Acute Coronary SyndromeHULKNCT03021044
Physical Activity Intervention for Patients With Reduced Physical Performance After Acute Coronary Syndrome
A study testing physical activity intervention in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by University Hospital of Ferrara at 3 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY Patients with low functional capacity (frail patients) with cardiovascular disease, in particular those undergoing invasive procedures or suffering from coronary artery disease, have a much higher adverse events, death and re-hospitalizations. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- physical activity intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 235 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Jan 2017to 28 Apr 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- informed consent
- age ≥70 years old
- hospital admission for acute coronary syndrome
- coronary artery angiography and successfully percutaneous coronary revascularization
- result of the short physical performance battery test at the inclusion visit between 4 and 9
Who cannot join
- chronic heart failure (new york heart association classification III-IV)
- left ventricle ejection fraction <30%.
- severe aortic or mitral valvulopathy
- three vessel coronary artery disease or left main coronary artery disease requiring surgical coronary revascularization
- need of staged percutaneous coronary intervention
- severe cognitive impairment (defined as short portable mental status questionnaire < 4)
- physical limitation/impairment not permitting physical activity training annd program
- life expectancy <12 months
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Italy3 sites
University Hospital of Ferrara
Cona, Ferrara, 44124
Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto
Piacenza
Ospedale Santa maria delle Croci
Ravenna
About this study
Official title: Physical Activity Intervention for Patients With Reduced Physical Performance After Acute Coronary Syndrome: a Randomized Clinical Trial (The HULK Pilot Study).
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
Patients with low functional capacity (frail patients) with cardiovascular disease, in particular those undergoing invasive procedures or suffering from coronary artery disease, have a much higher adverse events, death and re-hospitalizations. and complications, suggesting the need for a more accurate functional stratification and a more careful evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of some invasive procedures. An early and ad hoc physical activity intervention could be improve functional autonomy of these patients early after discharge with benefit on long-term outcome. The present study is performed to assess the impact, evaluated by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), of a program of physical activity early after discharge in elderly patients aged 75 years and older with low physical performance.
This is an interventional, multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase III study. The present study is expected to enroll elderly patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stratified with SPPB score predischarge. At the moment of discharge there will be a screening: patients with SPPB score 0-2 o 10-12 will be exclusively followed up by clinical visit every year. Patients with SPPB score 3-9 will be evaluated during the inclusion visit when SPPB will be repeated. If SPPB score will be 0-3 or 10-12, patients will be considered screening failure and will be followed up by clinical visit; patients with SPPB score between 4 to 9 will be randomized to standard of care (see below) or to an ad hoc physical activity program (see below). The aim of the study is to demonstrate 6 months later an improvement in the SPPB score (at least 1 point) in patients randomized to physical activity intervention versus patients randomized to standard of care. All patients will be evaluated until 3 years after randomization.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND Physical activity helps to prevent stroke, type II diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, while physical inactivity has been linked to declines in both muscle strength and cardiovascular function. Despite the evidence of the benefits of physical activity are well known, 61% of adults over the age of 65 are not meeting the recommended levels of physical activity. It has been demonstrated that regular physical exercise benefits in primary and secondary prevention in patients with cardiovascular diseases and improves functional capacity. The incidence of cardiovascular disease is higher in older patients (especially over 75 years old). In Italy, life expectancy at birth has reached 80 years in men and 85 in women; in about 50 years, life expectancy at the age of 80 has increased by an extraordinary 61% and 55%, respectively, due to more effective therapies and lower mortality of many diseases. So, as recommended by guidelines, physical activity should be suggested to older coronary patients; some studies demonstrated the benefit of physical training also in older patients, but only few studies enrolled patients aged 65 years and over because of some difficulties about patients' compliance mainly due to logistic problems and lack of motivation by doctors. As far as we know no studies have evaluated impact of physical activity intervention on functional capacity of older patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome. Among the numerous tests proposed in the literature for the functional evaluation and objective measures of physical capability in elderly patient, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the evaluation of hand grip strength (grip strength) are those characterized by an improved prognostic ability and an easy administration.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY Patients with low functional capacity (frail patients) with cardiovascular disease, in particular those undergoing invasive procedures or suffering from coronary artery disease, have a much higher adverse events, death and re-hospitalizations. and complications, suggesting the need for a more accurate functional stratification and a more careful evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of some invasive procedures. An early and ad hoc physical activity intervention could be improve functional autonomy of these patients early after discharge with benefit on long-term outcome. The present study is performed to assess the impact, evaluated by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), of a program of physical activity early after discharge in elderly patients aged 75 years and older with low physical performance.
