BlockNCT03017638
Analgesic Efficacy of Quadaratus Lumborum Block (QLB) for Laparoscopic Colectomy Surgery: A Prospective Case Control Trial to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes
An observational study of Block, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Pain after abdominal surgery can be extensive. Pain control is an important component of patient comfort and participation in rehabilitation. Multimodal analgesia methods have shown to reduce postoperative pain, and have been addressed to be a crucial part of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Block
- What is being tested?
- Questionaire
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 27 Feb 2017to 14 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population will include adults older than 18 years who are American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) Classes 1-3. Inclusion criteria are patients undergoing primary laparoscop colectomy under general anesthesia with QLB.
Who may be able to join
- All primary laparoscopic colectomy patients are eligible for inclusion in the study.
Who cannot join
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Allergy to local anesthetics or to systemic opioids
- Contraindication to regional anesthesia technique, such as local infection or coagulopathy, or patients receiving anticoagulation therapy with smaller specifications than listed in professional guidelines.
- Contraindication to the Quadratus lumborum block such as defects or interferences in the abdominal wall obstructing anatomical structure visibility.
- Requirements of more than 30 mg morphine equivalent daily prior to surgery
- ASA IV or greater
Show all 12Show fewer
- Psychiatric or cognitive disorders
- Incarceration
- Renal insufficiency with Cr > 2.0
- Hepatic failure
- Pregnancy
- Age under 18 years
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Analgesic Efficacy of Quadaratus Lumborum Block (QLB) for Laparoscopic Colectomy Surgery: A Prospective Observational Case Control Trial to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes
Pain after abdominal surgery can be extensive. Pain control is an important component of patient comfort and participation in rehabilitation. Multimodal analgesia methods have shown to reduce postoperative pain, and have been addressed to be a crucial part of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols.
Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a posterior abdominal wall block which analgesic efficacy has been shown for abdominal surgeries, and also for different laparoscopic procedures, such as ovarian surgery.
The aim of this study is to assess QLB's analgesic efficacy for laparoscopic colectomy surgeries, using serial pain score assessments and overall opioid consumption; its effect on patient satisfaction; and its effect on the development of postoperative respiratory complications. This study is a prospective clinical trial assessing the effect of application of QLB as a regional analgesic technique for primary laparoscopic colectomy, in comparison to a historical retrospective cohort.
Read the detailed description
- Specific Aims Pain control is an important component of patient comfort and rehabilitation after surgery. The aim of the study is to improve multimodal analgesia and reduce postoperative pain for laparoscopic colonic surgery. We hypothesize that performing a Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) prior to start of laparoscopic colon surgery will provide significant analgesic effect. As such, the primary endpoint of this study is the patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) elicited during the patient's post operative recovery unit (PACU) stay, 24 hours, 48 hours and 4 weeks after surgery.
Secondary endpoints are:
- Total opioid consumption during PACU stay and on 24 hours ,48 hours and 4 weeks after surgery.
- Length of hospital stay
- Overall patient satisfaction - will be documented on 24 hours after surgery, 48 hours and 4 weeks after surgery.
- Minimal saturation during PACU stay
- Development of postoperative respiratory complications until patient discharge: re-intubation, documented apneas, severe hypoxemia (measured saturations <94%; or arterial blood oxygen partial pressure in relation to inspired oxygen concentration [PaO2/FiO2] ration below 200)
Research Design and Methods The study is a prospective clinical trial assessing the effect of application of QLB as a regional analgesic technique for primary laparoscopic colectomy, in comparison to a historical cohort.
Inclusion Criteria:
All primary laparoscopic colectomy patients are eligible for inclusion in the study.
Exclusion criteria are:
- Allergy to local anesthetics or to systemic opioids
- Contraindication to regional anesthesia technique, such as local infection or coagulopathy
- Requirements of more than 30 mg morphine equivalent daily prior to surgery
- ASA IV or greater
- Psychiatric or cognitive disorders
- Incarceration
- Renal insufficiency with Cr > 2.0
- Hepatic failure
- Pregnancy
- Age under 18 years Potential risks for the procedure, which will be explained to the patient, include: bleeding, local infection, local anesthetic toxicity. All are commonly listed as rare complications of the procedures.
