AzTrials
AzTrials

BlockNCT03017638

Analgesic Efficacy of Quadaratus Lumborum Block (QLB) for Laparoscopic Colectomy Surgery: A Prospective Case Control Trial to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes

An observational study of Block, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pain after abdominal surgery can be extensive. Pain control is an important component of patient comfort and participation in rehabilitation. Multimodal analgesia methods have shown to reduce postoperative pain, and have been addressed to be a crucial part of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Block
What is being tested?
Questionaire
How many people
14 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
27 Feb 2017to 14 Jan 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population will include adults older than 18 years who are American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) Classes 1-3. Inclusion criteria are patients undergoing primary laparoscop colectomy under general anesthesia with QLB.

Who may be able to join

  • All primary laparoscopic colectomy patients are eligible for inclusion in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Previous abdominal surgery
  • Allergy to local anesthetics or to systemic opioids
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia technique, such as local infection or coagulopathy, or patients receiving anticoagulation therapy with smaller specifications than listed in professional guidelines.
  • Contraindication to the Quadratus lumborum block such as defects or interferences in the abdominal wall obstructing anatomical structure visibility.
  • Requirements of more than 30 mg morphine equivalent daily prior to surgery
  • ASA IV or greater
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Psychiatric or cognitive disorders
  • Incarceration
  • Renal insufficiency with Cr > 2.0
  • Hepatic failure
  • Pregnancy
  • Age under 18 years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site
  • Rabin Medical Center

    Petach Tikvah

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Analgesic Efficacy of Quadaratus Lumborum Block (QLB) for Laparoscopic Colectomy Surgery: A Prospective Observational Case Control Trial to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes

Pain after abdominal surgery can be extensive. Pain control is an important component of patient comfort and participation in rehabilitation. Multimodal analgesia methods have shown to reduce postoperative pain, and have been addressed to be a crucial part of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols.

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a posterior abdominal wall block which analgesic efficacy has been shown for abdominal surgeries, and also for different laparoscopic procedures, such as ovarian surgery.

The aim of this study is to assess QLB's analgesic efficacy for laparoscopic colectomy surgeries, using serial pain score assessments and overall opioid consumption; its effect on patient satisfaction; and its effect on the development of postoperative respiratory complications. This study is a prospective clinical trial assessing the effect of application of QLB as a regional analgesic technique for primary laparoscopic colectomy, in comparison to a historical retrospective cohort.

Read the detailed description
  1. Specific Aims Pain control is an important component of patient comfort and rehabilitation after surgery. The aim of the study is to improve multimodal analgesia and reduce postoperative pain for laparoscopic colonic surgery. We hypothesize that performing a Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) prior to start of laparoscopic colon surgery will provide significant analgesic effect. As such, the primary endpoint of this study is the patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) elicited during the patient's post operative recovery unit (PACU) stay, 24 hours, 48 hours and 4 weeks after surgery.

Secondary endpoints are:

  • Total opioid consumption during PACU stay and on 24 hours ,48 hours and 4 weeks after surgery.
  • Length of hospital stay
  • Overall patient satisfaction - will be documented on 24 hours after surgery, 48 hours and 4 weeks after surgery.
  • Minimal saturation during PACU stay
  • Development of postoperative respiratory complications until patient discharge: re-intubation, documented apneas, severe hypoxemia (measured saturations <94%; or arterial blood oxygen partial pressure in relation to inspired oxygen concentration [PaO2/FiO2] ration below 200)

Research Design and Methods The study is a prospective clinical trial assessing the effect of application of QLB as a regional analgesic technique for primary laparoscopic colectomy, in comparison to a historical cohort.

Inclusion Criteria:

All primary laparoscopic colectomy patients are eligible for inclusion in the study.

Exclusion criteria are:

  • Allergy to local anesthetics or to systemic opioids
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia technique, such as local infection or coagulopathy
  • Requirements of more than 30 mg morphine equivalent daily prior to surgery
  • ASA IV or greater
  • Psychiatric or cognitive disorders
  • Incarceration
  • Renal insufficiency with Cr > 2.0
  • Hepatic failure
  • Pregnancy
  • Age under 18 years Potential risks for the procedure, which will be explained to the patient, include: bleeding, local infection, local anesthetic toxicity. All are commonly listed as rare complications of the procedures.

After consenting to participation, QLB will be placed in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery.

