Prostate CancerNCT03017456
PC 360 Survivorship
A study testing Survivorship Care Plan in people with Prostate Cancer, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 3 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Prostate Cancer Survivorship 360º is a collaboration-based initiative involving prostate cancer (PC) and survivorship researchers/clinicians from three Canadian prostate centers with the goal of identifying and tracking unmet supportive care needs of patients with localized PC and responding to these needs through… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Survivorship Care Plan
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 203 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 29 May 2017to 31 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed localized (T1-T3N0M0) PC
- age at diagnosis >18 years
- treated with curative intent
- treatment received >1 month and <6 months
- disease-free as defined by absence of somatic disease activity parameters as per oncologist/urologist
- consented to participate in the PC360-IS database.
Who cannot join
- Patients who do not receive treatment and are followed by active surveillance
- inability to complete study questionnaires.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Canada3 sites
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 2R9
University Health Network - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5G2C4
Vancouver Prostate Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
About this study
Official title: Prostate Cancer Survivorship 360°
Prostate Cancer Survivorship 360º is a collaboration-based initiative involving prostate cancer (PC) and survivorship researchers/clinicians from three Canadian prostate centers with the goal of identifying and tracking unmet supportive care needs of patients with localized PC and responding to these needs through survivorship care. The current randomized control trail (RCT) will focus on the development and evaluation of a facilitated electronic Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care Plan (PC-SCP). The aims of this project are: 1) to develop an appropriate and tailored SCP and transition care delivery process; and 2) to conduct an RCT to evaluate whether a personalized PC SCP intervention is more effective than usual care (UC) on patient activation (primary outcome) and access to services, self-Management support, satisfaction with information, HRQoL and cancer worry (secondary outcomes). Data from a multi-site prospective database- Prostate Cancer Survivorship Information System (PC360-IS) will be used to electronically populate the survivorship care plans. Overall, this proposal represents initial steps in uniting the country in sharing programmatic resources, data, expertise, and enthusiasm to transform survivorship care for men with PC and their families.
Read the detailed description
A Phase III RCT will evaluate the superiority of a Survivorship Care Plan (SCP) intervention (SCP-Int) compared with usual care (UC) after primary curative prostate cancer (PC) treatment. Each of the three sites has designated clinical study leads (AM, LG, and ST), high referral volumes and study leads' patients will be entered into the PC360-IS database which will be interfaced to the PC-SCP system to consolidate patient details and generate personalized SCPs. Research ethics approval will be obtained at each site. The trial will be registered with clinicaltrials.gov and reported using the CONSORT recommendations for trials.
The study population inclusion criteria are as follows: Histologically confirmed localized (T1-T3N0M0) PC; age at diagnosis >18 years; treated with curative intent; treatment received >1 month and <6 months; disease-free as defined by absence of somatic disease activity parameters as per oncologist/urologist; consented to participate in the PC360-IS database. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who do not receive treatment and are followed by active surveillance; inability to complete study questionnaires.
Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to either the intervention arm or the control arm. A biostatistician will randomly assign participants to ensure that both the study RA and the participants are unaware of the treatment (SCP-int)/control groups (UC). Consenting patients will be registered into the study and randomized to receive either the SCP-Int or UC. Patients in the SCP-Int arm will be scheduled for the SCP-Int appointment on the same day as the patient's first (or second) follow-up appointment.
Eligible patients will be sent a study information letter which will be signed by the patient's urologist/ oncologist one month after the end of primary treatment. The RA will then contact patients to further explain the study. If agreeable, the patients will be sent consent forms, two stamped envelopes, and a baseline questionnaire to complete prior to the scheduled follow-up appointment. The patients will be asked to mail back the signed consent form and the completed questionnaire in each the envelopes provided.
Participants will have as much time as needed to decide if the participants would like to participate in the study prior to signing the consent form. The Research Analyst will obtain consent.
