Breast NeoplasmNCT03024463
The Multi-center Validation Study of Internal Mammary Lymph Biopsy With Modified Injection Technique in Breast Cancer Patients
An observational study of Breast Neoplasm, run by Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
In addition to axillary lymph node (ALN), internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) chain is also the first-echelon nodal drainage site for metastasis and it provides important prognostic information in breast cancer patients. However, decision about local treatment of IMLN is still being made based on ALN status. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- IM-SLNB and IMLN dissection
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2017to 1 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 200 patients with positive axillary node
Who may be able to join
- Patients with preoperative pathology confirmed invasive breast cancer;
- Clinical N1-3 M0 (with positive fine-needle aspiration result in their clinical or ultrasonic suspicious axillary lymph node ; no clinical or radiologic evidence of distant metastases);
- Be able and willing to sign informed consent forms.
Who cannot join
- Patients who have received neoadjuvant therapy (including neoadjuvant chemotherapy and / or endocrine therapy);
- Patients with a previous history of breast cancer (recurrence of breast cancer and contralateral breast cancer);
- Patients with a history of other malignancies;
- Patients who have had previous surgery in axillary or internal mammary;
- Patients in pregnancy and lactation;
- Patients participant in other clinical trials that will have an impact on the results of this study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
Jinan, Shandong, 250117
Yong-sheng Wang, MD, +8613505409989, wangysh2008@aliyun.com
Yong-sheng Wang, MD
About this study
Official title: The Multi-center Validation Study of Breast Cancer Internal Mammary Lymph Biopsy
In addition to axillary lymph node (ALN), internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) chain is also the first-echelon nodal drainage site for metastasis and it provides important prognostic information in breast cancer patients. However, decision about local treatment of IMLN is still being made based on ALN status. The 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines recommend internal mammary lymph node irradiation for patients with more than 4 positive ALNs (category 1), and strongly consider irradiation for patients with 1 to 3 positive ALNs (category 2A). Therefore, there will be patients in positive ALN subgroup who just face complications of an unnecessary radiation to IMLN and there will be patients in negative ALN subgroup who do not receive adjuvant radiation therapy they really need. Thus, these inclusion criteria of National Comprehensive Cancer Network might lead to over-treatment and under-treatment. Internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy (IM-SLNB) provides a less invasive method of assessing the IMLN than surgical dissection. However, low visualization rate of IM-SLN has been a restriction of IM-SLNB. A modified radiotracer injection technique was established in our previous study. This technique could significantly improve the IM-SLN detection rate. The investigators have validated the accurate of the hypothesis and the modified radiotracer injection technique in the previous study.
For axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy, the success rate and the accuracy are the most important technical indicators. The relatively lower false-negative rate is a precondition for the widely application of SLNB. Axillary SLNB needs to be accomplished with the cooperation of multi-disciplinary teamwork, including the breast surgery, the radiologist, the nuclear medicine doctor and the pathologist, in order to obtain a better success rate and a lower false-negative rate. Our previous studies confirmed that the modified radiotracer injection technique can greatly improve the IM-SLN detection rate. However, whether the IM-SLNB based on the modified radiotracer injection technique has a low false negative rate or not still need to be confirmed by a further validation research.
Read more
Furthermore,recently, the investigators propose that if IM-SLN is the only metastatic lymph node and there would be no positive node else in IMLN chain, the radiotherapy and its associated complications could be avoided in these patients. On the other hand, if there is the presence of metastatic non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) in IMLN chain after IM-SLNB, it is important to predict the risk of IM-NSLN metastasis in IM-SLN positive patients. As there is currently no such model, a predictive model for IM-SLN positive patients to avoid radiotherapy is needed in this situation. Therefore, a new study will be conducted to verify the issues above.
In the current study, all the participants (18~70 years of age) would have the preoperative pathology of invasive breast cancer and positive fine-needle aspiration result in their clinical or ultrasonic suspicious axillary lymph node. 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid was injected into the parenchyma under the ultrasound guidance 3 to 18 hours before surgery. Two syringes of 9.25 to 18.5MBq 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid in 0.5 to 0.7mL volume were injected at the 6 and 12 o'clock positions 0.5 to 1.0 cm from areola (about 2.0~4.0 cm from the nipple). IM-SLNB was performed in all participants with IMSLN visualized on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and/or detected by the intra-operative gamma probe. All hotspots in the internal mammary basin were harvested and intra-operative identification of the IM-SLN was based on gamma probe detection. The IM-SLN was sectioned along the long axis into two blocks and all blocks were tested by the frozen section and the touch imprint cytology intra-operatively. Those participants with positive intra-operative results received IMLN dissection. Finally, all the IM-SLN blocks and IM-NSLN dissected were assessed post-operatively by H\&E and Cytokeratin 19 stained immunohistochemistry. The conclusion would be drawn through the results mentioned above.
