Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum DisorderPhase 2/3NCT03002038
Comparison of Clinical Effects of Azathioprine and Rituximab NMO-SD Patients
A Phase 2/3 study testing Azathioprine and Rituximab in people with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder, run by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Iran.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare annual relapse rate, expanded disability status scale, and side effects of azathioprine and rituximab in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder during a one year follow up through a randomized clinical trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Azathioprine and Rituximab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 86 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIran
- Study dates
- Sep 2015to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder based on the recent guidelines in 2015
- Expanded disability status scale between 0 and 7
- Age between 18 and 50 years old
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or lactation during the study
- Deciding to leave the study by patient
- Lack of consent to enter the study
- Lack of cooperation for follow up
- Severe side effect of the medication
- Treatment with other immunosuppressant medications (including but not limited to cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, others) within two months before intervention
Show all 16Show fewer
- Taking any other immunosuppressant or other type of medication (including herbal drugs) without permission of the physician during the study.
- Presence of other autoimmune disease (including but not limited to Behcet disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and others)
- Presence of liver disorders
- Presence of hematologic disorders
- Presence of heart failure
- Receipt of a live vaccine within 4 weeks prior to intervention
- Previous treatment with Azathioporine or Rituximab
- History of HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
- Ongoing daily steroid use
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reaction to monoclonal antibodies
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Annual Relapse Rate, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and Side Effects Between Azathioprine and Rituximab in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders
The purpose of this study is to compare annual relapse rate, expanded disability status scale, and side effects of azathioprine and rituximab in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder during a one year follow up through a randomized clinical trial.
Read the detailed description
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMO-SD) is a recurrent inflammatory demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system. The disease is clinically recognized by optic neuritis and transverse myelitis and is associated with high risk of mortality. Each attack worsens patients' disability. This means that after 5 years of the disease onset, half of patients need to use wheelchair and approximately 50% of them become blind.
Considering that the disease can be disabling for patients, the maintenance treatment should be applied in addition to treatment of acute attacks, in order to prevent future recurrences. Acute attacks are usually treated with high doses of intravenous corticosteroids. Plasmapheresis is also used when patients fail to response to corticosteroids. B lymphocyte inhibitors are used as the maintenance therapy in these patients. First line therapeutic medications include azathioprine and rituximab which are being recommended for long term therapy and second line medications include methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil.
Azathioprine is an immune-modulatory agent which is available in the oral form and don't require hospitalization to be administered, however, because of side effects such as bone marrow suppression and hepatotoxicity, periodic check of blood cells and liver enzymes are needed. Rituximab is a cluster of differentiation antigen 20 inhibitor which leads to decreased B lymphocytes and antibody in patients. This medication is only available in the injectable form and needs hospitalization to be administered. Close monitory is needed during the administration considering severe side effects such as allergic reactions and respiratory distress. However, laboratory tests are not needed in patients taking rituximab although it is more expensive than azathioprine. No clinical trial has been performed previously to compare clinical efficacy of these two drugs in NMO-SD patients. Therefore, we aimed to compare their efficacy through a randomized clinical trial.
- Conditions
- Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
- Being tested
- Azathioprine, Rituximab
- Keywords
- neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, azathioprine, rituximab, clinical trial, annual relapse rate, expanded disability status scale
- Medical subject headings
- Neuromyelitis Optica
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AzathioprineDrug
Also called Azathioprine Mehrdaru®
Patients are started with Azathioprine 50 mg tablets, taken orally twice a day. The medication dose is increased gradually with the aim of lymphocytes count bellow 1500 and to the maximum dose of 3 g Azathioprine per day. Cell blood count is checked once a week in the first month of treatment, once every two weeks in the second month of treatment, and monthly in the third month of treatment to make decision about medication dose.