Planned trial interventions: SCP-Int: Patients in the SCP-Int arm will be asked to attend a one-time appointment with a trained oncology nurse (study nurse). To avoid additional travel and related costs to the patient, this appointment will be scheduled on the same day as the patient's follow-up appointment. The SCP-Int is comprised of two components: a 30-minute nurse-led face-to-face intervention and the provision of a tailored PC-specific SCP (PC-SCP). The intervention will be developed based on an established person-centred nursing framework with a tailored approach to customizing the intervention to the individual and will focus on the provision of self-management education and support and promote access to and coordination of post-treatment care including appropriate referrals to relevant programs and services (including TrueNTH solutions). The content of the PC-SCP will provide structure to the appointment. Persistent effects and concerns that are identified will prompt the development of a tailored management plan (i.e. patient education, referral to programs and services) captured within the PC-SCP. Relevant patient education and TrueNTH materials will be linked electronically. The appointment will focus on empowering the PC survivor to actively self-manage persistent treatment effects and to decrease the patients' risk of late effects by providing effective health information, support, and self-management support. Nurses will integrate a number of "active behaviour change ingredients" including the integration of motivational interviewing techniques which are effective in increasing healthy behaviours. Usual Care (UC): Patients in the UC arm will receive care according to usual practice. This usually involves a brief office visit (approximately 5-10 minutes) with pertinent history and physical examination related to surgical/radiation recovery, review of the pathology and general instructions regarding the next step in follow-up. In addition, patients in the UC arm will be able to access any supportive care programs or service available at the hospital according to usual practice. Currently, SCPs and dedicated transition appointments are not provided as part of a standard of care.
Allocation to trial groups: Patients will be allocated to either SCP-Int or UC by the Department of Biostatistics at Princess Margaret using a computer-generated randomization process (random blocks known only to statisticians). The research coordinator will telephone Biostatistics staff, who will not be involved in recruitment, to obtain the subject's assignment. Eligible patients from each site will be approached until the target number of participants is reached (or until a decision is made to stop recruitment).
Data collection: Data will be collected and analyzed according to the outlined project aims. Based on CONSORT criteria, a screening log will enable data collection on eligible and non-recruited patients with reasons for non-recruitment recorded when known. All data will be entered into a secured, password protected database within the UHN server. A separate database will be used for participant tracking to prevent re-approaching patients unnecessarily, and to ensure patients are receiving the questionnaire packages according to the study timeline.
Proposed primary and secondary outcome measures:
The outcome measures were chosen based on recent consensus and recommendations on the evaluation of SCPs. Patients will be assessed at baseline (T0), 6 (T1), and 12 (T2) months post-treatment. This questionnaire package is estimated to take 45 minutes to complete.
Primary Outcome: Patient activation will be measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), a 13-items measure assessing knowledge, skills, beliefs, and confidence in managing health and health care. Patient activation is strongly related to a broad range of health-related outcomes. The primary outcome will be the overall score of the 13 items collected at T2.
Secondary Outcomes: a) Supportive care services utilization: using the Health and Social Services Utilization Inventory (HSSUI) modified for use in cancer populations. Service types are grouped into five categories: Health Professionals, Institutional/Hospital Programs; Nursing and Homemaker Support Programs; Other Community and Social Support Program/Resources (will include True NTH solutions); Programs/Resources.; b) Self-Management Support will be assessed using the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ), designed to evaluate outcomes from patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions; c) Satisfaction with Information will be measured with the 25-item European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life INFO25 module which evaluates satisfaction with information received by cancer patients; d) Quality of Life will be measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) which assesses PC-specific quality of life, and e) Cancer Worry will be measured using the Assessment of Survivors Concerns (ASC) measure which assesses fear of recurrence and health in cancer survivors.
Proposed sample size and justification: Our sample size calculations are based on 85% power with an alpha-level of 0.05, a standard deviation of 16 and a difference between groups of 8 points on the primary outcome (or half a standard deviation difference). Given these specifications, the required sample size is 146 patients (or 73 patients per arm). Assuming attrition of up to 20%, 180 patients will be recruited (or 90 patients per arm). Based on previous studies, we expect to enroll about 70% of eligible patients. The number of potentially eligible patients from participating sites is estimated to vary between 15-30 patients per month. Based on these estimates and our anticipated participation rates, we anticipate recruiting 20 patients per month with total recruitment completed within 9 months. We anticipate at least 80% will complete the 12-month post-treatment follow-up. We will use multiple strategies to promote retention and prevent attrition. Reasons for participant attrition will be documented.
