Spinal InjuryPhase 4IONSYS PilotNCT03021083
IONSYS Feasibility Study
A Phase 4 study testing IONSYS Patch in people with Spinal Injury, run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York.
Trial summary
The treatment of postoperative pain continues to be a challenge after posterior spinal fusions. There is considerable evidence demonstrating that a multi-modality approach including patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioids for postoperative pain management compared to conventional opioid analgesia provides a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Injury
- What is being tested?
- IONSYS Patch
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2017to 1 Nov 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients 18-70 years old undergoing elective multi-level lumbar-sacral posterior spinal fusions
Who cannot join
- Chronic pain patients taking more than 20-mg equivalents of oxycodone daily
- Allergy to either hydromorphone or fentanyl
- Other chronic orthopedic pain complaints, which will confound the results of the study
- Issues with cognitive ability
About this study
Official title: Evaluating the Feasibility of Using Transdermal Patient-controlled Fentanyl After Spinal Fusions
The treatment of postoperative pain continues to be a challenge after posterior spinal fusions. There is considerable evidence demonstrating that a multi-modality approach including patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioids for postoperative pain management compared to conventional opioid analgesia provides a greater analgesic effect even when the amount of opioids consumed is similar between both groups. However, the PCA modality is often discontinued prior to all the patients' pain needs being met. The IONSYS system uses the concept of PCA-delivered narcotics and may be used for postoperative pain management.
Read the detailed description
Following posterior spinal fusions, many patients are treated with analgesics or other modalities for prolonged periods before choosing the surgical alternative. In addition, the narcotic-based anesthetic required for the procedure may induce postoperative hyperalgesia (1). Inadequate treatment of this pain can result in prolonged hospitalization, cardiopulmonary complications, and poor surgical outcome (2).
Pain during the immediate postoperative period is usually managed with IV narcotic PCA and then transitioned to a combination of long-acting and short-acting oral analgesics. Because of the requirement for continuous carrier fluid infusion, cumbersome pump technology restricting mobility and supervision by a dedicated pain team to control programming of the pump, the PCA modality is often discontinued prior to all the patients' pain needs being met.
The investigators' most recent study evaluated the addition of pregabalin to the pain regimen after spinal fusions. The study found that after the removal of the PCA modality, these patients had considerable pain during physical therapy (PT), and their pain was not improved with the addition of pregabalin.
The IONSYS system might alleviate some of the problems encountered with conventional PCA systems (3,4). The system is an iontophoretic transdermal (needleless) system preprogrammed to deliver upon activation 40 mcg fentanyl over a 10-minute period, with up to 6 doses per hour. The system performs for 24 hours. The drug is embedded in a matrix gel and is only delivered when a current is propagated between the two poles of the system. Other than the usual narcotic side effects, the only specific side effect is a local dermatological reaction to the patch (5% had a rash, which cleared after removal). The system was designed with fentanyl, since hydromorphone cannot be incorporated in this type of matrix. Unlike hydromorphone, fentanyl is quick acting and doesn't hang around. The in-house chronic pain service currently puts many of their patients on IV fentanyl, because of the belief that it works when they have pain but is quickly metabolized.
- Conditions
- Spinal Injury
- Being tested
- IONSYS Patch
- Keywords
- Lumbar multi-level fusions, Patient Controlled Analgesia, Fentanyl, Opioid Analgesia
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IONSYS PatchDevice
Also called Patient Controlled Transdermal Fentanyl Patch
Patient controlled transdermal fentanyl patch, IONSYS, applied to patient in place of a PCA.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IONSYS Administration | Experimental | Patients who have elective multi-level spinal fusions under general anesthesia (who do not receive methadone) will be enrolled. In addition, all patients will receive Pepcid 20 mg, dexamethasone 10 mg, and ondansetron 4 mg.
When patients will arrive in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), pain will initially be controlled with IV hydromorphone to achieve an NRS score of 3 or less. Once transferred to the step down unit (SDU), the IONSYS patch will be applied. IONSYS should be utilized when they have pain, but rescue analgesia will be available. If severe pain continues, the chronic pain service will be consulted, to potentially change the medications.
Patients will be assessed for pain at rest and with PT in the AM and PM of POD 1 and POD 2. The IONSYS system will be discontinued after 48 hours, and a total dose of fentanyl received per 24 hours will be recorded. PT milestones for discharge will be assessed on the afternoon of POD 1 and POD 2. Receives: Device: IONSYS Patch |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of IONSYS system
- Nursing assessment regarding the ease of setup and initiation of the IONSYS system (With regard to setup and initiation of the IONSYS, on a scale of 0-10, where 0=worst and 10=best, how would the nurse rate the system?). This will be given to the nurse who sets up the device on DOS, and nurse who sets up the device on POD 1, and the day nurse on POD 2. An average score of 7 will be considered feasible.
