AzTrials
AzTrials

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffusePhase 2NCT03003520

A Study of Durvalumab in Combination With R-CHOP or Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP in Previously Untreated High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

A Phase 2 study testing Durvalumab, Rituximab and Doxorubicin in people with Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, run by Celgene at 20 sites in 5 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This Phase 2, two-arm, open-label study is designed to evaluate the safety, clinical activity, and predictive biomarkers of durvalumab in combination with R-CHOP or R2-CHOP, followed by durvalumab consolidation therapy in previously untreated subjects with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse
What is being tested?
Durvalumab, Rituximab and Doxorubicin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
20 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
28 Feb 2017to 24 Apr 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • CD20+Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
  • Ann Arbor stage 3 or 4 or stage 2 with bulky disease
  • High or high-intermediate disease risk.
  • No prior anti-lymphoma treatment.
  • Subject is willing and able to undergo biopsy.
  • Investigator considers R-CHOP immunochemotherapy appropriate.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.
  • Adequate hematology laboratory results (absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 * 10^9/L, platelet count ≥ 75 * 10^9/L, hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dL).
  • Adequate biochemistry laboratory results (aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 3.0 * upper limit of normal; bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL; creatinine clearance of ≥ 40 mL/min).
  • Bi-dimensionally measurable disease (> 2.0 cm).
  • Subject is using effective contraception.

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of lymphoma other than Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
  • Composite lymphoma or transformed lymphoma.
  • Primary or secondary Central Nervous System involvement by lymphoma.
  • Seropositive or active viral infection with hepatitis B virus, human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis C virus.
  • History of other malignancies, unless disease-free for ≥ 5 years.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2.
  • Prior use of lenalidomide, or monoclonal antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1, or PD-L1.
  • High risk of developing thromboembolic events, who are unwilling to take venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.
  • Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders within the past 3 years.
  • Current or prior use of immunosuppressive medication within 28 days before start of treatment.

Trial locations and contacts

20 sites in 5 countries.

20 sites in 5 countries

United States7 sites
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute

    Buffalo, New York, 14263

  • Mid Ohio Oncology Hematology Inc

    Columbus, Ohio, 43219

  • Parkview Research Center

    Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46845

  • Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Gilbert, Arizona, 85234

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • University of Rochester Medical Center

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • Swedish Cancer Institute

    Seattle, Washington, 98104

Other trials in United States

Austria5 sites
  • Innsbruck Medical University Department of Internal Medicine

    Innsbruck, 6020

  • Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg

    Salzburg, 5020

  • Hanusch Krankenhaus

    Vienna, 1140

  • Local Institution - 101

    Vienna, 1190

  • Medical University of Vienna Internalmedicine 1, Hematology

    Vienna, 1190

Other trials in Austria

Denmark3 sites
  • Aarhus Sygehus

    Arhus C, DK-8000

  • Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavns Universitet - Centre for Clinical Intervention Research - The Copenhagen

    Copenhagen, 2100

  • Odense Universitetshospital

    Odense C, DK5000

Other trials in Denmark

United Kingdom3 sites
  • University Hospital Birmingham

    Birmingham, B15 2TH

  • Royal Marsden Hospital

    London, SW3 6JJ

  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust- Churchill Hospital-Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine

    Oxford, 0X3 7LE

Other trials in United Kingdom

Estonia2 sites
  • (North Estonia Medical Centre) - Onkoloogia-ja Hematoloogiakliinik

    Tallinn, 13419

  • Tartu University Hospital

    Tartu, 51014

Other trials in Estonia

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Activity of Durvalumab in Combination With Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone (R-CHOP) or With Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP (R2-CHOP) in Subjects With Previously Untreated, High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

This Phase 2, two-arm, open-label study is designed to evaluate the safety, clinical activity, and predictive biomarkers of durvalumab in combination with R-CHOP or R2-CHOP, followed by durvalumab consolidation therapy in previously untreated subjects with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Induction treatment with R-CHOP (± lenalidomide) will last for a total of up to 6 to 8 treatment cycles (21 day cycles), and the total time on study treatment, including durvalumab consolidation, will last up to 12 months.