After consenting to participation, QLB will be placed in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery.
For participating patients, the following data will be collected by the research staff: ASA physical status, age, height, weight, gender, intra- and post operative quantitative opiate use (expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg), numeric VAS scores, and QoR score (form included).
Intraoperative care:
Intraoperative anesthesia will be achieved using a general anesthetic technique. Intraoperative analgesia will be administered per anesthesiologists' discretion.
All patients will have a laparoscopic colectomy. QLB Procedure Details Patients will lie in the supine position. Aseptic precautions will be taken by wearing a surgical cap, a mask, sterile gown and sterile gloves after disinfection of the hands. The abdominal region will be disinfected using chlorhexidine solution, and then covered in sterile drapes. A high frequency linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Philips 4-12L linear transducer with a frequency of 6-12 MHz, Milwaukee, WI) covered with sterile plastic sheath will be placed in the anterior axillary line to visualize the typical triple abdominal layers. Then, the probe will be withdrawn to the posterior axillary line, where at this juncture the layers of abdominal layers start to taper: the transversus abdominis muscle converging with the internal oblique and external oblique forming a singular aponeurosis, blending with the quadratus lumborum muscle, which inserts from the dorsal aspect of the body [Figure 1].
At the junction of the tapered ends of abdominal muscles and QL, and under continuous US guidance, a 22 gauge 80 mm insulated Tuohy needle (SonoPlexStimu, PAJUNK MEDIZINTECHNOLOGIE GEISINGEN, GERMANY) will be inserted in plane [Figure 2]. Its proper location will be verified using 0.9% NaCl injection. After position verification and following negative aspiration, 25 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (Naropin-AstraZeneca, Sydney, North South Wales, Australia) will be injected under US visualization, in 3-5 mL aliquots, separated by repeated negative aspirations, meant to confirm absence of intravascular injection.
Post-operative analgesia All patients will be given a standard regimen of IV acetaminophen 1000mg q8hr, and IV Tramadone 100 mg q8hr (concurrent with prophylactic anti-emetic therapy using IV metoclopramide 10 mg q8hr), both started intraoperatively prior to conclusion of surgery, and continuing for 48 hours.
While in PACU, all patients will be administered a morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion pump (Graesby 3300®, Smith Medical International Ltd. Watford, UK; IVAC® PCAM®, Cardinal Health Inc., Rolle, Switzerland), for at least 48 hours. Per institutional protocol, PCA will be connected after bolus loading of IV 0.1 mg/kg morphine in the PACU.
Data Collection Patients will be enrolled for the study either during the pre-operative surgical appointment, or upon admission to the hospital. Upon enrollment, patients will have a Pain Management Questionnaire (attached) and VAS pain scores (0-10; 0 indicating no pain; 10 indicating most excruciating pain imaginable) recorded, and have their pre-operative analgesic medication documented.
To assess the effect of analgesia in PACU, maximal VAS pain scores, as reported by the patient to the PACU nursing staff, will be recorded. On 24 hours, 48 hoursafter surgery, the patient will indicate their level of pain using Pain Management Questionnaire (attached) and VAS pain scores. The patients will also complete their Pain Management Questionnaire and maximal VAS pain scores at 4 weeks after surgery (using a telephone survey).
Quality of recovery will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery (QoR) score 8-9, documented on 24 hours, 48 hours (personally) and also at 4 weeks after surgery (using a telephone survey).
In addition to the aforementioned scores, total analgesic medication will be documented: total opioid consumption (expressed in morphine equivalents doses, mg/kg) and during PACU stay and on 24 hours , and at 4 weeks after surgery.
Respiratory complications will be assessed by any of these events documented in the patient's chart during the postoperative period until patient discharge: re-intubation, documented apneas, severe hypoxemia (measured saturations <94%; or arterial blood oxygen partial pressure in relation to inspired oxygen concentration [PaO2/FiO2] ration below 200, if measured).