Proposed analyses: Analyses will be performed adhering to the intention to treat principle. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of participants in both groups. Recruitment bias and possible differential attrition will be assessed by calculating the standardized differences between the two arms. The overall PAM-13 score at 12 months adjusted for the baseline score will be compared between the two arms using the t-test if the data appears normal or the Mann-Whitney test otherwise. A p-value<=0.05 will be deemed significant. Secondary analyses of all scores at each time point will be conducted utilizing the mixed effect modeling to account for the intra-patient and intra-centre dependency due to the repeated measures within a patient and the multi-centre design. The residuals will be inspected and data will be transformed when necessary. Due to multiple testing for the secondary analyses a Hochberg-Benjamini approach will be used to ensure that the type I error rate does not exceed 0.05.
Cost-utility analyses: The analysis will also include a trial-based cost utility analysis. The health utility measured using the PORPUS-U and EQ-5D instruments will be used to provide patient-specific and group-mean estimates of quality-adjusted survival (Quality Adjusted Life Years). Costs from the payer perspective and from the societal perspective will be gathered using the HSSUI and an estimate of intervention costs. Inverse probability weighting will be used to adjust for induced dependent censoring. A net benefit regression approach will be employed to explore predictors of cost-effectiveness.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Survivorship Care Plan
- Keywords
- Survivorship, Prostate Cancer, Survivorship Care Plan
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Survivorship Care PlanBehavioural
Also called PC 360-SCP
SCP-Intervention: Patients in the SCP-Int arm will attend a one-time appointment with a trained oncology nurse while the patients in the UC arm will receive care according to the hospital standards for follow-up care. The intervention will be delivered during a regular follow-up appointment, face-to-face and will inform and educate patients on self-management and support as well as promote access to and coordination of post-treatment care. The appointment will focus on empowering the PC survivor to actively self-manage persistent treatment effects and to decrease their risk of late effects by providing effective health information, support, and self-management support. Nurses will integrate a number of "active behavior change ingredients" including the integration of motivational interviewing techniques which are effective in increasing healthy behaviors.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care (UC) | No intervention | Patients in the UC arm will not receive the study intervention (behavioral) and instead will receive care according to usual practice. This usually involves a brief office visit (approximately 5-10 minutes) with pertinent history and physical examination related to surgical/radiation recovery, review of the pathology and general instructions regarding the next step in follow-up. |
| SCP-Intervention vs usual care | Active comparator | behavioral intervention vs control Patients in the SCP-Int arm will be asked to attend a one-time appointment with a trained oncology nurse. The SCP-Int is comprised of a 30-minute nurse-led face-to-face intervention and the provision of a tailored PC-specific SCP (PC-SCP). Persistent effects and concerns that are identified will prompt the development of a tailored management plan captured within the PC-SCP. Relevant patient education materials will be linked electronically. Nurses will use motivational interviewing techniques to effective in increase healthy behaviors and empower the PC survivor to actively self-manage persistent treatment effects and to decrease their risk of late effects by providing effective health information, support, and self-management support. Receives: Behavioral: Survivorship Care Plan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in the Patient Activation measure questionnaire
Measured: Change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Changes in the Health and Social Services Utilization Inventory
Measured: change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Changes in the Health Education Impact Questionnaire
Measured: Change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Changes in the Quality of Life INFO25 module
Measured: Change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Changes in the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Measured: Change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Changes in the Assessment of Survivors Concerns measure
Measured: baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start29 May 2017
- Primary completion30 Dec 2019
- Study completion31 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Health Network, TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 203 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jennifer M Jones, PhD, Principal investigator, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03017456
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15-5045-CE
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 9 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Jones JM, Matthew A, Tanguay S, Higano CS, Goldenberg L, Howell D, Maganti M. A Tailored Electronic Survivorship Care Plan for Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol. 2025 Apr;213(4):407-416. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004359. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
PubMed 39705576
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prostate Cancer Survivorship 360°
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03017456
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15-5045-CE
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Survivorship, Prostate Cancer, Survivorship Care Plan
