Labor PainNCT03024411
Music and/or Video Games During Labor
A study testing iPod (Music/video games) in people with Labor Pain, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Data are lacking regarding the use of music and video games for the management of pain in labor. Pregnant women that are scheduled for labor induction with Foley bulb after 37 weeks will be approached for participation in the study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Labor Pain
- What is being tested?
- iPod (Music/video games)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 253 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 8 Jul 2016to 4 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > or = 18 years old
- Pregnant women > or = 37 weeks gestation
- Induction of labor using Foley bulb
- Singleton gestation
- Vertex fetal presentation
- Intact membranes
Who cannot join
- Any contraindication for vaginal delivery (malpresentation, placenta previa)
- Previous cesarean section
- Gestational age <37 weeks gestation
- Receiving pain medication at time of Foley bulb placement
- Chronic narcotic use (methadone, suboxone, oxycodone, etc.)
- Visual or auditory impairment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77553
About this study
Official title: Music and/or Video Games for Pain Management During Induction of Labor
Data are lacking regarding the use of music and video games for the management of pain in labor. Pregnant women that are scheduled for labor induction with Foley bulb after 37 weeks will be approached for participation in the study. Patients will be randomized to a music/video games group and a non-music/video games group. Those randomized to group with music/video games will be given an iPod for those purposes.The primary outcome will be the time for patients to request pain medications after Foley bulb placement. The two groups will be compared for differences in pain outcomes.
Read the detailed description
For decades, investigators have been evaluating the efficacy of music for pain relief. Music for pain management has been studied in the field of palliative care, oncology, physical therapy, pediatrics, post-operative procedural pain and childbirth. A 2006 Cochrane review found that listening to music reduces pain intensity levels and opioid requirements, but the magnitude of the benefits is small and the clinical importance unclear. Previous studies in obstetrics vary, as some evaluate music for pain control at time of cesarean section and others during labor. A 2014 study investigated the effect of progressive muscle relaxation exercises and music on low back pain and quality of life in pregnancy. Some previous studies investigating music or white noise for pain control during labor revealed beneficial results. One prospective trial of 25 women found little practical value of audio-analgesia.
However, most studies evaluating music therapy for pain relief in labor were limited by sample size. Specifically, a 2011 Cochrane review investigating randomized controlled trials comparing relaxation methods as a method of pain management in labor found insufficient evidence for the role of music and audio-analgesia and the need for further research. Excluded from this review was a trial by Phumdoung et al. due to the inability to obtain additional methodological and statistical information from the authors. More recently, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) done in Turkey randomized 156 women into a music and control group. Mothers in the music group were found to have a significantly lower level of pain and anxiety in all stages of labor. Pain and anxiety were evaluated by a visual analog scale. While this evidence is the best to date, there is a lack of generalizability for other populations and the primary outcome was subjective. A 2012 systematic review of video games found improvement in psychological therapy, physical therapy, physical activity, clinical skills, health education, pain distraction, and disease self-management outcomes.
Labor induction is a common obstetrical procedure. Labor results in severe pain for many women and typically requires medical treatment for pain relief. Types of analgesia for pain control on labor include parenteral (Fentanyl, Nalbuphine, Meperidine) and regional (spinal, epidural, combined spinal epidural) analgesia. However, all types of analgesia pose risks to the mother and fetus. Administration of parenteral agents result in minimal-to-absent reduction in pain scores and high doses affect fetal heart rate tracing and later increase the number of infants requiring naloxone therapy. While regional analgesia provides superior pain relief, common complications include hypotension, fever, postdural puncture headache, transient fetal heart rate decelerations, pruritus, and inadequate pain relief. Due to these risks and other reasons, many women prefer to go through labor without medical therapies or with minimal medical therapy and desire complementary therapies to help manage their pain. Data are lacking regarding the use of music and video games for the management of pain in labor.
In view of the lack of good quality evidence from well designed RCTs, we propose a randomized controlled trial to determine the utility of music and video games for pain management during induction of labor. Pregnant women that are scheduled for labor induction with Foley bulb after 37 weeks will be approached for participation in the study. The study informed consent will be obtained. Patients will be randomized to a music/video games group (group 1) and a non-music/video games group (group 2). Those randomized to group with music/video games will be given an iPod for those purposes. The iPod will include free music applications such as Pandora as well as some of the most commonly downloaded games. Randomization will be performed using a computer generated random list of numbers assigning patients to the 2 groups of the study. Randomization will occur after the Foley bulb is placed. Study assignment and the list of random number assignments will be kept secure in opaque envelopes until the end of the study.
