Kidney Transplant Failure and RejectionPhase 4AGEINGNCT03005236
AGe-adapted Benefits of Envarsus Versus Twice-daily Tacrolimus ImmunosuppressioN druGs After Kidney Transplantation
A Phase 4 study testing ENVARSUS and Standard twice daily tacrolimus in people with Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection, run by University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust.
Trial summary
The proportion of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) is steadily increasing. Although kidney transplantation remains the optimal RRT of choice, it is clear that older adults have a differential risk versus benefit profile after kidney transplantation compared to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
- What is being tested?
- ENVARSUS and Standard twice daily tacrolimus
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2017to Oct 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- kidney alone transplant, age ≥60, known sensitivity to tacrolimus
Who cannot join
- contra-indication to transplantation, multi-organ transplant, aged <60
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: AGe-adapted Benefits of Envarsus Versus Twice-daily Tacrolimus ImmunosuppressioN druGs After Kidney Transplantation (AGEING) - a Feasibility Study
The proportion of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) is steadily increasing. Although kidney transplantation remains the optimal RRT of choice, it is clear that older adults have a differential risk versus benefit profile after kidney transplantation compared to younger adults. No age-adapted immunosuppression for older adults has been shown to improve kidney allograft outcomes but recent sub-analyses of clinical trial data has hinted at improved outcomes for older kidney transplant patients receiving Envarsus versus standard twice-daily tacrolimus formulations. This feasibility study will investigate this effect to see whether a full scale randomised controlled trial is warranted and to provide information regarding study feasibility.
Read the detailed description
The proportion of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) is steadily increasing. National registry data consistently shows a trend towards increasing median ages for patients both starting dialysis and awaiting kidney transplantation on deceased-donor waiting lists (www.renalreg.org). For example, in the United Kingdom, national audit data from the UK Renal Registry demonstrates that the median age for all incident patients commencing RRT was 64.5 years (www.renalreg.org). Among the prevalent RRT population, the percentage of patients aged greater than 70 years has increased from 19.2% (in 2000) to 25.0% (in 2013) in the last registry report (www.renalreg.org). Focusing on data from the UK Transplant Registry, 28% of transplant recipients receiving a deceased-donor kidney allograft in the last year were aged 60 and over (7% were aged 70 and over), while 32% of the active kidney transplant waiting list is aged 60 and over (9% aged 70 and over) (http://www.odt.nhs.uk/uk-transplant-registry/). With chronic kidney disease increasingly recognized as a public health epidemic, the long-term prospects are of an increasingly elderly component to our end-stage kidney disease population.
Kidney transplantation is the gold standard method of RRT due to superior mortality, quality of life and cost effectiveness versus dialysis. It is therefore concerning that transplantation is an infrequent RRT choice for older adults and the number of older adults aged 70 and over who are listed for a kidney transplant is <10%. The Renal Association states; "age is not a contra-indication for transplantation but age related co-morbidity is an important limiting factor", but clearly the risk versus benefit ratio remains unclear for clinicians because mortality risk is higher for older versus younger kidney transplant recipients. However, improved mortality is observed with kidney transplantation versus wait-listed dialysis patients across all age groups, and specifically among older adults aged 70 and above in US studies, and therefore Investigators should consider kidney transplantation for this increasing large cohort. The risk of immunosuppression-related complications increases with age and therefore age-adapted immunosuppression should be considered to balance efficacy versus complications. However, no targeted age-adapted immunosuppression clinical trials have been conducted in kidney transplantation and this remains a major gap in the literature.
