Stress Urinary IncontinenceNCT03005977
Identifying Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
A study testing Urodynamics in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
What test is most sensitive in identifying stress urinary incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse; urodynamics, cough stress test, or pyridium pad test? The hypothesis states that there is a difference between the sensitivity of UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress tests, with UDS being the most sensitive… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- What is being tested?
- Urodynamics
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Feb 2017to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 y/o or greater
- Able to consent
- Stage 2 or greater prolapse
- With or without complaint of stress urinary incontinence
Who cannot join
- Desire non-surgical management
- Prior surgery for prolapse or incontinence
- Treated medically for incontinence in the past 4 weeks
- Current Infection
- Known neurologic condition
- Stage 3 or greater chronic kidney disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: What Test is Most Sensitive in Identifying Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Urodynamics, Standing Cough Stress Test, or Pyridium Pad Test?
What test is most sensitive in identifying stress urinary incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse; urodynamics, cough stress test, or pyridium pad test? The hypothesis states that there is a difference between the sensitivity of UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress tests, with UDS being the most sensitive and the gold standard in identifying SUI in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Read the detailed description
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the descent of the pelvic organs into or through the vagina. It is seen in about 11% of the female population by age 80 years old and is often treated with surgery. For patients with pelvic organ prolapse a complaint of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI), potential, or occult SUI after prolapse surgery is well-documented. This new onset of incontinence ranges from 6-60% of the time and therefore, patients who undergo surgery for POP are at risk for needing a subsequent procedure if SUI is not identified prior to the pelvic reconstruction.
Pre-operative evaluation for SUI includes a history and physical exam. The physical exam may include an empty supine stress test ESST, standing cough stress test (CST), pyridium pad test, and urodynamics (UDS). Prior studies have been performed to determine which of these tests are best at identifying SUI. One systemic review found that UDS was 92% sensitive in identifying SUI. When comparing UDS to the cough stress test and the weighed pyridium pad test, the cough stress test was found to be 90% sensitive and the pyridium pad test only 60% sensitive. The pyridium pad test was 68% sensitive when a pad test was found to be positive by orange color stain noted on the pad.
The various ways these tests are performed have also been evaluated. For example, there was no statistical difference in outcomes of a CST; whether completed supine or standing and independent of bladder volume. In regards to the pyridium pad tests, several studies have compared a 1 hour to 24 hour pyridium pad test with varying results of efficacy. Furthermore, in a study done when comparing pad weight and color, even asymptomatic women had positive pyridium pad tests suggesting this test is less specific in identifying SUI. A secondary analysis of the looked at how different reduction methods effect the predictability of post-operative SUI on UDS. Reduction of pelvic organ prolapse with a speculum was the most sensitive in identifying post-operative SUI at 53%. However, there is a paucity of evidence as to which pre-operative test is best in identifying SUI in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
In this prospective study, the aim is to determine which test is most sensitive in pre-operatively identifying SUI and occult SUI in patients treated for prolapse. The hypothesis states that there is a difference between the sensitivity of UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress tests, with UDS being the most sensitive and the gold standard in identifying SUI in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Being tested
- Urodynamics
- Keywords
- Urodynamics, Pyridium pad test, Cough stress test, Pelvic organ prolapse
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UrodynamicsProcedure or surgery
Also called 24 hour pyridium pad test, Cough stress test
UDS is to be performed with prolapse reduced by a speculum. The patient will be asked to valsalva three times then cough while seated after 150 ml of fluid is instilled in the bladder and then again at 300 ml. The same provocative measures will be performed at capacity, with the catheter in place and without the catheter if no leak is identified. If the patient leaks at any volume or if the patient leaks during the cough pressure profile (CPP), the test will be considered positive. If the patient does not leak during filling nor during the CPP then the test will be considered negative.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Urodynamics, pyridium pad & cough stress | Other | The Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire, a questionnaire standardized by Cleveland Clinic Florida, the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), and the numerical analog scale are to be administered prior to and 6 weeks after the surgical intervention. (14, 15)
Prior to surgery, patients will be scheduled for a UDS performed by a qualified nurse practitioner or physician and will be given instructions in verbal and written form to undergo a 24 H pyridium pad test at least 72 hours before the UDS. Patients will be given pyridium TID and report if orange stain is noted on their pad in this period of time. A supine and a standing cough stress test will also be performed. Receives: Procedure: Urodynamics |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with SUI as per Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire prior to prolapse surgery compared to number of patients with clinical SUI identified on either UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress test.
Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire:A comparison will be made for each patient across the three studies to identify which test is most predictive of patient's SUI indicated by leakage identified on patients pre-operative questionnaire: Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire.
Measured: 2 years
Number of patients with SUI as per the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6):Questionnaire prior to prolapse surgery compared to number of patients with clinical SUI identified on either UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress test.
The Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6):A comparison will be made for each patient across the three studies to identify which test is most predictive of patient's SUI indicated by leakage identified on patients pre-operative questionnaire: the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)
Measured: 2 years
Number of patients with SUI as per The numerical analog scale prior to prolapse surgery compared to number of patients with clinical SUI identified on either UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress test.
The numerical analog scale.A comparison will be made for each patient across the three studies to identify which test is most predictive of patient's SUI indicated by leakage identified on patients pre-operative questionnaire: the numerical analog scale.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start15 Feb 2017
- Primary completion30 Nov 2021
- Study completion31 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stress Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Cleveland ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eric Hurtado, The Cleveland Clinic
- Investigators
- Eric Hurtado, MD, Principal investigator, The Cleveland Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03005977
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FLA 16-078
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data individual participant data will not be shared with other researches.
Publications
Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):501-6. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.
PubMed 9083302Latini JM, Kreder KJ Jr. Associated pelvic organ prolapse in women with stress urinary incontinence: when to operate? Curr Opin Urol. 2005 Nov;15(6):380-5. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000179760.45715.9b.
PubMed 16205487Kasturi S, Diaz SI, McDermott CD, Woodman PJ, Bump RC, Terry CL, Hale DS. De novo stress urinary incontinence after negative prolapse reduction stress testing for total vaginal mesh procedures: incidence and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):487.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
PubMed 21925638Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Nager CW, Barber MD, Kenton K, Amundsen CL, Schaffer J, Meikle SF, Spino C; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2358-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111967.
PubMed 22716974Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Visco AG, Zyczynski H, Brown MB, Weber AM; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 13;354(15):1557-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054208.
PubMed 16611949Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrams KR, Turner DA, Sutton AJ, Chapple C, Assassa RP, Shaw C, Cheater F. Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(6):1-132, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10060.
PubMed 16487456Price DM, Noblett K. Comparison of the cough stress test and 24-h pad test in the assessment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23(4):429-33. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1602-1. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
PubMed 22086265Reena C, Kekre AN, Kekre N. Occult stress incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Apr;97(1):31-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.12.011. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
PubMed 17291508W. Henderson, S. Kane, J. Mangel, J. Garibay, E. Kikano, R. Pollard, S. T. Mahajan, A. Hijaz. A randomized comparative study correlating cough stress test with urodynamics and 24 hour pad test in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence. J. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery Issue: September/October 2015. Volume 21(5) Supplement 1, p S11
Artibani, W; Andersen, JT; Gajewski, JB; Ostergard, DR; Raz, S; Tubaro, A; Chapter 8C imaging and other Investigations. 2nd International Consultation on Incontinence 2002 p425-477
Wall LL, Wang K, Robson I, Stanton SL. The Pyridium pad test for diagnosing urinary incontinence. A comparative study of asymptomatic and incontinent women. J Reprod Med. 1990 Jul;35(7):682-4.
PubMed 2198349Visco AG, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Cundiff G, Fine P, Zyczynski H, Brown MB, Weber AM; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. The role of preoperative urodynamic testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy: the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized surgical trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 May;19(5):607-14. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0498-2. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
PubMed 18185903Peterson TV, Karp DR, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Validation of a global pelvic floor symptom bother questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Sep;21(9):1129-35. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1148-7. Epub 2010 May 11.
PubMed 20458467Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14(2):131-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.1930140206.
