AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatic AngiosarcomaNCT03025438

Cytological Diagnosis of Hepatic Angiosarcoma and Its Histopathologic Correlation

An observational study of Hepatic Angiosarcoma, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cytological diagnosis of hepatic angiosarcoma by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or imprint cytology is difficult due not only to its various cytomorphologic features but also clinical rarity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Hepatic Angiosarcoma
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
17 Jan 2017to 3 Apr 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: patients of a medical center in Taiwan; National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH)

Who may be able to join

  • Consecutive patients of hepatic angiosarcoma performed FNA and/or imprint cytological examinations in our hospital.

Who cannot join

  • Patients without pathological confirmation.
  • Patients who are not angiosarcoma by pathological reviews.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of laboratory medicine

    Taipei, 10008

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Cytological diagnosis of hepatic angiosarcoma by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or imprint cytology is difficult due not only to its various cytomorphologic features but also clinical rarity. Vasoformative features, such as pseudo-acini, branching pseudo-capillary structure, and intracytoplasmic lumina, are clues to achieve the diagnosis. But these features are not always present. In order to find clues for cytological diagnosis of angiosarcoma, we collected cases of hepatic angiosarcoma to study their cytological features. And then compared these features with those in their histopathological biopsy or resection.

Read the detailed description

Hepatic angiosarcoma is a rare hepatic malignant tumor. Although diagnosis of hepatic angiosarcoma by FNA cytology has been reported since 1982, followed by several studies, its cytomorphologic features were still not well recognized by cytopathologists because of its clinical rarity and various morphologic features.

We reviewed literatures about cytomorphology of hepatic angiosarcoma by FNA. There are only 11 cases retrieved in 10 articles searched from Medline. The sex M/F ratio was 6/4 (one unknown); age range was 56 to 79 years old. In initial cytological evaluation, four cases got angiosarcoma or consistent/suspicious angiosarcoma diagnosis. Positive for malignancy, sarcoma, and poorly differentiated spindle cell lesion were in one case respectively. One was diagnosed as atypical cells. Remaining three were unavailable by their reports.

In cytological morphologic features, all but one met least 2 of 3 cytological cellular criteria of angiosarcoma cells: spindle cells, epithelioid cells, and pleomorphic cells. In cytological architectural features, 7 of 11 cases showed vasoformative structures; 5 of 11 cases showed intracytoplasmic lumen or erythrophagocytosis. Ten of 11 cases had histologic/pathologic confirmation as angiosarcoma. One case reported interrelation of tumor structures and their own accompanied liver tissue in cell blocks.

Keywords
angiosarcoma, Cytology, liver, cancer
Medical subject headings
Hemangiosarcoma, Neoplasms

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. all cause mortality

    Measured: about 10 years from the date of diagnosis to the last follow-up date by medical record

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start17 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion4 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion3 Apr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03025438
Sponsor's protocol ID
201603013RINA
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
16 Jan 2017
Last updated
18 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hepatic Angiosarcoma, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

all cause mortality (time frame: about 10 years from the date of diagnosis to the last follow-up date by medical record). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in