Subacute StrokeSYNCOMOTNCT03009773
The Multitasking Rehabilitation She Enhanced Walking Speed Compared to the Simple Post Stroke Rehabilitation Task (AVC)?
A study testing rehabilitation multitasking walking. and Traditional walking rehabilitation in people with Subacute Stroke, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Stroke is the leading cause of severe disability in adults. The first cause of alterations in the quality of life and autonomy in these patients are disorders of walking and the balance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Subacute Stroke
- What is being tested?
- rehabilitation multitasking walking. and Traditional walking rehabilitation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 26 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 12 May 2017to 29 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Major: age between 18 and 90 years
- Hospitalized for ischemic or hemorrhagic hemispheric stroke confirmed by CT or MRI <6months
- walking disorder with the possibility of walking 10 meters with or without technical assistance (speed <1.2m / s)
- verbal understanding with complex orders
- Affiliates to social security
Who cannot join
- Brainstem stroke or cerebellar
- Hypoacusia annoying understanding
- Visual gene embarrassing awarding
- severe aphasia: no understanding of complex orders
- neurological or musculoskeletal history affecting walking
- Participation in interventional research protocol in motor rehabilitation of the lower limb or cognitive
- Patient under guardianship or deprived of liberty
- pregnant women, parturient women or lactating (art L.1121-5)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Stroke is the leading cause of severe disability in adults. The first cause of alterations in the quality of life and autonomy in these patients are disorders of walking and the balance. They are the leading cause of falls responsible for important medical, surgical and economic complications as well as a reactionary social isolation.
The techniques of rehabilitation of walking to the subacute phase of a stroke are usually based on automatic walking.Off walking is a complex activity usually performed in everyday life in association with multiple tasks. It is therefore interesting to re-educate walking in dual task or even in multitasking.
- Conditions
- Subacute Stroke
- Being tested
- rehabilitation multitasking walking., Traditional walking rehabilitation
- Keywords
- subacute stroke, multitasking rehabilitation, walking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rehabilitation multitasking walking.Other
rehabilitation multitasking walking.
Traditional walking rehabilitationOther
Traditional walking rehabilitation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| multitasking walking | Experimental | Multitasking Group: rehabilitation multitasking walking. Receives: Other: rehabilitation multitasking walking. |
| walking simple task | Active comparator | Simple task group : Traditional walking rehabilitation Receives: Other: Traditional walking rehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Measure walking speed
Speed of the simple task of walking 10 meters testing.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Description of different types of walking disorders and balance in the subacute phase of stroke
Currently no clinical scale exists in the literature at our knowledge. The walk of the patients will be qualitatively analyzed by the investigator in order to measure the prevalence of the different clinical categories of walking disorders according to their semiological characteristics
Measured: inclusion
Score neuromotor the lower limb
Score neuromotor the lower limb: Fugl Meyer
Measured: 6 months
Dynamic equilibrium to TUG single and double cognitive task
Dynamic equilibrium to TUG single and double cognitive task
Measured: 6 months
Walking speed double cognitive task
Walking speed double cognitive task
Measured: 6 months
Executive functions: a battery of neuropsychological
Executive functions: a battery of neuropsychological
Measured: 6 months
Autonomy: FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASUREMENT
Autonomy: FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASUREMENT
Measured: 6 months
EVA Quality of life
EVA (Visual Analogic Scale) quality of life
Measured: 6 months
Correlation of cognitive gains with the gain of the walking speed of 10 meters
Correlation of cognitive gains with the gain of the walking speed of 10 meters
Measured: 6 months
anatomoclinical correlations
Lesion score of gray matter and white matter (Volumetry on sequences 3DT1 and Flair) Cerebral
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start12 May 2017
- Primary completion29 Jun 2020
- Study completion29 Jun 2020
Why it stopped: Recruitment difficulties
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Subacute StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CENTRE DE REEDUCATION FONCTIONNELLE L'ESPOIR LILLE, CENTRE DE REEDUCATION FONCTIONNELLE SAINT-LAZARE, Centre Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation - Les herbiers, Centre Hospitalier Arras, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Compiègne-Noyon, CH CORBIE, CH Le Havre, University Hospital, Lille, Clinique de rééducation fonctionnelle Le Belloy, Fondation Hopale, Institut Médical de Breteuil
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sophie TASSEEL-PONCHE, Doctor, Study director, CHU Amiens-Picardie FranceEric VERIN, professor, Principal investigator, University Hospital, RouenEtienne ALLART, Doctor, Principal investigator, CHRU de LilleDEMAILLE Samantha, professor, Principal investigator, CRF 4Espoir LilleValérie LECLERCQ-DONTGEZ, Doctor, Principal investigator, Les 3 valléesHaykal ELLEUCH, Doctor, Principal investigator, CH ArrasMarie DECOCQ-DEMICHEL, Doctor, Principal investigator, CH Le BelloyPascal RIGAUX, Doctor, Principal investigator, CH Berck Sur Mer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03009773
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PI2016_843_0007
- Acronym
- SYNCOMOT
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Tasseel-Ponche S, Roussel M, Toba MN, Sader T, Barbier V, Delafontaine A, Meynier J, Picard C, Constans JM, Schnitzler A, Godefroy O, Yelnik AP. Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT). Trials. 2023 Mar 8;24(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07138-x.