The control subjects' data will be assessed reviewing patient records. Their data will include:
- Maximal PACU VAS pain score (per nursing charts)
- Overall 24 hours , 48 hours and 4 weeks opioid consumption (overall morphine mg/kg equivalent dose)
- POD 24 and 48 hours and 4 weeks Respiratory complications
- Conditions
- Block
- Being tested
- Questionaire
- Medical subject headings
- Bites and Stings
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
QuestionaireOther
Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic colectomy patients under general anesthesia with an additional Quadratus lumborum block (QLB ) will be asked to fill out a questionnaires detailing: numeric verbal analogue scores (VAS) and quality of recovery score(QoR) preoperatively, 24 hours, 48 hour and four weeks after surgery. Additional data will be collected: ASA physical status, demographics, intra- and post operative opiate(expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg) and non opiate consumption in order to assess the analgesic efficacy of QLB for primary laparoscopic colectomy. QLB will be performed as per standard routine regimens, in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients receiving QLB and questionaires | Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic colectomy patients under general anesthesia with an additional Quadratus lumborum block (QLB ) will be asked to fill out a questionnaires detailing: numeric verbal analogue scores (VAS) and quality of recovery score(QoR) preoperatively, 24 hours and 48 hours and four weeks after surgery. Additional data will be collected: ASA physical status, demographics, intra- and post operative opiate(expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg) and non opiate consumption in order to assess the analgesic efficacy of QLB for primary laparoscopic colectomy. QLB will be performed as per standard routine regimens, in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery. Receives: Other: Questionaire | |
| Historical control | The control subjects' data will be assessed reviewing patient records. Data will include: * Maximal PACU VAS pain score (per nursing charts) * Overall POD 24 hours and 48 hours and 4 weeks opioid consumption (overall morphine mg/kg equivalent dose) * POD 24 and 48 hours and 4 weeks Respiratory complications |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Verbal analogue scale (VAS)
patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) elicited during the patient's post operative recovery unit (PACU)
Measured: 24 Hours
Verbal analogue scale (VAS)
patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) on postoperative day 1
Measured: 24 hours
Verbal analogue scale (VAS)
patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) on postoperative day 2
Measured: 48 hours
Secondary outcomes (10)
Total opioid consumption in PACU
Total opioid consumption during PACU stay
Measured: 24 hours
Total opioid consumption on postoperative day 1.
Total opioid consumption on postoperative day 1.
Measured: 24 hours
Total opioid consumption postoperative day 2
Measured: 48 hours
Total opioid consumption at four weeks postoperatively
Measured: 4 weeks
Length of hospital stay
Total days of hospitalization
Measured: 1 week
Quality of recovery score (questionaire) four weeks postoperatively
Measured: 4 weeks
Quality of recovery score (questionaire) 1 day postoperatively
Measured: 24 hours
Quality of recovery score (questionaire) 48 postoperatively
Measured: 48 hours
Minimal saturation during PACU stay
Measured: 24 hours
Development of postoperative respiratory complications until patient discharge
re-intubation, documented apneas, severe hypoxemia (measured saturations <94%; or arterial blood oxygen partial pressure in relation to inspired oxygen concentration [PaO2/FiO2] ration below 200)
Measured: 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start27 Feb 2017
- Primary completion14 Jan 2018
- Study completion14 Jan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BlockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rabin Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Shia Fein, MD, Principal investigator, Rabin Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03017638
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0832-16
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 15 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Fischer HB, Simanski CJ, Sharp C, Bonnet F, Camu F, Neugebauer EA, Rawal N, Joshi GP, Schug SA, Kehlet H; PROSPECT Working Group. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1105-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05565.x. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
PubMed 18627367Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
PubMed 22221014O'Donnell BD, Iohom G. Regional anesthesia techniques for ambulatory orthopedic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Dec;21(6):723-8. doi: 10.1097/aco.0b013e328314b665.
PubMed 19009687Kang H, Ha YC, Kim JY, Woo YC, Lee JS, Jang EC. Effectiveness of multimodal pain management after bipolar hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Feb 20;95(4):291-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01708.
PubMed 23302898Kazak Bengisun Z, Aysu Salviz E, Darcin K, Suer H, Ates Y. Intraarticular levobupivacaine or bupivacaine administration decreases pain scores and provides a better recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Anesth. 2010 Oct;24(5):694-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0970-x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
PubMed 20571832Essving P, Axelsson K, Aberg E, Spannar H, Gupta A, Lundin A. Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):926-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182288deb. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
PubMed 21821506Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.
