Heart ArrestACIRNCT03021564
Unexpected Cardiac Arrest in Intensive Care Unit
An observational study of Heart Arrest, run by Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis at 45 sites in France.
Trial summary
Unexpected cardiac arrest involves approximately 0.5 to 5% of patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Even if they have a technical environment conducive to prompt diagnosis and prompt treatment, patients hospitalized in ICU suffer from chronic illnesses and organ failure(s) that obscure the prognosis of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Arrest
- What is being tested?
- cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 677 participants
- Where
- 45 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jan 2017to Jun 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients admitted in intensive care unit during the study period and presenting an unexpected cardiac arrest will be included
Who may be able to join
- Patient with unexpected cardiac arrest during his / her hospitalization in the ICU
- Patients who have benefited from at least one basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation technique by the ICU team to treat this circulatory arrest (external electric shock, external cardiac massage, adrenaline injection ...)
- Patients with multiple unexpected cardiac arrest during hospitalization will be included only for the first circulatory arrest.
Who cannot join
- Patients with unexpected cardiac that have not been resuscitated.
- Patients in cardiac arrest at admission to ICU
Trial locations and contacts
45 sites in 1 country.
45 sites in 1 country
France45 sites
CH Agen
Agen
CHU Angers
Angers
CH Angouleme
Angoulême
CH Angoulême
Angoulême
CH Arras
Arras
GH Carnelle Portes de l'Oise
Beaumont
CH Béthune
Béthune
CH Blois
Blois
APHP
Bobigny
CH Bourg en Bresse
Bourg-en-Bresse
CHU Brest
Brest
CHU Caen
Caen
CH Cahors
Cahors
CH Chartres
Chartres
CH Cholet
Cholet
CH Colmar
Colmar
CH Dieppe
Dieppe
CHU Dijon
Dijon
CH Sud Essonnes
Étampes
APHP
Garches
CHU Grenoble
Grenoble
CH Gueret
Guéret
CHU La Réunion
La Réunion
CHD Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon
GH La Rochelle Ré Aunis
La Rochelle
CH Lens
Lens
GH de l'Institut Catholique de Lille
Lille
CHU Limoges
Limoges
CHU Lyon
Lyon
CH Meaux
Meaux
CH Melun
Melun
CHU Nantes
Nantes
CHU Nîmes
Nîmes
CH Niort
Niort
CHR Orleans
Orléans
APHP Cochin
Paris
APHP Saint Louis
Paris
Hôpital Paris Saint Joseph
Paris
CH Pau
Pau
CHU Poitiers
Poitiers
CH Pontoise
Pontoise
CH Cornouaille
Quimper
CH Roanne
Roanne
CHU Rouen
Rouen
CH Versailles
Versailles
About this study
Official title: Prospective Multi-centre Observational Study on the Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Consequences of Unexpected Cardiac Arrest in Intensive Care Units.
Unexpected cardiac arrest involves approximately 0.5 to 5% of patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Even if they have a technical environment conducive to prompt diagnosis and prompt treatment, patients hospitalized in ICU suffer from chronic illnesses and organ failure(s) that obscure the prognosis of cardiac arrest. Although extra cardiac arrhythmias or intra-hospital arrests are the subject of numerous publications, few studies specifically focus on unexpected cardiac arrest in ICU (none in France). The objective of our work is to produce a prospective epidemiological description of unexpected cardiac arrest in in French ICUs.
Read the detailed description
Unexpected cardiac arrest in ICU corresponds to cardiovascular arrest leading to at least one cardiopulmonary resuscitation technique (external cardiac massage and / or electric shock). They account for about 0.5 to 5% of admissions to intensive care units. Even if they benefit from a technical environment conducive to prompt diagnosis and rapid management, Resuscitated patients suffer from chronic diseases and organ failure (s) that darken the prognosis. Etiologies of unexpected cardiac arrest in ICU are rarely described in the literature. Their specificity comes from the fact that they can be related to patient's medical characteristics, but also to deleterious effects of supportive techniques in place at the time of circulatory arrest (respiratory assistance, vasopressor drugs, extracorporeal circulation ...). These same techniques may also reduce the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cardiorespiratory interactions of respiratory assistance, pro-arrhythmogenic effect of vasopressor drugs, haemodynamic repercussion of extracorporeal circulation). Although cardiac arrests have been published extensively out of or in-hospital, there are few studies specifically concerning unexpected cardiac arrest in ICU (none in France). The prognosis is different: after an unexpected cardiac arrest in ICU, 50% of the patients recover a spontaneous cardiac activity but only 15% leave alive from the hospital (3 to 4% with a good functional autonomy). A prospective description of risk factors, circumstances and consequences in the medium term would identify (and prevent) risky situations and identify, among those at risk for unexpected cardiac arrest, those for whom a cardiopulmonary resuscitation is justified.