PubMed 7780440Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan;21(1):5-26. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
PubMed 19937315
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- What Test is Most Sensitive in Identifying Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Urodynamics, Standing Cough Stress Test, or Pyridium Pad Test?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03005977
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FLA 16-078
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Keywords
- Urodynamics, Pyridium pad test, Cough stress test, Pelvic organ prolapse
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
What test is most sensitive in identifying stress urinary incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse; urodynamics, cough stress test, or pyridium pad test? The hypothesis states that there is a difference between the sensitivity of UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress tests, with UDS being the most sensitive and the gold standard in identifying SUI in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Detailed description
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the descent of the pelvic organs into or through the vagina. It is seen in about 11% of the female population by age 80 years old and is often treated with surgery. For patients with pelvic organ prolapse a complaint of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI), potential, or occult SUI after prolapse surgery is well-documented. This new onset of incontinence ranges from 6-60% of the time and therefore, patients who undergo surgery for POP are at risk for needing a subsequent procedure if SUI is not identified prior to the pelvic reconstruction.
Pre-operative evaluation for SUI includes a history and physical exam. The physical exam may include an empty supine stress test ESST, standing cough stress test (CST), pyridium pad test, and urodynamics (UDS). Prior studies have been performed to determine which of these tests are best at identifying SUI. One systemic review found that UDS was 92% sensitive in identifying SUI. When comparing UDS to the cough stress test and the weighed pyridium pad test, the cough stress test was found to be 90% sensitive and the pyridium pad test only 60% sensitive. The pyridium pad test was 68% sensitive when a pad test was found to be positive by orange color stain noted on the pad.
The various ways these tests are performed have also been evaluated. For example, there was no statistical difference in outcomes of a CST; whether completed supine or standing and independent of bladder volume. In regards to the pyridium pad tests, several studies have compared a 1 hour to 24 hour pyridium pad test with varying results of efficacy. Furthermore, in a study done when comparing pad weight and color, even asymptomatic women had positive pyridium pad tests suggesting this test is less specific in identifying SUI. A secondary analysis of the looked at how different reduction methods effect the predictability of post-operative SUI on UDS. Reduction of pelvic organ prolapse with a speculum was the most sensitive in identifying post-operative SUI at 53%. However, there is a paucity of evidence as to which pre-operative test is best in identifying SUI in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
In this prospective study, the aim is to determine which test is most sensitive in pre-operatively identifying SUI and occult SUI in patients treated for prolapse. The hypothesis states that there is a difference between the sensitivity of UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress tests, with UDS being the most sensitive and the gold standard in identifying SUI in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Urodynamics, pyridium pad & cough stress | Other | Procedure: UrodynamicsThe Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire, a questionnaire standardized by Cleveland Clinic Florida, the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), and the numerical analog scale are to be administered prior to and 6 weeks after the surgical intervention. (14, 15) Prior to surgery, patients will be scheduled for a UDS performed by a qualified nurse practitioner or physician and will be given instructions in verbal and written form to undergo a 24 H pyridium pad test at least 72 hours before the UDS. Patients will be given pyridium TID and report if orange stain is noted on their pad in this period of time. A supine and a standing cough stress test will also be performed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 18 y/o or greater
- Able to consent
- Stage 2 or greater prolapse
- With or without complaint of stress urinary incontinence
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Desire non-surgical management
- Prior surgery for prolapse or incontinence
- Treated medically for incontinence in the past 4 weeks
- Current Infection
- Known neurologic condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UrodynamicsAlso: 24 hour pyridium pad test, Cough stress testUDS is to be performed with prolapse reduced by a speculum. The patient will be asked to valsalva three times then cough while seated after 150 ml of fluid is instilled in the bladder and then again at 300 ml. The same provocative measures will be performed at capacity, with the catheter in place and without the catheter if no leak is identified. If the patient leaks at any volume or if the patient leaks during the cough pressure profile (CPP), the test will be considered positive. If the patient does not leak during filling nor during the CPP then the test will be considered negative. | Procedure or surgery | Urodynamics, pyridium pad & cough stress |
Primary outcome
Number of patients with SUI as per Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire prior to prolapse surgery compared to number of patients with clinical SUI identified on either UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress test.
Time frame: 2 years
Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire:A comparison will be made for each patient across the three studies to identify which test is most predictive of patient's SUI indicated by leakage identified on patients pre-operative questionnaire: Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire.