PubMed 9895071Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
PubMed 10740540Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4.
PubMed 2805470Melvin JS, Stryker LS, Sierra RJ. Tranexamic Acid in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Dec;23(12):732-40. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00223. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
PubMed 26493971
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Analgesic Efficacy of Quadaratus Lumborum Block (QLB) for Laparoscopic Colectomy Surgery: A Prospective Observational Case Control Trial to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03017638
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0832-16
- Conditions
- Block
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rabin Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pain after abdominal surgery can be extensive. Pain control is an important component of patient comfort and participation in rehabilitation. Multimodal analgesia methods have shown to reduce postoperative pain, and have been addressed to be a crucial part of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols.
Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a posterior abdominal wall block which analgesic efficacy has been shown for abdominal surgeries, and also for different laparoscopic procedures, such as ovarian surgery.
The aim of this study is to assess QLB's analgesic efficacy for laparoscopic colectomy surgeries, using serial pain score assessments and overall opioid consumption; its effect on patient satisfaction; and its effect on the development of postoperative respiratory complications. This study is a prospective clinical trial assessing the effect of application of QLB as a regional analgesic technique for primary laparoscopic colectomy, in comparison to a historical retrospective cohort.
Detailed description
- Specific Aims Pain control is an important component of patient comfort and rehabilitation after surgery. The aim of the study is to improve multimodal analgesia and reduce postoperative pain for laparoscopic colonic surgery. We hypothesize that performing a Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) prior to start of laparoscopic colon surgery will provide significant analgesic effect. As such, the primary endpoint of this study is the patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) elicited during the patient's post operative recovery unit (PACU) stay, 24 hours, 48 hours and 4 weeks after surgery.
Secondary endpoints are:
- Total opioid consumption during PACU stay and on 24 hours ,48 hours and 4 weeks after surgery.
- Length of hospital stay
- Overall patient satisfaction - will be documented on 24 hours after surgery, 48 hours and 4 weeks after surgery.
- Minimal saturation during PACU stay
- Development of postoperative respiratory complications until patient discharge: re-intubation, documented apneas, severe hypoxemia (measured saturations <94%; or arterial blood oxygen partial pressure in relation to inspired oxygen concentration [PaO2/FiO2] ration below 200)
Research Design and Methods The study is a prospective clinical trial assessing the effect of application of QLB as a regional analgesic technique for primary laparoscopic colectomy, in comparison to a historical cohort.
Inclusion Criteria:
All primary laparoscopic colectomy patients are eligible for inclusion in the study.
Exclusion criteria are:
- Allergy to local anesthetics or to systemic opioids
- Contraindication to regional anesthesia technique, such as local infection or coagulopathy
- Requirements of more than 30 mg morphine equivalent daily prior to surgery
- ASA IV or greater
- Psychiatric or cognitive disorders
- Incarceration
- Renal insufficiency with Cr > 2.0
- Hepatic failure
- Pregnancy
- Age under 18 years Potential risks for the procedure, which will be explained to the patient, include: bleeding, local infection, local anesthetic toxicity. All are commonly listed as rare complications of the procedures.
After consenting to participation, QLB will be placed in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery.
For participating patients, the following data will be collected by the research staff: ASA physical status, age, height, weight, gender, intra- and post operative quantitative opiate use (expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg), numeric VAS scores, and QoR score (form included).
Intraoperative care:
Intraoperative anesthesia will be achieved using a general anesthetic technique. Intraoperative analgesia will be administered per anesthesiologists' discretion.
All patients will have a laparoscopic colectomy. QLB Procedure Details Patients will lie in the supine position. Aseptic precautions will be taken by wearing a surgical cap, a mask, sterile gown and sterile gloves after disinfection of the hands. The abdominal region will be disinfected using chlorhexidine solution, and then covered in sterile drapes. A high frequency linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Philips 4-12L linear transducer with a frequency of 6-12 MHz, Milwaukee, WI) covered with sterile plastic sheath will be placed in the anterior axillary line to visualize the typical triple abdominal layers. Then, the probe will be withdrawn to the posterior axillary line, where at this juncture the layers of abdominal layers start to taper: the transversus abdominis muscle converging with the internal oblique and external oblique forming a singular aponeurosis, blending with the quadratus lumborum muscle, which inserts from the dorsal aspect of the body [Figure 1].
