Airway ObstructionNCT03004300
Maxillary Expansion Effects in Children With Upper Airway Obstruction
A study testing Rapid maxillary expansion and Adenotonsillectomy in people with Airway Obstruction, run by Universidade Federal de Goias at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The most frequent causes of mouth breathers are the adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Adenotonsillectomy is the main choice for the elimination of the obstruction. However, this surgical treatment does not have its effect well elucidated and apnea has been cited in the literature as a residual outcome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 9 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Airway Obstruction
- What is being tested?
- Rapid maxillary expansion and Adenotonsillectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 13 Jul 2017to 31 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 9 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children (boys and girls) between 5 and 9 years of age.
- Atresic maxilla.
- Skeletal Class I
- With or without Adenotonsillar hypertrophy
- Parents or tutors sign Informed Consent.
Who cannot join
- Craniofacial syndromes or neurologic disease diagnosis.
- History of adenotonsillectomy and orthodontic treatment
- History of facial trauma
- Morbid obesity
- Premature loss of posterior teeth
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Maxillary Expansion Effects in the Facial Structures of Children With Upper Airway Obstruction: a Randomized Clinical Trial
The most frequent causes of mouth breathers are the adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Adenotonsillectomy is the main choice for the elimination of the obstruction. However, this surgical treatment does not have its effect well elucidated and apnea has been cited in the literature as a residual outcome. Other types of supporting treatment may also been involved such as the use of corticosteroids, physiotherapy and orthodontic-orthopedic treatment, among them rapid maxillary expansion (RME).
RME corrects the morphological constriction of the upper arch caused by buccal breathing and also reduce the airway resistance. Despite reports of RME influencing volume enhancement in pharyngeal airway, there are still few three-dimensional studies following the post-expansion effects. In addition, these changes are doubtful due postural changes of the tongue during the tomography exam. Conflicts of results are also present for changes in the nasal septum of children. The main alteration mentioned is the increase in the length of the lower third of the septum.
The investigators propose a randomized, prospective, controlled clinical trial in patients with atresic maxilla with or without adenotonsillar hypertrophy. The patients will be treated with RME and adenotonsillectomy when the obstruction is present. The purpose of this study is elucidate if there is different outcomes considering the moment of RME treatment before or after the adenotonsillectomy.
- Conditions
- Airway Obstruction
- Being tested
- Rapid maxillary expansion, Adenotonsillectomy
- Keywords
- maxillary expansion, adenotonsillar hypertrophy, airway volume
- Medical subject headings
- Airway Obstruction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rapid maxillary expansionProcedure or surgery
Also called maxillary expansion
Device
AdenotonsillectomyProcedure or surgery
Surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| group 1 | Active comparator | Patients with atresic maxilla without upper airway obstruction submitted to rapid maxillary expansion Receives: Procedure: Rapid maxillary expansion |
| group 2 | Experimental | Patients with atresic maxilla and adenotonsillar hypertrophy submitted to rapid maxillary expansion before adenotonsillectomy Receives: Procedure: Rapid maxillary expansion; Procedure: Adenotonsillectomy |
| group 3 | Experimental | Patients with atresic maxilla and adenotonsillar hypertrophy submitted to rapid maxillary expansion after adenotonsillectomy Receives: Procedure: Rapid maxillary expansion; Procedure: Adenotonsillectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Airway Volume
cone beam computed tomography
Measured: 7 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Quality of life before and after maxillary expansion:
Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 questionnaire (OSA-18: scale range 18-126. The impact on quality of life was classified in three groups: a) minor (scores below 60); b) moderate (scores between 60 and 80) and major (scores above 80).