PubMed 36890548
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Multitasking Rehabilitation She Enhanced Walking Speed Compared to the Simple Post Stroke Rehabilitation Task (AVC)?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03009773
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SYNCOMOT / PI2016_843_0007
- Conditions
- Subacute Stroke
- Keywords
- subacute stroke, multitasking rehabilitation, walking
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Recruitment difficulties
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CENTRE DE REEDUCATION FONCTIONNELLE L'ESPOIR LILLE, CENTRE DE REEDUCATION FONCTIONNELLE SAINT-LAZARE, Centre Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation - Les herbiers, Centre Hospitalier Arras, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Compiègne-Noyon, CH CORBIE, CH Le Havre, University Hospital, Lille, Clinique de rééducation fonctionnelle Le Belloy, Fondation Hopale, Institut Médical de Breteuil
- Study start
- 12 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stroke is the leading cause of severe disability in adults. The first cause of alterations in the quality of life and autonomy in these patients are disorders of walking and the balance. They are the leading cause of falls responsible for important medical, surgical and economic complications as well as a reactionary social isolation.
The techniques of rehabilitation of walking to the subacute phase of a stroke are usually based on automatic walking.Off walking is a complex activity usually performed in everyday life in association with multiple tasks. It is therefore interesting to re-educate walking in dual task or even in multitasking.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| multitasking walking | Experimental | Other: rehabilitation multitasking walking.Multitasking Group: rehabilitation multitasking walking. |
| walking simple task | Active comparator | Other: Traditional walking rehabilitationSimple task group : Traditional walking rehabilitation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Major: age between 18 and 90 years
- Hospitalized for ischemic or hemorrhagic hemispheric stroke confirmed by CT or MRI <6months
- walking disorder with the possibility of walking 10 meters with or without technical assistance (speed <1.2m / s)
- verbal understanding with complex orders
- Affiliates to social security
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Brainstem stroke or cerebellar
- Hypoacusia annoying understanding
- Visual gene embarrassing awarding
- severe aphasia: no understanding of complex orders
- neurological or musculoskeletal history affecting walking
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rehabilitation multitasking walking.rehabilitation multitasking walking. | Other | multitasking walking |
| Traditional walking rehabilitationTraditional walking rehabilitation | Other | walking simple task |
Primary outcome
Measure walking speed
Time frame: 6 months
Speed of the simple task of walking 10 meters testing.
9 secondary outcomes
Description of different types of walking disorders and balance in the subacute phase of stroke
Time frame: inclusion
Score neuromotor the lower limb
Time frame: 6 months
Dynamic equilibrium to TUG single and double cognitive task
Time frame: 6 months
Walking speed double cognitive task
Time frame: 6 months
Executive functions: a battery of neuropsychological
Time frame: 6 months
Autonomy: FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASUREMENT
Time frame: 6 months
EVA Quality of life
Time frame: 6 months
Correlation of cognitive gains with the gain of the walking speed of 10 meters
Time frame: 6 months
anatomoclinical correlations
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment difficulties). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36890548Tasseel-Ponche S, Roussel M, Toba MN, Sader T, Barbier V, Delafontaine A, Meynier J, Picard C, Constans JM, Schnitzler A, Godefroy O, Yelnik AP. Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT). Trials. 2023 Mar 8;24(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07138-x.
Related trials for Subacute Stroke
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of Sensorimotor Training and tACS on Upper Limb Function and Cervical Proprioception in Subacute Stroke
Sub-acute Stroke
Recruiting
Effects of Contralateral Gravity Eliminated Gluteus Medius and Ipsilateral Quadratus Lumborum Strengthening on Pelvic Alignment, Balance and Functional Mobility on Subacute Stroke Patients
Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Detecting and Predicting Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen
Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
MSC Secretome and rTMS for Motor Recovery After Subacute Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sophie TASSEEL-PONCHE, Doctor study director
CHU Amiens-Picardie France
Eric VERIN, professor principal investigator
University Hospital, Rouen
Etienne ALLART, Doctor principal investigator
CHRU de Lille
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing rehabilitation multitasking walking. and Traditional walking rehabilitation in people with Subacute Stroke, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment difficulties). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Measure walking speed (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03009773, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2026.