Sub-analyses of recently published work showed clinically relevant advantages of Envarsus versus twice-daily tacrolimus for prevention of treatment failure after 2-years among patients aged 65 and over (age ≥65 yrs; -25.89% (-45.11%, 0.36%), p=0.067) (Rostaing et al, AJKD 2016; Budde et al, AJT 2014). However, small numbers render the effect of borderline statistical significance
As one of the largest growing demographics, it is imperative to design a targeted clinical trial to ascertain if Envarsus has clinical benefits above and beyond twice-daily tacrolimus in older kidney transplant recipients. Before that is possible, investigators must investigate two things in preparation for a definitive study; 1) investigators must confirm reproducibility of this trend among older kidney transplant recipients in a separate cohort to determine effect size and power calculations, and 2) identify possible mechanistic, biological and/or pharmacogenomic rationale to understand any effect. This feasibility study will be the first contemporary randomised controlled trial in kidney transplantation looking at a modified age-adapted immunosuppression protocol specifically for older adults, attempting to determine whether the above results can be recreated and probed in greater detail. As one of the most topical questions in the field of transplantation, the results of this feasibility study would advise on the merits of undertaking a more definitive study which would almost certainly be one of the most eagerly awaited studies by global transplant clinicians.
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
- Being tested
- ENVARSUS, Standard twice daily tacrolimus
- Keywords
- Kidney transplant, Tacrolimus, Envarsus, Older adult, Elderly
- Medical subject headings
- Rejection, Psychology
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ENVARSUSDrug
Envarsus is a once-a-day oral formulation of tacrolimus.
Standard twice daily tacrolimusDrug
Standard tacrolimus will include twice-daily formulations that are currently available.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Envarsus | Experimental | Basiliximab induction with maintenance therapy of Envarsus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Envarsus constitutes the experimental component of immunosuppression in older kidney transplant recipients. Receives: Drug: ENVARSUS |
| Standard twice daily tacrolimus | Active comparator | Basiliximab induction with maintenance therapy of standard tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Standard tacrolimus constitutes the control component of immunosuppression in older kidney transplant recipients. Receives: Drug: Standard twice daily tacrolimus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment rates
Measured: 6-months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Treatment failure (composite endpoint of mortality, graft survival, rejection, loss to follow up)
Measured: 6-months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2017
- Primary completionApr 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Kidney Transplant Failure and RejectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Adnan Sharif, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
- Investigators
- Adnan Sharif, MD, Principal investigator, Consultant Nephrologist
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03005236
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AGEING
- Acronym
- AGEING
- Status last verified
- Dec 2016
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Dec 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- AGe-adapted Benefits of Envarsus Versus Twice-daily Tacrolimus ImmunosuppressioN druGs After Kidney Transplantation (AGEING) - a Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03005236
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AGEING / AGEING
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
- Keywords
- Kidney transplant, Tacrolimus, Envarsus, Older adult, Elderly
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2017
- Primary completion
- Apr 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The proportion of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) is steadily increasing. Although kidney transplantation remains the optimal RRT of choice, it is clear that older adults have a differential risk versus benefit profile after kidney transplantation compared to younger adults. No age-adapted immunosuppression for older adults has been shown to improve kidney allograft outcomes but recent sub-analyses of clinical trial data has hinted at improved outcomes for older kidney transplant patients receiving Envarsus versus standard twice-daily tacrolimus formulations. This feasibility study will investigate this effect to see whether a full scale randomised controlled trial is warranted and to provide information regarding study feasibility.
Detailed description
The proportion of elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) is steadily increasing. National registry data consistently shows a trend towards increasing median ages for patients both starting dialysis and awaiting kidney transplantation on deceased-donor waiting lists (www.renalreg.org). For example, in the United Kingdom, national audit data from the UK Renal Registry demonstrates that the median age for all incident patients commencing RRT was 64.5 years (www.renalreg.org). Among the prevalent RRT population, the percentage of patients aged greater than 70 years has increased from 19.2% (in 2000) to 25.0% (in 2013) in the last registry report (www.renalreg.org). Focusing on data from the UK Transplant Registry, 28% of transplant recipients receiving a deceased-donor kidney allograft in the last year were aged 60 and over (7% were aged 70 and over), while 32% of the active kidney transplant waiting list is aged 60 and over (9% aged 70 and over) (http://www.odt.nhs.uk/uk-transplant-registry/). With chronic kidney disease increasingly recognized as a public health epidemic, the long-term prospects are of an increasingly elderly component to our end-stage kidney disease population.