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 203 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Study start
- 29 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prostate Cancer Survivorship 360º is a collaboration-based initiative involving prostate cancer (PC) and survivorship researchers/clinicians from three Canadian prostate centers with the goal of identifying and tracking unmet supportive care needs of patients with localized PC and responding to these needs through survivorship care. The current randomized control trail (RCT) will focus on the development and evaluation of a facilitated electronic Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care Plan (PC-SCP). The aims of this project are: 1) to develop an appropriate and tailored SCP and transition care delivery process; and 2) to conduct an RCT to evaluate whether a personalized PC SCP intervention is more effective than usual care (UC) on patient activation (primary outcome) and access to services, self-Management support, satisfaction with information, HRQoL and cancer worry (secondary outcomes). Data from a multi-site prospective database- Prostate Cancer Survivorship Information System (PC360-IS) will be used to electronically populate the survivorship care plans. Overall, this proposal represents initial steps in uniting the country in sharing programmatic resources, data, expertise, and enthusiasm to transform survivorship care for men with PC and their families.
Detailed description
A Phase III RCT will evaluate the superiority of a Survivorship Care Plan (SCP) intervention (SCP-Int) compared with usual care (UC) after primary curative prostate cancer (PC) treatment. Each of the three sites has designated clinical study leads (AM, LG, and ST), high referral volumes and study leads' patients will be entered into the PC360-IS database which will be interfaced to the PC-SCP system to consolidate patient details and generate personalized SCPs. Research ethics approval will be obtained at each site. The trial will be registered with clinicaltrials.gov and reported using the CONSORT recommendations for trials.
The study population inclusion criteria are as follows: Histologically confirmed localized (T1-T3N0M0) PC; age at diagnosis >18 years; treated with curative intent; treatment received >1 month and <6 months; disease-free as defined by absence of somatic disease activity parameters as per oncologist/urologist; consented to participate in the PC360-IS database. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who do not receive treatment and are followed by active surveillance; inability to complete study questionnaires.
Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to either the intervention arm or the control arm. A biostatistician will randomly assign participants to ensure that both the study RA and the participants are unaware of the treatment (SCP-int)/control groups (UC). Consenting patients will be registered into the study and randomized to receive either the SCP-Int or UC. Patients in the SCP-Int arm will be scheduled for the SCP-Int appointment on the same day as the patient's first (or second) follow-up appointment.
Eligible patients will be sent a study information letter which will be signed by the patient's urologist/ oncologist one month after the end of primary treatment. The RA will then contact patients to further explain the study. If agreeable, the patients will be sent consent forms, two stamped envelopes, and a baseline questionnaire to complete prior to the scheduled follow-up appointment. The patients will be asked to mail back the signed consent form and the completed questionnaire in each the envelopes provided.
Participants will have as much time as needed to decide if the participants would like to participate in the study prior to signing the consent form. The Research Analyst will obtain consent.
Planned trial interventions: SCP-Int: Patients in the SCP-Int arm will be asked to attend a one-time appointment with a trained oncology nurse (study nurse). To avoid additional travel and related costs to the patient, this appointment will be scheduled on the same day as the patient's follow-up appointment. The SCP-Int is comprised of two components: a 30-minute nurse-led face-to-face intervention and the provision of a tailored PC-specific SCP (PC-SCP). The intervention will be developed based on an established person-centred nursing framework with a tailored approach to customizing the intervention to the individual and will focus on the provision of self-management education and support and promote access to and coordination of post-treatment care including appropriate referrals to relevant programs and services (including TrueNTH solutions). The content of the PC-SCP will provide structure to the appointment. Persistent effects and concerns that are identified will prompt the development of a tailored management plan (i.e. patient education, referral to programs and services) captured within the PC-SCP. Relevant patient education and TrueNTH materials will be linked electronically. The appointment will focus on empowering the PC survivor to actively self-manage persistent treatment effects and to decrease the patients' risk of late effects by providing effective health information, support, and self-management support. Nurses will integrate a number of "active behaviour change ingredients" including the integration of motivational interviewing techniques which are effective in increasing healthy behaviours. Usual Care (UC): Patients in the UC arm will receive care according to usual practice. This usually involves a brief office visit (approximately 5-10 minutes) with pertinent history and physical examination related to surgical/radiation recovery, review of the pathology and general instructions regarding the next step in follow-up. In addition, patients in the UC arm will be able to access any supportive care programs or service available at the hospital according to usual practice. Currently, SCPs and dedicated transition appointments are not provided as part of a standard of care.
