AzTrials
AzTrials

Recurrent MiscarriageW&DNCT03023137

Walking and Dietary Modification for Recurrent Early Miscarriages

A study testing Walking & dietary modification in people with Recurrent Miscarriage, run by Hospital dos Servidores do Estado do Rio de Janeiro at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is part of a big one aiming to evaluate how lifestyle interventions during pregnancy affect obstetric results, neonatal metabolism and the intelligence of the offspring (study not yet completed). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Recurrent Miscarriage
What is being tested?
Walking & dietary modification
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
480 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
May 2011to Feb 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 2 consecutive pregnancy losses in the first trimester;
  • losses should be documented by pathology or ultrasound-confirmed gestational sac.

Who cannot join

  • anatomic anomalies that may increase the risk of pregnancy losses, not amenable to surgical correction during pregnancy, such as uterine septum;
  • antiphospholipid antibodies;
  • prior second- or third-trimester losses;
  • current multiple gestation;
  • disabilities such as hemiplegia or paraplegia;
  • renal or liver failure;
  • conditions requiring a priori anticoagulation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Ministry of Health

    Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20221-903

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Walking and Dietary Modification for Women With Consecutive Early Miscarriages: a Randomized Study

This study is part of a big one aiming to evaluate how lifestyle interventions during pregnancy affect obstetric results, neonatal metabolism and the intelligence of the offspring (study not yet completed). Data regarding obstetric and neonatal results were entered in NCT01409382, but we decided to split results in two for the sake of clarity.

A cohort of women with early pregnancy losses without antiphospholipid antibodies was selected for two reasons. One is that these women follow strictly the recommendadtions. The second is that no medication has been shown to increase the rate of take-home babies in women with early miscarriages who test negative for antiphospholipid antibodies. We decided to focus on the fibrinolytic system because trophoblast migration and placental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis depend on plasmin-dependent extracellular matrix remodeling. Plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 inhibits the generation of plasmin. Since both glucose and insulin increase PAI-1 synthesis, hyperglycemia itself, or by stimulating insulin production, reduces plasmin generation, which may impair placentation.

Read more

Abnormalities in glucose metabolism may be also deleterious to embryos by causing epigenetic changes. Chromosomal abnormalities are considered an important cause of early pregnancy losses.

Several lines of evidence lend support to the hypothesis that carbohydrate metabolism abnormalities contribute to the pathogenesis of recurrent early pregnancy losses. One is that of the pregnancies of the women with polycystic ovary syndrome, around 30 and 50% end with first-trimester miscarriages. Hyperinsulinemia is a prevalent feature of the syndrome, and interventions proven effective in reducing insulin levels, such as metformin, have been shown to reduce the rate of early miscarriages. The other is that patients with body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 have significantly higher odds of early miscarriage, regardless of the method of conception.

The investigator's hypothesis was that a balanced diet combined to regular exercise, by improving glucose homeostasis, would increase the take-home baby rate in women with consecutive early miscarriages. Moderate exercises are usually well tolerated not only by the mother, but also by the fetus, as indicated by tests of fetal well-being, including umbilical artery systolic to diastolic ratio.

Read the detailed description

Women aged 18 to 40 years trying to conceive spontaneously were eligible if they had two or more consecutive pregnancy losses in the first trimester, documented by pathology or ultrasound-confirmed gestational sac.

All participants underwent ultrasound examination before inclusion in the study. Exclusion criteria were any of the following: anatomic anomalies that may increase the risk of pregnancy losses, not amenable to surgical correction during pregnancy, such as uterine septum; antiphospholipid antibodies; prior second- or third-trimester losses; current multiple gestation; disabilities such as hemiplegia or paraplegia; renal or liver failure; conditions requiring a priori anticoagulation.

Participants were enrolled by staff at the participating center. Randomization to the intervention protocol Walking and Diet (W\&D) or to a control group was performed before pregnancy occurred by a statistician using a computer-generated random-number table. This was not a double blind study, but care was taken to ensure that appointments of the patients assigned to the intervention protocol did not coincide with those of controls.

The intervention was standardized by training of research staff. Women assigned to W\&D were instructed to walk at a moderate pace (4 km/h) for at least 40 minutes, seven days a week. Besides, those who remained seated most of the day were advised to walk 25 to 30 minutes twice a day, avoiding hence more than 12 hours of physical inactivity. Walking could be replaced by stationary bicycle rides or swimming when convenient, which often occurred near term and when the mother was obese. Strenuous exercises were discouraged.

Patients assigned to protocol W\&D were also informed of the importance of a balanced diet and recommended to avoid high-glycemic index meals (high-carbohydrate, low-fiber). Sucralose could be used as a sweetener. As a strategy to promote satiety and reduce carbohydrate intake, W\&D participants were also advised to eat at least two daily servings of protein-rich food. The intervention began when participants wished to conceive, continuing until delivery. Careful instructions about walking speed and diet were given to participants assigned to W\&D at enrolment and at each consultation. During exercise, neither fetal nor maternal cardiac rate were assessed.