- Conditions
- Heart Arrest
- Being tested
- cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cardiopulmonary resuscitationOther
Basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation : external electric shock, external cardiac massage, adrenaline injection ...
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Patients With Unexpected Cardiac Arrest
Number of patients with at least one cardiac arrest in intensive care with attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a proportion of total admissions.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (10)
Number of Patients Per Reason for ICU Admission
Number of patients admitted to ICU with either Medical (vs surgical) reason for admission, circulatory failure, respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, cardiac surgery
Measured: 1 year
History, Comorbidities Before Unexpected Cardiac Arrest
High blood pressure, Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, Tobacco, Ischemic heart disease, Heart disease from another cause, Malignancy, Alcohol, Renal disease, Respiratory disease, Cardiac arrest, Neurological disease, Liver disease
Measured: 1 year
Mc Cabe Score Before Unexpected Cardiac Arrest
0- absence of underlying disease or non-life-threatening disease
- underlying life-threatening disease over a period of 5 years
- underlying disease estimated fatal within 1 year
Measured: 1 year
Knaus Score Before Unexpected Cardiac Arrest
A- No activity limitation B- Moderate restriction of activity (limited professional activities) C- Major activity restriction but not total D- Major activity restriction, bedridden condition, long-term hospitalization
Measured: 1 year
Organ Failure Score Before Unexpected Cardiac Arrest
sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) sub-score ≥ 3
- Respiratory failure: < 200 fraction of inspired oxygen inspired oxygen fraction (26.7 mmHg [kilopascal]) and mechanically ventilated,
- Neurological impairment : Glasgow coma scale <10,
- Circulatory failure: dopamine > 5 μg/kg/min OR epinephrine ≤ 0.1 μg/kg/min OR norepinephrine ≤ 0.1 μg/kg/min,
- Hepatic failure: ≥ 6.0-11.9 mg/dl [102-204 μmol/L] Bilirubin,
- Haematological failure: < 50 Platelets×103/μl,
- Renal failure: ≥ 3.5-4.9 mg/dl [300-44 0μmol/L] (or < 500 ml/d) Creatinine
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Unexpected Cardiac Arrest Etiologies
Measured: 1 year
Number of Patients With Resumption of Spontaneous Cardiac Activity After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Measured: 1 year
Cerebral Performance Category Scale at Hospital Discharge
Cerebral performance category score (CPC)
- Conscious without neurological deficit or minor deficit
- Conscious with moderate deficit
- Conscious with severe deficit
- Deep Coma or Vegetative State
- Deceased
Measured: at Hospital Discharge
Cerebral Performance Category Scale at 6 Months
Cerebral performance category score (CPC)
- Conscious without neurological deficit or minor deficit
- Conscious with moderate deficit
- Conscious with severe deficit
- Deep Coma or Vegetative State
- Deceased
Measured: at 6 months after inclusion (unexpected cardiac arrest)
Number of Patients With Unexpected Cardiac Arrest, Resuscitated Despite Previous Decision Not to Resuscitate
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2017
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionJun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart ArrestStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 677 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Maxime Leloup, MD, Study director, Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03021564
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2015/P04/049
- Acronym
- ACIR
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Rozen TH, Mullane S, Kaufman M, Hsiao YF, Warrillow S, Bellomo R, Jones DA. Antecedents to cardiac arrests in a teaching hospital intensive care unit. Resuscitation. 2014 Mar;85(3):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
PubMed 24326274Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med. 1981 Aug;9(8):591-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198108000-00008.
PubMed 7261642Synek VM. EEG abnormality grades and subdivisions of prognostic importance in traumatic and anoxic coma in adults. Clin Electroencephalogr. 1988 Jul;19(3):160-6. doi: 10.1177/155005948801900310.
PubMed 3416501Myrianthefs P, Kalafati M, Lemonidou C, Minasidou E, Evagelopoulou P, Karatzas S, Baltopoulos G. Efficacy of CPR in a general, adult ICU. Resuscitation. 2003 Apr;57(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00432-x.
PubMed 12668298Lesieur O, Leloup M, Gonzalez F, Mamzer MF; EPILAT Study Group. Eligibility for organ donation following end-of-life decisions: a study performed in 43 French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Sep;40(9):1323-31. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3409-2. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
PubMed 25091789Lee HK, Lee H, No JM, Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Lim YJ, Park HP. Factors influencing outcome in patients with cardiac arrest in the ICU. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Jul;57(6):784-92. doi: 10.1111/aas.12117. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
PubMed 23550795Peterson MW, Geist LJ, Schwartz DA, Konicek S, Moseley PL. Outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a medical intensive care unit. Chest. 1991 Jul;100(1):168-74. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.1.168.