STUDY DESIGN This is an interventional, multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase III study. The present study is expected to enroll elderly patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stratified with SPPB score predischarge. At the moment of discharge there will be a screening: patients with SPPB score 0-2 o 10-12 will be exclusively followed up by clinical visit every year. Patients with SPPB score 3-9 will be evaluated during the inclusion visit when SPPB will be repeated. If SPPB score will be 0-3 or 10-12, patients will be considered screening failure and will be followed up by clinical visit; patients with SPPB score between 4 to 9 will be randomized to standard of care (see below) or to an ad hoc physical activity program (see below). The aim of the study is to demonstrate 6 months later an improvement in the SPPB score (at least 1 point) in patients randomized to physical activity intervention versus patients randomized to standard of care. All patients will be evaluated until 3 years after randomization.
RANDOMIZATION
At discharge an investigator doctor and a study coordinator show to patients the study protocol, aims, risks and benefit. If the patient accepts to participate to the study, he signs the informed consent and he will be evaluated with SPPB score and other tests in the screening evaluation (T0). Patients with SPPB score <3 or >9 will be excluded and will be followed up with exclusively clinical visit every year. Patients with SPPB score 4-9 will be enrolled and data will be collected in the study case report form. These patients will be re-evaluated in the inclusion visit 30 days later (T1); if SPPB score will be 0-3 or 10-12 the patients will be considered screening failure and they will be followed up exclusively with clinical visit every year; on the contrary, if SPPB score will be 4-9, patients will be randomized to standard of care group or experimental group. There will be a stratified randomization by:
- male vs. female
- SPPB value 4-6 vs. SPPB value 7-9
- admission for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction vs. non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY GROUPS
- STANDARD OF CARE GROUP The standard of care group will be recommended about medications and a correct life style (physical activity, low salt and low fat diet, no smoking) in order to prevent cardiovascular events. In this 15-minutes talk study doctor will explain to patients and relatives the importance of aerobic physical activity (30-60 minutes daily, moderate intensity, for example speedy walking, for at least 5 days/weekly) with the aim of reducing cardiovascular risk. Patients will also receive a brochure with clear explanations. Study doctor and study coordinator will be helpful for any question and they will ensure that patients and relatives understand the importance of physical activity for cardiovascular health.
- EXPERIMENTAL GROUP, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTION Besides standard of care, the experimental group will participate to a program of physical activity intervention. Following hospital discharge, participants in stable clinical conditions will be referred by their cardiologist to the exercise-based secondary prevention program in dedicated centers. All patients should report no difficulty climbing one flight of stairs without resting or performing basic activities of daily living. The ultimate goal of the program is long-term promotion and maintenance of a physically active lifestyle in order to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and functional ability. Patients will be treated for cardiovascular and other diseases according to accepted international guidelines. All exercise testing and training sessions will be performed without discontinuing the prescribed medications. On admission to the program, and quarterly during follow-up, each patient will perform a 1-km treadmill walk test as previously described. Briefly, the test will be carried out as follows: the participants will be instructed to select a pace that they could maintain for 10 to 30 min at a moderate perceived exercise intensity using the Borg 6-20 scale. Participants will start the test walking on the level at 2.0 km/h, with subsequent increases of 0.3 km/h every 30 s up to a walking speed corresponding to a perceived exertion of 11-13 on the Borg scale. The test will be then started and the rate of perceived exertion acquired every 2 min. Walking speed will be adjusted to maintain the selected moderate perceived intensity. Heart rate will be monitored continuously during the test. Blood pressure will be monitored at least before and immediately after the test. No individual will be excluded on the basis of his/her performance on the treadmill protocol. Subjects walking at a perceived moderate speed < 3.0 km/h will perform the test over the distance of 500-m. The time to complete either 500-m and 1-km will be recorded and averaged walking speed calculated accordingly.
