AzTrials
AzTrials

Laparoscopic CholecystectomyNCT03022279

Nerve Blocks vs Local Injections for Post-op Pain Prevention in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Children

A study testing TAP Blocks and local wound infiltration in people with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, run by Brian Wallace Gray at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to compare transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks to local wound infiltration (LWI) in terms of postoperative pain control in pediatric patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
What is being tested?
TAP Blocks and local wound infiltration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
87 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Jan 2017to Sep 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • 8-17 yrs of age at date of enrollment.
  • Elective laparoscopic or da Vinci cholecystectomy scheduled for any diagnostic reason.

Who cannot join

  • Chronic pain or chronic use of narcotic or other prescription pain medications.
  • Use of pain medication within 24 hours before surgery
  • Prior major abdominal surgery
  • Evidence of acute inflammation
  • Patients with acute cholecystitis
  • Bleeding / coagulation disorder
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Seizure disorder
  • Renal dysfunction
  • Infection at injection sites for TAP block or trocar placement
  • Contraindication to LWI or TAP block procedure, as determined by surgeon or anesthesiologist performing the procedure (including, but not limited to, previous incision distorting anatomy or inability to visualize anatomical planes)
  • Any known allergy to medications used in this study
  • Patient unable to verbalize pain score or independently assess pain level
  • Unstable patient in need of emergent intervention at surgeon discretion
  • Patients who are known to be pregnant
  • Patients who are currently prisoners
  • Children in custody of the state
  • Subjects will a BMI >/= 50
  • Investigator discretion for any other reason

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Transversus Abdominis Plane Block vs. Local Wound Infiltration for Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Children and Adolescents: A Prospective Randomized-Controlled Trial

The objective of this study is to compare transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks to local wound infiltration (LWI) in terms of postoperative pain control in pediatric patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our hypothesis is that TAP blocks will be superior to LWI for postoperative pain control resulting in decreased use of opioid / narcotic pain medication and decreased pain scored in the immediate 24-hour postoperative period. The rationale is that determining the effect of analgesia in this pediatric population is important to optimize clinical care.

Read the detailed description

In this study, patients ages 8 through 17 years scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be invited to participate. Those having da Vinci cholecystectomy procedures will also be eligible. The da Vinci System is a minimally invasive option utilizing robotic technology. Once randomized, the patient will undergo either ultrasound guided bilateral TAP blocks or LWI at the beginning of the surgical procedure. Prospective data regarding pain scores, use of opioid medication, and nausea and vomiting episodes will be collected for both groups. Due to the nature of the study, it will not be possible to blind the investigators to the randomly selected method of injecting local anesthesia; however the personnel involved in the post-anesthetic and post-operative assessment will be blinded to the intervention, as well as the subjects themselves.

Being tested
TAP Blocks, local wound infiltration
Keywords
Pediatric, post-operative pain prevention, Anesthesia, Infiltration, Nerve Blockade

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TAP BlocksProcedure or surgery

    Also called nerve block, transversus abdominis plane block

    ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block utilizing 2.5 mg/kg or 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine

  • local wound infiltrationProcedure or surgery

    Also called local wound injections

    local anesthesia provided at the surgical site utilizing 2.5 mg/kg or 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine

Study groups in NCT03022279
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TAP blocksActive comparatorTAP block group will receive three injections performed by an Anesthesiologist trained in the procedure, prior to initiation of the surgical procedure. Bilateral posterior transversalis fascial plane blocks and a right sided subcostal transverse abdominal plane block will be placed under ultrasound guidance. Normal saline will be used to confirm proper muscle layer placement before instillation of the local anesthesia. All patients will receive 2.5 mg/kg or 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine with maximum of 60 mL (divided equally amongst the injection sites).
Receives: Procedure: TAP Blocks
Local Wound InfiltrationActive comparatorLocal wound infiltration (LWI) will be performed by the operative surgeon using 2.5 mg/kg or 1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine with maximum of 60 mL divided amongst the four port sites. 40% of the total dose will be given at the umbilicus, and 20% will be given at each of the other 3 ports. The majority of the anesthetic will be administered at the peritoneal level. Laparoscopic/robotic cholecystectomy will be performed with a port at the umbilicus and three smaller ports in a standard fashion in the subxiphoid and right upper quadrant regions. If conversion to open cholecystectomy occurs, the study data will still be collected, but the patient's data will be excluded from analysis.
Receives: Procedure: local wound infiltration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Amount of narcotic pain medication

    Measured: 24 hours post-op

  2. Time to first request of pain medication

    Measured: From post-anesthesia care unit "(PACU) in" time to first pain medication dose, up to 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start6 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completionSep 2022
  4. Study completionSep 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
87 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03022279
Sponsor's protocol ID
1410511719
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
25 Nov 2016
Last updated
3 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing TAP Blocks and local wound infiltration in people with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, run by Brian Wallace Gray at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Amount of narcotic pain medication (time frame: 24 hours post-op). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in