Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 4NCT03034915
A 24-week Study to Compare Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (UMEC/VI), UMEC and Salmeterol in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Phase 4 study testing UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA, UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTA and Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUS in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 212 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
COPD is characterized by an airflow limitation, which is not fully reversible, usually progressive and accompanied by chronic cough, sputum production and dyspnea, which can be a major cause of disability and anxiety associated with the disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA, UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTA and Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUS
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 2,696 participants
- Where
- 212 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2017to 18 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 40 years or older at date of signing informed consent at Screening Visit 1
- Outpatient with a diagnosis of COPD
- Persistent airflow limitations as indicated by a pre and post-albuterol/salbutamol FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.70 and a post-albuterol/salbutamol FEV1 of >=30% to <=80% predicted normal values at Screening Visit 1.
- A CAT score of >=10 at Screening Visit 1
- Current or former cigarette smokers with a history of cigarette smoking of >=10 pack-years (number of pack years = [number of cigarettes per day / 20] multiplied by number of years smoked [e.g., 20 cigarettes per day for 10 years, or 10 cigarettes per day for 20 years both equal 10 pack-years]). Former smokers are defined as those who have stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1. Pipe and/or cigar use cannot be used to calculate pack-year history.
- Male and female subjects are eligible to participate in the study. A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant (as confirmed by a negative urine human chorionic gonadotrophin test), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies: non-reproductive potential defined as pre-menopausal females with documented tubal ligation or documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion or hysterectomy or documented bilateral oophorectomy. Postmenopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea. In questionable cases, a blood sample with simultaneous follicle stimulating hormone and estradiol levels consistent with menopause must be tested. Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrolment.
- A female subject with reproductive potential is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant and agrees to follow one of the highly effective methods for avoiding pregnancy in females of reproductive potential from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication and until (at least five terminal half-lives or until any continuing pharmacologic effect has ended, whichever is longer) after the last dose of study medication and completion of the follow-up visit. The investigator is responsible for ensuring that subjects understand how to properly use methods of contraception.
- Capable of giving signed informed consent prior to study participation.
Who cannot join
- A current diagnosis of asthma (Subjects with a prior history of asthma are eligible if they have a current diagnosis of COPD, which is the primary cause of their respiratory symptoms).
- Subjects with known alpha-antitrypsin deficiency as the underlying cause of COPD
- Subjects with active tuberculosis are excluded. Subjects with other respiratory disorders (e.g., clinically significant: bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, lung fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases) are excluded if these conditions are the primary cause of their respiratory symptoms.
- Current active liver or biliary disease (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones or otherwise stable chronic liver disease as per investigator assessment); stable chronic liver disease should generally be defined by the absence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, oesophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis; chronic stable hepatitis B and C (e.g., presence of hepatitis B surface antigen or positive hepatitis C antibody test result or within 3 months prior to first dose of study treatment) are acceptable if subject otherwise meets entry criteria.
- Subjects with unstable or life threatening cardiac disease. The investigational product should be used with caution in subjects with severe cardiovascular disease. In the opinion of the investigator, use will only be considered if the benefit is likely to outweigh the risk in conditions such as myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 6 months, or unstable or life threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention in the last 3 months, or New York Heart Association Class IV heart failure.
- The investigator will determine the clinical significance of each abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) finding in relation to the subject's medical history and exclude subjects who would be at undue risk by participating in the trial. Subjects with the following abnormalities are excluded from participation in the study: atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate >120 beats per minute (bpm), sustained or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, second degree heart block Mobitz type II or third degree heart block (unless pacemaker or defibrillator had been inserted).
Show all 22Show fewer
- Subjects with medical conditions such as narrow-angle glaucoma, urinary retention, prostatic hypertrophy, or bladder neck obstruction will be excluded unless, in the opinion of the study physician, the benefit outweighs the risk.
- Any subject who is considered unlikely to survive the duration of the study period or has any rapidly progressing disease or immediate life-threatening illness (e.g., cancer). In addition, any subject who has any other condition (e.g., neurological condition) that is likely to affect respiratory function will not be included in the study.
- Hospitalization for COPD or pneumonia within 12 weeks prior to Visit 1. Pneumonia and/or moderate or severe COPD exacerbation that has not resolved at least 14 days prior to Screening Visit 1and at least 30 days following the last dose of oral/systemic corticosteroids (if applicable).
- Subjects who had received inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or ICS/ long-acting beta-agonist for the treatment of COPD in the 6 weeks prior to Screening Visit1.
- Subjects who had >1 moderate exacerbation in the 12 months prior to Screening Visit 1, or one severe exacerbation requiring hospitalization in the 12 months prior to Screening Visit 1.
- Other respiratory tract infections that have not resolved at least 7 days prior to Screening Visit 1.
- Subjects with lung volume reduction surgery (including procedures such as endobronchial valves) within the 12 months prior to Screening Visit 1.
