured by rates of dropout (%of total enrolled).
12 secondary outcomes
Feasibility of intervention exercises
Time frame: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Ease of intervention
Time frame: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Utility of intervention
Time frame: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Moderate-Vigorous Physical activity
Time frame: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Sedentary Time
Time frame: Change between baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in PANAS Scores
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in LOT-R Scores
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in HADS Scores
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in SEE Scores
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in RS Scores
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in MSPSS Scores
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Changes in SDSCA Scores
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35957957Millstein RA, Golden J, Healy BC, Amonoo HL, Harnedy LE, Carrillo A, Celano CM, Huffman JC. Latent growth curve modeling of physical activity trajectories in a positive-psychology and motivational interviewing intervention for people with type 2 diabetes. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022 Aug 4;10(1):713-730. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2104724. eCollection 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33763296Zambrano J, Celano CM, Chung WJ, Massey CN, Feig EH, Millstein RA, Healy BC, Wexler DJ, Park ER, Golden J, Huffman JC. Exploring the feasibility and impact of positive psychology-motivational interviewing interventions to promote positive affect and physical activity in type 2 diabetes: design and methods from the BEHOLD-8 and BEHOLD-16 clinical trials. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020;8(1):398-422. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1815538. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33575971Feig EH, Harnedy LE, Celano CM, Huffman JC. Increase in Daily Steps During the Early Phase of a Physical Activity Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes as a Predictor of Intervention Outcome. Int J Behav Med. 2021 Dec;28(6):834-839. doi: 10.1007/s12529-021-09966-0. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeff C Huffman, MD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PP-MI health behavior intervention in people with Type 2 Diabetes and Emotions, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of recruitment procedures (time frame: Change between baseline and 16 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03001999, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2018.