For participating patients, the following data will be collected by the research staff: ASA physical status, age, height, weight, gender, intra- and post operative quantitative opiate use (expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg), numeric VAS scores, and QoR score (form included).

Intraoperative care:

Intraoperative anesthesia will be achieved using a general anesthetic technique. Intraoperative analgesia will be administered per anesthesiologists' discretion.

All patients will have a laparoscopic colectomy. QLB Procedure Details Patients will lie in the supine position. Aseptic precautions will be taken by wearing a surgical cap, a mask, sterile gown and sterile gloves after disinfection of the hands. The abdominal region will be disinfected using chlorhexidine solution, and then covered in sterile drapes. A high frequency linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Philips 4-12L linear transducer with a frequency of 6-12 MHz, Milwaukee, WI) covered with sterile plastic sheath will be placed in the anterior axillary line to visualize the typical triple abdominal layers. Then, the probe will be withdrawn to the posterior axillary line, where at this juncture the layers of abdominal layers start to taper: the transversus abdominis muscle converging with the internal oblique and external oblique forming a singular aponeurosis, blending with the quadratus lumborum muscle, which inserts from the dorsal aspect of the body [Figure 1].

At the junction of the tapered ends of abdominal muscles and QL, and under continuous US guidance, a 22 gauge 80 mm insulated Tuohy needle (SonoPlexStimu, PAJUNK MEDIZINTECHNOLOGIE GEISINGEN, GERMANY) will be inserted in plane [Figure 2]. Its proper location will be verified using 0.9% NaCl injection. After position verification and following negative aspiration, 25 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (Naropin-AstraZeneca, Sydney, North South Wales, Australia) will be injected under US visualization, in 3-5 mL aliquots, separated by repeated negative aspirations, meant to confirm absence of intravascular injection.

Post-operative analgesia All patients will be given a standard regimen of IV acetaminophen 1000mg q8hr, and IV Tramadone 100 mg q8hr (concurrent with prophylactic anti-emetic therapy using IV metoclopramide 10 mg q8hr), both started intraoperatively prior to conclusion of surgery, and continuing for 48 hours.

While in PACU, all patients will be administered a morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion pump (Graesby 3300®, Smith Medical International Ltd. Watford, UK; IVAC® PCAM®, Cardinal Health Inc., Rolle, Switzerland), for at least 48 hours. Per institutional protocol, PCA will be connected after bolus loading of IV 0.1 mg/kg morphine in the PACU.

Data Collection Patients will be enrolled for the study either during the pre-operative surgical appointment, or upon admission to the hospital. Upon enrollment, patients will have a Pain Management Questionnaire (attached) and VAS pain scores (0-10; 0 indicating no pain; 10 indicating most excruciating pain imaginable) recorded, and have their pre-operative analgesic medication documented.

To assess the effect of analgesia in PACU, maximal VAS pain scores, as reported by the patient to the PACU nursing staff, will be recorded. On 24 hours, 48 hoursafter surgery, the patient will indicate their level of pain using Pain Management Questionnaire (attached) and VAS pain scores. The patients will also complete their Pain Management Questionnaire and maximal VAS pain scores at 4 weeks after surgery (using a telephone survey).

Quality of recovery will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery (QoR) score 8-9, documented on 24 hours, 48 hours (personally) and also at 4 weeks after surgery (using a telephone survey).

In addition to the aforementioned scores, total analgesic medication will be documented: total opioid consumption (expressed in morphine equivalents doses, mg/kg) and during PACU stay and on 24 hours , and at 4 weeks after surgery.

Respiratory complications will be assessed by any of these events documented in the patient's chart during the postoperative period until patient discharge: re-intubation, documented apneas, severe hypoxemia (measured saturations <94%; or arterial blood oxygen partial pressure in relation to inspired oxygen concentration [PaO2/FiO2] ration below 200, if measured).

The control subjects' data will be assessed reviewing patient records. Their data will include:

  • Maximal PACU VAS pain score (per nursing charts)
  • Overall 24 hours , 48 hours and 4 weeks opioid consumption (overall morphine mg/kg equivalent dose)
  • POD 24 and 48 hours and 4 weeks Respiratory complications
Conditions
Block
Being tested
Questionaire
Medical subject headings
Bites and Stings

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • QuestionaireOther

    Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic colectomy patients under general anesthesia with an additional Quadratus lumborum block (QLB ) will be asked to fill out a questionnaires detailing: numeric verbal analogue scores (VAS) and quality of recovery score(QoR) preoperatively, 24 hours, 48 hour and four weeks after surgery. Additional data will be collected: ASA physical status, demographics, intra- and post operative opiate(expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg) and non opiate consumption in order to assess the analgesic efficacy of QLB for primary laparoscopic colectomy. QLB will be performed as per standard routine regimens, in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery.

