AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney Transplant Failure and RejectionPhase 4AGEINGNCT03005236

AGe-adapted Benefits of Envarsus Versus Twice-daily Tacrolimus ImmunosuppressioN druGs After Kidney Transplantation

A Phase 4 study testing ENVARSUS and Standard twice daily tacrolimus in people with Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection, run by University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The proportion of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) is steadily increasing. Although kidney transplantation remains the optimal RRT of choice, it is clear that older adults have a differential risk versus benefit profile after kidney transplantation compared to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
What is being tested?
ENVARSUS and Standard twice daily tacrolimus
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 2017to Oct 2019
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • kidney alone transplant, age ≥60, known sensitivity to tacrolimus

Who cannot join

  • contra-indication to transplantation, multi-organ transplant, aged <60

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Adnan Sharif, MD contact

0121 371 5861

adnan.sharif@uhb.nhs.uk

About this study

Official title: AGe-adapted Benefits of Envarsus Versus Twice-daily Tacrolimus ImmunosuppressioN druGs After Kidney Transplantation (AGEING) - a Feasibility Study

The proportion of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) is steadily increasing. Although kidney transplantation remains the optimal RRT of choice, it is clear that older adults have a differential risk versus benefit profile after kidney transplantation compared to younger adults. No age-adapted immunosuppression for older adults has been shown to improve kidney allograft outcomes but recent sub-analyses of clinical trial data has hinted at improved outcomes for older kidney transplant patients receiving Envarsus versus standard twice-daily tacrolimus formulations. This feasibility study will investigate this effect to see whether a full scale randomised controlled trial is warranted and to provide information regarding study feasibility.

Read the detailed description

The proportion of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) is steadily increasing. National registry data consistently shows a trend towards increasing median ages for patients both starting dialysis and awaiting kidney transplantation on deceased-donor waiting lists (www.renalreg.org). For example, in the United Kingdom, national audit data from the UK Renal Registry demonstrates that the median age for all incident patients commencing RRT was 64.5 years (www.renalreg.org). Among the prevalent RRT population, the percentage of patients aged greater than 70 years has increased from 19.2% (in 2000) to 25.0% (in 2013) in the last registry report (www.renalreg.org). Focusing on data from the UK Transplant Registry, 28% of transplant recipients receiving a deceased-donor kidney allograft in the last year were aged 60 and over (7% were aged 70 and over), while 32% of the active kidney transplant waiting list is aged 60 and over (9% aged 70 and over) (http://www.odt.nhs.uk/uk-transplant-registry/). With chronic kidney disease increasingly recognized as a public health epidemic, the long-term prospects are of an increasingly elderly component to our end-stage kidney disease population.

Kidney transplantation is the gold standard method of RRT due to superior mortality, quality of life and cost effectiveness versus dialysis. It is therefore concerning that transplantation is an infrequent RRT choice for older adults and the number of older adults aged 70 and over who are listed for a kidney transplant is <10%. The Renal Association states; "age is not a contra-indication for transplantation but age related co-morbidity is an important limiting factor", but clearly the risk versus benefit ratio remains unclear for clinicians because mortality risk is higher for older versus younger kidney transplant recipients. However, improved mortality is observed with kidney transplantation versus wait-listed dialysis patients across all age groups, and specifically among older adults aged 70 and above in US studies, and therefore Investigators should consider kidney transplantation for this increasing large cohort. The risk of immunosuppression-related complications increases with age and therefore age-adapted immunosuppression should be considered to balance efficacy versus complications. However, no targeted age-adapted immunosuppression clinical trials have been conducted in kidney transplantation and this remains a major gap in the literature.

Sub-analyses of recently published work showed clinically relevant advantages of Envarsus versus twice-daily tacrolimus for prevention of treatment failure after 2-years among patients aged 65 and over (age ≥65 yrs; -25.89% (-45.11%, 0.36%), p=0.067) (Rostaing et al, AJKD 2016; Budde et al, AJT 2014). However, small numbers render the effect of borderline statistical significance

As one of the largest growing demographics, it is imperative to design a targeted clinical trial to ascertain if Envarsus has clinical benefits above and beyond twice-daily tacrolimus in older kidney transplant recipients. Before that is possible, investigators must investigate two things in preparation for a definitive study; 1) investigators must confirm reproducibility of this trend among older kidney transplant recipients in a separate cohort to determine effect size and power calculations, and 2) identify possible mechanistic, biological and/or pharmacogenomic rationale to understand any effect. This feasibility study will be the first contemporary randomised controlled trial in kidney transplantation looking at a modified age-adapted immunosuppression protocol specifically for older adults, attempting to determine whether the above results can be recreated and probed in greater detail. As one of the most topical questions in the field of transplantation, the results of this feasibility study would advise on the merits of undertaking a more definitive study which would almost certainly be one of the most eagerly awaited studies by global transplant clinicians.

Being tested
ENVARSUS, Standard twice daily tacrolimus
Keywords
Kidney transplant, Tacrolimus, Envarsus, Older adult, Elderly
Medical subject headings
Rejection, Psychology

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ENVARSUSDrug

    Envarsus is a once-a-day oral formulation of tacrolimus.

  • Standard twice daily tacrolimusDrug

    Standard tacrolimus will include twice-daily formulations that are currently available.

Study groups in NCT03005236
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EnvarsusExperimentalBasiliximab induction with maintenance therapy of Envarsus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Envarsus constitutes the experimental component of immunosuppression in older kidney transplant recipients.
Receives: Drug: ENVARSUS
Standard twice daily tacrolimusActive comparatorBasiliximab induction with maintenance therapy of standard tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Standard tacrolimus constitutes the control component of immunosuppression in older kidney transplant recipients.
Receives: Drug: Standard twice daily tacrolimus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recruitment rates

    Measured: 6-months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Treatment failure (composite endpoint of mortality, graft survival, rejection, loss to follow up)

    Measured: 6-months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2017
  3. Primary completionApr 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03005236
Sponsor's protocol ID
AGEING
Acronym
AGEING
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
30 Nov 2016
Last updated
29 Dec 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing ENVARSUS and Standard twice daily tacrolimus in people with Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection, run by University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Adnan Sharif, MD (0121 371 5861, adnan.sharif@uhb.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recruitment rates (time frame: 6-months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in