AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac ArrestNCT03017144

The Association Between Technical and Non-technical Skills in Real-life ALS Situations. Impact of Pit Crew Model on the Resuscitation Skills.

An observational study of Cardiac Arrest, run by Turku University Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cardiac arrest is handled by cardiopulmonary resuscitation which is a time critical emergency situation. The actions during resuscitation are lead by international guidelines. Traditionally, the main focus of the training has been on medical knowledge and technical skills (TS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Cardiac Arrest
What is being tested?
Pit crew model education
How many people
36 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jun 2012to Sep 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: The target group of this study is the resuscitation team of the adult ICU of Turku University Central Hospital. This team consists of an ICU doctor (most commonly an anaesthesiologist specialized for intensive care), two ICU nurses and one medical technician.

Who may be able to join

  • a doctor, a nurse, a paramedic or a medical technician working on adult ICU resuscitation team
  • all the members of the ICU resuscitation team in the CPR-situation are volunteer to take part in the study

Who cannot join

  • 1) if any member of the ICU resuscitation team in the CPR-situation refuse to be video recoded

About this study

Cardiac arrest is handled by cardiopulmonary resuscitation which is a time critical emergency situation. The actions during resuscitation are lead by international guidelines. Traditionally, the main focus of the training has been on medical knowledge and technical skills (TS). Nowadays non-technical skills (NTS), such as communication, teamwork behaviour, and leadership, are considered at least equally important.

The aim of this study is to evaluate both TS and NTS of the resuscitation team during real-life resuscitation situations using a validated assessment tool. The association between TS and NTS will be analyzed. Findings from this study may help to recognize the possible weaknesses and issues which could be improved by training. Hypothesis is that that TS are probably in a high level, but some improvement points of NTS are ought to be known better. Investigators hypothesis that the good NTS performance in resuscitation is accompanied by good TS performance.

Read the detailed description

Background

Cardiac arrest is a time-critical emergency situation, which is treated by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The actions during resuscitation are lead by international guidelines (Nolan et al 2010). Because of the relatively rare nature of cardiac arrests in many wards and clinics, regular resuscitation training is necessary.

During cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other sudden medical crisis situations, in addition to medical knowledge and technical skills (TS), also non-technical skills (NTS) are needed (Castelao et al 2011, Fletcher et al 2002, Helmreich et al 1999, Gaba et al 1998). NTS are behavioural elements which are ought to improve team performance. The importance of NTS has been demonstrated only in a simulated settings, not in a real life.

Drawbacks in team organization and communication are frequent problems within advanced life support (ALS) events (Risaliti et al, Colquitt et al). As unclear team member roles can cause errors during ALS (Weng et al, Ornato et al) more emphasis should be placed on educating specific roles and responsibilities to resuscitation team members (Soar et al, Maney et al). Pit crew models for resuscitation, where all resuscitation team members have their pre-assigned positions and pre-arranged roles and tasks to perform ALS have been developed to respond these problems. (Gonzales et al, Pearson et al, Glendenning et al, Ong et al, Hopkins et al, Spitzer et al)

Objective, purpose, and hypothesis

The first part of this study (ID T70/2012) aims to evaluate the technical and especially non-technical skills of the resuscitation team during real-life resuscitation situations. Investigators hypothesis that good non-technical performance is related on good technical performance. Findings from this study may help to recognize the possible weaknesses and issues which could be improved by training. The hypothesis is that technical skills are probably on a high level, but some improvement points of non-technical skills are ought to be known better.

The second part of the study aims to evaluate the impact of a pit crew model on ALS skills. (ID: T70/2012)

Design and Methods

Turku University Central Hospital lies in a Southwestern part of Finland, and provides medical services for 865 000 inhabitants. The target group of this study is the resuscitation team of the adult ICU of Turku University Central Hospital. This team consists of an ICU doctor (most commonly an anaesthesiologist specialized for intensive care), two ICU nurses, and one medical technician. These people are treating approximately 90 cardiac arrests per year, but this group also gets other alarms (like shortness of breath, unconscious patients and other acute situations). This ICU resuscitation team takes care of all resuscitation calls in the newer part of the Turku University Hospital, when the older parts of the hospital are taken care either by a resuscitation team from pediatric ICU or by prehospital emergency medical service system.

The data from 20 video-recorded real-life resuscitation situations treated by resuscitation team in Turku University Hospital will be collected and the overall NTS and TS score will be measured using a validated assessment tool (Peltonen et al 2017). The association between the TS and NTS will be analyzed by statistical methods. In addition, after each recorded resuscitation situation, every member of the resuscitation team will be called by a phone. During the calls team members are asked to tell examples, what went well during the resuscitation, and what could have been done better. Based on these answers, inductive analysis will be made.

A pit crew model for resuscitation will be implemented in our organizations' resuscitation team responding cardiac arrest alarms. We will continue to video-recording after the intervention, and similarly, NTS and TS will be measured using the validated assessment tool (Peltonen et al 2017). In the second part of the study, we will compare the pre- and post-intervention ALS-performance in the videos.

Ethics

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Turku University. All ALS-situations in Turku University newer hospital building area are considered eligible to the study regardless of the initial rhythm or presumed aetiology. Written information consent of patients is not needed, because the study is directed at resuscitation team performance, not the patients. The patients are not identified at any phase of the study.

Conditions
Cardiac Arrest
Being tested
Pit crew model education
Keywords
non-technical skills (NTS), human factors, team work, Crew Resource Management / Crisis Resource Management (CRM), technical skills (TS), Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Advanced cardiac life support, Pit Crew Model
Medical subject headings
Heart Arrest

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pit crew model educationOther

    A pit crew model for resuscitation is educated to all resuscitation team members.

Study groups in NCT03017144
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Resuscitation teamResuscitation pit crew model is educated to the resuscitation team.
Receives: Other: Pit crew model education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To measure the association of the NTS and TS on one-another using validated assessment tool.

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. To evaluate the association between NTS and TS subgategories.

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2018
  4. Study completionSep 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03017144
Sponsor's protocol ID
T70/2012
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
17 Oct 2016
Last updated
22 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Patients treated by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the videos can be recognized. Video material can not be shared due to patient privacy. Other data is possible to share.

Publications

  • Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Deakin C, Koster RW, Wyllie J, Bottiger B; ERC Guidelines Writing Group. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81(10):1219-76. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.021. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20956052
  • Fernandez Castelao E, Russo SG, Cremer S, Strack M, Kaminski L, Eich C, Timmermann A, Boos M. Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2011 Oct;82(10):1338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 May 25.

    PubMed 21664757
  • Fletcher GC, McGeorge P, Flin RH, Glavin RJ, Maran NJ. The role of non-technical skills in anaesthesia: a review of current literature. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Mar;88(3):418-29. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.3.418. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11990277
  • Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA; New Collective Author. The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999;9(1):19-32. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2.

    PubMed 11541445
  • Gaba DM, Howard SK, Flanagan B, Smith BE, Fish KJ, Botney R. Assessment of clinical performance during simulated crises using both technical and behavioral ratings. Anesthesiology. 1998 Jul;89(1):8-18. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199807000-00005.

    PubMed 9667288
  • Peltonen V, Peltonen LM, Salantera S, Hoppu S, Elomaa J, Pappila T, Hevonoja E, Hurme S, Perkonoja K, Elomaa T, Tommila M. An observational study of technical and non-technical skills in advanced life support in the clinical setting. Resuscitation. 2020 Aug;153:162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

    PubMed 32561474

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiac Arrest, run by Turku University Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To measure the association of the NTS and TS on one-another using validated assessment tool. (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03017144, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in