AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive DysfunctionNCT03036345

Cerebral Perfusion in the Beach Chair Position

A study testing Dual-monitoring in people with Cognitive Dysfunction, run by Brisbane Hand and Upper Limb Research Institute at 1 site in Australia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Surgery to the shoulder may be performed with patients seated upright in a position known as the "Beach Chair Position (BCP)." This position has certain advantages compared to alternative surgical positions (e.g. side lying) in some situations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
Conditions the study is for
Cognitive Dysfunction
What is being tested?
Dual-monitoring
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteAustralia
Study dates
25 May 2017to Jun 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Receiving treatment primarily by, but not restricted to, one of the Primary investigators for a shoulder condition that requires surgery in the BCP.
  • Over 18 years of age
  • Able to read and speak English

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Pregnant women
  • Pre-operative Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) < 24
  • Pre-existing cerebrovascular disease as reported by the assessing medical consultant and recorded in patient charts
  • Orthostatic hypotension
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III, IV and V*
Show all 10Show fewer
  • History of drug and/or alcohol abuse
  • Neurological disease (e.g. previous stroke)
  • Significant mood and anxiety disorders as determined by treating consultant.
  • Any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigators, would render the patient unsuitable for participation in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Australia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Brisbane Hand and Upper Limb Research Institute, Brisbane Private Hospital

    Brisbane, Queensland, 4000

    Silvia Manzanero, PhD, +61 7 3834 7069, researchmanager@upperlimb.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: Prediction of Post-operative Cognitive Decline Following Shoulder Surgery in the Beach Chair Position: The Value of Cerebral Oximetry

Surgery to the shoulder may be performed with patients seated upright in a position known as the "Beach Chair Position (BCP)." This position has certain advantages compared to alternative surgical positions (e.g. side lying) in some situations. However, it has been found that surgery in the BCP can temporarily decrease the amount of oxygen in the brain as a result of the combined effects of gravity and anaesthesia. This can result in complications following surgery such as some memory loss and confusion. Rarely, more serious complications have been reported in the past including death and stroke.

Due to these reported complications the use of "cerebral oximetry" during shoulder surgery in the BCP has become more common. Before and during surgery, a monitor placed on the patients forehead measures the amount of oxygen present in the brain to help control this to an acceptable level. A number of monitors are now commercially available. Two monitors are commonly discussed in the literature; the INVOS™ 5100 and the FORE-SIGHT® machines. However, the actual relationship between the supply of oxygen to the brain during surgery and the chance of later developing problems with memory and thinking (known as "post operative cognitive decline" - POCD) is not clear. It is also not known if one monitor is more accurate than another at predicting these complications.

Therefore, the main aim of this study is to examine the relationship between cerebral oxygen levels during shoulder surgery and the incidence of POCD (i.e. problems with memory and thinking). A second aim is to compare the INVOS™ 5100 and FORE-SIGHT® monitors ability to measure cerebral oxygen and cerebral desaturation events (CDEs) as well as the importance of other key clinical variables (e.g. blood pressure, nausea, body fat etc).

Read the detailed description

PURPOSE OF THE INVESTIGATION The purpose of this investigation is to generate evidence about cerebral oxygenation during shoulder surgery and the incidence of POCD. Currently, evidence relating to POCD following surgery is conflicting and relates mostly to outcomes following cardiac surgery. There is a strong need to explore this relationship in the specific context of shoulder surgery in the BCP.

INTERVENTION GROUPS This study will involve a single prospective cohort. Patients who meet the selection criteria will be recruited to the study following voluntary informed consent . Cerebral oxygenation will be measured by application of cerebral oximeters to each patients forehead.

AIM OF THE STUDY This study has three aims; (i) To examine the relationship between cerebral desaturation during shoulder surgery in the BCP, and the incidence of POCD.

(ii) To determine the variation in cerebral oxygenation recorded using randomised (for superior/inferior) simultaneous application of the INVOS™ and FORE-SIGHT® oximeters, during shoulder surgery in the beach chair position.

(iii) Assess the relationships between cerebral oxygen desaturation during shoulder surgery in the BCP and variables including mean arterial pressure, incidence of nausea/vomiting, duration of hospital stay, BMI, hypertension and adverse events.

RESEARCH QUESTION There are three research questions correlating with the three research aims; (i) Is cerebral desaturation during shoulder surgery associated with POCD? (ii) Do the FORE-SIGHT® and INVOS™ 5100 devices vary in their measurement of cerebral oxygenation during shoulder surgery in the BCP? (iii) Is there a relationship between cerebral desaturation events during shoulder surgery in the BCP and variables including mean arterial blood pressure, post-operative nausea/vomiting, length of hospital stay, BMI, hypertension and any adverse events?