Prospective subjects presenting for induction of labor in labor and delivery, and willing to participate in the study will be evaluated for their eligibility. After the Foley bulb is placed, patients will be randomized. Those assigned to the music/video game group will be given an iPod to use during labor. These patients will have the choice of listening to music via earphones or a speaker which amplifies the sound. Patients assigned to the non-music/video game group will not be given an iPod and will be asked to avoid using their own personal devices (if applicable) as much as possible. Understanding that patients randomized to the non-music/video game may still elect to use their own electronic devices, time of use of electronics for music/video game purposes will be recorded in both groups with assistance from the patients and nursing staff.
All nurses will be educated regarding the study procedure. Nurses will not ask any patient if they desire pain medicine to avoid prompting the patient. Every patient enrolled will receive a Foley bulb inserted just superior to the internal cervical os and then inflated with normal saline for mechanical dilation of the cervix. The Foley bulb will be placed under traction by taping the tubing to the patient's leg. No additional traction will be applied to the Foley bulb after placement and initial traction. After twelve hours, if the Foley balloon is still in place, the Foley balloon will be deflated and removed and the remainder of obstetrical care will be left to the discretion of the supervising faculty. After six hours or after epidural placement the use of music/video games will be continued or ceased pending patient desire.
The study will be explained as in the consent form and if agreed, patients will elect either to participate in the study or not after all risks and benefits are explained. Data to be collected will consist of age, gravida/para, gestational age, body mass index, time and date of intervention, time and date of delivery, mode of delivery, bishop score at admission (bishop score is a score that assesses cervical readiness for delivery and is measured by digital pelvic exam. A score < 7 is considered unfavorable and is an indication for cervical ripening to induce labor), time and date of pain medication request, type and amount of parenteral medication, time from Foley bulb placement until expulsion, patient pain score by visual analog scale, and patient satisfaction. Data will be extracted from patients' medical records as well as from direct interview with the patient. If elected to participate consents will be obtained and stored in patient chart. A copy of the consent will be given to the patient. Patients will be consented in either English or Spanish by research personnel fluent in the language. The primary outcome will be the time for patients to request pain medications after Foley bulb placement. The two groups will be compared for differences in pain outcomes.
- Conditions
- Labor Pain
- Being tested
- iPod (Music/video games)
- Medical subject headings
- Labor Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iPod (Music/video games)Other
Experimental patients will be given an iPod to enjoy music/video games during induction of labor.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Music/video games | Experimental | iPod (Music/video games) Receives: Other: iPod (Music/video games) |
| No intervention | No intervention | No intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time until patient request for pain medication after Foley bulb placement.
Time from Foley bulb placement until patient requests pain medication.
Measured: From time of Foley bulb placement (randomization) until time of request for pain medicine or time of delivery, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 days.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Parenteral medication
Amount of parenteral medication administered
Measured: From time of Foley bulb placement (randomization) until time of delivery, assessed up to 3 days.
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score every hour for the first 6 hours after Foley bulb placement.
Measured: Six hours from time of Foley bulb placement (randomization).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start8 Jul 2016
- Primary completion8 Jul 2017
- Study completion4 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Labor PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 253 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christopher L Dixon, M.D., Principal investigator, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03024411
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-0071
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Crowther CA. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD009514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009514.
PubMed 22161453van der Heijden MJ, Oliai Araghi S, van Dijk M, Jeekel J, Hunink MG. The Effects of Perioperative Music Interventions in Pediatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 6;10(8):e0133608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133608. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26247769Hsieh C, Kong J, Kirsch I, Edwards RR, Jensen KB, Kaptchuk TJ, Gollub RL. Well-loved music robustly relieves pain: a randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e107390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107390. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25211164Hartling L, Newton AS, Liang Y, Jou H, Hewson K, Klassen TP, Curtis S. Music to reduce pain and distress in the pediatric emergency department: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Sep;167(9):826-35. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.200.