- Use of long-term oxygen therapy described as resting oxygen therapy >3 Liter (L)/minute (min) at screening required to maintain adequate oxygenation (e.g., oxygen saturation in arterial blood [SaO2] >90%; oxygen use <=3 L/min flow is not exclusionary, and subjects may adjust oxygen levels up or down as needed during the study.)
- Use of ICS within 6 weeks prior to Screening Visit 1; use of depot corticosteroids within 12 weeks prior to Screening Visit 1; use of systemic, oral or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to Screening Visit 1 (Localized corticosteroid injections [e.g., intra-articular and epidural] are permitted); use of antibiotics (for lower respiratory tract infection) within 6 weeks prior to Screening Visit 1; use of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor (e.g., roflumilast) within 14 days prior to Screening Visit 1; use of long-acting beta-agonist/ ICS combination products within 6 weeks prior to Screening Visit 1; use of theophyllines within 48 hours prior to Screening Visit 1; use of oral long-acting beta2-agonists within 48 hours and short-acting beta2-agonists within 12 hours prior to Screening Visit 1; use of inhaled short-acting beta2-agonists within 4 hours prior to Screening Visit 1 (use of study provided albuterol/salbutamol is permitted during the study, except in the 4-hour period prior to spirometry testing); use of inhaled short-acting anticholinergics within 4 hours prior to Screening Visit 1; use of inhaled short-acting anticholinergic/short-acting beta2-agonist combination products within 4 hours prior to Screening Visit 1; use of any other investigational medication within 30 days or within 5 drug half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to Screening Visit 1.
- Subject unable to withhold albuterol/salbutamol for the 4-hour period required prior to spirometry testing at each study visit.
- Regular use (prescribed for daily/ regular use, not for as-needed use) of short-acting bronchodilators (e.g., albuterol/salbutamol).
- A known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse within 2 years prior to Screening Visit 1 that in the opinion of the investigator would prevent the subject from completing the study procedures.
- Any history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any anticholinergic/muscarinic receptor antagonist, sympathomimetic, lactose/milk protein or magnesium stearate.
- Participation in the acute phase of a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 4 weeks prior to Screening Visit 1. Subjects who are in the maintenance phase of a pulmonary rehabilitation program are not excluded.
- Subject is an investigator, sub-investigator, study coordinator, employee of a participating investigator or study site, or immediate family member of the aforementioned that is involved in this study.
- In the opinion of the investigator, any subject who is unable to read and/or would not be able to complete questionnaires on the electronic diary.
Trial locations and contacts
212 sites in 12 countries.
212 sites in 12 countries
Germany64 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Annaberg, Saxony, 09456
GSK Investigational Site
Bamberg, Bavaria, 96049
GSK Investigational Site
Bergisch Gladbach, North Rhine-Westphalia, 51429
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10117
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10119
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10367
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10625
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10717
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10787
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 12627
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 13086
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 13156
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 14059
GSK Investigational Site
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44787
GSK Investigational Site
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53119
GSK Investigational Site
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53123
GSK Investigational Site
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 51069
GSK Investigational Site
Darmstadt, Hesse, 64283
GSK Investigational Site
Delitzsch, Saxony, 04509
GSK Investigational Site
Dortmund, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44263
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01069
GSK Investigational Site
Düren, North Rhine-Westphalia, 52349
GSK Investigational Site
Erlangen, Bavaria, 91052
GSK Investigational Site
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45355
GSK Investigational Site
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45359
GSK Investigational Site
Frankfurt, 60313
GSK Investigational Site
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60389
GSK Investigational Site
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60596
GSK Investigational Site
Fulda, Hesse, 36039
GSK Investigational Site
Geesthacht, Schleswig-Holstein, 21502
GSK Investigational Site
Gelsenkirchen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45879
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 20253
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22143
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22299
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30159
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30167
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30173
GSK Investigational Site
Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, 76137
GSK Investigational Site
Kassel, Hesse, 34121
GSK Investigational Site
Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 56068
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzg, Saxony, 04109
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04157
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04275
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04357
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, 04207
GSK Investigational Site
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23552
GSK Investigational Site
Marburg, Hesse, 35037
GSK Investigational Site
Mittweida, Saxony, 09648
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 80339
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 81241
GSK Investigational Site
Neu-Isenburg, Hesse, 63263
GSK Investigational Site
Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, 49074
GSK Investigational Site
Peine, Lower Saxony, 31224
GSK Investigational Site
Potsdam, Brandenburg, 14469
GSK Investigational Site
Rheine, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48431
GSK Investigational Site
Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg, 15562
GSK Investigational Site
Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein, 24837
GSK Investigational Site
Schmölln, Thuringia, 04626
GSK Investigational Site
Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 19055
GSK Investigational Site
Teuchern, Saxony-Anhalt, 06682
GSK Investigational Site
Wardenburg, Lower Saxony, 26203
GSK Investigational Site
Warendorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48231
GSK Investigational Site
Wiesloch, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69168
United States37 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Abingdon, Virginia, 24210
GSK Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
GSK Investigational Site
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
GSK Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406-7108
GSK Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
GSK Investigational Site
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45231
GSK Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
GSK Investigational Site
Easley, South Carolina, 29640
GSK Investigational Site
Edina, Minnesota, 55435
GSK Investigational Site
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432
GSK Investigational Site
Gaffney, South Carolina, 29340
GSK Investigational Site
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28054
GSK Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
GSK Investigational Site
Lancaster, South Carolina, 29720
GSK Investigational Site
Lincoln, California, 95648
GSK Investigational Site
Medford, Oregon, 97504
GSK Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
GSK Investigational Site
Monroe, North Carolina, 28112
GSK Investigational Site
Mooresville, North Carolina, 28117
GSK Investigational Site
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505
GSK Investigational Site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
GSK Investigational Site
Natchitoches, Louisiana, 71457
GSK Investigational Site
O'Fallon, Illinois, 62269
GSK Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68134
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32825
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
GSK Investigational Site
Rock Hill, South Carolina, 29732
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Charles, Missouri, 63301
GSK Investigational Site
Seneca, South Carolina, 29678
GSK Investigational Site
Sherman, Texas, 75092
GSK Investigational Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33603
GSK Investigational Site
Union, South Carolina, 29379
GSK Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
GSK Investigational Site
Woodbury, Minnesota, 55125
Argentina32 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1120AAC
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1121ABE
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1128AAF
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1424BSF
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1425BEN
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1426ABP
GSK Investigational Site
Capital Federal, C1440BRR
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenis Aires, C1015ABR
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1028AAP
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1414AIF
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1425AGC
GSK Investigational Site
Concepción del Uruguay, Entre Ríos Province, 3260
GSK Investigational Site
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, X5003DCE
GSK Investigational Site
Florida, Buenos Aires, 1602
GSK Investigational Site
La Plata, Buenos Aires
GSK Investigational Site
Lobos, Buenos Aires, 7240
GSK Investigational Site
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, 7600
GSK Investigational Site
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, B7600FZN
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, 5500
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, 5501
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, M5500CCG
GSK Investigational Site
Monte Grande, 1842
GSK Investigational Site
Paraná, Buenos Aires, E3100BHK
GSK Investigational Site
Quilmes, Buenos Aires, B1878FNR
GSK Investigational Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
GSK Investigational Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2002OJN
GSK Investigational Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, 4000
GSK Investigational Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000DGF
GSK Investigational Site
San Rafael, Mendoza Province, 5600
GSK Investigational Site
Santa Fe, 3000
GSK Investigational Site
Santa Rosa, 6300
GSK Investigational Site
Vicente López, Buenos Aires, B1602DOH
Italy14 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Benevento, Campania, 82100
GSK Investigational Site
Cassano Delle Murge (BA), Apulia, 70020
GSK Investigational Site
Naples, Campania, 80131
GSK Investigational Site
Naples, 80131
GSK Investigational Site
Palermo, Sicily, 90146
GSK Investigational Site
Pisa, Tuscany, 56124
GSK Investigational Site
Pordenone, Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33170
GSK Investigational Site
Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna, 42100
GSK Investigational Site
Riccione (RN), Emilia-Romagna, 47838
GSK Investigational Site
Salerno, Campania, 84131
GSK Investigational Site
San Felice A Cancello (CE), Campania, 81027
GSK Investigational Site
San Pietro Vernotico, 72027
GSK Investigational Site
San Sisto (PG), Umbria, 06156
GSK Investigational Site
Tradate (VA), Lombardy, 21049
Canada13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Gatineau, Quebec, J8Y 6S8
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 5G8
GSK Investigational Site
London, Ontario, N5W 6A2
GSK Investigational Site
Mirabel, Quebec, J7J 2K8
GSK Investigational Site
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1G1A7
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H1M 1B1
GSK Investigational Site
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5
GSK Investigational Site
Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4
GSK Investigational Site
Saint-Charles-Borromée, Quebec, J6E 2B4