RituximabDrug
Also called RediTux®
Patients will receive 1 g of Rituximab (two vials of RediTux 500 mg/50 ml) in 500 cc normal saline serum through intravenous infusion and this will be repeated two weeks later. This cycle will be repeated every 6 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Azathioprine | Experimental | Patients in this group will receive 50 mg of azathioprine, two times each day and gradually increased to maximum dose of 3 g daily with the aim of lymphocytes count less than 1500. Receives: Drug: Azathioprine |
| Rituximab | Experimental | Patients in this group will receive 1g of Rituximab in 500 cc normal saline serum through intravenous infusion with two weeks intervals (as one course) and each course of treatment is repeated every 6 months. Receives: Drug: Rituximab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Annual Relapse Rate
annual relapse rate will be measured in the baseline (according to patients' history in the last year) and after 12 months of intervention.
Measured: one year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Expanded Disability Status Scale
expanded disability status scale will be measured in the baseline and after 12 months of intervention.
Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) is a measure of disability for patients. The score ranges from 0-10, with 0 showing normal neurological exam and 10 showing death due to the disabling disease. Thus, higher scores represent more profound levels of disability.
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2015
- Primary completionNov 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vahid Shaygannejad, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
- Investigators
- Vahid Shaygannejad, M.D., Study chair, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03002038
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 395275
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 21 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: We may share the individual participant data (anonymously) on request of the journal publishing the study report.
Publications
Sato DK, Lana-Peixoto MA, Fujihara K, de Seze J. Clinical spectrum and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: evolution and current status. Brain Pathol. 2013 Nov;23(6):647-60. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12087.
PubMed 24118482Morrow MJ, Wingerchuk D. Neuromyelitis optica. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012 Jun;32(2):154-66. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31825662f1.
PubMed 22617743Costanzi C, Matiello M, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG, Pittock SJ, Mandrekar J, Thapa P, McKeon A. Azathioprine: tolerability, efficacy, and predictors of benefit in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. 2011 Aug 16;77(7):659-66. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822a2780. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
PubMed 21813788Trebst C, Jarius S, Berthele A, Paul F, Schippling S, Wildemann B, Borisow N, Kleiter I, Aktas O, Kumpfel T; Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica: recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). J Neurol. 2014 Jan;261(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7169-7. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
PubMed 24272588Kim SH, Huh SY, Lee SJ, Joung A, Kim HJ. A 5-year follow-up of rituximab treatment in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70(9):1110-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3071.
PubMed 23897062Katz Sand I. Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Jun;22(3):864-96. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000337.
PubMed 27261687Nikoo Z, Badihian S, Shaygannejad V, Asgari N, Ashtari F. Comparison of the efficacy of azathioprine and rituximab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurol. 2017 Sep;264(9):2003-2009. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8590-0. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
PubMed 28831548
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Annual Relapse Rate, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and Side Effects Between Azathioprine and Rituximab in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03002038
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 395275
- Conditions
- Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
- Keywords
- neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, azathioprine, rituximab, clinical trial, annual relapse rate, expanded disability status scale
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Isfahan University of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2015
- Primary completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare annual relapse rate, expanded disability status scale, and side effects of azathioprine and rituximab in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder during a one year follow up through a randomized clinical trial.
Detailed description
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMO-SD) is a recurrent inflammatory demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system. The disease is clinically recognized by optic neuritis and transverse myelitis and is associated with high risk of mortality. Each attack worsens patients' disability. This means that after 5 years of the disease onset, half of patients need to use wheelchair and approximately 50% of them become blind.
Considering that the disease can be disabling for patients, the maintenance treatment should be applied in addition to treatment of acute attacks, in order to prevent future recurrences. Acute attacks are usually treated with high doses of intravenous corticosteroids. Plasmapheresis is also used when patients fail to response to corticosteroids. B lymphocyte inhibitors are used as the maintenance therapy in these patients. First line therapeutic medications include azathioprine and rituximab which are being recommended for long term therapy and second line medications include methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil.