PubMed 23857075Primack BA, Carroll MV, McNamara M, Klem ML, King B, Rich M, Chan CW, Nayak S. Role of video games in improving health-related outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):630-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.023.
PubMed 22608382MOORE WM, BROWNE JC, HILL ID. CLINICAL TRIAL OF AUDIO-ANALGESIA IN CHILDBIRTH. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1965 Aug;72:626-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1965.tb00074.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 14341119Yinger OS, Gooding LF. A systematic review of music-based interventions for procedural support. J Music Ther. 2015 Spring;52(1):1-77. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thv004. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
PubMed 25878063Cepeda MS, Carr DB, Lau J, Alvarez H. Music for pain relief. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD004843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004843.pub2.
PubMed 16625614Browning CA. Using music during childbirth. Birth. 2000 Dec;27(4):272-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00272.x.
PubMed 11251514Akmese ZB, Oran NT. Effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation Exercises Accompanied by Music on Low Back Pain and Quality of Life During Pregnancy. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Sep-Oct;59(5):503-9. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12176. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
PubMed 24965313Wright J, Adams D, Vohra S. Complementary, holistic, and integrative medicine: music for procedural pain. Pediatr Rev. 2013 Nov;34(11):e42-6. doi: 10.1542/pir.34-11-e42. No abstract available.
PubMed 24187147Keenan A, Keithley JK. Integrative Review: Effects of Music on Cancer Pain in Adults. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2015 Nov;42(6):E368-75. doi: 10.1188/15.ONF.E368-E375.
PubMed 26488843BURT RK, KORN GW. AUDIOANALGESIA IN OBSTETRICS. "WHITE SOUND" ANALGESIA DURING LABOR. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1964 Feb 1;88:361-6. No abstract available.
PubMed 14123408Tsai HF, Chen YR, Chung MH, Liao YM, Chi MJ, Chang CC, Chou KR. Effectiveness of music intervention in ameliorating cancer patients' anxiety, depression, pain, and fatigue: a meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;37(6):E35-50. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000116.
PubMed 24662723Bellieni CV, Cioncoloni D, Mazzanti S, Bianchi ME, Morrone I, Becattelli R, Perrone S, Buonocore G. Music provided through a portable media player (iPod) blunts pain during physical therapy. Pain Manag Nurs. 2013 Dec;14(4):e151-e155. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
PubMed 24315267
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Music and/or Video Games for Pain Management During Induction of Labor
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03024411
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 16-0071
- Conditions
- Labor Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 253 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Jul 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Data are lacking regarding the use of music and video games for the management of pain in labor. Pregnant women that are scheduled for labor induction with Foley bulb after 37 weeks will be approached for participation in the study. Patients will be randomized to a music/video games group and a non-music/video games group. Those randomized to group with music/video games will be given an iPod for those purposes.The primary outcome will be the time for patients to request pain medications after Foley bulb placement. The two groups will be compared for differences in pain outcomes.
Detailed description
For decades, investigators have been evaluating the efficacy of music for pain relief. Music for pain management has been studied in the field of palliative care, oncology, physical therapy, pediatrics, post-operative procedural pain and childbirth. A 2006 Cochrane review found that listening to music reduces pain intensity levels and opioid requirements, but the magnitude of the benefits is small and the clinical importance unclear. Previous studies in obstetrics vary, as some evaluate music for pain control at time of cesarean section and others during labor. A 2014 study investigated the effect of progressive muscle relaxation exercises and music on low back pain and quality of life in pregnancy. Some previous studies investigating music or white noise for pain control during labor revealed beneficial results. One prospective trial of 25 women found little practical value of audio-analgesia.
However, most studies evaluating music therapy for pain relief in labor were limited by sample size. Specifically, a 2011 Cochrane review investigating randomized controlled trials comparing relaxation methods as a method of pain management in labor found insufficient evidence for the role of music and audio-analgesia and the need for further research. Excluded from this review was a trial by Phumdoung et al. due to the inability to obtain additional methodological and statistical information from the authors. More recently, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) done in Turkey randomized 156 women into a music and control group. Mothers in the music group were found to have a significantly lower level of pain and anxiety in all stages of labor. Pain and anxiety were evaluated by a visual analog scale. While this evidence is the best to date, there is a lack of generalizability for other populations and the primary outcome was subjective. A 2012 systematic review of video games found improvement in psychological therapy, physical therapy, physical activity, clinical skills, health education, pain distraction, and disease self-management outcomes.