GSK Investigational Site
Sarnia, Ontario, N7T 4X3
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M9V 4B4
GSK Investigational Site
Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 1L2
GSK Investigational Site
Windsor, Ontario, N8X 1T3
Sweden13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Borås, SE-506 30
GSK Investigational Site
Gothenburg, SE-413 45
GSK Investigational Site
Gothenburg, SE-413 90
GSK Investigational Site
Höllviken, SE-236 51
GSK Investigational Site
Linköping, SE-587 58
GSK Investigational Site
Luleå, SE-971 89
GSK Investigational Site
Lund, SE-221 85
GSK Investigational Site
Lund, SE-222 22
GSK Investigational Site
Malmö, SE-211 52
GSK Investigational Site
Örebro, SE-703 62
GSK Investigational Site
Skövde, SE-541 50
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, 11446
GSK Investigational Site
Uppsala, SE-752 37
South Africa11 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bloemfontein, 9301
GSK Investigational Site
Cape Town, 7570
GSK Investigational Site
Durban, 4001
GSK Investigational Site
Eloffsdal, Gauteng, 0084
GSK Investigational Site
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2113
GSK Investigational Site
Middelburg, Mpumalanga, 1050
GSK Investigational Site
Mowbray, 7700
GSK Investigational Site
Panorama, 7500
GSK Investigational Site
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0087
GSK Investigational Site
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0121
GSK Investigational Site
Reiger Park, 1459
Netherlands9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Almere Stad, 1311 RL
GSK Investigational Site
Beek, 6191 JW
GSK Investigational Site
Breda, 4818 CK
GSK Investigational Site
Heerlen, 6419 PC
GSK Investigational Site
Hoorn, 1624 NP
GSK Investigational Site
Kloosterhaar, 7694 AC
GSK Investigational Site
Rotterdam, 3067 GJ
GSK Investigational Site
The Hague, 2565 KV
GSK Investigational Site
Zutphen, 7207 AE
Spain8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Alicante, 03004
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08023
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08036
GSK Investigational Site
Centelles (Barcelona), 08540
GSK Investigational Site
Girona, 17005
GSK Investigational Site
Marbella - Málaga, Andalusia, 29603
GSK Investigational Site
Mérida (Badajoz), 06800
GSK Investigational Site
Peralada( Girona), 17491
Australia5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, 2450
GSK Investigational Site
Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, 2010
GSK Investigational Site
Kanwal, New South Wales, 2259
GSK Investigational Site
Port Macquarie, New South Wales, 2444
GSK Investigational Site
Sydney, New South Wales, 2010
France4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13331
GSK Investigational Site
Nice, 06000
GSK Investigational Site
Perpignan, 66000
GSK Investigational Site
Pessac, 33604
Mexico2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44100
GSK Investigational Site
Zapopan, Jalisco, 45070
About this study
Official title: A 24-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group Study to Compare Umeclidinium/Vilanterol, Umeclidinium, and Salmeterol in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
COPD is characterized by an airflow limitation, which is not fully reversible, usually progressive and accompanied by chronic cough, sputum production and dyspnea, which can be a major cause of disability and anxiety associated with the disease. In addition, COPD is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Pharmacologic therapy is used to improve lung function, reduce symptoms, reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations, and also to improve health status and exercise tolerance.
This is a multi-center, randomized, double blind, double dummy, 3-arm parallel group study to compare umeclidinium/vilanterol (62.5/25 microgram [mcg], once daily), umeclidinium (62.5 mcg, once daily), and salmeterol (50 mg, twice daily) in male and female subjects with COPD. The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate improvements in lung function for subjects treated with UMEC/VI compared with UMEC for 24 weeks.
Read more
Approximately 2424 subjects will be randomized across 3 parallel arms in 1:1:1 ratio. Subjects will be stratified based on long-acting bronchodilator usage during the run-in period (none, one or 2 long-acting bronchodilators per day). Subjects will receive either UMEC/VI inhalation powder (62.5/25 microgram [mcg] once daily) administered via the ELLIPTA® dry powder inhaler (DPI) and placebo twice daily via DISKUS® DPI; or UMEC (62.5 mcg once daily) administered via the ELLIPTA DPI and placebo twice daily via DISKUS DPI or salmeterol (50 mcg twice daily [BID]) administered via the DISKUS DPI and placebo once daily via ELLIPTA DPI. The duration of the study will be 29 to 31 weeks including a pre-screening period of 2 weeks, run-in period of 4 weeks, treatment period of 24 weeks and follow-up period of 1 week.
ELLIPTA and DISKUS are trademarks of GSK group of companies.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA, UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTA, Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUS, Placebo via ELLIPTA, Placebo via DISKUS
- Keywords
- Vilanterol, COPD, HRQoL, Salmeterol, Umeclidinium
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTADrug
ELLIPTA DPI inhaler will contain two individual blister strips with 30 blisters per strip; the first strip contains umeclidinium bromide (62.5 mcg per blister) blended with lactose monohydrate and magnesium stearate and second strip contains vilanterol trifenatae (25 mcg per blister) blended with lactose monohydrate and magnesium stearate.
UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTADrug
The ELLIPTA inhaler will contain one blister strip, which will have 30 blisters of umeclidinium bromide (62.5 mcg).
Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUSDrug
The DISKUS inhaler will contain one blister strip, which will have 60 blisters of salmeterol xinafoate (50 mcg). The DISKUS will provide a total of 60 doses (60 blisters) and will deliver, when actuated, the contents of a single blister strip.
Placebo via ELLIPTADrug
Lactose dry powder will be administered using ELLIPTA for both treatment periods. ELLIPTA DPI inhaler will contain two individual blister strips with 30 blisters per strip; containing lactose dry powder.