NULL HYPOTHESES The three null hypotheses are; (i) Cerebral desaturation as measured using cerebral oximetry is not related to POCD after shoulder surgery in the BCP.

(ii) There is no significant difference between the INVOS™ 5100 and the FORE-SIGHT® monitors assessment of cerebral oxygenation during shoulder surgery in the BCP.

(iii) There is no relationship between cerebral desaturation events during shoulder surgery in the BCP and variables including mean arterial blood pressure, the frequency of post-operative nausea/vomiting, length of hospital stay, BMI, hypertension and any adverse events.

PRIMARY HYPOTHESES The primary research hypotheses are; (i) Cerebral desaturation events during surgery in the BCP will be related to POCD.

(ii) The INVOS™ 5100 and the FORE-SIGHT® monitors will show no significant difference in their ability to measure cerebral oxygenation.

(iii) Cerebral desaturation events experienced during shoulder surgery in the BCP are related to a drop in mean arterial blood pressure, an increased likelihood of post-operative nausea and vomiting, greater length of hospital stay, a higher BMI, hypertension and greater frequency of adverse events.

Being tested
Dual-monitoring
Medical subject headings
Cognitive Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dual-monitoringDevice

    Monitored using both INVOS and FORE-SIGHT monitors.

Study groups in NCT03036345
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Surgery patientsExperimentalPatients receiving shoulder surgery in the Beach Chair Position, and monitored by both INVOS and FORE-SIGHT monitors.
Receives: Device: Dual-monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Trail making test: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System

    The D-KEFs Trails subtest has four trials; visual scanning, number sequencing, letter sequencing and letter number sequencing.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Trail making test: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System

    The D-KEFs Trails subtest has four trials; visual scanning, number sequencing, letter sequencing and letter number sequencing.

    Measured: 1 day post-operative

  3. Trail making test: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System

    The D-KEFs Trails subtest has four trials; visual scanning, number sequencing, letter sequencing and letter number sequencing.

    Measured: 8-14 days post-operative

  4. Trail making test: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System

    The D-KEFs Trails subtest has four trials; visual scanning, number sequencing, letter sequencing and letter number sequencing.

    Measured: 6 weeks post-operative

  5. Trail making test: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System

    The D-KEFs Trails subtest has four trials; visual scanning, number sequencing, letter sequencing and letter number sequencing.

    Measured: 3 months post-operative

  6. Single letter verbal fluency

    This task requires the individual to spontaneously generate a list of words in 60 seconds, where the words cannot be name of places, people or other proper nouns.

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Single letter verbal fluency

    This task requires the individual to spontaneously generate a list of words in 60 seconds, where the words cannot be name of places, people or other proper nouns.

    Measured: 1 day post-operative

  8. Single letter verbal fluency

    This task requires the individual to spontaneously generate a list of words in 60 seconds, where the words cannot be name of places, people or other proper nouns.

    Measured: 8-14 days post-operative

  9. Single letter verbal fluency

    This task requires the individual to spontaneously generate a list of words in 60 seconds, where the words cannot be name of places, people or other proper nouns.

    Measured: 6 weeks post-operative

  10. Single letter verbal fluency

    This task requires the individual to spontaneously generate a list of words in 60 seconds, where the words cannot be name of places, people or other proper nouns.

    Measured: 3 months post-operative

  11. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

    The RAVLT assesses immediate and delayed auditory memory recall and recognition. The task consists of 15 nouns learned over 5 trials with a free recall after each presentation. The order of presentation remaining fixed across trials (List A). At the end of the 5th trial an interference list of 15 words is presented (List B), following a free recall of that list. Immediately after this, delayed recall of the first list is tested. Following a 20-minute delay, delayed recall and recognition of the first word list is assessed.

    Measured: Baseline

  12. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

    The RAVLT assesses immediate and delayed auditory memory recall and recognition. The task consists of 15 nouns learned over 5 trials with a free recall after each presentation. The order of presentation remaining fixed across trials (List A). At the end of the 5th trial an interference list of 15 words is presented (List B), following a free recall of that list. Immediately after this, delayed recall of the first list is tested. Following a 20-minute delay, delayed recall and recognition of the first word list is assessed.

    Measured: 1 day post-operative

  13. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

    The RAVLT assesses immediate and delayed auditory memory recall and recognition. The task consists of 15 nouns learned over 5 trials with a free recall after each presentation. The order of presentation remaining fixed across trials (List A). At the end of the 5th trial an interference list of 15 words is presented (List B), following a free recall of that list. Immediately after this, delayed recall of the first list is tested. Following a 20-minute delay, delayed recall and recognition of the first word list is assessed.