Measured: 1 and 7 months
Pediatric Quality of Life
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory: 0-100 scale range. Higher scores indicate better HRQOL (Health-Related Quality of Life)
Measured: 1 and 7 months
Sleep Disturbance for Children
Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children: scale range 26-130.Scores higher than 39 indicate sleep disturbance
Measured: 1 and 7 months
Nasal septum morphology
Linear parameters by lateral tomographic distances
Measured: 7 months
Dental arch distances
Dental arch growth as described by Mc Namara,2003
Measured: 7 months
Airway obstruction
Adenotonsillar hypertrophy by nasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy
Measured: 7 months
Bruxism
Bruxism episodes
Measured: 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start13 Jul 2017
- Primary completion30 Mar 2019
- Study completion31 Mar 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Airway ObstructionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal de Goias
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, José Valladares Neto, Universidade Federal de Goias
- Investigators
- Jose Valladares Neto, PHD, Principal investigator, Universidade Federal de Goiás
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03004300
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 044029
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Guilleminault C, Monteyrol PJ, Huynh NT, Pirelli P, Quo S, Li K. Adeno-tonsillectomy and rapid maxillary distraction in pre-pubertal children, a pilot study. Sleep Breath. 2011 May;15(2):173-7. doi: 10.1007/s11325-010-0419-3. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
PubMed 20848317de Castilho LS, Abreu MH, de Oliveira RB, Souza E Silva ME, Resende VL. Factors associated with mouth breathing in children with -developmental -disabilities. Spec Care Dentist. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):75-9. doi: 10.1111/scd.12157. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
PubMed 26763202Caprioglio A, Meneghel M, Fastuca R, Zecca PA, Nucera R, Nosetti L. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients: correspondence between 3-dimensional airway changes and polysomnography. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;78(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
PubMed 24231036Chang Y, Koenig LJ, Pruszynski JE, Bradley TG, Bosio JA, Liu D. Dimensional changes of upper airway after rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.019.
PubMed 23561406Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006.
PubMed 11468499Bruni O, Ottaviano S, Guidetti V, Romoli M, Innocenzi M, Cortesi F, Giannotti F. The Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC). Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate sleep disturbances in childhood and adolescence. J Sleep Res. 1996 Dec;5(4):251-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1996.00251.x.
PubMed 9065877Fernandes FM, Teles Rda C. Application of the Portuguese version of the Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 survey to children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov-Dec;79(6):720-6. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130132.
PubMed 24474484
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Maxillary Expansion Effects in the Facial Structures of Children With Upper Airway Obstruction: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03004300
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 044029
- Conditions
- Airway Obstruction
- Keywords
- maxillary expansion, adenotonsillar hypertrophy, airway volume
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal de GoiasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The most frequent causes of mouth breathers are the adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Adenotonsillectomy is the main choice for the elimination of the obstruction. However, this surgical treatment does not have its effect well elucidated and apnea has been cited in the literature as a residual outcome. Other types of supporting treatment may also been involved such as the use of corticosteroids, physiotherapy and orthodontic-orthopedic treatment, among them rapid maxillary expansion (RME).
RME corrects the morphological constriction of the upper arch caused by buccal breathing and also reduce the airway resistance. Despite reports of RME influencing volume enhancement in pharyngeal airway, there are still few three-dimensional studies following the post-expansion effects. In addition, these changes are doubtful due postural changes of the tongue during the tomography exam. Conflicts of results are also present for changes in the nasal septum of children. The main alteration mentioned is the increase in the length of the lower third of the septum.
The investigators propose a randomized, prospective, controlled clinical trial in patients with atresic maxilla with or without adenotonsillar hypertrophy. The patients will be treated with RME and adenotonsillectomy when the obstruction is present. The purpose of this study is elucidate if there is different outcomes considering the moment of RME treatment before or after the adenotonsillectomy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| group 1 | Active comparator | Procedure: Rapid maxillary expansionPatients with atresic maxilla without upper airway obstruction submitted to rapid maxillary expansion |
| group 2 | Experimental | Procedure: Rapid maxillary expansion, Procedure: AdenotonsillectomyPatients with atresic maxilla and adenotonsillar hypertrophy submitted to rapid maxillary expansion before adenotonsillectomy |
| group 3 | Experimental | Procedure: Rapid maxillary expansion, Procedure: AdenotonsillectomyPatients with atresic maxilla and adenotonsillar hypertrophy submitted to rapid maxillary expansion after adenotonsillectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 9 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Children (boys and girls) between 5 and 9 years of age.