Placebo via DISKUSDrug
Lactose dry powder will be administered using DISKUS for both treatment periods. The DISKUS inhaler will contain one blister strip, which will have 60 blisters of lactose dry powder. The DISKUS will provide a total of 60 doses (60 blisters) and will deliver, when actuated, the contents of a single blister strip.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA + placebo via DISKUS | Experimental | Subjects will be instructed to self-administer one dose of UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg inhalation powder each morning via ELLIPTA DPI and placebo twice daily (morning and evening) via DISKUS DPI. Receives: Drug: UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA; Drug: Placebo via DISKUS |
| UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTA + placebo via DISKUS | Experimental | Subjects will be instructed to self-administer one dose of UMEC 62.5 mcg inhalation powder each morning via ELLIPTA DPI and placebo twice daily (morning and evening) via DISKUS DPI. Receives: Drug: UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTA; Drug: Placebo via DISKUS |
| Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUS + placebo via ELLIPTA | Experimental | Subjects will be instructed to self-administer one dose of salmeterol 50 mcg twice daily (morning and evening) via DISKUS DPI and placebo once daily morning via ELLIPTA DPI. Receives: Drug: Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUS; Drug: Placebo via ELLIPTA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 24 is defined as the mean of the FEV1 values obtained 23 and 24 hours after dosing on the previous day. Baseline trough FEV1 is the mean of the values measured at 30 minutes and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the trough FEV1 value on Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using a repeated measures model (MMRM) with covariates of Baseline FEV1, geographical region, stratum (number of bronchodilators per day during run-in), visit, treatment, visit by Baseline and visit by treatment interaction. ITT population comprised of all randomized participants (excluding those who were randomized in error) who received at least one dose of study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 24
Secondary outcomes (10)
Self Administered Computerized (SAC) Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 24
TDI focal score comprises of 3 individual scales (Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, Magnitude of Effort). Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 to +6, lower scores indicates impairment. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of 3 individual scores (range is -18 to +18). Lower score indicates deterioration of dyspnea. If a score is missing for any of the three scales, then the TDI focal score was set to missing. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with covariates of SAC BDI focal score, geographical region, stratum (no. of bronchodilators per day during run-in), visit, treatment, visit by SAC BDI and visit by treatment interactions.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of TDI Responders According to SAC TDI Focal Score
TDI focal score comprises of 3 individual scales (Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, Magnitude of Effort). Each of these scales had a possible score ranging from -6 to +6, lower scores indicates impairment. TDI focal score was calculated as the sum of 3 individual scores (range is -18 to +18). Lower score indicates deterioration of dyspnea. If a score is missing for any of the three scales, then TDI focal score was set to missing. A participant was considered as a responder if the on-treatment TDI focal score was at least 1 unit at that visit. Non-response was SAC TDI focal score of less than 1 unit or a missing SAC TDI focal score with no subsequent non-missing on-treatment scores. Analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model with treatment as an explanatory variable and visit, SAC BDI focal score, stratum (no. of bronchodilators per day during run-in), geographical region, visit by SAC BDI and visit by treatment interactions included as covariates.
Measured: Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) Total Score
The E-RS is intended to capture information related to respiratory symptoms. A daily symptom score for E-RS is derived by summing 11 item-scores. The domains include: respiratory symptoms (RS)-breathlessness (RS-BRL comprised of 5 items, score range [0-17]), RS-cough and sputum (RS-CSP comprised of 3 items, score range [0-11]), and RS-chest symptoms (RS-CSY comprised of 3 items, score range [0-12]). Total score ranged between 0-40 and higher values indicates severe respiratory symptoms. The instrument was completed each night prior to going to bed. Baseline E-RS score is the mean within-participant daily score over 7 days prior to randomization. Change from Baseline is the difference at Week 21-Week 24 value and Baseline value. Analysis was performed using MMRM with covariates of Baseline score, geographical region, stratum (no. of bronchodilators per day during run-in), 4-weekly period, treatment, 4-weekly period by Baseline and 4-weekly period by treatment interactions.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 21 to Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in E-RS Subscale Score
The E-RS is intended to capture information related to respiratory symptoms. A daily symptom score for E-RS is derived by summing 11 item-scores. The domains include: respiratory symptoms (RS)-breathlessness (RS-BRL comprised of 5 items, score range [0-17]), RS-cough and sputum (RS-CSP comprised of 3 items, score range [0-11]), and RS-chest symptoms (RS-CSY comprised of 3 items, score range [0-12]). Total score ranged between 0-40 and higher values indicates severe respiratory symptoms. The instrument was completed each night prior to going to bed. Baseline E-RS score is the mean within-participant daily score over 7 days prior to randomization. Change from Baseline is the difference at Week 21-Week 24 value and Baseline value. Analysis was performed using MMRM with covariates of Baseline score, geographical region, stratum (no. of bronchodilators per day during run-in), 4-weekly period, treatment, 4-weekly period by Baseline and 4-weekly period by treatment interactions.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 21 to Week 24
Percentage of E-RS Responders According to E-RS Total Score
The E-RS is intended to capture information related to respiratory symptoms. A daily symptom score for E-RS is derived by summing 11 item-scores. The domains include: RS-BRL comprised of 5 items, score range (0-17); RS-CSP comprised of 3 items, score range (0-11); and RS-CSY comprised of 4 items, score range (0-12). Total score ranged between 0-40 and higher values indicates severe respiratory symptoms. The instrument was completed each night prior to going to bed. Response is defined as an E-RS total score of at least 2 or 3.35 below Baseline. Participants with a Baseline but all missing post-Baseline data are also considered a non-responder. Analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model with treatment as an explanatory variable and four-weekly period, Baseline score, stratum (no. of bronchodilators per day during run-in), geographical region, four-weekly period by baseline and four-weekly period by treatment interactions included as covariates.
