Brain InjuriesNCT03027011
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Brain Injury in Carotid Endarterectomy
A study testing Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in people with Brain Injuries and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning, run by The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This is a randomized controlled trial designed to test an intervention (Remote ischemic preconditioning) in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA).Remote ischemic preconditioning(RIPC) with transient upper limb ischemia/reperfusion is a novel, simple, cost-free,non-pharmacological and non-invasive… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Injuries, Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
- What is being tested?
- Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2017to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy
- Patients aged 55 years to 80 years
Who cannot join
- Inability to give informed consent
- Known Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in arm
- Pre-existing lymphedema or axillary node dissection both arms
- Arteriovenous fistula or graft in both arms
- Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%
- Diagnosis of dementia, intellectual disability, or mental illness including depression, anxiety, or schizophrenia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000
Chen Xiuxia, MD, +86-18052268332, cxxlxy@sina.com
About this study
Official title: Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Brain Injury in Carotid Endarterectomy
This is a randomized controlled trial designed to test an intervention (Remote ischemic preconditioning) in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA).Remote ischemic preconditioning(RIPC) with transient upper limb ischemia/reperfusion is a novel, simple, cost-free,non-pharmacological and non-invasive strategy.The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning on perioperative ischaemic injury in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy compared to control intervention.The outcomes of interest include neurocognitive function,clinical outcomes,and biomarkers of brain injury.
Read the detailed description
Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protocol will be induced during anesthesia by 3 cycles of 5-min upper limb ischemia and 5-min reperfusion using a blood pressure cuff inflated to a pressure 200mmHg
- Conditions
- Brain Injuries, Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
- Being tested
- Remote Ischemic Preconditioning, Control
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Remote Ischemic PreconditioningProcedure or surgery
Also called RIPC
RIPC will be induced during anesthesia by 3 cycles of 5-min upper limb ischemia and 5-min reperfusion using a blood-pressure cuff inflated to a pressure 200mmHg
ControlProcedure or surgery
Control group without remote ischemic preconditioning
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Remote Ischemic Preconditioning(RIPC) | Active comparator | RIPC will be induced during anesthesia by 3 cycles of 5-min upper limb ischemia and 5-min reperfusion using a blood-pressure cuff inflated to a pressure 200mmHg Receives: Procedure: Remote Ischemic Preconditioning |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Control group without remote ischemic preconditioning Receives: Procedure: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
S100-beta biomarker
tested by ELISA
Measured: 48 hours post surgery
Secondary outcomes (3)
Short - term cognitive function
Short - term cognitive function will be tested by mini-mental state examination
Measured: 1 day before surgery and 1 week post surgery
Neuron specific enolase (NSE) biomarker
tested by ELISA
Measured: 48 hours post surgery
Sleep quality
Sleep quality will be test by medical outcomes study sleep scale
Measured: 1 week post surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start1 Mar 2017
- Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Brain InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chen Xiuxia, MD, Principal investigator, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03027011
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- XYFY-2017-005
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD will be available when this trial is finished and the article have been published
Publications
Naylor AR. What is the current status of angioplasty vs endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease? J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2007 Apr;48(2):161-80.
PubMed 17410063Naylor AR. Where next after SPACE and EVA-3S: 'the good, the bad and the ugly!'. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):44-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
PubMed 17126572Brevoord D, Kranke P, Kuijpers M, Weber N, Hollmann M, Preckel B. Remote ischemic conditioning to protect against ischemia-reperfusion injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042179. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
PubMed 22860077Sanderson TH, Reynolds CA, Kumar R, Przyklenk K, Huttemann M. Molecular mechanisms of ischemia-reperfusion injury in brain: pivotal role of the mitochondrial membrane potential in reactive oxygen species generation. Mol Neurobiol. 2013 Feb;47(1):9-23. doi: 10.1007/s12035-012-8344-z. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
PubMed 23011809Pundik S, Xu K, Sundararajan S. Reperfusion brain injury: focus on cellular bioenergetics. Neurology. 2012 Sep 25;79(13 Suppl 1):S44-51. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182695a14.
PubMed 23008411Bhuiyan MI, Kim YJ. Mechanisms and prospects of ischemic tolerance induced by cerebral preconditioning. Int Neurourol J. 2010 Dec;14(4):203-12. doi: 10.5213/inj.2010.14.4.203. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
PubMed 21253330Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986 Nov;74(5):1124-36. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.5.1124.
PubMed 3769170Przyklenk K, Bauer B, Ovize M, Kloner RA, Whittaker P. Regional ischemic 'preconditioning' protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion. Circulation. 1993 Mar;87(3):893-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.3.893.
PubMed 7680290Nandagopal K, Dawson TM, Dawson VL. Critical role for nitric oxide signaling in cardiac and neuronal ischemic preconditioning and tolerance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001 May;297(2):474-8.
PubMed 11303032Kitagawa K, Matsumoto M, Tagaya M, Hata R, Ueda H, Niinobe M, Handa N, Fukunaga R, Kimura K, Mikoshiba K, et al. 'Ischemic tolerance' phenomenon found in the brain. Brain Res. 1990 Sep 24;528(1):21-4. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90189-i.
PubMed 2245337Ederle J, Featherstone RL, Brown MM. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub3.
PubMed 17943745Lim SY, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. The neural and humoral pathways in remote limb ischemic preconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010 Sep;105(5):651-5. doi: 10.1007/s00395-010-0099-y. Epub 2010 May 7.