Allocation to trial groups: Patients will be allocated to either SCP-Int or UC by the Department of Biostatistics at Princess Margaret using a computer-generated randomization process (random blocks known only to statisticians). The research coordinator will telephone Biostatistics staff, who will not be involved in recruitment, to obtain the subject's assignment. Eligible patients from each site will be approached until the target number of participants is reached (or until a decision is made to stop recruitment).
Data collection: Data will be collected and analyzed according to the outlined project aims. Based on CONSORT criteria, a screening log will enable data collection on eligible and non-recruited patients with reasons for non-recruitment recorded when known. All data will be entered into a secured, password protected database within the UHN server. A separate database will be used for participant tracking to prevent re-approaching patients unnecessarily, and to ensure patients are receiving the questionnaire packages according to the study timeline.
Proposed primary and secondary outcome measures:
The outcome measures were chosen based on recent consensus and recommendations on the evaluation of SCPs. Patients will be assessed at baseline (T0), 6 (T1), and 12 (T2) months post-treatment. This questionnaire package is estimated to take 45 minutes to complete.
Primary Outcome: Patient activation will be measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), a 13-items measure assessing knowledge, skills, beliefs, and confidence in managing health and health care. Patient activation is strongly related to a broad range of health-related outcomes. The primary outcome will be the overall score of the 13 items collected at T2.
Secondary Outcomes: a) Supportive care services utilization: using the Health and Social Services Utilization Inventory (HSSUI) modified for use in cancer populations. Service types are grouped into five categories: Health Professionals, Institutional/Hospital Programs; Nursing and Homemaker Support Programs; Other Community and Social Support Program/Resources (will include True NTH solutions); Programs/Resources.; b) Self-Management Support will be assessed using the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ), designed to evaluate outcomes from patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions; c) Satisfaction with Information will be measured with the 25-item European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life INFO25 module which evaluates satisfaction with information received by cancer patients; d) Quality of Life will be measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) which assesses PC-specific quality of life, and e) Cancer Worry will be measured using the Assessment of Survivors Concerns (ASC) measure which assesses fear of recurrence and health in cancer survivors.
Proposed sample size and justification: Our sample size calculations are based on 85% power with an alpha-level of 0.05, a standard deviation of 16 and a difference between groups of 8 points on the primary outcome (or half a standard deviation difference). Given these specifications, the required sample size is 146 patients (or 73 patients per arm). Assuming attrition of up to 20%, 180 patients will be recruited (or 90 patients per arm). Based on previous studies, we expect to enroll about 70% of eligible patients. The number of potentially eligible patients from participating sites is estimated to vary between 15-30 patients per month. Based on these estimates and our anticipated participation rates, we anticipate recruiting 20 patients per month with total recruitment completed within 9 months. We anticipate at least 80% will complete the 12-month post-treatment follow-up. We will use multiple strategies to promote retention and prevent attrition. Reasons for participant attrition will be documented.
Proposed analyses: Analyses will be performed adhering to the intention to treat principle. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of participants in both groups. Recruitment bias and possible differential attrition will be assessed by calculating the standardized differences between the two arms. The overall PAM-13 score at 12 months adjusted for the baseline score will be compared between the two arms using the t-test if the data appears normal or the Mann-Whitney test otherwise. A p-value<=0.05 will be deemed significant. Secondary analyses of all scores at each time point will be conducted utilizing the mixed effect modeling to account for the intra-patient and intra-centre dependency due to the repeated measures within a patient and the multi-centre design. The residuals will be inspected and data will be transformed when necessary. Due to multiple testing for the secondary analyses a Hochberg-Benjamini approach will be used to ensure that the type I error rate does not exceed 0.05.