Measured: Week 21 to Week 24
Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score
SGRQ is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on HRQoL of participants with COPD. It contains 14 questions with a total of 40 items grouped into domains (Symptoms, Activity and Impacts). SGRQ total score was calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from all positive items divided by sum of weights for all items in questionnaire. It ranges from 0 to 100, higher score indicates poor HRQoL. Baseline is last non-missing score recorded prior to dosing on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at Week 24. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with covariates of Baseline SGRQ total score, geographical region, stratum (no. of bronchodilators per day during run-in), visit, treatment, visit by Baseline and visit by treatment interactions.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Responders Based on the Saint (St) George Respiratory Questionnaire COPD Specific (SGRQ) Total Score
SGRQ is a disease-specific questionnaire designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on HRQoL of participants with COPD. It contains 14 questions with a total of 40 items grouped into domains (Symptoms, Activity and Impacts). SGRQ total score was calculated as 100 multiplied by summed weights from all positive items divided by sum of weights for all items in questionnaire. It ranges from 0 to 100, higher score indicates poor HRQoL. Analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model with treatment as an explanatory variable and visit, Baseline SGRQ score, stratum (no. of bronchodilators per day during run-in), geographical region, visit by Baseline and visit by treatment interactions included as covariates. Response was defined as an SGRQ total score of 4 or more units below Baseline.
Measured: Week 24
Change From Baseline in COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
The CAT is a participant-completed instrument designed to provide a simple and reliable measure of health status in COPD for the assessment and long-term follow-up of the individual participant. The CAT consists of eight items, each formatted on a differential scale. Participants rated their experience on a 6-point scale for each question, ranging from 0 (no impact) to 5 (high impact). A total CAT score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores on the eight items ranging from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater disease impact. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing score recorded prior to dosing on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at Week 24. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with covariates of Baseline CAT score, geographical region, stratum (no. of bronchodilators per day during run-in), visit, treatment, visit by Baseline and visit by treatment interactions.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Responders According to CAT
The CAT is a participant-completed instrument designed to provide a simple and reliable measure of health status in COPD for the assessment and long-term follow-up of the individual participant. The CAT consists of eight items. Participants rated their experience on a 6-point scale for each question, ranging from 0 (no impact) to 5 (high impact). A total CAT score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores on the eight items ranging from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicate greater disease impact. Response was defined as an CAT score of >=2 below Baseline. Non response was defined as CAT score <2 units below Baseline or a missing CAT score with no subsequent on treatment scores. Analysis performed using a generalized linear mixed model with treatment as an explanatory variable and visit, baseline CAT score, stratum (no. of bronchodilators per day during run-in), geographical region, visit by baseline and visit by treatment interactions included as covariates.
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants With on Treatment Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant , temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or all events associated with liver injury and impaired liver function based on pre-defined criteria were categorized as SAE.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start16 Jun 2017
- Primary completion18 Jun 2018
- Study completion18 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2,696 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03034915
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201749
- Other IDs
- 2016-002513-22, 2016
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 11 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Publications
Maltais F, Bjermer L, Kerwin EM, Jones PW, Watkins ML, Tombs L, Naya IP, Boucot IH, Lipson DA, Compton C, Vahdati-Bolouri M, Vogelmeier CF. Efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium and salmeterol monotherapies in symptomatic patients with COPD not receiving inhaled corticosteroids: the EMAX randomised trial. Respir Res. 2019 Oct 30;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1193-9.
PubMed 31666084Kerwin EM, Jones PW, Bjermer LH, Maltais F, Boucot IH, Naya IP, Lipson DA, Compton C, Tombs L, Vogelmeier CF. How can the findings of the EMAX trial on long-acting bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease be applied in the primary care setting? Chron Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;20:14799731231202257. doi: 10.1177/14799731231202257.