Labor induction is a common obstetrical procedure. Labor results in severe pain for many women and typically requires medical treatment for pain relief. Types of analgesia for pain control on labor include parenteral (Fentanyl, Nalbuphine, Meperidine) and regional (spinal, epidural, combined spinal epidural) analgesia. However, all types of analgesia pose risks to the mother and fetus. Administration of parenteral agents result in minimal-to-absent reduction in pain scores and high doses affect fetal heart rate tracing and later increase the number of infants requiring naloxone therapy. While regional analgesia provides superior pain relief, common complications include hypotension, fever, postdural puncture headache, transient fetal heart rate decelerations, pruritus, and inadequate pain relief. Due to these risks and other reasons, many women prefer to go through labor without medical therapies or with minimal medical therapy and desire complementary therapies to help manage their pain. Data are lacking regarding the use of music and video games for the management of pain in labor.
In view of the lack of good quality evidence from well designed RCTs, we propose a randomized controlled trial to determine the utility of music and video games for pain management during induction of labor. Pregnant women that are scheduled for labor induction with Foley bulb after 37 weeks will be approached for participation in the study. The study informed consent will be obtained. Patients will be randomized to a music/video games group (group 1) and a non-music/video games group (group 2). Those randomized to group with music/video games will be given an iPod for those purposes. The iPod will include free music applications such as Pandora as well as some of the most commonly downloaded games. Randomization will be performed using a computer generated random list of numbers assigning patients to the 2 groups of the study. Randomization will occur after the Foley bulb is placed. Study assignment and the list of random number assignments will be kept secure in opaque envelopes until the end of the study.
Prospective subjects presenting for induction of labor in labor and delivery, and willing to participate in the study will be evaluated for their eligibility. After the Foley bulb is placed, patients will be randomized. Those assigned to the music/video game group will be given an iPod to use during labor. These patients will have the choice of listening to music via earphones or a speaker which amplifies the sound. Patients assigned to the non-music/video game group will not be given an iPod and will be asked to avoid using their own personal devices (if applicable) as much as possible. Understanding that patients randomized to the non-music/video game may still elect to use their own electronic devices, time of use of electronics for music/video game purposes will be recorded in both groups with assistance from the patients and nursing staff.
All nurses will be educated regarding the study procedure. Nurses will not ask any patient if they desire pain medicine to avoid prompting the patient. Every patient enrolled will receive a Foley bulb inserted just superior to the internal cervical os and then inflated with normal saline for mechanical dilation of the cervix. The Foley bulb will be placed under traction by taping the tubing to the patient's leg. No additional traction will be applied to the Foley bulb after placement and initial traction. After twelve hours, if the Foley balloon is still in place, the Foley balloon will be deflated and removed and the remainder of obstetrical care will be left to the discretion of the supervising faculty. After six hours or after epidural placement the use of music/video games will be continued or ceased pending patient desire.
The study will be explained as in the consent form and if agreed, patients will elect either to participate in the study or not after all risks and benefits are explained. Data to be collected will consist of age, gravida/para, gestational age, body mass index, time and date of intervention, time and date of delivery, mode of delivery, bishop score at admission (bishop score is a score that assesses cervical readiness for delivery and is measured by digital pelvic exam. A score < 7 is considered unfavorable and is an indication for cervical ripening to induce labor), time and date of pain medication request, type and amount of parenteral medication, time from Foley bulb placement until expulsion, patient pain score by visual analog scale, and patient satisfaction. Data will be extracted from patients' medical records as well as from direct interview with the patient. If elected to participate consents will be obtained and stored in patient chart. A copy of the consent will be given to the patient. Patients will be consented in either English or Spanish by research personnel fluent in the language. The primary outcome will be the time for patients to request pain medications after Foley bulb placement. The two groups will be compared for differences in pain outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Music/video games | Experimental | Other: iPod (Music/video games)iPod (Music/video games) |
| No intervention | No intervention | –No intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age > or = 18 years old
- Pregnant women > or = 37 weeks gestation
- Induction of labor using Foley bulb
- Singleton gestation
- Vertex fetal presentation
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Any contraindication for vaginal delivery (malpresentation, placenta previa)
- Previous cesarean section
- Gestational age <37 weeks gestation
- Receiving pain medication at time of Foley bulb placement
- Chronic narcotic use (methadone, suboxone, oxycodone, etc.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iPod (Music/video games)Experimental patients will be given an iPod to enjoy music/video games during induction of labor. | Other | Music/video games |
Primary outcome
Time until patient request for pain medication after Foley bulb placement.
