PoliomyelitisPhase 3NCT03016949
A Study to Evaluate Immunogenicity of Various Schedules of Inactivated Polio Vaccine
A Phase 3 study testing IPV and f-IPV in people with Poliomyelitis, run by Fidec Corporation.
Trial summary
The study will evaluate the humoral immunogenicity in various schedule combinations of full dose inactivated polio vaccines (IPV) via intramuscular administration (IM) and of the fractional dose of inactivated poliovaccine (f-IPV) via intradermal administration (ID). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 7 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Poliomyelitis
- What is being tested?
- IPV and f-IPV
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2017to Nov 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 7 weeks
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Infants of 6 weeks of age (-7 to + 7 days) on date of first vaccination
- Healthy, as assessed from medical history and physical examination by a study physician
- Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal representatives that they have been properly informed about the study and are able to comply with planned study procedures
Who cannot join
- Vaccinated with any poliovirus vaccine prior to inclusion
- A household contact with OPV vaccination history in the past 4 weeks
- HIV infection or pharmacologic immunosuppression.
- Known allergy to any component of the study vaccines (phenoxyethanol, formaldehyde)
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy or blood disorder contraindicating intramuscular and intradermal injections.
- Acute severe febrile illness on day of vaccination deemed by the Investigator to be a contraindication for vaccination.
- Not suitable for inclusion or is unlikely to comply with the protocol in the opinion of the investigator.
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Humoral Immunogenicity of Various Schedules of Intramuscular Full Dose and Intradermal Fractional Dose of Inactivated Polio Vaccine in Infants
The study will evaluate the humoral immunogenicity in various schedule combinations of full dose inactivated polio vaccines (IPV) via intramuscular administration (IM) and of the fractional dose of inactivated poliovaccine (f-IPV) via intradermal administration (ID).
Read the detailed description
The study will be conducted in a setting where only IPV is being used for polio prevention in infant immunization schedules.
The study population will include infants from Uruguay, a pioneer country in immunization programs in Latin America, where tOPV(trivalent oral polio vaccine) was used until 2012, after which the program changed to an all-IPV schedule without transition.
The primary IPV immunization schedule in the country is as stand-alone vaccine at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, with a booster dose at 15 months. This setting allows the evaluation of IPV immunogenicity in a scenario where the circulation of any poliovirus is highly unlikely.
Infants will receive two or three doses of full dose IPV IM or fractional dose f-IPV ID, in various schedule combinations (6 and 14 weeks; 10 and 14 weeks; 14 and 36 weeks; 6, 14 and 36 weeks; 10, 14 and 36 weeks). Immunological and safety assessments will be made after one dose, two doses and three doses.
The study will be conducted in Montevideo, Uruguay and a total of 1493 infants will be randomized into 6 groups. Other vaccines comprise DTPw-HB-Hib (pentavalent combined diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-hepatitis B-Hib vaccine), Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, Rotavirus and will be administered concomitantly.
Optimum immunogenicity expected from the dose/s of IPV in the post-eradication era will have to be balanced with the cost and supply constraints of IPV. This study will be critical to determine how many doses of IPV and which schedule will be recommended for the post-eradication era after the cessation of OPV (oral polio vaccine) usage globally.
- Conditions
- Poliomyelitis
- Being tested
- IPV, f-IPV
- Medical subject headings
- Poliomyelitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IPVBiological
Comparison of different vaccination schedules with 2 different vaccines (IPV and f-IPV) and 2 different types of administration (IM and ID)
f-IPVBiological
Comparison of different vaccination schedules with 2 different vaccines (IPV and f-IPV) and 2 different types of administration (IM and ID)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | 3 doses IPV IM at 10, 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 10, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. Receives: Biological: IPV |
| Group B | Experimental | 3 doses f-IPV ID at 10, 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 10, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. Receives: Biological: f-IPV |
| Group C | Experimental | 2 doses IPV IM at 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 14, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. Receives: Biological: IPV |
| Group D | Experimental | 2 doses f-IPV ID at 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 14, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. Receives: Biological: f-IPV |
| Group E | Experimental | 3 doses IPV IM at 6, 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 6, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. Receives: Biological: IPV |
| Group F | Experimental | 3 doses f-IPV ID at 6, 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 6, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. Receives: Biological: f-IPV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Seroconversion
Seroconversion will be defined as a change from seronegative to seropositive (antibody titers of ≥1:8) and in infants seropositive at baseline (assumed to be from maternally-derived antibody titers), as a ≥4-fold rise in antibody titers post-vaccination, computed by assuming an exponential decay model with a half-life of 24 days.
Measured: To be assessed four weeks after the second vaccination for all groups receiving 2 doses of IPV and four weeks after the second vaccination for all groups receiving 2 doses of f-IPV.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Seroconversion
Measured: To be assessed four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving IPV and four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving f-IPV.
Median titers
Measured: To be assessed four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving IPV and four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving f-IPV.
SAEs (Serious Adverse Events)
Measured: To be assessed throughout the complete study period, approx. 18 months.
IMEs (Important Medical Events)
These are medically significant events that do not meet any of the SAE criteria, but require medical or surgical consultation or intervention to prevent this event from becoming a SAE.
Measured: To be assessed throughout the complete study period, approx. 18 months.
Severe local reactions
Severe local reactions can include severe pain, inflammation, induration and edema in the injection area.