PubMed 37800633Bjermer LH, Boucot IH, Vogelmeier CF, Maltais F, Jones PW, Tombs L, Compton C, Lipson DA, Kerwin EM. Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Current and Former Smokers with COPD: A Prespecified Analysis of The EMAX Trial. Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4815-4835. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01855-y. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
PubMed 34347255Maltais F, Naya IP, Vogelmeier CF, Boucot IH, Jones PW, Bjermer L, Tombs L, Compton C, Lipson DA, Kerwin EM. Salbutamol use in relation to maintenance bronchodilator efficacy in COPD: a prospective subgroup analysis of the EMAX trial. Respir Res. 2020 Oct 22;21(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01451-8.
PubMed 33092591Kerwin EM, Boucot IH, Vogelmeier CF, Maltais F, Naya IP, Tombs L, Jones PW, Lipson DA, Keeley T, Bjermer L. Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620926949. doi: 10.1177/1753466620926949.
PubMed 32462979
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 24-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group Study to Compare Umeclidinium/Vilanterol, Umeclidinium, and Salmeterol in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03034915
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201749
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Keywords
- Vilanterol, COPD, HRQoL, Salmeterol, Umeclidinium
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,696 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
COPD is characterized by an airflow limitation, which is not fully reversible, usually progressive and accompanied by chronic cough, sputum production and dyspnea, which can be a major cause of disability and anxiety associated with the disease. In addition, COPD is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Pharmacologic therapy is used to improve lung function, reduce symptoms, reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations, and also to improve health status and exercise tolerance.
This is a multi-center, randomized, double blind, double dummy, 3-arm parallel group study to compare umeclidinium/vilanterol (62.5/25 microgram [mcg], once daily), umeclidinium (62.5 mcg, once daily), and salmeterol (50 mg, twice daily) in male and female subjects with COPD. The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate improvements in lung function for subjects treated with UMEC/VI compared with UMEC for 24 weeks.
Approximately 2424 subjects will be randomized across 3 parallel arms in 1:1:1 ratio. Subjects will be stratified based on long-acting bronchodilator usage during the run-in period (none, one or 2 long-acting bronchodilators per day). Subjects will receive either UMEC/VI inhalation powder (62.5/25 microgram [mcg] once daily) administered via the ELLIPTA® dry powder inhaler (DPI) and placebo twice daily via DISKUS® DPI; or UMEC (62.5 mcg once daily) administered via the ELLIPTA DPI and placebo twice daily via DISKUS DPI or salmeterol (50 mcg twice daily [BID]) administered via the DISKUS DPI and placebo once daily via ELLIPTA DPI. The duration of the study will be 29 to 31 weeks including a pre-screening period of 2 weeks, run-in period of 4 weeks, treatment period of 24 weeks and follow-up period of 1 week.
ELLIPTA and DISKUS are trademarks of GSK group of companies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA + placebo via DISKUS | Experimental | Drug: UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA, Drug: Placebo via DISKUSSubjects will be instructed to self-administer one dose of UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg inhalation powder each morning via ELLIPTA DPI and placebo twice daily (morning and evening) via DISKUS DPI. |
| UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTA + placebo via DISKUS | Experimental | Drug: UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTA, Drug: Placebo via DISKUSSubjects will be instructed to self-administer one dose of UMEC 62.5 mcg inhalation powder each morning via ELLIPTA DPI and placebo twice daily (morning and evening) via DISKUS DPI. |
| Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUS + placebo via ELLIPTA | Experimental | Drug: Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUS, Drug: Placebo via ELLIPTASubjects will be instructed to self-administer one dose of salmeterol 50 mcg twice daily (morning and evening) via DISKUS DPI and placebo once daily morning via ELLIPTA DPI. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- 40 years or older at date of signing informed consent at Screening Visit 1
- Outpatient with a diagnosis of COPD
- Persistent airflow limitations as indicated by a pre and post-albuterol/salbutamol FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.70 and a post-albuterol/salbutamol FEV1 of >=30% to <=80% predicted normal values at Screening Visit 1.
- A CAT score of >=10 at Screening Visit 1
- Current or former cigarette smokers with a history of cigarette smoking of >=10 pack-years (number of pack years = [number of cigarettes per day / 20] multiplied by number of years smoked [e.g., 20 cigarettes per day for 10 years, or 10 cigarettes per day for 20 years both equal 10 pack-years]). Former smokers are defined as those who have stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1. Pipe and/or cigar use cannot be used to calculate pack-year history.
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- A current diagnosis of asthma (Subjects with a prior history of asthma are eligible if they have a current diagnosis of COPD, which is the primary cause of their respiratory symptoms).
- Subjects with known alpha-antitrypsin deficiency as the underlying cause of COPD
- Subjects with active tuberculosis are excluded. Subjects with other respiratory disorders (e.g., clinically significant: bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, lung fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases) are excluded if these conditions are the primary cause of their respiratory symptoms.
- Current active liver or biliary disease (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones or otherwise stable chronic liver disease as per investigator assessment); stable chronic liver disease should generally be defined by the absence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, oesophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis; chronic stable hepatitis B and C (e.g., presence of hepatitis B surface antigen or positive hepatitis C antibody test result or within 3 months prior to first dose of study treatment) are acceptable if subject otherwise meets entry criteria.
