CancerSSCPNCT03035773
Simplifying Survivorship Care Planning
A study testing Care Plan Only, Care Plan During a Visit and Care Plan During a Visit with an Additional Visit in people with Cancer, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify an SCP process that is patient-centered, effective in promoting appropriate survivorship care and can be successfully implemented for patients with different types of cancer who are being treated in a broad range of clinical settings. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Care Plan Only, Care Plan During a Visit and Care Plan During a Visit with an Additional Visit
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 378 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2015to 31 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 21 years or older;
- Diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer (stages I-III);
- Treated with intent to cure
- People who are on long-term (>1 year) chronic treatment are eligible;
- No evidence of disease;
- Able to complete the study data collection in English;
- Had their cancer care primarily managed by either JHMI or PRMC, with JHMI or PRMC primarily responsible for the patients' survivorship care; and
- Has private insurance, or covered by Medicare or Medicaid.
Who cannot join
- Younger than 21 years of age;
- Diagnosed with in situ or metastatic breast, prostate or colorectal cancer (i.e. Stage 0 or IV);
- Not treated with intent to cure;
- Did not have cancer care primarily managed within one of the 4 participating clinics, or JHMI or PRMC is not primarily responsible for the patients' survivorship care; and
- Does not have health insurance at screening.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
Peninsula Regional Medical Center
Salisbury, Maryland, 21801
About this study
Official title: Simplifying Survivorship Care Planning; Comparing the Efficacy and Patient-Centeredness of Three Care Delivery Models
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify an SCP process that is patient-centered, effective in promoting appropriate survivorship care and can be successfully implemented for patients with different types of cancer who are being treated in a broad range of clinical settings. There is a need for research related to SCP that prioritizes outcomes that are most highly valued by patients, caregivers and clinical stakeholders.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND: Each year, approximately 1.6 million people are diagnosed with cancer and the relative 5-year survival rate across all cancer types approaches 70%. As of 2014, there were almost 15 million Americans living with a history of cancer. Cancer survivors face a variety of health care needs, including surveillance for recurrence, treatment for long-term and late effects of cancer and its treatment, general primary and preventive care, management of any comorbidities, encouragement of healthy lifestyle behaviors, and attention to psychosocial issues. In 2005, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report 'From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition' highlighted the challenges that cancer survivors face as they transition from acute treatment. The completion of acute cancer treatment is a critical juncture at which patients are in need of better support and communication to ensure optimal health and quality of life outcomes as they transition to long-term survivorship. Cancer survivors face substantial deficiencies in the quality of care that they receive, including both underuse of recommended care and overuse of services that are not recommended for routine follow-up. The 2005 IOM report called for all patients completing acute treatment to be provided with a survivorship care plan (SCP) that summarizes treatments received and outlines future healthcare priorities in order to facilitate effective management of health care between survivors and their oncology and primary care providers.
STUDY PROCEDURES: The primary aim of this trial is to assess whether there is a difference among three SCP models of varying levels of resource intensity and patients' receipt of recommended health services in the months following completion of acute treatment. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to measure whether the provision of the SCP to the survivor and primary care provider (PCP) is associated with survivors' receipt of cancer follow-up care as outlined on their SCP (primary outcome). Avoidance of non-recommended care, receipt of recommended primary and preventive care, and patient-reported outcome measures will serve as secondary endpoints.
Participants in the RCT will have been treated for breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer. This RCT will be conducted in four oncology clinics in two medical systems. The investigators will enroll survivors of Stage I-III breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer who are completing treatment and transitioning to long-term survivorship, and use a stratified randomization to assign participants to one of three study conditions (Arms A, B or C). This study will focus specifically on the period following completion of acute treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy); patients receiving long-term adjuvant endocrine/antibody therapies will also be eligible.
The proposed trial will be conducted at Johns Hopkins Medical Institution (JHMI) and Peninsula Regional Medical Center (PRMC). JHMI is a large, academic medical center in an urban setting with distinct treatment programs based on disease site. At JHMI, the investigators will recruit from the Breast Cancer Program, the Genitourinary Cancer Program (prostate cancer), and Gastrointestinal Cancer Program (colorectal cancer). These programs operate across disciplines (e.g., medical, radiation, and surgical oncology) but separately from each other, enabling evaluation of 3 separate clinical settings within JHMI. In addition, the trial will include the PRMC Richard A. Henson Cancer Institute, a community cancer program located in the rural area of Maryland's eastern shore. At PRMC there is a single general oncology practice. The four programs differ in the extent to which survivorship care planning is already a part of routine care. As yet, none of the clinics in this study has a consistent format for the delivery of SCP universally at the completion of acute treatment. The study design (cancer types, clinical systems and SCP models) is intended to enable the development of real-world best practices for the implementation of SCPs and assess whether these are consistent or vary across a wide range of clinical contexts and survivor characteristics.
