AzTrials
AzTrials

Opioid Use DisorderNCT03023930

Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department: CTN 0069

A study testing Standard Dissemination Practice and Implementation Facilitation (IF) in people with Opioid Use Disorder, run by Yale University at 5 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of (1) Implementation Facilitation (IF) on rates of provision of Emergency Department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) treatment with referral for ongoing medication-assisted treatment (MAT) and the (2) effectiveness of IF on patient engagement in formal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Opioid Use Disorder
What is being tested?
Standard Dissemination Practice and Implementation Facilitation (IF)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,731 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
3 Apr 2017to 23 Apr 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are treated in the ED during study screening hours with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 criteria for moderate to severe OUD and provide an opioid positive urine sample will be eligible to participate.

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who test positive for fentanyl only are not eligible due to lack of uniformly available rapid urine tests.
  • Patients will be excluded if they have a medical or psychiatric condition requiring hospitalization at the index ED visit, are acutely suicidal or severely cognitively impaired precluding informed consent, present from an extended care facility, require continued prescription opioids for a pain condition, are a prisoner or in police custody at time of index ED visit, are currently (past 30 days) enrolled in formal addiction treatment including by court order, are unable to provide 2 contact numbers, are unwilling to follow study procedures, have been previously enrolled in the current study or do not speak English.

ED and Community Participants Inclusion Criteria:

  • ED and community providers and administrators (i.e. physicians, residents, fellows, nursing, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, social workers, counselors, administrative directors, office-based physicians and opioid treatment program representatives) as well as ED patients with OUD.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • University of Cincinnati Medical Center

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • The Mount Sinai Hospital

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Weill Cornell Medical College

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Harborview Medical Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department: Clinical Trials Network-0069

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of (1) Implementation Facilitation (IF) on rates of provision of Emergency Department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) treatment with referral for ongoing medication-assisted treatment (MAT) and the (2) effectiveness of IF on patient engagement in formal addiction treatment at 30 days.

Read the detailed description

The study was originally proposed to use a Hybrid Type 3 Effectiveness-Implementation framework and a modified stepped wedge design.

Original protocol registration language: The study will be conducted at four EDs with a high prevalence of patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD). The four sites will receive the same sequence of evaluations and interventions: the baseline evaluation period after the standard dissemination practice, the IF phase, and continuation of facilitation into the IF evaluation period. The timing of initiation of the study activities at each site will be randomly offset by ~ 3 month increments to accommodate logistical constraints of simultaneous implementation at all sites. The study populations will include (1) ED providers and staff involved in the treatment of patients with OUD; (2) Community opioid treatment provider and program staff involved in providing care for patients with OUD referred from the ED; and (3) ED patients with moderate to severe OUD.

Exploratory analyses have been added to assess the impact of COVID-19 and social distancing guidance on drug use and drug supply; access to medications for opioid use disorder; and COVID19 disease from the perspectives of patient participants and ED leadership.

Upon results entry, changes were made to reflect that the study design originally was described as a "modified step wedge" but ultimately was not designed or implemented as such, as there was no substantial overlap of the baseline evaluation and IF evaluation periods. Thus, the statistical plan was adjusted accordingly.

Being tested
Standard Dissemination Practice, Implementation Facilitation (IF)
Keywords
Opioid Use Disorder
Medical subject headings
Opioid-Related Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard Dissemination PracticeOther

    Emergency department provider education using a grand rounds format. The content of the lecture will cover the scope of the opioid problem, ED specific facts related to the epidemic, potential models of intervention including the results of publications outlining the efficacy of ED-initiated BUP.

  • Implementation Facilitation (IF)Other

    IF involves a "formative evaluation" to identify the specific and dynamic needs of stakeholders and the context for implementation of evidence-based practices. This evaluation informs the initial tailoring and refinement of the IF, which includes a bundle of services tailored to meet site-specific needs, such as identifying and engaging local stakeholders, providing extensive ongoing education, tailoring program to the site and monitoring performance and offering feedback.