PubMed 2060338Enohumah KO, Moerer O, Kirmse C, Bahr J, Neumann P, Quintel M. Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in intensive care units in a university hospital. Resuscitation. 2006 Nov;71(2):161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.03.013. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
PubMed 16989937Landry FJ, Parker JM, Phillips YY. Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the intensive care setting. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Nov;152(11):2305-8.
PubMed 1444691Tian J, Kaufman DA, Zarich S, Chan PS, Ong P, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA; American Heart Association National Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Investigators. Outcomes of critically ill patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug 15;182(4):501-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200910-1639OC. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
PubMed 20413625Kutsogiannis DJ, Bagshaw SM, Laing B, Brindley PG. Predictors of survival after cardiac or respiratory arrest in critical care units. CMAJ. 2011 Oct 4;183(14):1589-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100034. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
PubMed 21844108Smith DL, Kim K, Cairns BA, Fakhry SM, Meyer AA. Prospective analysis of outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in critically ill surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Apr;180(4):394-401.
PubMed 7719542Cummins RO, Chamberlain D, Hazinski MF, Nadkarni V, Kloeck W, Kramer E, Becker L, Robertson C, Koster R, Zaritsky A, Bossaert L, Ornato JP, Callanan V, Allen M, Steen P, Connolly B, Sanders A, Idris A, Cobbe S. Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on in-hospital resuscitation: the in-hospital 'Utstein style'. American Heart Association. Circulation. 1997 Apr 15;95(8):2213-39. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.8.2213. No abstract available.
PubMed 9133537Langhelle A, Nolan J, Herlitz J, Castren M, Wenzel V, Soreide E, Engdahl J, Steen PA; 2003 Utstein Consensus Symposium. Recommended guidelines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on post-resuscitation care: the Utstein style. Resuscitation. 2005 Sep;66(3):271-83. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.06.005.
PubMed 16129543Gershengorn HB, Li G, Kramer A, Wunsch H. Survival and functional outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2012 Aug;27(4):421.e9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.11.001. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
PubMed 22227081
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Multi-centre Observational Study on the Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Consequences of Unexpected Cardiac Arrest in Intensive Care Units.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03021564
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACIR / 2015/P04/049
- Conditions
- Heart Arrest
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 677 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré AunisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Aug 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Unexpected cardiac arrest involves approximately 0.5 to 5% of patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Even if they have a technical environment conducive to prompt diagnosis and prompt treatment, patients hospitalized in ICU suffer from chronic illnesses and organ failure(s) that obscure the prognosis of cardiac arrest. Although extra cardiac arrhythmias or intra-hospital arrests are the subject of numerous publications, few studies specifically focus on unexpected cardiac arrest in ICU (none in France). The objective of our work is to produce a prospective epidemiological description of unexpected cardiac arrest in in French ICUs.
Detailed description
Unexpected cardiac arrest in ICU corresponds to cardiovascular arrest leading to at least one cardiopulmonary resuscitation technique (external cardiac massage and / or electric shock). They account for about 0.5 to 5% of admissions to intensive care units. Even if they benefit from a technical environment conducive to prompt diagnosis and rapid management, Resuscitated patients suffer from chronic diseases and organ failure (s) that darken the prognosis. Etiologies of unexpected cardiac arrest in ICU are rarely described in the literature. Their specificity comes from the fact that they can be related to patient's medical characteristics, but also to deleterious effects of supportive techniques in place at the time of circulatory arrest (respiratory assistance, vasopressor drugs, extracorporeal circulation ...). These same techniques may also reduce the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cardiorespiratory interactions of respiratory assistance, pro-arrhythmogenic effect of vasopressor drugs, haemodynamic repercussion of extracorporeal circulation). Although cardiac arrests have been published extensively out of or in-hospital, there are few studies specifically concerning unexpected cardiac arrest in ICU (none in France). The prognosis is different: after an unexpected cardiac arrest in ICU, 50% of the patients recover a spontaneous cardiac activity but only 15% leave alive from the hospital (3 to 4% with a good functional autonomy). A prospective description of risk factors, circumstances and consequences in the medium term would identify (and prevent) risky situations and identify, among those at risk for unexpected cardiac arrest, those for whom a cardiopulmonary resuscitation is justified.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients admitted in intensive care unit during the study period and presenting an unexpected cardiac arrest will be included
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient with unexpected cardiac arrest during his / her hospitalization in the ICU
- Patients who have benefited from at least one basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation technique by the ICU team to treat this circulatory arrest (external electric shock, external cardiac massage, adrenaline injection ...)
- Patients with multiple unexpected cardiac arrest during hospitalization will be included only for the first circulatory arrest.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with unexpected cardiac that have not been resuscitated.