Each participant will be followed for 18 months, with the number of visits dependent on the randomization arm (described below). The investigators will abstract 18 months of follow-up data for enrolled patients from medical records, as well as from patient reports of health service use; data will be collected at months 6, 12, and 18. The investigators will obtain and abstract medical records guided by the information in the summary document (see Health Services Use Summary included as a supplemental study document) and from the patient using provided tracking tools of providers they have seen, tests they have undergone, etc. (see Tip Sheet in supplemental study documents). Patient-reported outcomes will be collected at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months primarily via a REDCap form, with telephone or in-person data collection as a back-up when needed.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- Care Plan Only, Care Plan During a Visit, Care Plan During a Visit with an Additional Visit
- Keywords
- Oncology, Survivorship
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Care Plan OnlyBehavioural
Also called Arm A
Patient participants randomized to Arm A will be sent a copy of the SCP within 3 months of completion of treatment and a copy will be added to their medical record. A copy of the SCP will also be sent to the PCP on record. The SCP will be completed by a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. The SCP will be accompanied by a cover letter that will be signed by a member of the clinical team.
Care Plan During a VisitBehavioural
Also called Arm B
Patient participants randomized to Arm B will receive a copy of the SCP during an in-person 'stethoscope free' visit with a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. A copy of the SCP will be added to the medical record and a copy will be sent to the primary care provider on record. The visit will be scheduled after consent is signed and will occur between 1 and 3 months after completion of treatment. The visit will focus on review of the SCP content and offer an opportunity for patients to ask questions about any aspect of the plan or associated treatment and survivorship issues.
Care Plan During a Visit with an Additional VisitBehavioural
Also called Arm C
Participants randomized to Arm C will receive a copy of the SCP during an in-person 'stethoscope free' visit with a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. A copy of the SCP will be added to the medical record and a copy will be sent to the primary care provider. The visit will be scheduled after consent is signed and will occur between 1-3 months after completion of treatment. The initial visit will focus on review of the SCP content and offer an opportunity for patients to ask questions about any aspect of the plan or associated treatment and survivorship issues. Patients will also receive a follow up survivorship visit 7-10 months after the end of treatment that will focus on a review of the SCP and offer the opportunity to ask about any persistent or emerging issues.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ARM A; Care Plan Only | Experimental | SCP document delivered to the patient \& Primary Care Provider Receives: Behavioral: Care Plan Only |
| ARM B; Care Plan During Visit | Experimental | SCP document provided to the patient in an in-person survivorship visit and copy sent to PCP Receives: Behavioral: Care Plan During a Visit |
| ARM C; Care Plan During Visit + Additional Visit | Experimental | SCP document provided to the patient in an in-person survivorship visit with an additional follow-up visit and copy of the document sent to PCP Receives: Behavioral: Care Plan During a Visit with an Additional Visit |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Compliant With Follow-up Care Visits
The primary outcome classifies patients as compliant or non-compliant based on whether they were compliant on all visits, tests/procedures, and non-oral medication recommendations included in their care plans.
Measured: 18 Months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of Participants Who Received an Annual Physical Exam
This secondary outcome classifies participants as having had an annual physical exam based on medical record review. This outcome was operationalized as a dichotomous variable (received recommended primary care: yes/no). Participants were included in this analysis if they had a primary care visit recommended on their survivorship care plan.
Measured: 18 Months
Number of Participants Who Received Tests and Procedures Recommended on Their Survivorship Care Plan
These data are generated through electronic medical record review. This outcome is operationalized as a dichotomous variable (received recommended tests and procedures: yes/no).
Measured: 18 Months
Number of Participants Who Received Cancer-related Tests Consistent With Overuse
This analysis compared potential overuse of surveillance tests between cancer types (breast, prostate and colorectal). This outcome will be operationalized as a dichotomous variable (did not receive inappropriate care: yes/no). The outcome relates to participants who received care not specified on their care plan and on a guideline predetermined list of "not recommended surveillance. This was determined through a physician chart review.