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Being tested
- physical activity intervention, standard of care
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
physical activity interventionOther
30, 60, 90 and 120 days after hospital discharge a clinical visit and session of physical activity training and program
standard of careOther
30, 60, 90 and 120 days after hospital discharge a clinical visit with correct style life recommendation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| STANDARD OF CARE | Other | The standard of care group will be recommended about medications and a correct life style (physical activity, low salt and low fat diet, no smoking) in order to prevent cardiovascular events. In this 15-minutes talk study doctor will explain to patients and relatives the importance of aerobic physical activity (30-60 minutes daily, moderate intensity, for example speedy walking, for at least 5 days/weekly) with the aim of reducing cardiovascular risk. Patients will also receive a brochure with clear explanations. Study doctor and study coordinator will be helpful for any question and they will ensure that patients and relatives understand the importance of physical activity for cardiovascular health. Receives: Other: standard of care |
| PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTION | Experimental | Besides standard of care, the experimental group will participate to a program of physical activity intervention. Following hospital discharge, participants in stable clinical conditions will be referred by their cardiologist to the exercise-based secondary prevention program. All exercise testing and training sessions will be performed without discontinuing the prescribed medications. On admission to the program, and quarterly during follow-up, each patient will perform a 1-km treadmill walk test as previously described (1k-TWT). Receives: Other: physical activity intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Physical performance
result of the short physical performance battery test
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Physical performance
result of the short physical performance battery test
Measured: 1 year
Physical performance
result of the short physical performance battery test
Measured: 2 years
Physical performance
result of the short physical performance battery test
Measured: 3 years
clinical adverse events
cumulative occurrence of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospital readmission
Measured: 1 year
clinical adverse events
cumulative occurrence of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospital readmission
Measured: 2 years
clinical adverse events
cumulative occurrence of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospital readmission
Measured: 3 years
cardiac adverse events
cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause
Measured: 1 year
cardiac adverse events
cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause
Measured: 2 years
cardiac adverse events
cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2017
- Primary completion30 Oct 2018
- Study completion28 Apr 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Coronary SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 235 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital of Ferrara
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gianluca Campo, University Hospital of Ferrara
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03021044
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 161098
- Acronym
- HULK
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Raisi A, Zerbini V, Tonet E, Zagnoni S, Chiaranda G, Aschieri D, Pasanisi G, D'Intino PE, Pavasini R, Cimaglia P, Casella G, Caglioni S, Cocco M, Biscaglia S, Campo G, Volpato S, Grazzi N, Piva T, Menegatti E, Mazzoni G, Grazzi G, Mandini S. Physical performance and outcomes after myocardial infarction in older patients undergoing multidomain cardiac rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2026 Sep 16:zwag390. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwag390. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42748164Raisi A, Zerbini V, Myers J, Piva T, Campo G, Mazzoni G, Grazzi G, Mandini S. A Novel Motivational Approach in the Management of Older Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2023 Jul 1;43(4):309-310. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000791. Epub 2023 Apr 5. No abstract available.
PubMed 37014940Erriquez A, Pavasini R, Biscaglia S, Tebaldi M, Tonet E, Maietti E, Cimaglia P, Grazzi G, Scoccia A, Cardelli LS, Verardi FM, Morelli C, Campana R, Rubboli A, Mazzoni G, Volpato S, Ferrari R, Campo G. The impact of periprocedural myocardial infarction on mortality in older adults with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a pooled analysis of the FRASER and HULK studies. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Jul 1;22(7):546-552. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001146.
PubMed 34076602Campo G, Tonet E, Chiaranda G, Sella G, Maietti E, Bugani G, Vitali F, Serenelli M, Mazzoni G, Ruggiero R, Villani G, Biscaglia S, Pavasini R, Rubboli A, Campana R, Caglioni S, Volpato S, Myers J, Grazzi G. Exercise intervention improves quality of life in older adults after myocardial infarction: randomised clinical trial. Heart. 2020 Nov;106(21):1658-1664. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316349. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
PubMed 32144189Tonet E, Maietti E, Chiaranda G, Vitali F, Serenelli M, Bugani G, Mazzoni G, Ruggiero R, Myers J, Villani GQ, Corvi U, Pasanisi G, Biscaglia S, Pavasini R, Lucchi GR, Sella G, Ferrari R, Volpato S, Campo G, Grazzi G. Physical activity intervention for elderly patients with reduced physical performance after acute coronary syndrome (HULK study): rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 21;18(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0839-8.
