AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Tract InfectionsMITIGATENCT03022929

A Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infection for Adults and Children in Emergency Department and Urgent Care Settings

A study testing Enhanced Antimicrobial Stewardship Commitment and Feedback in people with Respiratory Tract Infections, run by University of California, Davis at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Inappropriate antibiotic use is a major public health concern. Excessive exposure to antibiotics results in emergence and spread of drug-resistant bacteria, potentially avoidable adverse drug reactions, and increased healthcare utilization and cost. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Tract Infections
What is being tested?
Enhanced Antimicrobial Stewardship Commitment and Feedback
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
257 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2017to 24 Sep 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Clinicians will be eligible for the study if they meet the following Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Must be a clinician at one of the study sites.
  2. Must treat adult and/or pediatric patients with an acute respiratory infections.

Individual patient encounters will be ineligible for analysis if they meet any of the following Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medical co-morbidities that make acute respiratory infection (ARI) guidelines less likely to apply.
  2. Concomitant visit diagnoses indicating a non-ARI possible bacterial infection.
  3. Concomitant visit diagnoses indicating potentially antibiotic appropriate ARI. diagnoses or other ARI diagnoses suggestive of a bacterial infection.
  4. Visit occurred within 30 days of an earlier ARI diagnosis.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Children's Hospital Colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • UC Davis Medical Center

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • UCLA Harbor Medical Center

    Torrance, California, 90509

Other trials in United States

About this study

Inappropriate antibiotic use is a major public health concern. Excessive exposure to antibiotics results in emergence and spread of drug-resistant bacteria, potentially avoidable adverse drug reactions, and increased healthcare utilization and cost. As antibiotic prescribing in emergency departments and urgent care centers remains unchecked, national professional organizations including the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology (SHEA), and an Executive Order from the President of the United States, recommend expansion of antimicrobial stewardship to these ambulatory care settings. The goal of antimicrobial stewardship is to effectively promote judicious antibiotic use in all healthcare settings, yet stewardship programs have not achieved their potential in terms of either reach or effectiveness. Reach has been limited by implementation mostly in inpatient settings; at the same time, recent critical experiments in behavioral science suggest that the effectiveness of existing stewardship programs could be greatly augmented through inclusion of behavioral nudges, benchmarked audit and feedback, and peer-to-peer comparisons.

Read the detailed description

In this proposed acute care project, the investigators will compare a package consisting of education for providers using existing materials from Center for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) GetSmart campaign adapted for the acute care setting led by a physician champion at each site (the adapted intervention), to a more intensive intervention that incorporates adapted GetSmart materials enhanced with individualized audit and feedback, peer comparisons, and behavioral nudges (the enhanced intervention). The comparative effectiveness of the enhanced intervention will be evaluated in a multicenter cluster randomized trial nested within a quasi-experimental study of acute care stewardship. The investigators' hypothesis is that both interventions will reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for antibiotic nonresponsive acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in emergency departments and urgent care centers, but that the enhanced one will be more effective. The investigators will use an interrupted time series study design to measure the impact of their interventions against the baseline period of usual care as well as against seasonally-adjusted historical controls. The cluster randomized design for the two types of acute care stewardship interventions will allow measurement of the difference- in-differences in antibiotic prescribing rates for acute bronchitis, acute bronchiolitis, viral pharyngitis, influenza, and nonspecific upper respiratory infection (URI). Translation of proven behavioral techniques is a new and innovative approach to improving prescribing decisions. This project will expand stewardship to a new setting using innovative and effective approaches including the adaptation of behavioral techniques for emergency department (ED) and urgent care settings. The investigators will also further establish their research group as a network for developing novel tools, measuring outcomes for antimicrobial stewardship, and disseminating research findings through acute care setting-specific toolkits.

Being tested
Enhanced Antimicrobial Stewardship Commitment and Feedback
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Tract Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Enhanced Antimicrobial Stewardship Commitment and FeedbackBehavioural

    Goes beyond the GetSmart recommendations to discern whether these recommendations can be improved upon.

Study groups in NCT03022929
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adapted InterventionNo interventionThe investigators will use GetSmart materials published by the CDC appropriate to the emergency department and urgent care settings and select and adapt brochures and other campaign messages for acute care providers.
Enhanced InterventionExperimentalThe investigators will use all of the methods of the Adapted Intervention. In addition to these methods, the investigators will add posters within exam rooms which will include modified GetSmart content and other nudges such as physician pictures with their signed public commitment to antibiotic stewardship or flair denoting commitment to stewardship. The investigators will also provide physicians with personalized monthly performance ranking with each physician receiving the designation of "top performer" or "not a top performer" based on their appropriate antibiotic prescribing practices for acute respiratory infections. This will be the Enhanced Antimicrobial Stewardship Commitment and Feedback intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Antimicrobial Stewardship Commitment and Feedback

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Antibiotic Prescribing Trends

    The investigators will measure the likelihood that an antibiotic is prescribed in an antibiotic-nonresponsive acute respiratory infection visit.

    Measured: Up to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2017
  3. Primary completion24 Sep 2018
  4. Study completion24 Sep 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
257 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03022929
Sponsor's protocol ID
986083
Other IDs
971471
Acronym
MITIGATE
Status last verified
Dec 2018
First submitted
11 Jan 2017
Last updated
20 Dec 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: No IPD planned.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Enhanced Antimicrobial Stewardship Commitment and Feedback in people with Respiratory Tract Infections, run by University of California, Davis at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Antibiotic Prescribing Trends (time frame: Up to 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in