Kidney transplantation is the gold standard method of RRT due to superior mortality, quality of life and cost effectiveness versus dialysis. It is therefore concerning that transplantation is an infrequent RRT choice for older adults and the number of older adults aged 70 and over who are listed for a kidney transplant is <10%. The Renal Association states; "age is not a contra-indication for transplantation but age related co-morbidity is an important limiting factor", but clearly the risk versus benefit ratio remains unclear for clinicians because mortality risk is higher for older versus younger kidney transplant recipients. However, improved mortality is observed with kidney transplantation versus wait-listed dialysis patients across all age groups, and specifically among older adults aged 70 and above in US studies, and therefore Investigators should consider kidney transplantation for this increasing large cohort. The risk of immunosuppression-related complications increases with age and therefore age-adapted immunosuppression should be considered to balance efficacy versus complications. However, no targeted age-adapted immunosuppression clinical trials have been conducted in kidney transplantation and this remains a major gap in the literature.
Sub-analyses of recently published work showed clinically relevant advantages of Envarsus versus twice-daily tacrolimus for prevention of treatment failure after 2-years among patients aged 65 and over (age ≥65 yrs; -25.89% (-45.11%, 0.36%), p=0.067) (Rostaing et al, AJKD 2016; Budde et al, AJT 2014). However, small numbers render the effect of borderline statistical significance
As one of the largest growing demographics, it is imperative to design a targeted clinical trial to ascertain if Envarsus has clinical benefits above and beyond twice-daily tacrolimus in older kidney transplant recipients. Before that is possible, investigators must investigate two things in preparation for a definitive study; 1) investigators must confirm reproducibility of this trend among older kidney transplant recipients in a separate cohort to determine effect size and power calculations, and 2) identify possible mechanistic, biological and/or pharmacogenomic rationale to understand any effect. This feasibility study will be the first contemporary randomised controlled trial in kidney transplantation looking at a modified age-adapted immunosuppression protocol specifically for older adults, attempting to determine whether the above results can be recreated and probed in greater detail. As one of the most topical questions in the field of transplantation, the results of this feasibility study would advise on the merits of undertaking a more definitive study which would almost certainly be one of the most eagerly awaited studies by global transplant clinicians.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Envarsus | Experimental | Drug: ENVARSUSBasiliximab induction with maintenance therapy of Envarsus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Envarsus constitutes the experimental component of immunosuppression in older kidney transplant recipients. |
| Standard twice daily tacrolimus | Active comparator | Drug: Standard twice daily tacrolimusBasiliximab induction with maintenance therapy of standard tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Standard tacrolimus constitutes the control component of immunosuppression in older kidney transplant recipients. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- kidney alone transplant, age ≥60, known sensitivity to tacrolimus
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- contra-indication to transplantation, multi-organ transplant, aged <60
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ENVARSUSEnvarsus is a once-a-day oral formulation of tacrolimus. | Drug | Envarsus |
| Standard twice daily tacrolimusStandard tacrolimus will include twice-daily formulations that are currently available. | Drug | Standard twice daily tacrolimus |
Primary outcome
Recruitment rates
Time frame: 6-months
1 secondary outcome
Treatment failure (composite endpoint of mortality, graft survival, rejection, loss to follow up)
Time frame: 6-months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Dec 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
(TNX-1500) in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant, Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study Comparing Siplizumab With Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin to Help the Body Accept a Kidney Transplant
Renal Transplant Failure and Rejection
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ECP-DL Cell Infusion for Induction in Living Donor Kidney (LDK) Transplants
Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection, Kidney Transplant; Complications
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Microbiota Changes Related to Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation
End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Adnan Sharif, MD principal investigator
Consultant Nephrologist
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing ENVARSUS and Standard twice daily tacrolimus in people with Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection, run by University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Adnan Sharif, MD (0121 371 5861, adnan.sharif@uhb.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment rates (time frame: 6-months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2016.