At the junction of the tapered ends of abdominal muscles and QL, and under continuous US guidance, a 22 gauge 80 mm insulated Tuohy needle (SonoPlexStimu, PAJUNK MEDIZINTECHNOLOGIE GEISINGEN, GERMANY) will be inserted in plane [Figure 2]. Its proper location will be verified using 0.9% NaCl injection. After position verification and following negative aspiration, 25 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (Naropin-AstraZeneca, Sydney, North South Wales, Australia) will be injected under US visualization, in 3-5 mL aliquots, separated by repeated negative aspirations, meant to confirm absence of intravascular injection.
Post-operative analgesia All patients will be given a standard regimen of IV acetaminophen 1000mg q8hr, and IV Tramadone 100 mg q8hr (concurrent with prophylactic anti-emetic therapy using IV metoclopramide 10 mg q8hr), both started intraoperatively prior to conclusion of surgery, and continuing for 48 hours.
While in PACU, all patients will be administered a morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion pump (Graesby 3300®, Smith Medical International Ltd. Watford, UK; IVAC® PCAM®, Cardinal Health Inc., Rolle, Switzerland), for at least 48 hours. Per institutional protocol, PCA will be connected after bolus loading of IV 0.1 mg/kg morphine in the PACU.
Data Collection Patients will be enrolled for the study either during the pre-operative surgical appointment, or upon admission to the hospital. Upon enrollment, patients will have a Pain Management Questionnaire (attached) and VAS pain scores (0-10; 0 indicating no pain; 10 indicating most excruciating pain imaginable) recorded, and have their pre-operative analgesic medication documented.
To assess the effect of analgesia in PACU, maximal VAS pain scores, as reported by the patient to the PACU nursing staff, will be recorded. On 24 hours, 48 hoursafter surgery, the patient will indicate their level of pain using Pain Management Questionnaire (attached) and VAS pain scores. The patients will also complete their Pain Management Questionnaire and maximal VAS pain scores at 4 weeks after surgery (using a telephone survey).
Quality of recovery will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery (QoR) score 8-9, documented on 24 hours, 48 hours (personally) and also at 4 weeks after surgery (using a telephone survey).
In addition to the aforementioned scores, total analgesic medication will be documented: total opioid consumption (expressed in morphine equivalents doses, mg/kg) and during PACU stay and on 24 hours , and at 4 weeks after surgery.
Respiratory complications will be assessed by any of these events documented in the patient's chart during the postoperative period until patient discharge: re-intubation, documented apneas, severe hypoxemia (measured saturations <94%; or arterial blood oxygen partial pressure in relation to inspired oxygen concentration [PaO2/FiO2] ration below 200, if measured).
The control subjects' data will be assessed reviewing patient records. Their data will include:
- Maximal PACU VAS pain score (per nursing charts)
- Overall 24 hours , 48 hours and 4 weeks opioid consumption (overall morphine mg/kg equivalent dose)
- POD 24 and 48 hours and 4 weeks Respiratory complications
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients receiving QLB and questionaires | – | Other: QuestionairePatients undergoing primary laparoscopic colectomy patients under general anesthesia with an additional Quadratus lumborum block (QLB ) will be asked to fill out a questionnaires detailing: numeric verbal analogue scores (VAS) and quality of recovery score(QoR) preoperatively, 24 hours and 48 hours and four weeks after surgery. Additional data will be collected: ASA physical status, demographics, intra- and post operative opiate(expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg) and non opiate consumption in order to assess the analgesic efficacy of QLB for primary laparoscopic colectomy. QLB will be performed as per standard routine regimens, in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery. |
| Historical control | – | –The control subjects' data will be assessed reviewing patient records. Data will include: * Maximal PACU VAS pain score (per nursing charts) * Overall POD 24 hours and 48 hours and 4 weeks opioid consumption (overall morphine mg/kg equivalent dose) * POD 24 and 48 hours and 4 weeks Respiratory complications |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population will include adults older than 18 years who are American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) Classes 1-3. Inclusion criteria are patients undergoing primary laparoscop colectomy under general anesthesia with QLB.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All primary laparoscopic colectomy patients are eligible for inclusion in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Allergy to local anesthetics or to systemic opioids
- Contraindication to regional anesthesia technique, such as local infection or coagulopathy, or patients receiving anticoagulation therapy with smaller specifications than listed in professional guidelines.