PubMed 20449597Manchurov V, Ryazankina N, Khmara T, Skrypnik D, Reztsov R, Vasilieva E, Shpektor A. Remote ischemic preconditioning and endothelial function in patients with acute myocardial infarction and primary PCI. Am J Med. 2014 Jul;127(7):670-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
PubMed 24565591Olguner C, Koca U, Kar A, Karci A, Islekel H, Canyilmaz M, Mavioglu O, Kizildag S, Unlu G, Elar Z. Ischemic preconditioning attenuates the lipid peroxidation and remote lung injury in the rat model of unilateral lower limb ischemia reperfusion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Feb;50(2):150-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00938.x.
PubMed 16430534Xia Z, Herijgers P, Nishida T, Ozaki S, Wouters P, Flameng W. Remote preconditioning lessens the deterioration of pulmonary function after repeated coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion in sheep. Can J Anaesth. 2003 May;50(5):481-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03021061. English, French.
PubMed 12734158
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Brain Injury in Carotid Endarterectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03027011
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- XYFY-2017-005
- Conditions
- Brain Injuries, Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized controlled trial designed to test an intervention (Remote ischemic preconditioning) in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA).Remote ischemic preconditioning(RIPC) with transient upper limb ischemia/reperfusion is a novel, simple, cost-free,non-pharmacological and non-invasive strategy.The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning on perioperative ischaemic injury in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy compared to control intervention.The outcomes of interest include neurocognitive function,clinical outcomes,and biomarkers of brain injury.
Detailed description
Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protocol will be induced during anesthesia by 3 cycles of 5-min upper limb ischemia and 5-min reperfusion using a blood pressure cuff inflated to a pressure 200mmHg
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Remote Ischemic Preconditioning(RIPC) | Active comparator | Procedure: Remote Ischemic PreconditioningRIPC will be induced during anesthesia by 3 cycles of 5-min upper limb ischemia and 5-min reperfusion using a blood-pressure cuff inflated to a pressure 200mmHg |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Procedure: ControlControl group without remote ischemic preconditioning |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy
- Patients aged 55 years to 80 years
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Inability to give informed consent
- Known Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in arm
- Pre-existing lymphedema or axillary node dissection both arms
- Arteriovenous fistula or graft in both arms
- Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Remote Ischemic PreconditioningAlso: RIPCRIPC will be induced during anesthesia by 3 cycles of 5-min upper limb ischemia and 5-min reperfusion using a blood-pressure cuff inflated to a pressure 200mmHg | Procedure or surgery | Remote Ischemic Preconditioning(RIPC) |
| ControlControl group without remote ischemic preconditioning | Procedure or surgery | Control |
Primary outcome
S100-beta biomarker
Time frame: 48 hours post surgery
tested by ELISA
3 secondary outcomes
Short - term cognitive function
Time frame: 1 day before surgery and 1 week post surgery
Neuron specific enolase (NSE) biomarker
Time frame: 48 hours post surgery
Sleep quality
Time frame: 1 week post surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 17410063Naylor AR. What is the current status of angioplasty vs endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease? J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2007 Apr;48(2):161-80.
- Results publication: PubMed 17126572Naylor AR. Where next after SPACE and EVA-3S: 'the good, the bad and the ugly!'. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):44-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 22860077Brevoord D, Kranke P, Kuijpers M, Weber N, Hollmann M, Preckel B. Remote ischemic conditioning to protect against ischemia-reperfusion injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e42179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042179. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
- Results publication: PubMed 23011809Sanderson TH, Reynolds CA, Kumar R, Przyklenk K, Huttemann M. Molecular mechanisms of ischemia-reperfusion injury in brain: pivotal role of the mitochondrial membrane potential in reactive oxygen species generation. Mol Neurobiol. 2013 Feb;47(1):9-23. doi: 10.1007/s12035-012-8344-z. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 23008411Pundik S, Xu K, Sundararajan S. Reperfusion brain injury: focus on cellular bioenergetics. Neurology. 2012 Sep 25;79(13 Suppl 1):S44-51. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182695a14.
- Results publication: PubMed 21253330Bhuiyan MI, Kim YJ. Mechanisms and prospects of ischemic tolerance induced by cerebral preconditioning. Int Neurourol J. 2010 Dec;14(4):203-12. doi: 10.5213/inj.2010.14.4.203. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
- Results publication: PubMed 3769170Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986 Nov;74(5):1124-36. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.5.1124.
- Results publication: PubMed 7680290Przyklenk K, Bauer B, Ovize M, Kloner RA, Whittaker P. Regional ischemic 'preconditioning' protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion. Circulation. 1993 Mar;87(3):893-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.3.893.
- Results publication: PubMed 11303032Nandagopal K, Dawson TM, Dawson VL. Critical role for nitric oxide signaling in cardiac and neuronal ischemic preconditioning and tolerance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001 May;297(2):474-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 2245337Kitagawa K, Matsumoto M, Tagaya M, Hata R, Ueda H, Niinobe M, Handa N, Fukunaga R, Kimura K, Mikoshiba K, et al. 'Ischemic tolerance' phenomenon found in the brain. Brain Res. 1990 Sep 24;528(1):21-4. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90189-i.
- Results publication: PubMed 17943745Ederle J, Featherstone RL, Brown MM. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub3.
- Results publication: PubMed 20449597Lim SY, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. The neural and humoral pathways in remote limb ischemic preconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010 Sep;105(5):651-5. doi: 10.1007/s00395-010-0099-y. Epub 2010 May 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD will be available when this trial is finished and the article have been published
Related trials for Brain Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Additional Effects on tDCS With AOT on Lower Limb Functions on Children With Diplegic CP
Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation Compared With Clinic-Based Physiotherapy in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chen Xiuxia, MD principal investigator
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in people with Brain Injuries and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning, run by The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Chen Xiuxia, MD (+86-18052268332, cxxlxy@sina.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
S100-beta biomarker (time frame: 48 hours post surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03027011, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2017.