AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Coronary SyndromeHULKNCT03021044

Physical Activity Intervention for Patients With Reduced Physical Performance After Acute Coronary Syndrome

A study testing physical activity intervention in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by University Hospital of Ferrara at 3 sites in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY Patients with low functional capacity (frail patients) with cardiovascular disease, in particular those undergoing invasive procedures or suffering from coronary artery disease, have a much higher adverse events, death and re-hospitalizations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Coronary Syndrome
What is being tested?
physical activity intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
235 participants
Where
3 sitesItaly
Study dates
Jan 2017to 28 Apr 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • informed consent
  • age ≥70 years old
  • hospital admission for acute coronary syndrome
  • coronary artery angiography and successfully percutaneous coronary revascularization
  • result of the short physical performance battery test at the inclusion visit between 4 and 9

Who cannot join

  • chronic heart failure (new york heart association classification III-IV)
  • left ventricle ejection fraction <30%.
  • severe aortic or mitral valvulopathy
  • three vessel coronary artery disease or left main coronary artery disease requiring surgical coronary revascularization
  • need of staged percutaneous coronary intervention
  • severe cognitive impairment (defined as short portable mental status questionnaire < 4)
  • physical limitation/impairment not permitting physical activity training annd program
  • life expectancy <12 months

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Italy3 sites
  • University Hospital of Ferrara

    Cona, Ferrara, 44124

  • Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto

    Piacenza

  • Ospedale Santa maria delle Croci

    Ravenna

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Physical Activity Intervention for Patients With Reduced Physical Performance After Acute Coronary Syndrome: a Randomized Clinical Trial (The HULK Pilot Study).

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

Patients with low functional capacity (frail patients) with cardiovascular disease, in particular those undergoing invasive procedures or suffering from coronary artery disease, have a much higher adverse events, death and re-hospitalizations. and complications, suggesting the need for a more accurate functional stratification and a more careful evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of some invasive procedures. An early and ad hoc physical activity intervention could be improve functional autonomy of these patients early after discharge with benefit on long-term outcome. The present study is performed to assess the impact, evaluated by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), of a program of physical activity early after discharge in elderly patients aged 75 years and older with low physical performance.

This is an interventional, multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase III study. The present study is expected to enroll elderly patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stratified with SPPB score predischarge. At the moment of discharge there will be a screening: patients with SPPB score 0-2 o 10-12 will be exclusively followed up by clinical visit every year. Patients with SPPB score 3-9 will be evaluated during the inclusion visit when SPPB will be repeated. If SPPB score will be 0-3 or 10-12, patients will be considered screening failure and will be followed up by clinical visit; patients with SPPB score between 4 to 9 will be randomized to standard of care (see below) or to an ad hoc physical activity program (see below). The aim of the study is to demonstrate 6 months later an improvement in the SPPB score (at least 1 point) in patients randomized to physical activity intervention versus patients randomized to standard of care. All patients will be evaluated until 3 years after randomization.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Physical activity helps to prevent stroke, type II diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, while physical inactivity has been linked to declines in both muscle strength and cardiovascular function. Despite the evidence of the benefits of physical activity are well known, 61% of adults over the age of 65 are not meeting the recommended levels of physical activity. It has been demonstrated that regular physical exercise benefits in primary and secondary prevention in patients with cardiovascular diseases and improves functional capacity. The incidence of cardiovascular disease is higher in older patients (especially over 75 years old). In Italy, life expectancy at birth has reached 80 years in men and 85 in women; in about 50 years, life expectancy at the age of 80 has increased by an extraordinary 61% and 55%, respectively, due to more effective therapies and lower mortality of many diseases. So, as recommended by guidelines, physical activity should be suggested to older coronary patients; some studies demonstrated the benefit of physical training also in older patients, but only few studies enrolled patients aged 65 years and over because of some difficulties about patients' compliance mainly due to logistic problems and lack of motivation by doctors. As far as we know no studies have evaluated impact of physical activity intervention on functional capacity of older patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome. Among the numerous tests proposed in the literature for the functional evaluation and objective measures of physical capability in elderly patient, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the evaluation of hand grip strength (grip strength) are those characterized by an improved prognostic ability and an easy administration.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY Patients with low functional capacity (frail patients) with cardiovascular disease, in particular those undergoing invasive procedures or suffering from coronary artery disease, have a much higher adverse events, death and re-hospitalizations. and complications, suggesting the need for a more accurate functional stratification and a more careful evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio of some invasive procedures. An early and ad hoc physical activity intervention could be improve functional autonomy of these patients early after discharge with benefit on long-term outcome. The present study is performed to assess the impact, evaluated by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), of a program of physical activity early after discharge in elderly patients aged 75 years and older with low physical performance.