Measured: Day 2 following surgery for each patient
NRS Pain Scores
- NRS pain (0-10 scale) on first day after surgery (POD 1) during the afternoon session of PT. In a previous study on similar patients with IV PCA, we recorded mean pain scores of 4.6 during PT. Adequate pain control is delineated as NRS ≤ 3
Measured: Day 1 following surgery for each patient
Secondary outcomes (5)
Day of eligibility for discharge,
- Day of eligibility for discharge, as assessed by a physical therapist's observation of a patient's ability to walk at least 20 feet and climb 4 stairs. Will be delineated as either AM or PM on a day following surgery, since PT is conducted twice daily.
Measured: Up to 1 week after surgery
A Oswestry Back Pain Disability Index questionnaire
An Oswestry Back Pain Disability Index questionnaire will be conducted at the first postoperative office visit to assess whether improved pain control in the hospital had an effect on the post-discharge recovery of the patient.
Measured: 6 weeks after surgery at the Post-Op Office Visit
Level of Sedation
Level of sedation, as assessed by PT starting on POD1 at the initiation of PT using the University of Michigan sedation scale: (1) awake and alert; (2) minimally sedated; (3) moderately sedated; (4) deeply sedated; (5) unarousable
Measured: POD1
Presence of Nausea of Vomiting
Assess whether the patient has post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
Measured: POD1 and POD2 after surgery
Satisfaction Survey
A satisfaction survey will be conducted prior to discharge from the hospital. It will include the following questions: (1) Was the patient's pain adequately treated? (Y/N); (2) What was the patient's worst pain level after surgery? (0-10 scale); (3) Was the IONSYS device explained? (Y/N); (4) Did the patient have side effects to the IONSYS? (Y/N); (5) Was the patient able to perform PT? (Y/N); (6) Overall satisfaction with IONSYS device (0-10 scale; 0=not satisfied; 10=most satisfied).
Measured: Up to 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start1 Nov 2017
- Primary completion1 Nov 2017
- Study completion1 Nov 2017
Why it stopped: Contract not reached with sponsor
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Medicines Company
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael Urban, M.D., Principal investigator, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03021083
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016-803
- Acronym
- IONSYS Pilot
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):991-1004. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu137.
PubMed 24829420White PF. The changing role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5 Suppl):S5-S22. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000177099.28914.A7.
PubMed 16334489Scott LJ. Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System: A Review in Acute Postoperative Pain. Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Apr;36(4):321-30. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0387-x.
PubMed 26968174Mayes S, Ferrone M. Fentanyl HCl patient-controlled iontophoretic transdermal system for the management of acute postoperative pain. Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Dec;40(12):2178-86. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H135.
PubMed 17164395
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating the Feasibility of Using Transdermal Patient-controlled Fentanyl After Spinal Fusions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03021083
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IONSYS Pilot / 2016-803
- Conditions
- Spinal Injury
- Keywords
- Lumbar multi-level fusions, Patient Controlled Analgesia, Fentanyl, Opioid Analgesia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Contract not reached with sponsor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Medicines Company
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The treatment of postoperative pain continues to be a challenge after posterior spinal fusions. There is considerable evidence demonstrating that a multi-modality approach including patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioids for postoperative pain management compared to conventional opioid analgesia provides a greater analgesic effect even when the amount of opioids consumed is similar between both groups. However, the PCA modality is often discontinued prior to all the patients' pain needs being met. The IONSYS system uses the concept of PCA-delivered narcotics and may be used for postoperative pain management.
Detailed description
Following posterior spinal fusions, many patients are treated with analgesics or other modalities for prolonged periods before choosing the surgical alternative. In addition, the narcotic-based anesthetic required for the procedure may induce postoperative hyperalgesia (1). Inadequate treatment of this pain can result in prolonged hospitalization, cardiopulmonary complications, and poor surgical outcome (2).
Pain during the immediate postoperative period is usually managed with IV narcotic PCA and then transitioned to a combination of long-acting and short-acting oral analgesics. Because of the requirement for continuous carrier fluid infusion, cumbersome pump technology restricting mobility and supervision by a dedicated pain team to control programming of the pump, the PCA modality is often discontinued prior to all the patients' pain needs being met.
The investigators' most recent study evaluated the addition of pregabalin to the pain regimen after spinal fusions. The study found that after the removal of the PCA modality, these patients had considerable pain during physical therapy (PT), and their pain was not improved with the addition of pregabalin.