    Measured: 8-14 days post-operative

  14. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

    The RAVLT assesses immediate and delayed auditory memory recall and recognition. The task consists of 15 nouns learned over 5 trials with a free recall after each presentation. The order of presentation remaining fixed across trials (List A). At the end of the 5th trial an interference list of 15 words is presented (List B), following a free recall of that list. Immediately after this, delayed recall of the first list is tested. Following a 20-minute delay, delayed recall and recognition of the first word list is assessed.

    Measured: 6 weeks post-operative

  15. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

    The RAVLT assesses immediate and delayed auditory memory recall and recognition. The task consists of 15 nouns learned over 5 trials with a free recall after each presentation. The order of presentation remaining fixed across trials (List A). At the end of the 5th trial an interference list of 15 words is presented (List B), following a free recall of that list. Immediately after this, delayed recall of the first list is tested. Following a 20-minute delay, delayed recall and recognition of the first word list is assessed.

    Measured: 3 months post-operative

  16. Letter-Number Sequencing (from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th edition)

    The examinee is verbally presented with a combination of numbers and letters or increasing amounts. The examinee is required to recall the numbers in ascending order then letters in alphabetical order.

    Measured: Baseline

  17. Letter-Number Sequencing (from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th edition)

    The examinee is verbally presented with a combination of numbers and letters or increasing amounts. The examinee is required to recall the numbers in ascending order then letters in alphabetical order.

    Measured: 1 day post-operative

  18. Letter-Number Sequencing (from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th edition)

    The examinee is verbally presented with a combination of numbers and letters or increasing amounts. The examinee is required to recall the numbers in ascending order then letters in alphabetical order.

    Measured: 8-14 days post-operative

  19. Letter-Number Sequencing (from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th edition)

    The examinee is verbally presented with a combination of numbers and letters or increasing amounts. The examinee is required to recall the numbers in ascending order then letters in alphabetical order.

    Measured: 6 weeks post-operative

  20. Letter-Number Sequencing (from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th edition)

    The examinee is verbally presented with a combination of numbers and letters or increasing amounts. The examinee is required to recall the numbers in ascending order then letters in alphabetical order.

    Measured: 3 months post-operative

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Cerebral desaturation events (INVOS)

    Cerebral desaturation will be defined as a decrease in regional cerebral oxygen saturation greater than, or equal to 20% from baseline or a fall below 50% absolute.

    Measured: Intra-operative

  2. Cerebral desaturation events (FORE-SIGHT)

    Cerebral desaturation will be defined as a decrease in regional cerebral oxygen saturation greater than, or equal to 20% from baseline or a fall below 50% absolute.

    Measured: Intra-operative

  3. Mean arterial pressure

    Mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg)

    Measured: Intra-operative

  4. Body Mass Index

    Patient Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Hypertension

    Patient-reported hypertension

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Nausea and vomiting within 48 hours

    Patient-reported nausea and vomiting

    Measured: 1 day, 8-14 days

  7. Duration of hospital stay

    Patient duration of hospital stay

    Measured: 8-14 days

  8. Adverse events

    Any adverse events arising during the trial will be closely monitored and followed up until the resolution of symptoms. These will be checked at each assessment stage and recorded on a data collection form.

    Measured: Intra-operative

  9. Adverse events

    Any adverse events arising during the trial will be closely monitored and followed up until the resolution of symptoms. These will be checked at each assessment

    Measured: 1 day

  10. Adverse events

    Any adverse events arising during the trial will be closely monitored and followed up until the resolution of symptoms. These will be checked at each assessment

    Measured: 8-14 days

  11. Adverse events

    Any adverse events arising during the trial will be closely monitored and followed up until the resolution of symptoms. These will be checked at each assessment

    Measured: 6 weeks

  12. Adverse events

    Any adverse events arising during the trial will be closely monitored and followed up until the resolution of symptoms. These will be checked at each assessment

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start25 May 2017
  3. Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03036345
Sponsor's protocol ID
ISR-2016-10757
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
29 Dec 2016
Last updated
16 Jan 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Deidentified cerebral oximeter data acquisition files will be made available to the equipment manufacturers (Medtronic, CASMED) at the conclusion of the study.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dual-monitoring in people with Cognitive Dysfunction, run by Brisbane Hand and Upper Limb Research Institute at 1 site in Australia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Silvia Manzanero, PhD (+61 7 3834 7069, researchmanager@upperlimb.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Trail making test: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 20 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in