Azathioprine is an immune-modulatory agent which is available in the oral form and don't require hospitalization to be administered, however, because of side effects such as bone marrow suppression and hepatotoxicity, periodic check of blood cells and liver enzymes are needed. Rituximab is a cluster of differentiation antigen 20 inhibitor which leads to decreased B lymphocytes and antibody in patients. This medication is only available in the injectable form and needs hospitalization to be administered. Close monitory is needed during the administration considering severe side effects such as allergic reactions and respiratory distress. However, laboratory tests are not needed in patients taking rituximab although it is more expensive than azathioprine. No clinical trial has been performed previously to compare clinical efficacy of these two drugs in NMO-SD patients. Therefore, we aimed to compare their efficacy through a randomized clinical trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Azathioprine | Experimental | Drug: AzathioprinePatients in this group will receive 50 mg of azathioprine, two times each day and gradually increased to maximum dose of 3 g daily with the aim of lymphocytes count less than 1500. |
| Rituximab | Experimental | Drug: RituximabPatients in this group will receive 1g of Rituximab in 500 cc normal saline serum through intravenous infusion with two weeks intervals (as one course) and each course of treatment is repeated every 6 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder based on the recent guidelines in 2015
- Expanded disability status scale between 0 and 7
- Age between 18 and 50 years old
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Pregnancy or lactation during the study
- Deciding to leave the study by patient
- Lack of consent to enter the study
- Lack of cooperation for follow up
- Severe side effect of the medication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AzathioprineAlso: Azathioprine Mehrdaru®Patients are started with Azathioprine 50 mg tablets, taken orally twice a day. The medication dose is increased gradually with the aim of lymphocytes count bellow 1500 and to the maximum dose of 3 g Azathioprine per day. Cell blood count is checked once a week in the first month of treatment, once every two weeks in the second month of treatment, and monthly in the third month of treatment to make decision about medication dose. | Drug | Azathioprine |
| RituximabAlso: RediTux®Patients will receive 1 g of Rituximab (two vials of RediTux 500 mg/50 ml) in 500 cc normal saline serum through intravenous infusion and this will be repeated two weeks later. This cycle will be repeated every 6 months. | Drug | Rituximab |
Primary outcome
Annual Relapse Rate
Time frame: one year
annual relapse rate will be measured in the baseline (according to patients' history in the last year) and after 12 months of intervention.
1 secondary outcome
Expanded Disability Status Scale
Time frame: one year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24118482Sato DK, Lana-Peixoto MA, Fujihara K, de Seze J. Clinical spectrum and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: evolution and current status. Brain Pathol. 2013 Nov;23(6):647-60. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12087.
- Background: PubMed 22617743Morrow MJ, Wingerchuk D. Neuromyelitis optica. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012 Jun;32(2):154-66. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31825662f1.
- Background: PubMed 21813788Costanzi C, Matiello M, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG, Pittock SJ, Mandrekar J, Thapa P, McKeon A. Azathioprine: tolerability, efficacy, and predictors of benefit in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. 2011 Aug 16;77(7):659-66. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822a2780. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
- Background: PubMed 24272588Trebst C, Jarius S, Berthele A, Paul F, Schippling S, Wildemann B, Borisow N, Kleiter I, Aktas O, Kumpfel T; Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica: recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). J Neurol. 2014 Jan;261(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7169-7. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
- Background: PubMed 23897062Kim SH, Huh SY, Lee SJ, Joung A, Kim HJ. A 5-year follow-up of rituximab treatment in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70(9):1110-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3071.
- Background: PubMed 27261687Katz Sand I. Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Jun;22(3):864-96. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000337.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28831548Nikoo Z, Badihian S, Shaygannejad V, Asgari N, Ashtari F. Comparison of the efficacy of azathioprine and rituximab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurol. 2017 Sep;264(9):2003-2009. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8590-0. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. We may share the individual participant data (anonymously) on request of the journal publishing the study report.
Related trials for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Neurogenetics and Multi-omics of Neuroinflammatory Diseases in Multiplex Families to Improve Patients Health
Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
Recruiting
Impact of a Structured Wellness Behavioral Intervention on Quality of Life in NMOSD
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Safety Study in Women With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) Exposed to UPLIZNA® During Pregnancy
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder, Pregnancy Related
RecruitingPhase 2
Efgartigimod for the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis
Optic Neuritis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Biobank For MS And Other Demyelinating Diseases
Multiple Sclerosis, Transverse Myelitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vahid Shaygannejad, M.D. study chair
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Azathioprine and Rituximab in people with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder, run by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Iran.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Iran. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Annual Relapse Rate (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03002038, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2020.