Time frame: From time of Foley bulb placement (randomization) until time of request for pain medicine or time of delivery, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 days.
Time from Foley bulb placement until patient requests pain medication.
2 secondary outcomes
Parenteral medication
Time frame: From time of Foley bulb placement (randomization) until time of delivery, assessed up to 3 days.
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score
Time frame: Six hours from time of Foley bulb placement (randomization).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2018.
- Background: PubMed 22161453Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Crowther CA. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD009514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009514.
- Background: PubMed 26247769van der Heijden MJ, Oliai Araghi S, van Dijk M, Jeekel J, Hunink MG. The Effects of Perioperative Music Interventions in Pediatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 6;10(8):e0133608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133608. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 25211164Hsieh C, Kong J, Kirsch I, Edwards RR, Jensen KB, Kaptchuk TJ, Gollub RL. Well-loved music robustly relieves pain: a randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e107390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107390. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 23857075Hartling L, Newton AS, Liang Y, Jou H, Hewson K, Klassen TP, Curtis S. Music to reduce pain and distress in the pediatric emergency department: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Sep;167(9):826-35. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.200.
- Background: PubMed 22608382Primack BA, Carroll MV, McNamara M, Klem ML, King B, Rich M, Chan CW, Nayak S. Role of video games in improving health-related outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):630-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.023.
- Background: PubMed 14341119MOORE WM, BROWNE JC, HILL ID. CLINICAL TRIAL OF AUDIO-ANALGESIA IN CHILDBIRTH. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1965 Aug;72:626-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1965.tb00074.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 25878063Yinger OS, Gooding LF. A systematic review of music-based interventions for procedural support. J Music Ther. 2015 Spring;52(1):1-77. doi: 10.1093/jmt/thv004. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
- Background: PubMed 16625614Cepeda MS, Carr DB, Lau J, Alvarez H. Music for pain relief. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD004843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004843.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 11251514Browning CA. Using music during childbirth. Birth. 2000 Dec;27(4):272-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00272.x.
- Background: PubMed 24965313Akmese ZB, Oran NT. Effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation Exercises Accompanied by Music on Low Back Pain and Quality of Life During Pregnancy. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Sep-Oct;59(5):503-9. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12176. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 24187147Wright J, Adams D, Vohra S. Complementary, holistic, and integrative medicine: music for procedural pain. Pediatr Rev. 2013 Nov;34(11):e42-6. doi: 10.1542/pir.34-11-e42. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26488843Keenan A, Keithley JK. Integrative Review: Effects of Music on Cancer Pain in Adults. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2015 Nov;42(6):E368-75. doi: 10.1188/15.ONF.E368-E375.
Related trials for Labor Pain
Recruiting
The Effect Of Partner-Assısted Rebozo Technıque On Labor Paın And Satısfactıon In Prımary Pregnant Women
Labor Pains
RecruitingPhase 4
Analgesic Efficacy and Obstetric Effects of Tramadol, Paracetamol and Placebo in Active Labor
Labor Pain
Not yet recruiting
Pre-Examination Reflexology for Anxiety and Pain During Pelvic Examination
Anxiety
Recruiting
Pain Neuroscience-Based Education for Labor Pain in Pregnant Women
Labor Pain and Anxiety
Recruiting
The Effect of Breast Milk, 10% and 20% Dextrose on Pain and Physiological Variables During Heel Puncture in Infants
Newborn Care, Pain Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christopher L Dixon, M.D. principal investigator
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing iPod (Music/video games) in people with Labor Pain, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time until patient request for pain medication after Foley bulb placement. (time frame: From time of Foley bulb placement (randomization) until time of request for pain medicine or time of delivery, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03024411, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2018.