AzTrials
AzTrials

Full Thickness Rotator Cuff TearNCT03021733

A Pilot Cohort Study of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Rotator Cuff Tears

An observational study of Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear, run by University of Michigan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project will involve planning and implementing a two-arm prospective pragmatic cohort clinical trial in patients with known rotator cuff tears. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear
What is being tested?
Operative management
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
222 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Feb 2012to Nov 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients presenting to an orthopaedic clinic with full-thickness rotator cuff tears as determined by surgeon opinion and imaging

Who may be able to join

  • Patients over 18 years of age with full-thickness rotator cuff tears eligible for operative repair

Who cannot join

  • less than 18 years old,
  • non-operative rotator cuff tears,
  • calcific tendonitis, fracture, adhesive capsulitis,
  • severe osteoarthritis of the shoulder,
  • no prior shoulder surgery

About this study

This project will involve planning and implementing a two-arm prospective pragmatic cohort clinical trial in patients with known rotator cuff tears.

Read the detailed description

This project will involve planning and implementing a two-arm prospective pragmatic cohort clinical trial in patients with known rotator cuff tears. Pragmatic or effectiveness clinical trials reflect real world settings and thus have greater external generalizability than efficacy trials. The evaluation component in this trial will be three-fold: first, the study team will compare the success of patients undergoing operative versus non-operative management and identify which variables predict success in each group; second, investigators will attempt to predict which patients end up choosing, along with their care giver(s), operative versus non-operative management by examining the predictive capability of a selection of variables; third, investigators will evaluate the clinical research site(s), personnel, and implementation processes for their capability to implement clinical trials with the intent of planning for a future large multi-site clinical trial building on the results of the present study.

Being tested
Operative management

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Operative managementProcedure or surgery

    Rotator cuff surgery

Study groups in NCT03021733
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Non-operativePatients whom elected non-operative treatment
OperativePatients whom elected operative treatment
Receives: Procedure: Operative management

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Veterans Rand VR-12 Quality of Life Score

    Measured: baseline

  2. Veterans Rand VR-12 Quality of Life Score

    Measured: 4 weeks

  3. Veterans Rand VR-12 Quality of Life Score

    Measured: 8 weeks

  4. Veterans Rand VR-12 Quality of Life Score

    Measured: 16 weeks

  5. Veterans Rand VR-12 Quality of Life Score

    Measured: 32 weeks

  6. Veterans Rand VR-12 Quality of Life Score

    Measured: 48 weeks

  7. Veterans Rand VR-12 Quality of Life Score

    Measured: 64 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionNov 2016
  4. Study completionNov 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
222 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03021733
Sponsor's protocol ID
HUM00056320
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
12 Jan 2017
Last updated
18 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No: No individual patient data will be shared

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear, run by University of Michigan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Veterans Rand VR-12 Quality of Life Score (time frame: baseline). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in