PubMed 29783928
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physical Activity Intervention for Patients With Reduced Physical Performance After Acute Coronary Syndrome: a Randomized Clinical Trial (The HULK Pilot Study).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03021044
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HULK / 161098
- Conditions
- Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 235 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital of FerraraUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Apr 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
Patients with low functional capacity (frail patients) with cardiovascular disease, in particular those undergoing invasive procedures or suffering from coronary artery disease, have a much higher adverse events, death and re-hospitalizations. and complications, suggesting the need for a more accurate functional stratification and a more careful evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of some invasive procedures. An early and ad hoc physical activity intervention could be improve functional autonomy of these patients early after discharge with benefit on long-term outcome. The present study is performed to assess the impact, evaluated by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), of a program of physical activity early after discharge in elderly patients aged 75 years and older with low physical performance.
This is an interventional, multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase III study. The present study is expected to enroll elderly patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stratified with SPPB score predischarge. At the moment of discharge there will be a screening: patients with SPPB score 0-2 o 10-12 will be exclusively followed up by clinical visit every year. Patients with SPPB score 3-9 will be evaluated during the inclusion visit when SPPB will be repeated. If SPPB score will be 0-3 or 10-12, patients will be considered screening failure and will be followed up by clinical visit; patients with SPPB score between 4 to 9 will be randomized to standard of care (see below) or to an ad hoc physical activity program (see below). The aim of the study is to demonstrate 6 months later an improvement in the SPPB score (at least 1 point) in patients randomized to physical activity intervention versus patients randomized to standard of care. All patients will be evaluated until 3 years after randomization.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND Physical activity helps to prevent stroke, type II diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, while physical inactivity has been linked to declines in both muscle strength and cardiovascular function. Despite the evidence of the benefits of physical activity are well known, 61% of adults over the age of 65 are not meeting the recommended levels of physical activity. It has been demonstrated that regular physical exercise benefits in primary and secondary prevention in patients with cardiovascular diseases and improves functional capacity. The incidence of cardiovascular disease is higher in older patients (especially over 75 years old). In Italy, life expectancy at birth has reached 80 years in men and 85 in women; in about 50 years, life expectancy at the age of 80 has increased by an extraordinary 61% and 55%, respectively, due to more effective therapies and lower mortality of many diseases. So, as recommended by guidelines, physical activity should be suggested to older coronary patients; some studies demonstrated the benefit of physical training also in older patients, but only few studies enrolled patients aged 65 years and over because of some difficulties about patients' compliance mainly due to logistic problems and lack of motivation by doctors. As far as we know no studies have evaluated impact of physical activity intervention on functional capacity of older patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome. Among the numerous tests proposed in the literature for the functional evaluation and objective measures of physical capability in elderly patient, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the evaluation of hand grip strength (grip strength) are those characterized by an improved prognostic ability and an easy administration.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY Patients with low functional capacity (frail patients) with cardiovascular disease, in particular those undergoing invasive procedures or suffering from coronary artery disease, have a much higher adverse events, death and re-hospitalizations. and complications, suggesting the need for a more accurate functional stratification and a more careful evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of some invasive procedures. An early and ad hoc physical activity intervention could be improve functional autonomy of these patients early after discharge with benefit on long-term outcome. The present study is performed to assess the impact, evaluated by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), of a program of physical activity early after discharge in elderly patients aged 75 years and older with low physical performance.
STUDY DESIGN This is an interventional, multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase III study. The present study is expected to enroll elderly patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stratified with SPPB score predischarge. At the moment of discharge there will be a screening: patients with SPPB score 0-2 o 10-12 will be exclusively followed up by clinical visit every year. Patients with SPPB score 3-9 will be evaluated during the inclusion visit when SPPB will be repeated. If SPPB score will be 0-3 or 10-12, patients will be considered screening failure and will be followed up by clinical visit; patients with SPPB score between 4 to 9 will be randomized to standard of care (see below) or to an ad hoc physical activity program (see below). The aim of the study is to demonstrate 6 months later an improvement in the SPPB score (at least 1 point) in patients randomized to physical activity intervention versus patients randomized to standard of care. All patients will be evaluated until 3 years after randomization.