- Atresic maxilla.
- Skeletal Class I
- With or without Adenotonsillar hypertrophy
- Parents or tutors sign Informed Consent.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Craniofacial syndromes or neurologic disease diagnosis.
- History of adenotonsillectomy and orthodontic treatment
- History of facial trauma
- Morbid obesity
- Premature loss of posterior teeth
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid maxillary expansionAlso: maxillary expansionDevice | Procedure or surgery | group 1, group 2, group 3 |
| AdenotonsillectomySurgery | Procedure or surgery | group 2, group 3 |
Primary outcome
Airway Volume
Time frame: 7 months
cone beam computed tomography
7 secondary outcomes
Quality of life before and after maxillary expansion:
Time frame: 1 and 7 months
Pediatric Quality of Life
Time frame: 1 and 7 months
Sleep Disturbance for Children
Time frame: 1 and 7 months
Nasal septum morphology
Time frame: 7 months
Dental arch distances
Time frame: 7 months
Airway obstruction
Time frame: 7 months
Bruxism
Time frame: 7 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2019.
- Background: PubMed 20848317Guilleminault C, Monteyrol PJ, Huynh NT, Pirelli P, Quo S, Li K. Adeno-tonsillectomy and rapid maxillary distraction in pre-pubertal children, a pilot study. Sleep Breath. 2011 May;15(2):173-7. doi: 10.1007/s11325-010-0419-3. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
- Background: PubMed 26763202de Castilho LS, Abreu MH, de Oliveira RB, Souza E Silva ME, Resende VL. Factors associated with mouth breathing in children with -developmental -disabilities. Spec Care Dentist. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):75-9. doi: 10.1111/scd.12157. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
- Background: PubMed 24231036Caprioglio A, Meneghel M, Fastuca R, Zecca PA, Nucera R, Nosetti L. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients: correspondence between 3-dimensional airway changes and polysomnography. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;78(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 23561406Chang Y, Koenig LJ, Pruszynski JE, Bradley TG, Bosio JA, Liu D. Dimensional changes of upper airway after rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.019.
- Background: PubMed 11468499Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 9065877Bruni O, Ottaviano S, Guidetti V, Romoli M, Innocenzi M, Cortesi F, Giannotti F. The Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC). Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate sleep disturbances in childhood and adolescence. J Sleep Res. 1996 Dec;5(4):251-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1996.00251.x.
- Background: PubMed 24474484Fernandes FM, Teles Rda C. Application of the Portuguese version of the Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 survey to children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov-Dec;79(6):720-6. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130132.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Airway Obstruction
Recruiting
Measuring Nasal Airway Changes After VivAer Treatment Using AI Analysis
Nasal Airway Obstruction
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Prospective Study Comparing VivAer to Alternative Surgical Procedures to Treat Nasal Airway Obstruction in Patients With Nasal Valve Dysfunction.
Nasal Airway Obstruction
Not yet recruiting
Pharyngeal Mucosal Conditioning to Prevent Postoperative Sore Throat in Septoplasty Patients With Severe Nasal Obstruction
Postoperative Sore Throat, Nasal Obstruction
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study of an Isotonic Saline Solution for the Relief of Nasal Congestion in Infants and Toddlers
Nasal Congestion, Common Cold
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jose Valladares Neto, PHD principal investigator
Universidade Federal de Goiás
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rapid maxillary expansion and Adenotonsillectomy in people with Airway Obstruction, run by Universidade Federal de Goias at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Airway Volume (time frame: 7 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03004300, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2019.