Number of patients with SUI as per the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6):Questionnaire prior to prolapse surgery compared to number of patients with clinical SUI identified on either UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress test.
Time frame: 2 years
The Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6):A comparison will be made for each patient across the three studies to identify which test is most predictive of patient's SUI indicated by leakage identified on patients pre-operative questionnaire: the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)
Number of patients with SUI as per The numerical analog scale prior to prolapse surgery compared to number of patients with clinical SUI identified on either UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress test.
Time frame: 2 years
The numerical analog scale.A comparison will be made for each patient across the three studies to identify which test is most predictive of patient's SUI indicated by leakage identified on patients pre-operative questionnaire: the numerical analog scale.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 9083302Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):501-6. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.
- Background: PubMed 16205487Latini JM, Kreder KJ Jr. Associated pelvic organ prolapse in women with stress urinary incontinence: when to operate? Curr Opin Urol. 2005 Nov;15(6):380-5. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000179760.45715.9b.
- Background: PubMed 21925638Kasturi S, Diaz SI, McDermott CD, Woodman PJ, Bump RC, Terry CL, Hale DS. De novo stress urinary incontinence after negative prolapse reduction stress testing for total vaginal mesh procedures: incidence and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):487.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 22716974Wei JT, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Nager CW, Barber MD, Kenton K, Amundsen CL, Schaffer J, Meikle SF, Spino C; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2358-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111967.
- Background: PubMed 16611949Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Visco AG, Zyczynski H, Brown MB, Weber AM; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 13;354(15):1557-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054208.
- Background: PubMed 16487456Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrams KR, Turner DA, Sutton AJ, Chapple C, Assassa RP, Shaw C, Cheater F. Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(6):1-132, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10060.
- Background: PubMed 22086265Price DM, Noblett K. Comparison of the cough stress test and 24-h pad test in the assessment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23(4):429-33. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1602-1. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
- Background: PubMed 17291508Reena C, Kekre AN, Kekre N. Occult stress incontinence in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Apr;97(1):31-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.12.011. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
- BackgroundW. Henderson, S. Kane, J. Mangel, J. Garibay, E. Kikano, R. Pollard, S. T. Mahajan, A. Hijaz. A randomized comparative study correlating cough stress test with urodynamics and 24 hour pad test in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence. J. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery Issue: September/October 2015. Volume 21(5) Supplement 1, p S11
- BackgroundArtibani, W; Andersen, JT; Gajewski, JB; Ostergard, DR; Raz, S; Tubaro, A; Chapter 8C imaging and other Investigations. 2nd International Consultation on Incontinence 2002 p425-477
- Background: PubMed 2198349Wall LL, Wang K, Robson I, Stanton SL. The Pyridium pad test for diagnosing urinary incontinence. A comparative study of asymptomatic and incontinent women. J Reprod Med. 1990 Jul;35(7):682-4.
- Background: PubMed 18185903Visco AG, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Cundiff G, Fine P, Zyczynski H, Brown MB, Weber AM; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. The role of preoperative urodynamic testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy: the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized surgical trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 May;19(5):607-14. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0498-2. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data individual participant data will not be shared with other researches.
Related trials for Stress Urinary Incontinence
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Orforglipron in Female Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence Who Have Obesity or Overweight
Urinary Incontinence,Stress
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Return to Physical Activity After Retropublic Transvaginal Sling and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
RecruitingPhase 1
Allogeneic Use of Expanded Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived From Adipose Tissue (HC106), Female Urinary Incontinence Women Over 50 Years Old
Urinary Incontinence Stress
Recruiting
The Application of Somatosensory Interactive Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Men Underwent Radical Prostatectomy
Prostate Cancer (Post Prostatectomy)
RecruitingObservational study
Standardized 4D Transperineal Ultrasound Assessment of Urethrovesical Junction Mobility After Vaginal Laser Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Urinary Incontinence , Stress, Laser Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eric Hurtado, MD principal investigator
The Cleveland Clinic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Urodynamics in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with SUI as per Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire prior to prolapse surgery compared to number of patients with clinical SUI identified on either UDS, pyridium pad test and cough stress test. (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03005977, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2022.