- Subjects with unstable or life threatening cardiac disease. The investigational product should be used with caution in subjects with severe cardiovascular disease. In the opinion of the investigator, use will only be considered if the benefit is likely to outweigh the risk in conditions such as myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 6 months, or unstable or life threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention in the last 3 months, or New York Heart Association Class IV heart failure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTAELLIPTA DPI inhaler will contain two individual blister strips with 30 blisters per strip; the first strip contains umeclidinium bromide (62.5 mcg per blister) blended with lactose monohydrate and magnesium stearate and second strip contains vilanterol trifenatae (25 mcg per blister) blended with lactose monohydrate and magnesium stearate. | Drug | UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA + placebo via DISKUS |
| UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTAThe ELLIPTA inhaler will contain one blister strip, which will have 30 blisters of umeclidinium bromide (62.5 mcg). | Drug | UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTA + placebo via DISKUS |
| Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUSThe DISKUS inhaler will contain one blister strip, which will have 60 blisters of salmeterol xinafoate (50 mcg). The DISKUS will provide a total of 60 doses (60 blisters) and will deliver, when actuated, the contents of a single blister strip. | Drug | Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUS + placebo via ELLIPTA |
| Placebo via ELLIPTALactose dry powder will be administered using ELLIPTA for both treatment periods. ELLIPTA DPI inhaler will contain two individual blister strips with 30 blisters per strip; containing lactose dry powder. | Drug | Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUS + placebo via ELLIPTA |
| Placebo via DISKUSLactose dry powder will be administered using DISKUS for both treatment periods. The DISKUS inhaler will contain one blister strip, which will have 60 blisters of lactose dry powder. The DISKUS will provide a total of 60 doses (60 blisters) and will deliver, when actuated, the contents of a single blister strip. | Drug | UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTA + placebo via DISKUS, UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA + placebo via DISKUS |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 24
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 at Week 24 is defined as the mean of the FEV1 values obtained 23 and 24 hours after dosing on the previous day. Baseline trough FEV1 is the mean of the values measured at 30 minutes and 5 minutes pre-dose on Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the trough FEV1 value on Week 24 minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using a repeated measures model (MMRM) with covariates of Baseline FEV1, geographical region, stratum (number of bronchodilators per day during run-in), visit, treatment, visit by Baseline and visit by treatment interaction. ITT population comprised of all randomized participants (excluding those who were randomized in error) who received at least one dose of study medication.
10 secondary outcomes
Self Administered Computerized (SAC) Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of TDI Responders According to SAC TDI Focal Score
Time frame: Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 21 to Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in E-RS Subscale Score
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 21 to Week 24
Percentage of E-RS Responders According to E-RS Total Score
Time frame: Week 21 to Week 24
Change From Baseline in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Responders Based on the Saint (St) George Respiratory Questionnaire COPD Specific (SGRQ) Total Score
Time frame: Week 24
Change From Baseline in COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Responders According to CAT
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With on Treatment Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Mar 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 31666084Maltais F, Bjermer L, Kerwin EM, Jones PW, Watkins ML, Tombs L, Naya IP, Boucot IH, Lipson DA, Compton C, Vahdati-Bolouri M, Vogelmeier CF. Efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium and salmeterol monotherapies in symptomatic patients with COPD not receiving inhaled corticosteroids: the EMAX randomised trial. Respir Res. 2019 Oct 30;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1193-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37800633Kerwin EM, Jones PW, Bjermer LH, Maltais F, Boucot IH, Naya IP, Lipson DA, Compton C, Tombs L, Vogelmeier CF. How can the findings of the EMAX trial on long-acting bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease be applied in the primary care setting? Chron Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;20:14799731231202257. doi: 10.1177/14799731231202257.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34347255Bjermer LH, Boucot IH, Vogelmeier CF, Maltais F, Jones PW, Tombs L, Compton C, Lipson DA, Kerwin EM. Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Current and Former Smokers with COPD: A Prespecified Analysis of The EMAX Trial. Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4815-4835. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01855-y. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33092591Maltais F, Naya IP, Vogelmeier CF, Boucot IH, Jones PW, Bjermer L, Tombs L, Compton C, Lipson DA, Kerwin EM. Salbutamol use in relation to maintenance bronchodilator efficacy in COPD: a prospective subgroup analysis of the EMAX trial. Respir Res. 2020 Oct 22;21(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01451-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32462979Kerwin EM, Boucot IH, Vogelmeier CF, Maltais F, Naya IP, Tombs L, Jones PW, Lipson DA, Keeley T, Bjermer L. Early and sustained symptom improvement with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in COPD: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX randomised controlled trial. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620926949. doi: 10.1177/1753466620926949.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
212 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA, UMEC 62.5 mcg via ELLIPTA and Salmeterol 50 mcg via DISKUS in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 212 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 212 sites in Germany, United States, Argentina, Italy, Canada and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03034915, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2020.