On 05-Sep-2017, the US FDA has issued a Partial Clinical Hold on this study resulting in the discontinuation of enrollment into Arm B (Durvalumab + Lenalidomide + R-CHOP). After the US FDA Partial Clinical Hold, new eligible participants have been enrolled in Arm A (Durvalumab + R-CHOP).

Read the detailed description

This research study is conducted in participants with previously untreated, high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients with high-risk DLBCL typically have insufficient therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, the addition of novel agents to the currently used induction therapy (R-CHOP) is a rational approach to improve therapeutic outcomes in this disease setting.

Based on pre-clinical and clinical observations, it is hypothesized that durvalumab will have activity in DLBCL because the PD 1/PD L1 pathway is involved in the pathophysiology of DLBCL. In particular, the addition of durvalumab may augment the anti-tumor activity of R-CHOP against high-risk DLBCL sub-types.

The safety of durvalumab has already been explored. However, as there is limited clinical experience with durvalumab in DLBCL, the study is divided into two stages:

  • A Safety Run-in Stage to evaluate the safety of the treatment combinations until at least 10 subjects are included in each of the two treatment arms
  • An Expansion Stage to analyze the clinical activity of the treatment combinations

Results posted following Primary Outcome Completion date are based on a database cut-off of August 2, 2018.

Keywords
Lymphoma, Diffuse-large B-Cell Lymphoma, Durvalumab, Anti-PD-L1 Antibody, MEDI4736, Immune Checkpoint, Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone/Prednisolone, Lenalidomide
Medical subject headings
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Lymphoma, Dendritic Cell Sarcoma, Interdigitating

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DurvalumabDrug

    Also called MEDI4736, IMFINZI™, DUR

    Durvalumab was supplied in single use vials as a liquid solution containing 500 mg (nominal) of durvalumab at a concentration of 50 mg/mL to be infused by intravenous (IV) injection.

    Day 1 of each treatment cycle (Induction Period and Consolidation Period) started with the administration of IV durvalumab followed by a 2-hour observation period post infusion.

  • RituximabDrug

    Also called RITUXAN®

    Subsequent to durvalumab infusion, rituximab was administered by IV. Rituximab administration could be split over 2 consecutive days according to local clinical practice. Rapid infusion of rituximab was not allowed in this clinical study.

  • DoxorubicinDrug

    Also called Adriamycin

    A component of the CHOP therapy administered by IV. CHOP therapy was administered following rituximab.

  • VincristineDrug

    Also called leurocristine, Oncovin

    A component of the CHOP therapy administered by IV. CHOP therapy was administered following rituximab.

  • CyclophosphamideDrug

    Also called cytophosphane, Cytoxan

    A component of the CHOP therapy administered by IV. CHOP therapy was administered following rituximab.

  • PrednisoneDrug

    Also called corticosteroid, prednisolone

    Prednisone was administered as an IV infusion or by mouth (PO) on Day 1, followed by PO administration on Days 2-5 of each cycle.

    Prednisone could be given prior to other drugs of the CHOP therapy. It was administered after lenalidomide dosing in the R2-CHOP treatment arm.

  • LenalidomideDrug

    Also called Revlimid®

    Lenalidomide was administered orally in capsule form on Days 1-14 of the DUR+R2-CHOP treatment arm only.

Study groups in NCT03003520
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DUR + R-CHOPExperimentalOn Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received durvalumab 1125 mg intravenously (IV) followed by R-CHOP (IV rituximab 375 mg/m^2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m^2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m^2 (maximum dose of 2.0 mg total), and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m^2); Participants also were administered daily oral or IV prednisone/prednisolone 100 mg from Day 1 to 5. Induction treatment continued for a total of 6-8 cycles. Participants who achieve a complete response or partial response continue with consolidation therapy treatment consisting of durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg by IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 12 months.
Receives: Drug: Durvalumab; Drug: Rituximab; Drug: Doxorubicin; Drug: Vincristine; Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Prednisone
DUR + R2-CHOPExperimentalParticipants start the study on durvalumab in combination with R-CHOP (as described in Arm DUR + R-CHOP). Based on their DLBCL Cell-of-Origin subtype (test typically done between cycles 1 and 2), participants with ABC subtype continue the study taking durvalumab in combination with R2-CHOP. On Day 1 of each 21-day cycle, participants received durvalumab 1125 mg intravenously (IV) followed by R-CHOP. Participants were also administered daily oral or IV prednisone/prednisolone 100 mg from Day 1 to 5. In addition, a daily oral lenalidomide 15 mg was administered from Day 1 to 14 of each 21-day cycle. Induction treatment continued for a total of 6-8 cycles. Participants who achieve a complete response or partial response continue with consolidation therapy treatment consisting of durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg by IV on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle for up to a total of 12 months. Enrollment into Arm B was discontinued.
Receives: Drug: Durvalumab; Drug: Rituximab; Drug: Doxorubicin; Drug: Vincristine; Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Lenalidomide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR) at the End of Induction Therapy