- Contraindication to the Quadratus lumborum block such as defects or interferences in the abdominal wall obstructing anatomical structure visibility.
- Requirements of more than 30 mg morphine equivalent daily prior to surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| QuestionairePatients undergoing primary laparoscopic colectomy patients under general anesthesia with an additional Quadratus lumborum block (QLB ) will be asked to fill out a questionnaires detailing: numeric verbal analogue scores (VAS) and quality of recovery score(QoR) preoperatively, 24 hours, 48 hour and four weeks after surgery. Additional data will be collected: ASA physical status, demographics, intra- and post operative opiate(expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg) and non opiate consumption in order to assess the analgesic efficacy of QLB for primary laparoscopic colectomy. QLB will be performed as per standard routine regimens, in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery. | Other | Patients receiving QLB and questionaires |
Primary outcome
Verbal analogue scale (VAS)
Time frame: 24 Hours
patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) elicited during the patient's post operative recovery unit (PACU)
Verbal analogue scale (VAS)
Time frame: 24 hours
patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) on postoperative day 1
Verbal analogue scale (VAS)
Time frame: 48 hours
patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) on postoperative day 2
10 secondary outcomes
Total opioid consumption in PACU
Time frame: 24 hours
Total opioid consumption on postoperative day 1.
Time frame: 24 hours
Total opioid consumption postoperative day 2
Time frame: 48 hours
Total opioid consumption at four weeks postoperatively
Time frame: 4 weeks
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: 1 week
Quality of recovery score (questionaire) four weeks postoperatively
Time frame: 4 weeks
Quality of recovery score (questionaire) 1 day postoperatively
Time frame: 24 hours
Quality of recovery score (questionaire) 48 postoperatively
Time frame: 48 hours
Minimal saturation during PACU stay
Time frame: 24 hours
Development of postoperative respiratory complications until patient discharge
Time frame: 1 week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 18627367Fischer HB, Simanski CJ, Sharp C, Bonnet F, Camu F, Neugebauer EA, Rawal N, Joshi GP, Schug SA, Kehlet H; PROSPECT Working Group. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1105-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05565.x. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 22221014Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 19009687O'Donnell BD, Iohom G. Regional anesthesia techniques for ambulatory orthopedic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Dec;21(6):723-8. doi: 10.1097/aco.0b013e328314b665.
- Results publication: PubMed 23302898Kang H, Ha YC, Kim JY, Woo YC, Lee JS, Jang EC. Effectiveness of multimodal pain management after bipolar hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Feb 20;95(4):291-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01708.
- Results publication: PubMed 20571832Kazak Bengisun Z, Aysu Salviz E, Darcin K, Suer H, Ates Y. Intraarticular levobupivacaine or bupivacaine administration decreases pain scores and provides a better recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Anesth. 2010 Oct;24(5):694-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0970-x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 21821506Essving P, Axelsson K, Aberg E, Spannar H, Gupta A, Lundin A. Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):926-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182288deb. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 9895071Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.
- Results publication: PubMed 10740540Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
- Results publication: PubMed 2805470Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 26493971Melvin JS, Stryker LS, Sierra RJ. Tranexamic Acid in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Dec;23(12):732-40. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00223. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Block
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Serial Amnioinfusions as Regenerative Therapy for Pulmonary Hypoplasia
Renal Failure Congenital, Congenital Renal Anomaly Nos
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Shia Fein, MD principal investigator
Rabin Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Block, run by Rabin Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Verbal analogue scale (VAS) (time frame: 24 Hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03017638, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2018.