AzTrials
AzTrials

Myocardial Infarction, AcuteNCT03018873

Long-term Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Improve the Prognosis of Myocardial Infarction Patients With Emergency Reperfusion Therapy

A study testing remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in people with Myocardial Infarction, Acute, run by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are in critical condition. When primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performing, no-reflow, reperfusion injury,heart failure, heart rupture, malignant arrhythmia maybe happen. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Myocardial Infarction, Acute
What is being tested?
remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2016to Jul 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18-80 years;
  • ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI);
  • Plan to primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Who cannot join

  • Age more than 80;
  • renal failure with creatinine >2 mg/dl;
  • reject taking part in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Liu zhi, doctor contact

13911517967

xwyy168@sina.com

About this study

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are in critical condition. When primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performing, no-reflow, reperfusion injury,heart failure, heart rupture, malignant arrhythmia maybe happen. It was reported remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may play an effective endogenous cardiac protection. This study will investigate whether once RIPC before primary PCI or long-term RIPC can improve AMI patients short-term and long-term (1 year) prognosis. 400 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were randomly divided into 3 groups: long-term RIPC group (once preoperative RIPC and once RIPC/day after PCI), preoperative RIPC group (once preoperative RIPC), control group (without RIPC). Cardiac troponin (TNI), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), adenosine, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), echocardiography and magnetic resonance (MR)were detected 1 day, 1 month and 1 year after PCI. Patients will be followed up by telephone at the end of one year. The major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) include cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization and stroke.

Being tested
remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC)
Keywords
remote ischemic preconditioning, acute myocardial infarction
Medical subject headings
Myocardial Infarction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC)Other

    once RIPC: three five-minute cycles of upper limb ischaemia and three five-minute pauses using a blood pressure cuff inflated to 200 mmHg.

Study groups in NCT03018873
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
long-term RIPC groupExperimentalroutine treatment + interventions interventions: once preoperative RIPC and once RIPC/day after PCI for one year. Once preoperative remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) : Three five-minute cycles of upper limb ischaemia and three five-minute pauses using a blood pressure cuff inflated to 200 mmHg before primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Once RIPC/day after PCI for one year:Three five-minute cycles of upper limb ischaemia and three five-minute pauses using a blood pressure cuff inflated to 200 mmHg.
Receives: Other: remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC)
preoperative RIPC groupActive comparatorroutine treatment + Once preoperative remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) : Three five-minute cycles of upper limb ischaemia and three five-minute pauses using a blood pressure cuff inflated to 200 mmHg before primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Receives: Other: remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC)
control groupNo interventionroutine treatment, no RIPC

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. major adverse cardiovascular events

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2016
  3. Primary completionJul 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
400 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03018873
Sponsor's protocol ID
XuanwuH-RIPC1
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
21 Jul 2016
Last updated
12 Jan 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Tobis J. Is no-no-reflow following PCI in AMI due to distal embolization of plaque and thrombus? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug 1;82(2):210-1. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25078. No abstract available.

    PubMed 23878032
  • Crimi G, Pica S, Raineri C, Bramucci E, De Ferrari GM, Klersy C, Ferlini M, Marinoni B, Repetto A, Romeo M, Rosti V, Massa M, Raisaro A, Leonardi S, Rubartelli P, Oltrona Visconti L, Ferrario M. Remote ischemic post-conditioning of the lower limb during primary percutaneous coronary intervention safely reduces enzymatic infarct size in anterior myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1055-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.011.

    PubMed 24156966
  • Schmidt MR, Sloth AD, Johnsen J, Botker HE. Remote ischemic conditioning: the cardiologist's perspective. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Nov;13(11):667-74. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328357bff2.

    PubMed 23114270
  • Szijarto A, Czigany Z, Turoczi Z, Harsanyi L. Remote ischemic perconditioning--a simple, low-risk method to decrease ischemic reperfusion injury: models, protocols and mechanistic background. A review. J Surg Res. 2012 Dec;178(2):797-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.067. Epub 2012 Jul 28.

    PubMed 22868050
  • Ghaemian A, Nouraei SM, Abdollahian F, Naghshvar F, Giussani DA, Nouraei SA. Remote ischemic preconditioning in percutaneous coronary revascularization: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2012 Oct;20(5):548-54. doi: 10.1177/0218492312439999.

    PubMed 23087298
  • Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, Bottcher M, Kaltoft AK, Terkelsen CJ, Munk K, Andersen NH, Hansen TM, Trautner S, Lassen JF, Christiansen EH, Krusell LR, Kristensen SD, Thuesen L, Nielsen SS, Rehling M, Sorensen HT, Redington AN, Nielsen TT. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):727-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62001-8.

    PubMed 20189026
  • Hausenloy DJ, Mwamure PK, Venugopal V, Harris J, Barnard M, Grundy E, Ashley E, Vichare S, Di Salvo C, Kolvekar S, Hayward M, Keogh B, MacAllister RJ, Yellon DM. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Aug 18;370(9587):575-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61296-3.

    PubMed 17707752
  • Shimizu M, Saxena P, Konstantinov IE, Cherepanov V, Cheung MM, Wearden P, Zhangdong H, Schmidt M, Downey GP, Redington AN. Remote ischemic preconditioning decreases adhesion and selectively modifies functional responses of human neutrophils. J Surg Res. 2010 Jan;158(1):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.08.010.

    PubMed 19540519
  • Hu S, Dong HL, Li YZ, Luo ZJ, Sun L, Yang QZ, Yang LF, Xiong L. Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on biochemical markers and neurologic outcomes in patients undergoing elective cervical decompression surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010 Jan;22(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181c572bd.

    PubMed 19996767
  • Meng R, Asmaro K, Meng L, Liu Y, Ma C, Xi C, Li G, Ren C, Luo Y, Ling F, Jia J, Hua Y, Wang X, Ding Y, Lo EH, Ji X. Upper limb ischemic preconditioning prevents recurrent stroke in intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology. 2012 Oct 30;79(18):1853-61. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318271f76a. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

    PubMed 23035060
  • D'Ascenzo F, Moretti C, Omede P, Cerrato E, Cavallero E, Er F, Presutti DG, Colombo F, Crimi G, Conrotto F, Dinicolantonio JJ, Chen S, Prasad A, Biondi Zoccai G, Gaita F. Cardiac remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces periprocedural myocardial infarction for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. EuroIntervention. 2014;9(12):1463-71. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I12A244.

    PubMed 24755386
  • Liu Z, Wang YL, Hua Q, Chu YY, Ji XM. Late remote ischemic preconditioning provides benefit to patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014 Sep;70(1):437-42. doi: 10.1007/s12013-014-9936-1.

    PubMed 25015066

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in people with Myocardial Infarction, Acute, run by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Liu zhi, doctor (13911517967, xwyy168@sina.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

major adverse cardiovascular events (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03018873, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in