RANDOMIZATION
At discharge an investigator doctor and a study coordinator show to patients the study protocol, aims, risks and benefit. If the patient accepts to participate to the study, he signs the informed consent and he will be evaluated with SPPB score and other tests in the screening evaluation (T0). Patients with SPPB score <3 or >9 will be excluded and will be followed up with exclusively clinical visit every year. Patients with SPPB score 4-9 will be enrolled and data will be collected in the study case report form. These patients will be re-evaluated in the inclusion visit 30 days later (T1); if SPPB score will be 0-3 or 10-12 the patients will be considered screening failure and they will be followed up exclusively with clinical visit every year; on the contrary, if SPPB score will be 4-9, patients will be randomized to standard of care group or experimental group. There will be a stratified randomization by:
- male vs. female
- SPPB value 4-6 vs. SPPB value 7-9
- admission for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction vs. non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY GROUPS
- STANDARD OF CARE GROUP The standard of care group will be recommended about medications and a correct life style (physical activity, low salt and low fat diet, no smoking) in order to prevent cardiovascular events. In this 15-minutes talk study doctor will explain to patients and relatives the importance of aerobic physical activity (30-60 minutes daily, moderate intensity, for example speedy walking, for at least 5 days/weekly) with the aim of reducing cardiovascular risk. Patients will also receive a brochure with clear explanations. Study doctor and study coordinator will be helpful for any question and they will ensure that patients and relatives understand the importance of physical activity for cardiovascular health.
- EXPERIMENTAL GROUP, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTION Besides standard of care, the experimental group will participate to a program of physical activity intervention. Following hospital discharge, participants in stable clinical conditions will be referred by their cardiologist to the exercise-based secondary prevention program in dedicated centers. All patients should report no difficulty climbing one flight of stairs without resting or performing basic activities of daily living. The ultimate goal of the program is long-term promotion and maintenance of a physically active lifestyle in order to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and functional ability. Patients will be treated for cardiovascular and other diseases according to accepted international guidelines. All exercise testing and training sessions will be performed without discontinuing the prescribed medications. On admission to the program, and quarterly during follow-up, each patient will perform a 1-km treadmill walk test as previously described. Briefly, the test will be carried out as follows: the participants will be instructed to select a pace that they could maintain for 10 to 30 min at a moderate perceived exercise intensity using the Borg 6-20 scale. Participants will start the test walking on the level at 2.0 km/h, with subsequent increases of 0.3 km/h every 30 s up to a walking speed corresponding to a perceived exertion of 11-13 on the Borg scale. The test will be then started and the rate of perceived exertion acquired every 2 min. Walking speed will be adjusted to maintain the selected moderate perceived intensity. Heart rate will be monitored continuously during the test. Blood pressure will be monitored at least before and immediately after the test. No individual will be excluded on the basis of his/her performance on the treadmill protocol. Subjects walking at a perceived moderate speed < 3.0 km/h will perform the test over the distance of 500-m. The time to complete either 500-m and 1-km will be recorded and averaged walking speed calculated accordingly.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| STANDARD OF CARE | Other | Other: standard of careThe standard of care group will be recommended about medications and a correct life style (physical activity, low salt and low fat diet, no smoking) in order to prevent cardiovascular events. In this 15-minutes talk study doctor will explain to patients and relatives the importance of aerobic physical activity (30-60 minutes daily, moderate intensity, for example speedy walking, for at least 5 days/weekly) with the aim of reducing cardiovascular risk. Patients will also receive a brochure with clear explanations. Study doctor and study coordinator will be helpful for any question and they will ensure that patients and relatives understand the importance of physical activity for cardiovascular health. |
| PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTION | Experimental | Other: physical activity interventionBesides standard of care, the experimental group will participate to a program of physical activity intervention. Following hospital discharge, participants in stable clinical conditions will be referred by their cardiologist to the exercise-based secondary prevention program. All exercise testing and training sessions will be performed without discontinuing the prescribed medications. On admission to the program, and quarterly during follow-up, each patient will perform a 1-km treadmill walk test as previously described (1k-TWT). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- informed consent
- age ≥70 years old
- hospital admission for acute coronary syndrome
- coronary artery angiography and successfully percutaneous coronary revascularization
- result of the short physical performance battery test at the inclusion visit between 4 and 9
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- chronic heart failure (new york heart association classification III-IV)
- left ventricle ejection fraction <30%.