STUDY DESIGN This is an interventional, multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase III study. The present study is expected to enroll elderly patients admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stratified with SPPB score predischarge. At the moment of discharge there will be a screening: patients with SPPB score 0-2 o 10-12 will be exclusively followed up by clinical visit every year. Patients with SPPB score 3-9 will be evaluated during the inclusion visit when SPPB will be repeated. If SPPB score will be 0-3 or 10-12, patients will be considered screening failure and will be followed up by clinical visit; patients with SPPB score between 4 to 9 will be randomized to standard of care (see below) or to an ad hoc physical activity program (see below). The aim of the study is to demonstrate 6 months later an improvement in the SPPB score (at least 1 point) in patients randomized to physical activity intervention versus patients randomized to standard of care. All patients will be evaluated until 3 years after randomization.

RANDOMIZATION

At discharge an investigator doctor and a study coordinator show to patients the study protocol, aims, risks and benefit. If the patient accepts to participate to the study, he signs the informed consent and he will be evaluated with SPPB score and other tests in the screening evaluation (T0). Patients with SPPB score <3 or >9 will be excluded and will be followed up with exclusively clinical visit every year. Patients with SPPB score 4-9 will be enrolled and data will be collected in the study case report form. These patients will be re-evaluated in the inclusion visit 30 days later (T1); if SPPB score will be 0-3 or 10-12 the patients will be considered screening failure and they will be followed up exclusively with clinical visit every year; on the contrary, if SPPB score will be 4-9, patients will be randomized to standard of care group or experimental group. There will be a stratified randomization by:

  • male vs. female
  • SPPB value 4-6 vs. SPPB value 7-9
  • admission for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction vs. non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY GROUPS

  • STANDARD OF CARE GROUP The standard of care group will be recommended about medications and a correct life style (physical activity, low salt and low fat diet, no smoking) in order to prevent cardiovascular events. In this 15-minutes talk study doctor will explain to patients and relatives the importance of aerobic physical activity (30-60 minutes daily, moderate intensity, for example speedy walking, for at least 5 days/weekly) with the aim of reducing cardiovascular risk. Patients will also receive a brochure with clear explanations. Study doctor and study coordinator will be helpful for any question and they will ensure that patients and relatives understand the importance of physical activity for cardiovascular health.
  • EXPERIMENTAL GROUP, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTION Besides standard of care, the experimental group will participate to a program of physical activity intervention. Following hospital discharge, participants in stable clinical conditions will be referred by their cardiologist to the exercise-based secondary prevention program in dedicated centers. All patients should report no difficulty climbing one flight of stairs without resting or performing basic activities of daily living. The ultimate goal of the program is long-term promotion and maintenance of a physically active lifestyle in order to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and functional ability. Patients will be treated for cardiovascular and other diseases according to accepted international guidelines. All exercise testing and training sessions will be performed without discontinuing the prescribed medications. On admission to the program, and quarterly during follow-up, each patient will perform a 1-km treadmill walk test as previously described. Briefly, the test will be carried out as follows: the participants will be instructed to select a pace that they could maintain for 10 to 30 min at a moderate perceived exercise intensity using the Borg 6-20 scale. Participants will start the test walking on the level at 2.0 km/h, with subsequent increases of 0.3 km/h every 30 s up to a walking speed corresponding to a perceived exertion of 11-13 on the Borg scale. The test will be then started and the rate of perceived exertion acquired every 2 min. Walking speed will be adjusted to maintain the selected moderate perceived intensity. Heart rate will be monitored continuously during the test. Blood pressure will be monitored at least before and immediately after the test. No individual will be excluded on the basis of his/her performance on the treadmill protocol. Subjects walking at a perceived moderate speed < 3.0 km/h will perform the test over the distance of 500-m. The time to complete either 500-m and 1-km will be recorded and averaged walking speed calculated accordingly.
Being tested
physical activity intervention, standard of care
Medical subject headings
Acute Coronary Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • physical activity interventionOther

    30, 60, 90 and 120 days after hospital discharge a clinical visit and session of physical activity training and program

  • standard of careOther

    30, 60, 90 and 120 days after hospital discharge a clinical visit with correct style life recommendation