Study groups in NCT03023930
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Evidenced-based Practice DisseminationExperimentalEvaluating standard dissemination practice compared with implementation facilitation
Receives: Other: Standard Dissemination Practice; Other: Implementation Facilitation (IF)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Implementation (Considered the Primary Outcome)

    The primary implementation outcome will be evaluated assessing the rate of ED-initiated BUP therapy with referral for ongoing MAT

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Effectiveness

    The primary effectiveness outcome is defined as the rates of patient engagement in formal addiction treatment on the 30th day post enrollment.

    Measured: 30 Days Post Enrollment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Implementation: ED Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) Score

    ED ORCA score relating to ED-initiated BUP with referral for ongoing MAT. Scores are dichotomized as less ready (scores 0-6) or most ready (scores 7-10).

    Measured: Pre IF (Baseline)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start3 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion16 Jul 2021
  4. Study completion23 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,731 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03023930
Sponsor's protocol ID
1611018631
Other IDs
5UG1DA015831-15
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
10 Jan 2017
Last updated
18 Dec 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • D'Onofrio G, O'Connor PG, Pantalon MV, Chawarski MC, Busch SH, Owens PH, Bernstein SL, Fiellin DA. Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1636-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3474.

    PubMed 25919527
  • Coupet E Jr, D'Onofrio G, Chawarski M, Edelman EJ, O'Connor PG, Owens P, Martel S, Fiellin DA, Cowan E, Richardson L, Huntley K, Whiteside LK, Lyons MS, Rothman RE, Pantalon M, Hawk K. Emergency department patients with untreated opioid use disorder: A comparison of those seeking versus not seeking referral to substance use treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Feb 1;219:108428. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108428. Epub 2020 Nov 26.

    PubMed 33307301
  • Chawarski MC, Hawk K, Edelman EJ, O'Connor P, Owens P, Martel S, Coupet E Jr, Whiteside L, Tsui JI, Rothman R, Cowan E, Richardson L, Lyons MS, Fiellin DA, D'Onofrio G. Use of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants Among Emergency Department Patients With Untreated Opioid Use Disorder. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;76(6):782-787. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.06.046. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

    PubMed 32782084
  • Hawk KF, D'Onofrio G, Chawarski MC, O'Connor PG, Cowan E, Lyons MS, Richardson L, Rothman RE, Whiteside LK, Owens PH, Martel SH, Coupet E Jr, Pantalon M, Curry L, Fiellin DA, Edelman EJ. Barriers and Facilitators to Clinician Readiness to Provide Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e204561. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4561.

    PubMed 32391893
  • D'Onofrio G, Edelman EJ, Hawk KF, Pantalon MV, Chawarski MC, Owens PH, Martel SH, VanVeldhuisen P, Oden N, Murphy SM, Huntley K, O'Connor PG, Fiellin DA. Implementation facilitation to promote emergency department-initiated buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: protocol for a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation study (Project ED HEALTH). Implement Sci. 2019 May 7;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0891-5.

    PubMed 31064390
  • Ryan D, Lu T, Edelman EJ, Hawk KF, O'Connor PG, Coupet E Jr, Jalali A, Owens PH, Fiellin DA, D'Onofrio G, Murphy SM. Microcosting implementation facilitation for emergency department-initiated buprenorphine for untreated opioid use disorder. Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Dec;98:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.08.002. Epub 2025 Aug 12.

    PubMed 40865260
  • D'Onofrio G, Edelman EJ, Hawk KF, Chawarski MC, Pantalon MV, Owens PH, Martel SH, Rothman R, Saheed M, Schwartz RP, Cowan E, Richardson L, Salsitz E, Lyons MS, Freiermuth C, Wilder C, Whiteside L, Tsui JI, Klein JW, Coupet E, O'Connor PG, Matthews AG, Murphy SM, Huntley K, Fiellin DA. Implementation Facilitation to Promote Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e235439. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5439.

    PubMed 37017967

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Standard Dissemination Practice and Implementation Facilitation (IF) in people with Opioid Use Disorder, run by Yale University at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Feb 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Implementation (Considered the Primary Outcome) (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03023930, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in