    The primary efficacy analysis evaluated the complete response rate (CRR) at the end of the induction therapy in the efficacy evaluable population in a comparative manner against historical control. The response to treatment was assessed according to the 2014 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Cheson, 2014). CR was defined as a complete metabolic response and radiographic evidence showing target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in longest diameter, no new lesions, regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of splenomegaly, and absence of bone marrow involvement. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% confidence interval is reported. Null hypothesis for the primary endpoint was rejected if the lower limit of the confidence interval for the complete response rate at the completion of the induction therapy in the efficacy evaluable population is above 55%.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Responded During Induction and Continued Into Consolidation Therapy (Database Cutoff Date: 02-Aug-2018)

    The percentage of participants who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) at the end of Induction and continued into consolidation period in the efficacy evaluable population in a comparative manner against historical control. The response to treatment was assessed according to the 2014 International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (Cheson, 2014). CR was defined in outcome #1. PR was defined as a partial metabolic response and radiographic evidence showing ≥ 50% decrease in sum of perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites, no new lesions, spleen must have regressed > 50% in length beyond normal, and residual bone marrow involvement improved from baseline. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% confidence interval is reported. Null hypothesis was rejected if the lower limit of the confidence interval for the rate of subjects who continue consolidation therapy out of all subjects.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug to completion of at least one cycle in the Consolidation Period (Day 1 up to Week 52)

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) CD8 T-Cell Density

    Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.

    Measured: Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Total Percentage

    Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.

    Measured: Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Programmed Death Ligand - 1 (PDL1) Percentage of Tumor Cells

    Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.

    Measured: Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Clinical Response in the Biomarker Subpopulation for the Interferon Gamma Score (IFNG-Score) From Ribonucleic Acid (RNA)-Sequencing Data

    Data in the analysis include all participants who received durvalumab, irrespective of the study arm in which they enrolled, because the selected biomarkers have been associated with response in other anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 studies, such as durvalumab. IHC analysis was performed on the baseline tumor biopsy to quantify CD8 T-cell density. Participants with 'high' values, i.e. above the threshold defined as the median value of 774 cells/mm^2 found in commercial DLBCL samples using matched analytical methods, were predicted to be responders to treatment with durvalumab. The definition of a complete response was that used in the primary outcome.

    Measured: Biomarker biopsies: Days -28 to Day -1. Clinical response: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).

  6. Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03): - Grade 1 = Mild (no limitation in activity or intervention); - Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention required); - Grade 3 = Severe (marked limitation in activity; medical intervention required, hospitalization possible); - Grade 4 = Life-threatening; - Grade 5 = Death. Relation to IP is determined by the investigator.

    Measured: From the date of the first dose of study drug to within 90 days after the last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after the last dose of any investigational product (IP) whichever is greater. (Up to approximately 72 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion24 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion24 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03003520
Sponsor's protocol ID
MEDI4736-DLBCL-001
Other IDs
2015-005173-20, 2015
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
22 Dec 2016
Last updated
22 May 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Durvalumab, Rituximab and Doxorubicin in people with Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, run by Celgene at 20 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 20 sites in United States, Austria, Denmark, United Kingdom, Estonia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR) at the End of Induction Therapy (time frame: From first dose of study drug to end of Induction therapy (Day 1 up to Week 26 - maximum duration of Induction Period).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in