- Patients in cardiac arrest at admission to ICU
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cardiopulmonary resuscitationBasic cardiopulmonary resuscitation : external electric shock, external cardiac massage, adrenaline injection ... | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Number of Patients With Unexpected Cardiac Arrest
Time frame: 1 year
Number of patients with at least one cardiac arrest in intensive care with attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a proportion of total admissions.
10 secondary outcomes
Number of Patients Per Reason for ICU Admission
Time frame: 1 year
History, Comorbidities Before Unexpected Cardiac Arrest
Time frame: 1 year
Mc Cabe Score Before Unexpected Cardiac Arrest
Time frame: 1 year
Knaus Score Before Unexpected Cardiac Arrest
Time frame: 1 year
Organ Failure Score Before Unexpected Cardiac Arrest
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Participants With Unexpected Cardiac Arrest Etiologies
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Patients With Resumption of Spontaneous Cardiac Activity After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Time frame: 1 year
Cerebral Performance Category Scale at Hospital Discharge
Time frame: at Hospital Discharge
Cerebral Performance Category Scale at 6 Months
Time frame: at 6 months after inclusion (unexpected cardiac arrest)
Number of Patients With Unexpected Cardiac Arrest, Resuscitated Despite Previous Decision Not to Resuscitate
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24326274Rozen TH, Mullane S, Kaufman M, Hsiao YF, Warrillow S, Bellomo R, Jones DA. Antecedents to cardiac arrests in a teaching hospital intensive care unit. Resuscitation. 2014 Mar;85(3):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
- Background: PubMed 7261642Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med. 1981 Aug;9(8):591-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198108000-00008.
- Background: PubMed 3416501Synek VM. EEG abnormality grades and subdivisions of prognostic importance in traumatic and anoxic coma in adults. Clin Electroencephalogr. 1988 Jul;19(3):160-6. doi: 10.1177/155005948801900310.
- Background: PubMed 12668298Myrianthefs P, Kalafati M, Lemonidou C, Minasidou E, Evagelopoulou P, Karatzas S, Baltopoulos G. Efficacy of CPR in a general, adult ICU. Resuscitation. 2003 Apr;57(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00432-x.
- Background: PubMed 25091789Lesieur O, Leloup M, Gonzalez F, Mamzer MF; EPILAT Study Group. Eligibility for organ donation following end-of-life decisions: a study performed in 43 French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Sep;40(9):1323-31. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3409-2. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
- Background: PubMed 23550795Lee HK, Lee H, No JM, Jeon YT, Hwang JW, Lim YJ, Park HP. Factors influencing outcome in patients with cardiac arrest in the ICU. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Jul;57(6):784-92. doi: 10.1111/aas.12117. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
- Background: PubMed 2060338Peterson MW, Geist LJ, Schwartz DA, Konicek S, Moseley PL. Outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a medical intensive care unit. Chest. 1991 Jul;100(1):168-74. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.1.168.
- Background: PubMed 16989937Enohumah KO, Moerer O, Kirmse C, Bahr J, Neumann P, Quintel M. Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in intensive care units in a university hospital. Resuscitation. 2006 Nov;71(2):161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.03.013. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
- Background: PubMed 1444691Landry FJ, Parker JM, Phillips YY. Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the intensive care setting. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Nov;152(11):2305-8.
- Background: PubMed 20413625Tian J, Kaufman DA, Zarich S, Chan PS, Ong P, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA; American Heart Association National Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Investigators. Outcomes of critically ill patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug 15;182(4):501-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200910-1639OC. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
- Background: PubMed 21844108Kutsogiannis DJ, Bagshaw SM, Laing B, Brindley PG. Predictors of survival after cardiac or respiratory arrest in critical care units. CMAJ. 2011 Oct 4;183(14):1589-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100034. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
- Background: PubMed 7719542Smith DL, Kim K, Cairns BA, Fakhry SM, Meyer AA. Prospective analysis of outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in critically ill surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Apr;180(4):394-401.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Heart Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study of Cardiac Arrhythmias During Treatment With BTK Inhibitors or Venetoclax
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Waldenstr(SqrRoot)(Delta)m s Macroglobulinemia
Active, not recruiting
The REVIVE-PEEP Trial: Positive End-expiratory Pressure Versus Sham Valve/Zero End-expiratory Pressure in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Manual Ventilation to Improve Neurological Outcomes at Discharge in Adult Patients Suffering an Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital
RecruitingObservational study
Accuracy of Doppler Ultrasound Versus Manual Palpation of Pulse in Cardiac Arrest
Cardiac Arrest
Active, not recruiting
RACE-CARS - RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems
Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Therapeutic Outcomes of In-Hospital Resuscitation of Patients Admitted to the Internal Medicine Wards
Survival to Discharge With Good Neurologic Outcome Among in Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maxime Leloup, MD study director
Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
45 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Heart Arrest, run by Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis at 45 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 45 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Aug 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Patients With Unexpected Cardiac Arrest (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03021564, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2020.