Measured: To be assessed throughout the complete study period, approx. 18 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completionOct 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2018 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Regulatory timelines for approval expired
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PoliomyelitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fidec Corporation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stella Gutierrez, MD, Principal investigator, CASMU Polyclinic 8 de Octubre 3310 Montevideo, Uruguay
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03016949
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IPV-003-ABMG
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 27 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Humoral Immunogenicity of Various Schedules of Intramuscular Full Dose and Intradermal Fractional Dose of Inactivated Polio Vaccine in Infants
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03016949
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IPV-003-ABMG
- Conditions
- Poliomyelitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Regulatory timelines for approval expired
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fidec CorporationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Study start
- Jul 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study will evaluate the humoral immunogenicity in various schedule combinations of full dose inactivated polio vaccines (IPV) via intramuscular administration (IM) and of the fractional dose of inactivated poliovaccine (f-IPV) via intradermal administration (ID).
Detailed description
The study will be conducted in a setting where only IPV is being used for polio prevention in infant immunization schedules.
The study population will include infants from Uruguay, a pioneer country in immunization programs in Latin America, where tOPV(trivalent oral polio vaccine) was used until 2012, after which the program changed to an all-IPV schedule without transition.
The primary IPV immunization schedule in the country is as stand-alone vaccine at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, with a booster dose at 15 months. This setting allows the evaluation of IPV immunogenicity in a scenario where the circulation of any poliovirus is highly unlikely.
Infants will receive two or three doses of full dose IPV IM or fractional dose f-IPV ID, in various schedule combinations (6 and 14 weeks; 10 and 14 weeks; 14 and 36 weeks; 6, 14 and 36 weeks; 10, 14 and 36 weeks). Immunological and safety assessments will be made after one dose, two doses and three doses.
The study will be conducted in Montevideo, Uruguay and a total of 1493 infants will be randomized into 6 groups. Other vaccines comprise DTPw-HB-Hib (pentavalent combined diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-hepatitis B-Hib vaccine), Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, Rotavirus and will be administered concomitantly.
Optimum immunogenicity expected from the dose/s of IPV in the post-eradication era will have to be balanced with the cost and supply constraints of IPV. This study will be critical to determine how many doses of IPV and which schedule will be recommended for the post-eradication era after the cessation of OPV (oral polio vaccine) usage globally.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Biological: IPV3 doses IPV IM at 10, 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 10, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. |
| Group B | Experimental | Biological: f-IPV3 doses f-IPV ID at 10, 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 10, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. |
| Group C | Experimental | Biological: IPV2 doses IPV IM at 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 14, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. |
| Group D | Experimental | Biological: f-IPV2 doses f-IPV ID at 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 14, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. |
| Group E | Experimental | Biological: IPV3 doses IPV IM at 6, 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 6, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. |
| Group F | Experimental | Biological: f-IPV3 doses f-IPV ID at 6, 14 \& 36 weeks of age incl. blood sampling at 6, 18, 36 \& 40 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 7 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Infants of 6 weeks of age (-7 to + 7 days) on date of first vaccination
- Healthy, as assessed from medical history and physical examination by a study physician
- Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal representatives that they have been properly informed about the study and are able to comply with planned study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Vaccinated with any poliovirus vaccine prior to inclusion
- A household contact with OPV vaccination history in the past 4 weeks
- HIV infection or pharmacologic immunosuppression.
- Known allergy to any component of the study vaccines (phenoxyethanol, formaldehyde)
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy or blood disorder contraindicating intramuscular and intradermal injections.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IPVComparison of different vaccination schedules with 2 different vaccines (IPV and f-IPV) and 2 different types of administration (IM and ID) | Biological | Group A, Group C, Group E |
| f-IPVComparison of different vaccination schedules with 2 different vaccines (IPV and f-IPV) and 2 different types of administration (IM and ID) | Biological | Group B, Group D, Group F |
Primary outcome
Seroconversion
Time frame: To be assessed four weeks after the second vaccination for all groups receiving 2 doses of IPV and four weeks after the second vaccination for all groups receiving 2 doses of f-IPV.
Seroconversion will be defined as a change from seronegative to seropositive (antibody titers of ≥1:8) and in infants seropositive at baseline (assumed to be from maternally-derived antibody titers), as a ≥4-fold rise in antibody titers post-vaccination, computed by assuming an exponential decay model with a half-life of 24 days.
5 secondary outcomes
Seroconversion
Time frame: To be assessed four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving IPV and four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving f-IPV.
Median titers
Time frame: To be assessed four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving IPV and four weeks after the second or third vaccination, respectively, for the groups receiving f-IPV.
SAEs (Serious Adverse Events)
Time frame: To be assessed throughout the complete study period, approx. 18 months.
IMEs (Important Medical Events)
Time frame: To be assessed throughout the complete study period, approx. 18 months.
Severe local reactions
Time frame: To be assessed throughout the complete study period, approx. 18 months.
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jun 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Poliomyelitis
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of the Diphtheria, Tetanus, Acellular Component Pertussis and Sabin Inactivated Poliomyelitis Vaccine Adsorbed
Diphtheria, Pertussis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Immunogenicity of a Combined Diphtheria, Tetanus, Whole Cell Pertussis, Hepatitis B, Recombinant Poliomyelitis and Haemophilus Influenzae Type b (Hib) Vaccine (SIIPL DTwP-HepB-rPV-Hib)
Diptheria Immunization, Tetanus Immunization
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Poliomyelitis Vaccine (rPV) in Comparison With IPOL Vaccine in Healthy Adults
Polio Immunity
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Virtual Walking on Chronic Pain and Psychological Distress for Individuals With Severe Mobility Impairment
Severe Mobility Impairment, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stella Gutierrez, MD principal investigator
CASMU Polyclinic 8 de Octubre 3310 Montevideo, Uruguay
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing IPV and f-IPV in people with Poliomyelitis, run by Fidec Corporation.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Seroconversion (time frame: To be assessed four weeks after the second vaccination for all groups receiving 2 doses of IPV and four weeks after the second vaccination for all groups receiving 2 doses of f-IPV.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2017.