Cost-utility analyses: The analysis will also include a trial-based cost utility analysis. The health utility measured using the PORPUS-U and EQ-5D instruments will be used to provide patient-specific and group-mean estimates of quality-adjusted survival (Quality Adjusted Life Years). Costs from the payer perspective and from the societal perspective will be gathered using the HSSUI and an estimate of intervention costs. Inverse probability weighting will be used to adjust for induced dependent censoring. A net benefit regression approach will be employed to explore predictors of cost-effectiveness.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care (UC) | No intervention | –Patients in the UC arm will not receive the study intervention (behavioral) and instead will receive care according to usual practice. This usually involves a brief office visit (approximately 5-10 minutes) with pertinent history and physical examination related to surgical/radiation recovery, review of the pathology and general instructions regarding the next step in follow-up. |
| SCP-Intervention vs usual care | Active comparator | Behavioral: Survivorship Care Planbehavioral intervention vs control Patients in the SCP-Int arm will be asked to attend a one-time appointment with a trained oncology nurse. The SCP-Int is comprised of a 30-minute nurse-led face-to-face intervention and the provision of a tailored PC-specific SCP (PC-SCP). Persistent effects and concerns that are identified will prompt the development of a tailored management plan captured within the PC-SCP. Relevant patient education materials will be linked electronically. Nurses will use motivational interviewing techniques to effective in increase healthy behaviors and empower the PC survivor to actively self-manage persistent treatment effects and to decrease their risk of late effects by providing effective health information, support, and self-management support. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histologically confirmed localized (T1-T3N0M0) PC
- age at diagnosis >18 years
- treated with curative intent
- treatment received >1 month and <6 months
- disease-free as defined by absence of somatic disease activity parameters as per oncologist/urologist
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who do not receive treatment and are followed by active surveillance
- inability to complete study questionnaires.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Survivorship Care PlanAlso: PC 360-SCPSCP-Intervention: Patients in the SCP-Int arm will attend a one-time appointment with a trained oncology nurse while the patients in the UC arm will receive care according to the hospital standards for follow-up care. The intervention will be delivered during a regular follow-up appointment, face-to-face and will inform and educate patients on self-management and support as well as promote access to and coordination of post-treatment care. The appointment will focus on empowering the PC survivor to actively self-manage persistent treatment effects and to decrease their risk of late effects by providing effective health information, support, and self-management support. Nurses will integrate a number of "active behavior change ingredients" including the integration of motivational interviewing techniques which are effective in increasing healthy behaviors. | Behavioural | SCP-Intervention vs usual care |
Primary outcome
Changes in the Patient Activation measure questionnaire
Time frame: Change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
5 secondary outcomes
Changes in the Health and Social Services Utilization Inventory
Time frame: change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Changes in the Health Education Impact Questionnaire
Time frame: Change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Changes in the Quality of Life INFO25 module
Time frame: Change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Changes in the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Time frame: Change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Changes in the Assessment of Survivors Concerns measure
Time frame: baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 May 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39705576Jones JM, Matthew A, Tanguay S, Higano CS, Goldenberg L, Howell D, Maganti M. A Tailored Electronic Survivorship Care Plan for Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol. 2025 Apr;213(4):407-416. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004359. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
The COSMYC Trial (COmbined Suppression of MYC)
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-101556143 With Best Supportive Care in Participants With Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
PULSE Registry: for Patients Receiving Lutetium (177Lu) Vipivotide Tetraxetan
Metastatic Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Relugolix and Enzalutamide in Combination With Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Very High Risk Prostate Cancer, OPTIMAL Trial
Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer M Jones, PhD principal investigator
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Survivorship Care Plan in people with Prostate Cancer, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 3 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in the Patient Activation measure questionnaire (time frame: Change from baseline (prior to intervention), 6 months post intervention, 12 months post intervention.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03017456, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2023.