Non-adherence to the intervention protocol was suspected when non-obese participants assigned to W\&D gained > 1 kg in 4 weeks until the 28th week of gestation, > 1.5 kg from the 28th to the 32nd week, and > 2 kg in 4 weeks thereafter, in the absence of edema. The threshold was lower for obese participants: > 700 g in 4 weeks until the 28th week of gestation, > 1 kg from the 28th to the 32nd week, and > 1.5 kg in 4 weeks thereafter21. Excessive weight gain aroused the suspicion of protocol violation because high carbohydrate consumption, especially when combined with physical inactivity stimulates the pancreas to overproduce insulin, a hormone that promotes fat storage. To enhance adherence to the protocol, W\&D participants who gained excessive weight were recommended to increase the frequency, duration and intensity of the physical activity and to increase the protein intake. Participants of the W\&D group who had a successful pregnancy volunteered to encourage mothers assigned to the intervention protocol, especially those who gained excessive weight.

At enrollment and during first-trimester consultations, W\&D participants were explained that antiemetics such as ondansetron should be taken before nausea became severe, in order to help them tolerate balanced meals.

No recommendations regarding diet or physical activity were given to controls. Antiemetics such as ondansetron were given to controls who complained of hyperemesis.

All participants were given folic acid tablets 5 mg daily until 14 weeks of gestation, as prevention of neural tube defects. In both groups, participants reporting abdominal pain, cramps, and vaginal bleeding during the first-trimester were medicated with vaginal progesterone. Subcutaneous heparin was given to all participants whose pregnancies were complicated with nephrotic range proteinuria or any evidence of placental insufficiency. Antihypertensive medications included methyldopa, amlodipine and hydralazine. No patient received aspirin or metformin in this study.

Appointments were scheduled according to the routine. Maternal weight and blood pressure were assessed at every appointment and all mothers were screened for gestational diabetes according to the American Diabetes Association recommendations.

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were obtained from the hospital records. Neonates were classified as small, appropriate or large for gestational age according to Olsen et al. growth curves.

Written informed consent was obtained from each participant after a full explanation of the study.

Being tested
Walking & dietary modification
Keywords
prevention, carbohydrate, exercise, neonatal hypoglycemia
Medical subject headings
Abortion, Habitual, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Walking & dietary modificationBehavioural

    Also called W&D

    1. Daily walking at a moderate pace (4 km/h) > 40 min, 7/7. Those remaining seated most of the day should walk 25-30 min twice a day, avoiding >12 h of physical inactivity. Walking may be replaced by stationary bicycle rides or swimming when convenient, which often occurred near term and when the mother was obese.
    2. At least two daily servings of protein-rich food (≥ 4 g/kg of meat, poultry, fish or eggs) per day. Avoidance of high-carbohydrate, low-fiber meals, such as snacks, candies, fiber-free juices, coconut water or sugar-sweetened beverages. Sucralose could be used as a sweetener. Participants are recommended to use ondansetron for nausea and vomiting prevention
Study groups in NCT03023137
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Walking & dietary modification (W&D)Active comparatorW\&D should begin when participants wish to conceive. The intervention was standardized by training of research staff. Careful instructions about walking speed and diet would be given to participants assigned to W\&D at enrolment and at each consultation.
Receives: Behavioral: Walking & dietary modification
ControlsNo interventionNo recommendations regarding diet or physical activity were given to controls. Antiemetics such as ondansetron would be given to controls complaining of vomiting.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Take-home Baby Rate

    Measured: End of pregnancy

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

    Measured: Pregnancies reaching 24 weeks' gestation

  2. Preeclampsia

    Measured: Pregnancies reaching 20 weeks' gestation

  3. Mothers Who Used Heparin for Nephrotic Range Proteinuria or Placental Insufficiency

    Measured: End of pregnancy

  4. Excessive Weight Gain

    Weight gain >13 kg for underweight, normal weight or overweight mothers and > 9 kg for obese mothers

    Measured: End of term pregnancies

  5. First-trimester Losses

    Measured: 14 weeks of gestation

  6. Second and Third-trimester Losses

    Measured: 28 weeks of gestation and end of gestation

  7. Live-born Children

    Measured: End of pregnancy

  8. Babies Born at Term

    Measured: End of pregnancy

  9. Appropriate-for-gestational Age Babies

    Measured: End of pregnancy

  10. Neonates With Hypoglycemia

    Hypoglycemia was defined as any blood glucose concentration ≤ 40 mg/dL.

    Measured: One, two and fours hours after birth

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2011
  3. Primary completionAug 2016
  4. Study completionFeb 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
480 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03023137
Sponsor's protocol ID
HospitalSERJ
Acronym
W&D
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
13 Jan 2017
Last updated
10 Apr 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Walking & dietary modification in people with Recurrent Miscarriage, run by Hospital dos Servidores do Estado do Rio de Janeiro at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Take-home Baby Rate (time frame: End of pregnancy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in