AzTrials
AzTrials

Behavioral HealthNCT03034369

Caring for the Whole Person

An observational study of Behavioral Health, run by Providence Health & Services at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to identify outcomes associated with Behavioral Health Integration (BHI) that matter to patients, to compare changes in outcome over time to measure the impact of different BHI models on different patients, and to create and maintain an Integration Learning Collaborative. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Behavioral Health
What is being tested?
Access to Care, Depression Screening and Patient-Provider Relationship
How many people
6,000 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2015to Dec 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients accessing care at safety net clinic in Oregon.

Who may be able to join

  • Age >= 18
  • Received care at a safety net care clinic in Oregon

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Providence Health & Services

    Portland, Oregon, 97213

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Caring for the Whole Person: A Patient-Centered Assessment of Integrated Care Models in Vulnerable Populations

The goal of this study is to identify outcomes associated with Behavioral Health Integration (BHI) that matter to patients, to compare changes in outcome over time to measure the impact of different BHI models on different patients, and to create and maintain an Integration Learning Collaborative.

Read the detailed description

Twelve safety net clinics have been selected to be a part of this study. The clinics vary on a BHI continuum level, which includes minimal collaboration, basic collaboration at a distance, basic collaboration on site, close collaboration (partially integrated) and close collaboration (fully integrated).

Twelve-thousand patients will be randomly selected from the 12 clinics to be invited to participate in the study. Patients who elect to participate will complete a survey at baseline to collect patient-reported outcomes and again twelve months later.

The Oregon All Providers All Claims (APAC) database will be accessed to analyze financial data regarding the patients at baseline and 12 months.

The hypothesis is that the degree of clinic BHI will predict patient outcomes.

Being tested
Access to Care, Depression Screening, Patient-Provider Relationship, Patient-Clinic Interactions, Stigma
Keywords
Integration, Primary Care, Behavioral Health, Health Care Reform, Medical Home, Accountable Care Organization

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Access to CareOther

    Patient reported outcome survey administered at baseline and 12 months to measure satisfaction with access to care.

  • Depression ScreeningOther

    Analysis of health care claims data for depression screenings at baseline and 12 months.

  • Patient-Provider RelationshipOther

    Patient reported outcome survey administered at baseline and 12 months to measure satisfaction with patient-provider relationship.

  • Patient-Clinic InteractionsOther

    Patient reported outcome survey administered at baseline and 12 months to measure satisfaction with patient-clinic interactions.

  • StigmaOther

    Patient reported outcome survey administered at baseline and 12 months to measure perceived stigma.

  • Provider ContinuityOther

    Patient reported outcome survey administered at baseline and 12 months to measure satisfaction with provider continuity.

  • Symptom SeverityOther

    Patient reported outcome survey administered at baseline and 12 months to measure symptom severity.

  • DiagnosesOther

    Patient reported outcome survey administered at baseline and 12 months to measure diagnoses.

  • Social supportOther

    Patient reported outcome survey administered at baseline and 12 months to assess social support and outlets.

  • Preventive ScreeningOther

    Analysis of health care claims data for preventive screenings at baseline and 12 months.

  • Inpatient Hospitalization UtilizationOther

    Analysis of health care claims data for Inpatient Hospitalization Utilization at baseline and 12 months.

  • Inpatient ReadmissionsOther

    Analysis of health care claims data for Inpatient Hospitalization Readmissions at baseline and 12 months.

  • Post-Admission follow-upOther

    Analysis of health care claims data for Post-Admission follow-up at baseline and 12 months.

Study groups in NCT03034369
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Safety Net Clinic PatientsA Cohort of patients in 12 different primary care clinics will be studied to measure how changes in different integration factors impacts the following patient reported outcomes at baseline and 12 months: Access to Care, Patient-Provider Relationship, Patient-Clinic Interactions, Stigma, Provider Continuity, Symptom Severity, Diagnoses, and Social Support. Health care claims data will be accessed to analyze Depression Screening, Preventive Screening, Inpatient Hospitalization Utilization, Inpatient Readmissions, and Post-Admission follow-up at baseline and 12 months.
Receives: Other: Access to Care; Other: Depression Screening; Other: Patient-Provider Relationship; Other: Patient-Clinic Interactions; Other: Stigma; Other: Provider Continuity; Other: Symptom Severity; Other: Diagnoses; Other: Social support; Other: Preventive Screening; Other: Inpatient Hospitalization Utilization; Other: Inpatient Readmissions; Other: Post-Admission follow-up

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in patient reported outcomes

    Change in patient reported outcomes at baseline and 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Change in health care claims

    change in health care claims at baseline and 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
6,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03034369
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-247A
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
25 Jan 2017
Last updated
15 Jun 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Behavioral Health, run by Providence Health & Services at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in patient reported outcomes (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in