Measured: 18 Months
Patient-reported Outcomes: Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS)
PLANS is a cancer survivorship questionnaire with 2 items specifically related to survivorship care planning. These items are 'I feel prepared for what to expect over the next year' (score range 1-4 with 4 being a more positive score) and 'There is a well-coordinated plan for my cancer care' (score range 1-10 with 1 being "Not at all confident and 10 being "Extremely confident".
Measured: 18 Months
Patient-reported Outcomes: Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC)
The outcome is a sum score of a 5-item scale with a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 20 with a higher score indicating greater worry (worse outcome).
Measured: 18 Months
Patient-reported Outcomes: Follow-up Care Use Among Survivors (FOCUS)-Information Needs Module
Questionnaire asking about informational needs on 12 topics. Responses for each question can be yes/no/not sure. Reported the total number of health needs responded to as "yes". Outcome is a sum of reported needs. Score range from 0-12 with a higher score reflecting more informational needs.
Measured: 18 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2015
- Primary completionDec 2020
- Study completion31 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 378 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Katherine C Smith, PhD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03035773
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- J16117
- Other IDs
- IRB00110605, R-1410-24904
- Acronym
- SSCP
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 13 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 27 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Beckjord EB, Arora NK, McLaughlin W, Oakley-Girvan I, Hamilton AS, Hesse BW. Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Surviv. 2008 Sep;2(3):179-89. doi: 10.1007/s11764-008-0055-0. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
PubMed 18792791Dunn, R., Crowley, S., & Janz, N. (2011). Impact of a transition visit on addressing quality of life and readiness to assume greater self-management among breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 20(S1), S91.
Gotay CC, Pagano IS. Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC): a newly proposed brief questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Mar 13;5:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-15.
PubMed 17352831Hershman DL, Greenlee H, Awad D, Kalinsky K, Maurer M, Kranwinkel G, Brafman L, Jayasena R, Tsai WY, Neugut AI, Crew KD. Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):795-806. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2486-1. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
PubMed 23542954Hewitt, M., Greenfield, S., & Stovall, E. (Eds.). (2005). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. National Academies Press.
Kent EE, Arora NK, Rowland JH, Bellizzi KM, Forsythe LP, Hamilton AS, Oakley-Girvan I, Beckjord EB, Aziz NM. Health information needs and health-related quality of life in a diverse population of long-term cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Nov;89(2):345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
PubMed 23021856Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG. Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors' satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.009.
PubMed 15893218Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Hesse BW, Croyle RT, Willis G, Arora NK, Rimer BK, Viswanath KV, Weinstein N, Alden S. The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun. 2004 Sep-Oct;9(5):443-60; discussion 81-4. doi: 10.1080/10810730490504233.
PubMed 15513791Smith KC, Tolbert E, Hannum SM, Radhakrishnan A, Zorn K, Blackford A, Greco S, Smith K, Snyder CF. Comparing Web-Based Provider-Initiated and Patient-Initiated Survivorship Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Cancer. 2016 Aug 30;2(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/cancer.5947.
PubMed 28410187
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Simplifying Survivorship Care Planning; Comparing the Efficacy and Patient-Centeredness of Three Care Delivery Models
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03035773
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SSCP / J16117
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Keywords
- Oncology, Survivorship
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 378 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns HopkinsUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Study start
- Oct 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Jun 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to identify an SCP process that is patient-centered, effective in promoting appropriate survivorship care and can be successfully implemented for patients with different types of cancer who are being treated in a broad range of clinical settings. There is a need for research related to SCP that prioritizes outcomes that are most highly valued by patients, caregivers and clinical stakeholders.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND: Each year, approximately 1.6 million people are diagnosed with cancer and the relative 5-year survival rate across all cancer types approaches 70%. As of 2014, there were almost 15 million Americans living with a history of cancer. Cancer survivors face a variety of health care needs, including surveillance for recurrence, treatment for long-term and late effects of cancer and its treatment, general primary and preventive care, management of any comorbidities, encouragement of healthy lifestyle behaviors, and attention to psychosocial issues. In 2005, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report 'From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition' highlighted the challenges that cancer survivors face as they transition from acute treatment. The completion of acute cancer treatment is a critical juncture at which patients are in need of better support and communication to ensure optimal health and quality of life outcomes as they transition to long-term survivorship. Cancer survivors face substantial deficiencies in the quality of care that they receive, including both underuse of recommended care and overuse of services that are not recommended for routine follow-up. The 2005 IOM report called for all patients completing acute treatment to be provided with a survivorship care plan (SCP) that summarizes treatments received and outlines future healthcare priorities in order to facilitate effective management of health care between survivors and their oncology and primary care providers.