The IONSYS system might alleviate some of the problems encountered with conventional PCA systems (3,4). The system is an iontophoretic transdermal (needleless) system preprogrammed to deliver upon activation 40 mcg fentanyl over a 10-minute period, with up to 6 doses per hour. The system performs for 24 hours. The drug is embedded in a matrix gel and is only delivered when a current is propagated between the two poles of the system. Other than the usual narcotic side effects, the only specific side effect is a local dermatological reaction to the patch (5% had a rash, which cleared after removal). The system was designed with fentanyl, since hydromorphone cannot be incorporated in this type of matrix. Unlike hydromorphone, fentanyl is quick acting and doesn't hang around. The in-house chronic pain service currently puts many of their patients on IV fentanyl, because of the belief that it works when they have pain but is quickly metabolized.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IONSYS Administration | Experimental | Device: IONSYS PatchPatients who have elective multi-level spinal fusions under general anesthesia (who do not receive methadone) will be enrolled. In addition, all patients will receive Pepcid 20 mg, dexamethasone 10 mg, and ondansetron 4 mg. When patients will arrive in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), pain will initially be controlled with IV hydromorphone to achieve an NRS score of 3 or less. Once transferred to the step down unit (SDU), the IONSYS patch will be applied. IONSYS should be utilized when they have pain, but rescue analgesia will be available. If severe pain continues, the chronic pain service will be consulted, to potentially change the medications. Patients will be assessed for pain at rest and with PT in the AM and PM of POD 1 and POD 2. The IONSYS system will be discontinued after 48 hours, and a total dose of fentanyl received per 24 hours will be recorded. PT milestones for discharge will be assessed on the afternoon of POD 1 and POD 2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients 18-70 years old undergoing elective multi-level lumbar-sacral posterior spinal fusions
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Chronic pain patients taking more than 20-mg equivalents of oxycodone daily
- Allergy to either hydromorphone or fentanyl
- Other chronic orthopedic pain complaints, which will confound the results of the study
- Issues with cognitive ability
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IONSYS PatchAlso: Patient Controlled Transdermal Fentanyl PatchPatient controlled transdermal fentanyl patch, IONSYS, applied to patient in place of a PCA. | Device | IONSYS Administration |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of IONSYS system
Time frame: Day 2 following surgery for each patient
1. Nursing assessment regarding the ease of setup and initiation of the IONSYS system (With regard to setup and initiation of the IONSYS, on a scale of 0-10, where 0=worst and 10=best, how would the nurse rate the system?). This will be given to the nurse who sets up the device on DOS, and nurse who sets up the device on POD 1, and the day nurse on POD 2. An average score of 7 will be considered feasible.
NRS Pain Scores
Time frame: Day 1 following surgery for each patient
1. NRS pain (0-10 scale) on first day after surgery (POD 1) during the afternoon session of PT. In a previous study on similar patients with IV PCA, we recorded mean pain scores of 4.6 during PT. Adequate pain control is delineated as NRS ≤ 3
5 secondary outcomes
Day of eligibility for discharge,
Time frame: Up to 1 week after surgery
A Oswestry Back Pain Disability Index questionnaire
Time frame: 6 weeks after surgery at the Post-Op Office Visit
Level of Sedation
Time frame: POD1
Presence of Nausea of Vomiting
Time frame: POD1 and POD2 after surgery
Satisfaction Survey
Time frame: Up to 1 week
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 24829420Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):991-1004. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu137.
- Background: PubMed 16334489White PF. The changing role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5 Suppl):S5-S22. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000177099.28914.A7.
- Background: PubMed 26968174Scott LJ. Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System: A Review in Acute Postoperative Pain. Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Apr;36(4):321-30. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0387-x.
- Background: PubMed 17164395Mayes S, Ferrone M. Fentanyl HCl patient-controlled iontophoretic transdermal system for the management of acute postoperative pain. Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Dec;40(12):2178-86. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H135.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Injury
Recruiting
Comparison Between Objective Biomechanical Cost and Perceived Physical Demand in Manual Wheelchair Users During Propulsion Tasks
Manual Wheelchair Use, Spinal Cord Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Risk Factors for Spinal Cord Injury After Minimally Invasive Aortic Repair
Spinal Cord Ischemia
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation in Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Injuries (Complete and Incomplete), Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Recruiting
Evaluating Long-term Use of a Pediatric Robotic Exoskeleton (P.REX/Agilik) to Improve Gait in Children With Movement Disorders
Cerebral Palsy, Muscular Dystrophy
Not yet recruiting
Functional Electrical Stimulation Plus High Intensity Interval Training at Home
Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Urban, M.D. principal investigator
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing IONSYS Patch in people with Spinal Injury, run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of IONSYS system (time frame: Day 2 following surgery for each patient). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03021083, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2022.