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasm
- Being tested
- IM-SLNB and IMLN dissection
- Keywords
- Breast Neoplasm; Internal Lymph Node; Sentinel Lymph Node Biospy
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IM-SLNB and IMLN dissectionProcedure or surgery
Internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by internal mammary lymph node dissection
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The accuracy (false negative rate) of internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy
Measured: Two years
Secondary outcomes (2)
The number of internal mammary non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with positive axillary node and internal mammary sentinel lymph node
Measured: Two years
Factors influencing the number of internal mammary non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with positive axillary node and internal mammary sentinel lymph node
Measured: Two years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start1 Aug 2017
- Primary completion1 Mar 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yongsheng Wang, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03024463
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IMLN-VS
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 21 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Multi-center Validation Study of Breast Cancer Internal Mammary Lymph Biopsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03024463
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMLN-VS
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasm
- Keywords
- Breast Neoplasm; Internal Lymph Node; Sentinel Lymph Node Biospy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In addition to axillary lymph node (ALN), internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) chain is also the first-echelon nodal drainage site for metastasis and it provides important prognostic information in breast cancer patients. However, decision about local treatment of IMLN is still being made based on ALN status. The 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines recommend internal mammary lymph node irradiation for patients with more than 4 positive ALNs (category 1), and strongly consider irradiation for patients with 1 to 3 positive ALNs (category 2A). Therefore, there will be patients in positive ALN subgroup who just face complications of an unnecessary radiation to IMLN and there will be patients in negative ALN subgroup who do not receive adjuvant radiation therapy they really need. Thus, these inclusion criteria of National Comprehensive Cancer Network might lead to over-treatment and under-treatment. Internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy (IM-SLNB) provides a less invasive method of assessing the IMLN than surgical dissection. However, low visualization rate of IM-SLN has been a restriction of IM-SLNB. A modified radiotracer injection technique was established in our previous study. This technique could significantly improve the IM-SLN detection rate. The investigators have validated the accurate of the hypothesis and the modified radiotracer injection technique in the previous study.
For axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy, the success rate and the accuracy are the most important technical indicators. The relatively lower false-negative rate is a precondition for the widely application of SLNB. Axillary SLNB needs to be accomplished with the cooperation of multi-disciplinary teamwork, including the breast surgery, the radiologist, the nuclear medicine doctor and the pathologist, in order to obtain a better success rate and a lower false-negative rate. Our previous studies confirmed that the modified radiotracer injection technique can greatly improve the IM-SLN detection rate. However, whether the IM-SLNB based on the modified radiotracer injection technique has a low false negative rate or not still need to be confirmed by a further validation research.
Furthermore,recently, the investigators propose that if IM-SLN is the only metastatic lymph node and there would be no positive node else in IMLN chain, the radiotherapy and its associated complications could be avoided in these patients. On the other hand, if there is the presence of metastatic non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) in IMLN chain after IM-SLNB, it is important to predict the risk of IM-NSLN metastasis in IM-SLN positive patients. As there is currently no such model, a predictive model for IM-SLN positive patients to avoid radiotherapy is needed in this situation. Therefore, a new study will be conducted to verify the issues above.
In the current study, all the participants (18~70 years of age) would have the preoperative pathology of invasive breast cancer and positive fine-needle aspiration result in their clinical or ultrasonic suspicious axillary lymph node. 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid was injected into the parenchyma under the ultrasound guidance 3 to 18 hours before surgery. Two syringes of 9.25 to 18.5MBq 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid in 0.5 to 0.7mL volume were injected at the 6 and 12 o'clock positions 0.5 to 1.0 cm from areola (about 2.0~4.0 cm from the nipple). IM-SLNB was performed in all participants with IMSLN visualized on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and/or detected by the intra-operative gamma probe. All hotspots in the internal mammary basin were harvested and intra-operative identification of the IM-SLN was based on gamma probe detection. The IM-SLN was sectioned along the long axis into two blocks and all blocks were tested by the frozen section and the touch imprint cytology intra-operatively. Those participants with positive intra-operative results received IMLN dissection. Finally, all the IM-SLN blocks and IM-NSLN dissected were assessed post-operatively by H\&E and Cytokeratin 19 stained immunohistochemistry. The conclusion would be drawn through the results mentioned above.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 200 patients with positive axillary node
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with preoperative pathology confirmed invasive breast cancer;
- Clinical N1-3 M0 (with positive fine-needle aspiration result in their clinical or ultrasonic suspicious axillary lymph node ; no clinical or radiologic evidence of distant metastases);
- Be able and willing to sign informed consent forms.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients who have received neoadjuvant therapy (including neoadjuvant chemotherapy and / or endocrine therapy);
- Patients with a previous history of breast cancer (recurrence of breast cancer and contralateral breast cancer);
- Patients with a history of other malignancies;
- Patients who have had previous surgery in axillary or internal mammary;
- Patients in pregnancy and lactation;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IM-SLNB and IMLN dissectionInternal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by internal mammary lymph node dissection | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
The accuracy (false negative rate) of internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy
Time frame: Two years
2 secondary outcomes
The number of internal mammary non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with positive axillary node and internal mammary sentinel lymph node
Time frame: Two years
Factors influencing the number of internal mammary non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with positive axillary node and internal mammary sentinel lymph node
Time frame: Two years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2018.
Related trials for Breast Neoplasm
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breast Neoplasm, run by Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The accuracy (false negative rate) of internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy (time frame: Two years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.