- severe aortic or mitral valvulopathy
- three vessel coronary artery disease or left main coronary artery disease requiring surgical coronary revascularization
- need of staged percutaneous coronary intervention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| physical activity intervention30, 60, 90 and 120 days after hospital discharge a clinical visit and session of physical activity training and program | Other | PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTION |
| standard of care30, 60, 90 and 120 days after hospital discharge a clinical visit with correct style life recommendation | Other | STANDARD OF CARE |
Primary outcome
Physical performance
Time frame: 6 months
result of the short physical performance battery test
9 secondary outcomes
Physical performance
Time frame: 1 year
Physical performance
Time frame: 2 years
Physical performance
Time frame: 3 years
clinical adverse events
Time frame: 1 year
clinical adverse events
Time frame: 2 years
clinical adverse events
Time frame: 3 years
cardiac adverse events
Time frame: 1 year
cardiac adverse events
Time frame: 2 years
cardiac adverse events
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42748164Raisi A, Zerbini V, Tonet E, Zagnoni S, Chiaranda G, Aschieri D, Pasanisi G, D'Intino PE, Pavasini R, Cimaglia P, Casella G, Caglioni S, Cocco M, Biscaglia S, Campo G, Volpato S, Grazzi N, Piva T, Menegatti E, Mazzoni G, Grazzi G, Mandini S. Physical performance and outcomes after myocardial infarction in older patients undergoing multidomain cardiac rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2026 Sep 16:zwag390. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwag390. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37014940Raisi A, Zerbini V, Myers J, Piva T, Campo G, Mazzoni G, Grazzi G, Mandini S. A Novel Motivational Approach in the Management of Older Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2023 Jul 1;43(4):309-310. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000791. Epub 2023 Apr 5. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34076602Erriquez A, Pavasini R, Biscaglia S, Tebaldi M, Tonet E, Maietti E, Cimaglia P, Grazzi G, Scoccia A, Cardelli LS, Verardi FM, Morelli C, Campana R, Rubboli A, Mazzoni G, Volpato S, Ferrari R, Campo G. The impact of periprocedural myocardial infarction on mortality in older adults with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a pooled analysis of the FRASER and HULK studies. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Jul 1;22(7):546-552. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001146.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32144189Campo G, Tonet E, Chiaranda G, Sella G, Maietti E, Bugani G, Vitali F, Serenelli M, Mazzoni G, Ruggiero R, Villani G, Biscaglia S, Pavasini R, Rubboli A, Campana R, Caglioni S, Volpato S, Myers J, Grazzi G. Exercise intervention improves quality of life in older adults after myocardial infarction: randomised clinical trial. Heart. 2020 Nov;106(21):1658-1664. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316349. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29783928Tonet E, Maietti E, Chiaranda G, Vitali F, Serenelli M, Bugani G, Mazzoni G, Ruggiero R, Myers J, Villani GQ, Corvi U, Pasanisi G, Biscaglia S, Pavasini R, Lucchi GR, Sella G, Ferrari R, Volpato S, Campo G, Grazzi G. Physical activity intervention for elderly patients with reduced physical performance after acute coronary syndrome (HULK study): rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 21;18(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0839-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Recruiting
Intracoronary Cryotherapy Effect on Stabilization of Vulnerable Plaque in Patients With Stable Angina or ACS - A Traditional Feasibility Study
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Plaque
RecruitingPhase 4
CCTA Evaluation of SGLT2i-related Pericoronary Fat Changes Patients With Stage 4 CKM Syndrome
ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome), SGLT2 Inhibitors
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Aspirin for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications in Giant Cell Arteritis
Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
Enrolling by invitation
Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Vessel Evaluation
Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Comparative Assessment of Inclisiran on Top of Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone for LDL-C Evaluation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Saudi Arabia
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing physical activity intervention in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by University Hospital of Ferrara at 3 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Physical performance (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03021044, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2021.