Study groups in NCT03017638
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients receiving QLB and questionairesPatients undergoing primary laparoscopic colectomy patients under general anesthesia with an additional Quadratus lumborum block (QLB ) will be asked to fill out a questionnaires detailing: numeric verbal analogue scores (VAS) and quality of recovery score(QoR) preoperatively, 24 hours and 48 hours and four weeks after surgery. Additional data will be collected: ASA physical status, demographics, intra- and post operative opiate(expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg) and non opiate consumption in order to assess the analgesic efficacy of QLB for primary laparoscopic colectomy. QLB will be performed as per standard routine regimens, in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery.
Receives: Other: Questionaire
Historical controlThe control subjects' data will be assessed reviewing patient records. Data will include: * Maximal PACU VAS pain score (per nursing charts) * Overall POD 24 hours and 48 hours and 4 weeks opioid consumption (overall morphine mg/kg equivalent dose) * POD 24 and 48 hours and 4 weeks Respiratory complications

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Verbal analogue scale (VAS)

    patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) elicited during the patient's post operative recovery unit (PACU)

    Measured: 24 Hours

  2. Verbal analogue scale (VAS)

    patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) on postoperative day 1

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Verbal analogue scale (VAS)

    patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) on postoperative day 2

    Measured: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Total opioid consumption in PACU

    Total opioid consumption during PACU stay

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Total opioid consumption on postoperative day 1.

    Total opioid consumption on postoperative day 1.

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Total opioid consumption postoperative day 2

    Measured: 48 hours

  4. Total opioid consumption at four weeks postoperatively

    Measured: 4 weeks

  5. Length of hospital stay

    Total days of hospitalization

    Measured: 1 week

  6. Quality of recovery score (questionaire) four weeks postoperatively

    Measured: 4 weeks

  7. Quality of recovery score (questionaire) 1 day postoperatively

    Measured: 24 hours

  8. Quality of recovery score (questionaire) 48 postoperatively

    Measured: 48 hours

  9. Minimal saturation during PACU stay

    Measured: 24 hours

  10. Development of postoperative respiratory complications until patient discharge

    re-intubation, documented apneas, severe hypoxemia (measured saturations <94%; or arterial blood oxygen partial pressure in relation to inspired oxygen concentration [PaO2/FiO2] ration below 200)

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion14 Jan 2018
  4. Study completion14 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03017638
Sponsor's protocol ID
0832-16
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
10 Jan 2017
Last updated
15 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Fischer HB, Simanski CJ, Sharp C, Bonnet F, Camu F, Neugebauer EA, Rawal N, Joshi GP, Schug SA, Kehlet H; PROSPECT Working Group. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1105-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05565.x. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

    PubMed 18627367
  • Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

    PubMed 22221014
  • O'Donnell BD, Iohom G. Regional anesthesia techniques for ambulatory orthopedic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Dec;21(6):723-8. doi: 10.1097/aco.0b013e328314b665.

    PubMed 19009687
  • Kang H, Ha YC, Kim JY, Woo YC, Lee JS, Jang EC. Effectiveness of multimodal pain management after bipolar hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Feb 20;95(4):291-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01708.

    PubMed 23302898
  • Kazak Bengisun Z, Aysu Salviz E, Darcin K, Suer H, Ates Y. Intraarticular levobupivacaine or bupivacaine administration decreases pain scores and provides a better recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Anesth. 2010 Oct;24(5):694-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0970-x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

    PubMed 20571832
  • Essving P, Axelsson K, Aberg E, Spannar H, Gupta A, Lundin A. Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):926-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182288deb. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

    PubMed 21821506
  • Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.

    PubMed 9895071
  • Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.

    PubMed 10740540
  • Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4.

    PubMed 2805470
  • Melvin JS, Stryker LS, Sierra RJ. Tranexamic Acid in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Dec;23(12):732-40. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00223. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

    PubMed 26493971

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Block, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Verbal analogue scale (VAS) (time frame: 24 Hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03017638, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in