STUDY PROCEDURES: The primary aim of this trial is to assess whether there is a difference among three SCP models of varying levels of resource intensity and patients' receipt of recommended health services in the months following completion of acute treatment. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to measure whether the provision of the SCP to the survivor and primary care provider (PCP) is associated with survivors' receipt of cancer follow-up care as outlined on their SCP (primary outcome). Avoidance of non-recommended care, receipt of recommended primary and preventive care, and patient-reported outcome measures will serve as secondary endpoints.
Participants in the RCT will have been treated for breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer. This RCT will be conducted in four oncology clinics in two medical systems. The investigators will enroll survivors of Stage I-III breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer who are completing treatment and transitioning to long-term survivorship, and use a stratified randomization to assign participants to one of three study conditions (Arms A, B or C). This study will focus specifically on the period following completion of acute treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy); patients receiving long-term adjuvant endocrine/antibody therapies will also be eligible.
The proposed trial will be conducted at Johns Hopkins Medical Institution (JHMI) and Peninsula Regional Medical Center (PRMC). JHMI is a large, academic medical center in an urban setting with distinct treatment programs based on disease site. At JHMI, the investigators will recruit from the Breast Cancer Program, the Genitourinary Cancer Program (prostate cancer), and Gastrointestinal Cancer Program (colorectal cancer). These programs operate across disciplines (e.g., medical, radiation, and surgical oncology) but separately from each other, enabling evaluation of 3 separate clinical settings within JHMI. In addition, the trial will include the PRMC Richard A. Henson Cancer Institute, a community cancer program located in the rural area of Maryland's eastern shore. At PRMC there is a single general oncology practice. The four programs differ in the extent to which survivorship care planning is already a part of routine care. As yet, none of the clinics in this study has a consistent format for the delivery of SCP universally at the completion of acute treatment. The study design (cancer types, clinical systems and SCP models) is intended to enable the development of real-world best practices for the implementation of SCPs and assess whether these are consistent or vary across a wide range of clinical contexts and survivor characteristics.
Each participant will be followed for 18 months, with the number of visits dependent on the randomization arm (described below). The investigators will abstract 18 months of follow-up data for enrolled patients from medical records, as well as from patient reports of health service use; data will be collected at months 6, 12, and 18. The investigators will obtain and abstract medical records guided by the information in the summary document (see Health Services Use Summary included as a supplemental study document) and from the patient using provided tracking tools of providers they have seen, tests they have undergone, etc. (see Tip Sheet in supplemental study documents). Patient-reported outcomes will be collected at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months primarily via a REDCap form, with telephone or in-person data collection as a back-up when needed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ARM A; Care Plan Only | Experimental | Behavioral: Care Plan OnlySCP document delivered to the patient \& Primary Care Provider |
| ARM B; Care Plan During Visit | Experimental | Behavioral: Care Plan During a VisitSCP document provided to the patient in an in-person survivorship visit and copy sent to PCP |
| ARM C; Care Plan During Visit + Additional Visit | Experimental | Behavioral: Care Plan During a Visit with an Additional VisitSCP document provided to the patient in an in-person survivorship visit with an additional follow-up visit and copy of the document sent to PCP |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age 21 years or older;
- Diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer (stages I-III);
- Treated with intent to cure
- People who are on long-term (>1 year) chronic treatment are eligible;
- No evidence of disease;
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Younger than 21 years of age;
- Diagnosed with in situ or metastatic breast, prostate or colorectal cancer (i.e. Stage 0 or IV);
- Not treated with intent to cure;
- Did not have cancer care primarily managed within one of the 4 participating clinics, or JHMI or PRMC is not primarily responsible for the patients' survivorship care; and
- Does not have health insurance at screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Care Plan OnlyAlso: Arm APatient participants randomized to Arm A will be sent a copy of the SCP within 3 months of completion of treatment and a copy will be added to their medical record. A copy of the SCP will also be sent to the PCP on record. The SCP will be completed by a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. The SCP will be accompanied by a cover letter that will be signed by a member of the clinical team. | Behavioural | ARM A; Care Plan Only |
| Care Plan During a VisitAlso: Arm BPatient participants randomized to Arm B will receive a copy of the SCP during an in-person 'stethoscope free' visit with a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. A copy of the SCP will be added to the medical record and a copy will be sent to the primary care provider on record. The visit will be scheduled after consent is signed and will occur between 1 and 3 months after completion of treatment. The visit will focus on review of the SCP content and offer an opportunity for patients to ask questions about any aspect of the plan or associated treatment and survivorship issues. | Behavioural | ARM B; Care Plan During Visit |
| Care Plan During a Visit with an Additional VisitAlso: Arm CParticipants randomized to Arm C will receive a copy of the SCP during an in-person 'stethoscope free' visit with a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. A copy of the SCP will be added to the medical record and a copy will be sent to the primary care provider. The visit will be scheduled after consent is signed and will occur between 1-3 months after completion of treatment. The initial visit will focus on review of the SCP content and offer an opportunity for patients to ask questions about any aspect of the plan or associated treatment and survivorship issues. Patients will also receive a follow up survivorship visit 7-10 months after the end of treatment that will focus on a review of the SCP and offer the opportunity to ask about any persistent or emerging issues. | Behavioural | ARM C; Care Plan During Visit + Additional Visit |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Compliant With Follow-up Care Visits
Time frame: 18 Months
The primary outcome classifies patients as compliant or non-compliant based on whether they were compliant on all visits, tests/procedures, and non-oral medication recommendations included in their care plans.
