Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)Phase 4NCT03007212
Outcome of Transarterial Chemo-embolization (TACE) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Partial Portal Vein Thrombosis
A Phase 4 study testing transarterial chemoembolization versus the standard treatment with sorafinib in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), run by Ain Shams University.
Trial summary
Portal vein tumor invasion (PVT) is a common complication in HCC. the studyb Aimed to assess the outcomes after TACE in patients with branch PVT regarding Child classification, radiological response and 1 year survival. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
- What is being tested?
- transarterial chemoembolization versus the standard treatment with sorafinib
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2014to Sep 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with newly diagnosed HCC,
- Child class A and
- Portal vein branch tumoral thrombus (proved by imaging)
- written informed consent
Who cannot join
- patients with Child class B and C,
- main Portal vein thrombosis,
- previous management for HCC,
- Arterio-portal shunt
- refused to be enrolled
About this study
Portal vein tumor invasion (PVT) is a common complication in HCC. the studyb Aimed to assess the outcomes after TACE in patients with branch PVT regarding Child classification, radiological response and 1 year survival.
Read the detailed description
Thirty HCC patients (24 male, 6 females) Child A cirrhotics with branch PVT. Follow up was done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after first TACE. All patients underwent laboratory investigations including liver function tests to assess deterioration in liver functions, triphasic spiral CT to assess radiological response according to mRECIST criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimations.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
- Being tested
- transarterial chemoembolization versus the standard treatment with sorafinib
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
transarterial chemoembolization versus the standard treatment with sorafinibProcedure or surgery
TACE procedures were performed by the interventional radiologist through femoral artery approach in all patients. Super-selective cannulation of the main feeders was performed using a microcatheter whenever possible. The c-TACE protocol consisted of intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin 50-100 mg mixed with lipiodol ,Just prior to injection, emulsion is prepared by intensive mixing of equal volumes of cytotoxic drug solution and iodized oil using the pumping method with two syringes and a three way stop cock. Injection is guided by fluoroscopy and results in dense accumulation of the emulsion within the tumor vascular bed. Injection of poor iodized oil up to a maximum volume of 10-20 cc is an option and is followed by embolization of feeding arteries by Gelfoam cubes .Endpoints of conventional TACE are complete filling of the tumor vascular bed with iodized oil and stop-flow in subsegmental and segmental feeding arteries..
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HCC patients with Pranch portal vein thrombosis | Experimental | Thirty HCC patients (24 male, 6 females) Child A cirrhotics with branch PVT. Follow up was done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after first TACE. All patients underwent laboratory investigations including liver function tests to assess deterioration in liver functions, triphasic spiral CT to assess radiological response according to mRECIST criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimations. Receives: Procedure: transarterial chemoembolization versus the standard treatment with sorafinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
changes in Radiological Response in the (CT/ MRI) after the intervention
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2014
- Primary completionSep 2015
- Study completionSep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ain Shams UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Iman Fawzy Montasser, Ain Shams University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03007212
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Status last verified
- Dec 2016
- First submitted
- 24 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 2 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcome of Transarterial Chemo-embolization (TACE) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Partial Portal Vein Thrombosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03007212
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2014
- Primary completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Portal vein tumor invasion (PVT) is a common complication in HCC. the studyb Aimed to assess the outcomes after TACE in patients with branch PVT regarding Child classification, radiological response and 1 year survival.
Detailed description
Thirty HCC patients (24 male, 6 females) Child A cirrhotics with branch PVT. Follow up was done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after first TACE. All patients underwent laboratory investigations including liver function tests to assess deterioration in liver functions, triphasic spiral CT to assess radiological response according to mRECIST criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HCC patients with Pranch portal vein thrombosis | Experimental | Procedure: transarterial chemoembolization versus the standard treatment with sorafinibThirty HCC patients (24 male, 6 females) Child A cirrhotics with branch PVT. Follow up was done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after first TACE. All patients underwent laboratory investigations including liver function tests to assess deterioration in liver functions, triphasic spiral CT to assess radiological response according to mRECIST criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimations. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with newly diagnosed HCC,
- Child class A and
- Portal vein branch tumoral thrombus (proved by imaging)
- written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- patients with Child class B and C,
- main Portal vein thrombosis,
- previous management for HCC,
- Arterio-portal shunt
- refused to be enrolled
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| transarterial chemoembolization versus the standard treatment with sorafinibTACE procedures were performed by the interventional radiologist through femoral artery approach in all patients. Super-selective cannulation of the main feeders was performed using a microcatheter whenever possible. The c-TACE protocol consisted of intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin 50-100 mg mixed with lipiodol ,Just prior to injection, emulsion is prepared by intensive mixing of equal volumes of cytotoxic drug solution and iodized oil using the pumping method with two syringes and a three way stop cock. Injection is guided by fluoroscopy and results in dense accumulation of the emulsion within the tumor vascular bed. Injection of poor iodized oil up to a maximum volume of 10-20 cc is an option and is followed by embolization of feeding arteries by Gelfoam cubes .Endpoints of conventional TACE are complete filling of the tumor vascular bed with iodized oil and stop-flow in subsegmental and segmental feeding arteries.. | Procedure or surgery | HCC patients with Pranch portal vein thrombosis |
Primary outcome
changes in Radiological Response in the (CT/ MRI) after the intervention
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jan 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing transarterial chemoembolization versus the standard treatment with sorafinib in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), run by Ain Shams University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
changes in Radiological Response in the (CT/ MRI) after the intervention (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jan 2017.