Study groups in NCT03021044
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
STANDARD OF CAREOtherThe standard of care group will be recommended about medications and a correct life style (physical activity, low salt and low fat diet, no smoking) in order to prevent cardiovascular events. In this 15-minutes talk study doctor will explain to patients and relatives the importance of aerobic physical activity (30-60 minutes daily, moderate intensity, for example speedy walking, for at least 5 days/weekly) with the aim of reducing cardiovascular risk. Patients will also receive a brochure with clear explanations. Study doctor and study coordinator will be helpful for any question and they will ensure that patients and relatives understand the importance of physical activity for cardiovascular health.
Receives: Other: standard of care
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTIONExperimentalBesides standard of care, the experimental group will participate to a program of physical activity intervention. Following hospital discharge, participants in stable clinical conditions will be referred by their cardiologist to the exercise-based secondary prevention program. All exercise testing and training sessions will be performed without discontinuing the prescribed medications. On admission to the program, and quarterly during follow-up, each patient will perform a 1-km treadmill walk test as previously described (1k-TWT).
Receives: Other: physical activity intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Physical performance

    result of the short physical performance battery test

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Physical performance

    result of the short physical performance battery test

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Physical performance

    result of the short physical performance battery test

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Physical performance

    result of the short physical performance battery test

    Measured: 3 years

  4. clinical adverse events

    cumulative occurrence of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospital readmission

    Measured: 1 year

  5. clinical adverse events

    cumulative occurrence of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospital readmission

    Measured: 2 years

  6. clinical adverse events

    cumulative occurrence of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospital readmission

    Measured: 3 years

  7. cardiac adverse events

    cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause

    Measured: 1 year

  8. cardiac adverse events

    cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause

    Measured: 2 years

  9. cardiac adverse events

    cumulative occurrence of cardiovascular death and hospital readmission for cardiovascular cause

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion28 Apr 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
235 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03021044
Sponsor's protocol ID
161098
Acronym
HULK
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
11 Jan 2017
Last updated
29 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Raisi A, Zerbini V, Tonet E, Zagnoni S, Chiaranda G, Aschieri D, Pasanisi G, D'Intino PE, Pavasini R, Cimaglia P, Casella G, Caglioni S, Cocco M, Biscaglia S, Campo G, Volpato S, Grazzi N, Piva T, Menegatti E, Mazzoni G, Grazzi G, Mandini S. Physical performance and outcomes after myocardial infarction in older patients undergoing multidomain cardiac rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2026 Sep 16:zwag390. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwag390. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42748164
  • Raisi A, Zerbini V, Myers J, Piva T, Campo G, Mazzoni G, Grazzi G, Mandini S. A Novel Motivational Approach in the Management of Older Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2023 Jul 1;43(4):309-310. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000791. Epub 2023 Apr 5. No abstract available.

    PubMed 37014940
  • Erriquez A, Pavasini R, Biscaglia S, Tebaldi M, Tonet E, Maietti E, Cimaglia P, Grazzi G, Scoccia A, Cardelli LS, Verardi FM, Morelli C, Campana R, Rubboli A, Mazzoni G, Volpato S, Ferrari R, Campo G. The impact of periprocedural myocardial infarction on mortality in older adults with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a pooled analysis of the FRASER and HULK studies. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Jul 1;22(7):546-552. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001146.

    PubMed 34076602
  • Campo G, Tonet E, Chiaranda G, Sella G, Maietti E, Bugani G, Vitali F, Serenelli M, Mazzoni G, Ruggiero R, Villani G, Biscaglia S, Pavasini R, Rubboli A, Campana R, Caglioni S, Volpato S, Myers J, Grazzi G. Exercise intervention improves quality of life in older adults after myocardial infarction: randomised clinical trial. Heart. 2020 Nov;106(21):1658-1664. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316349. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

    PubMed 32144189
  • Tonet E, Maietti E, Chiaranda G, Vitali F, Serenelli M, Bugani G, Mazzoni G, Ruggiero R, Myers J, Villani GQ, Corvi U, Pasanisi G, Biscaglia S, Pavasini R, Lucchi GR, Sella G, Ferrari R, Volpato S, Campo G, Grazzi G. Physical activity intervention for elderly patients with reduced physical performance after acute coronary syndrome (HULK study): rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 21;18(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0839-8.

    PubMed 29783928

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing physical activity intervention in people with Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by University Hospital of Ferrara at 3 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Physical performance (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03021044, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in