6 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Received an Annual Physical Exam
Time frame: 18 Months
Number of Participants Who Received Tests and Procedures Recommended on Their Survivorship Care Plan
Time frame: 18 Months
Number of Participants Who Received Cancer-related Tests Consistent With Overuse
Time frame: 18 Months
Patient-reported Outcomes: Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS)
Time frame: 18 Months
Patient-reported Outcomes: Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC)
Time frame: 18 Months
Patient-reported Outcomes: Follow-up Care Use Among Survivors (FOCUS)-Information Needs Module
Time frame: 18 Months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jun 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 18792791Beckjord EB, Arora NK, McLaughlin W, Oakley-Girvan I, Hamilton AS, Hesse BW. Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Surviv. 2008 Sep;2(3):179-89. doi: 10.1007/s11764-008-0055-0. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
- BackgroundDunn, R., Crowley, S., & Janz, N. (2011). Impact of a transition visit on addressing quality of life and readiness to assume greater self-management among breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 20(S1), S91.
- Background: PubMed 17352831Gotay CC, Pagano IS. Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC): a newly proposed brief questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Mar 13;5:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-15.
- Background: PubMed 23542954Hershman DL, Greenlee H, Awad D, Kalinsky K, Maurer M, Kranwinkel G, Brafman L, Jayasena R, Tsai WY, Neugut AI, Crew KD. Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):795-806. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2486-1. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
- BackgroundHewitt, M., Greenfield, S., & Stovall, E. (Eds.). (2005). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. National Academies Press.
- Background: PubMed 23021856Kent EE, Arora NK, Rowland JH, Bellizzi KM, Forsythe LP, Hamilton AS, Oakley-Girvan I, Beckjord EB, Aziz NM. Health information needs and health-related quality of life in a diverse population of long-term cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Nov;89(2):345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 15893218Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG. Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors' satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):342-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.009.
- Background: PubMed 15513791Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Hesse BW, Croyle RT, Willis G, Arora NK, Rimer BK, Viswanath KV, Weinstein N, Alden S. The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun. 2004 Sep-Oct;9(5):443-60; discussion 81-4. doi: 10.1080/10810730490504233.
- Background: PubMed 28410187Smith KC, Tolbert E, Hannum SM, Radhakrishnan A, Zorn K, Blackford A, Greco S, Smith K, Snyder CF. Comparing Web-Based Provider-Initiated and Patient-Initiated Survivorship Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Cancer. 2016 Aug 30;2(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/cancer.5947.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate DMR-001 in Participants With CALR-mutant Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs)
Recruiting
Role of ERBT Plus Intravesical BCG in Intermediate-Risk or High-Risk NMBC
Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Comparing New Treatments for People With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia That Has an IDH2 Gene Change (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Safety and Clinical Activity of Azer-cel in Participants With B-cell Mediated Autoimmune Disorders
B-cell Mediated Autoimmune Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Effects of the Combination of Elranatamab, Daratumumab and Lenalidomide Compared With Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Not Candidates for Transplant
Multiple Myeloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Katherine C Smith, PhD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Care Plan Only, Care Plan During a Visit and Care Plan During a Visit with an Additional Visit in people with Cancer, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Compliant With Follow-up Care Visits (time frame: 18 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03035773, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2024.