Fracture DislocationNCT03026920
Pelvic and Acetabular Fracture in Old People
A study testing less invasive method in people with Fracture Dislocation, run by Hebei Medical University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
It was reported that satisfactory postoperative outcome was difficult to obtain for the pelvic or acetabular fracture in old people. The less invasive surgical method was conducted in this study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Fracture Dislocation
- What is being tested?
- less invasive method
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Jun 2016to Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Over 60 years old Fracture involving pelvis or acetabulum Operation was conducted within 14 days Sign the consent form
Who cannot join
- Presented with a pathologic acetabular fracture Refused to participate Follow-up insufficient 12 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051
Zhiyong Hou, M.D, +8618533112800, houzhiyong1234@126.com
Ruipeng Zhang, M.D
About this study
Official title: Different Surgical Methods for Pelvic or Acetabular Fracture of Old Man
It was reported that satisfactory postoperative outcome was difficult to obtain for the pelvic or acetabular fracture in old people. The less invasive surgical method was conducted in this study. Then, the clinical results were compared with the patients treated using traditional methods to assess the less invasive method.
Read the detailed description
Pelvic or acetabular fractures were caused by high energy trauma, which may lead to poor prognosis for the old. The patients over 60 years were included in this study. The surgical procedure was conducted in two weeks. The less invasive methods involved Stoppa approach and novel plate. The data including surgical time, blood loss and results of follow-up were recorded. The clinical results were compared with the patients treated using traditional methods. Thus, the clinical outcome of Pelvic or acetabular fractures in old man was assessed.
- Conditions
- Fracture Dislocation
- Being tested
- less invasive method
- Keywords
- Fracture, outcome, pelvic, acetabular
- Medical subject headings
- Fracture Dislocation, Fractures, Bone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
less invasive methodProcedure or surgery
The less invasive surgical method was conducted in this study. Then, the clinical results were compared with the patients treated using traditional methods to assess the less invasive method.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| clinical outcome | Experimental | Less invasive method was applied to pelvic or acetabular fracture of old people. Thus, the clinical outcome of Pelvic or acetabular fractures in old man was assessed. Receives: Procedure: less invasive method |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
fracture union time
how long the fracture line disappeared postoperatively in radiograph
Measured: 4 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
complication
wound infection, iatrogenic injury of vessels and nerves, nonunion
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2016
- Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fracture DislocationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ruipeng Zhang, M.D, Principal investigator, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03026920
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HZY2015
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Dec 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Dec 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Different Surgical Methods for Pelvic or Acetabular Fracture of Old Man
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03026920
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HZY2015
- Conditions
- Fracture Dislocation
- Keywords
- Fracture, outcome, pelvic, acetabular
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hebei Medical University Third HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
It was reported that satisfactory postoperative outcome was difficult to obtain for the pelvic or acetabular fracture in old people. The less invasive surgical method was conducted in this study. Then, the clinical results were compared with the patients treated using traditional methods to assess the less invasive method.
Detailed description
Pelvic or acetabular fractures were caused by high energy trauma, which may lead to poor prognosis for the old. The patients over 60 years were included in this study. The surgical procedure was conducted in two weeks. The less invasive methods involved Stoppa approach and novel plate. The data including surgical time, blood loss and results of follow-up were recorded. The clinical results were compared with the patients treated using traditional methods. Thus, the clinical outcome of Pelvic or acetabular fractures in old man was assessed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| clinical outcome | Experimental | Procedure: less invasive methodLess invasive method was applied to pelvic or acetabular fracture of old people. Thus, the clinical outcome of Pelvic or acetabular fractures in old man was assessed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Over 60 years old Fracture involving pelvis or acetabulum Operation was conducted within 14 days Sign the consent form
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Presented with a pathologic acetabular fracture Refused to participate Follow-up insufficient 12 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| less invasive methodThe less invasive surgical method was conducted in this study. Then, the clinical results were compared with the patients treated using traditional methods to assess the less invasive method. | Procedure or surgery | clinical outcome |
Primary outcome
fracture union time
Time frame: 4 months
how long the fracture line disappeared postoperatively in radiograph
1 secondary outcome
complication
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Dec 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fracture Dislocation
Recruiting
Wrist Injury Strengthening Exercise (WISE) Versus Usual Care Advice for Improving Pain and Function
Distal Radius Fracture, Colles Fracture
Not yet recruitingObservational study
3D-Printed Pelvic Models for Planning Complex Total Hip Arthroplasty
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, Acetabular Bone Loss
Recruiting
SMR Stemless Reverse vs SMR Reverse Shoulder System
Arthroplasty, Replacement
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Prospective Study for the Evaluation of the Cementless Anatomic Femoral Stem Minimax -Launay
Primary Osteoarthritis, Secondary Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Opioid Analgesia Impacts on Neurological Development
Fracture, Scoliosis Idiopathic Adolescent
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ruipeng Zhang, M.D principal investigator
Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing less invasive method in people with Fracture Dislocation, run by Hebei Medical University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zhiyong Hou, M.D (+8618533112800, houzhiyong1234@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
fracture union time (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2017.