AzTrials
AzTrials

Churg-Strauss SyndromeEGPA CohortNCT03036670

Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis Cohort

An observational study of Churg-Strauss Syndrome, run by Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

EGPA (Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis, previously Churg-Strauss syndrome) is a rare vasculitis, characterised by asthma, rhinosinusitis and eosinophilia. There has previously been confusion around diagnostic criteria, with multiple sets of classification criteria being used inappropriately for diagnosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Churg-Strauss Syndrome
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
10 Aug 2016to 31 Jan 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Study participants are adults with Churg-Strauss syndrome under the care of Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust.

Who may be able to join

  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
  • Cared for currently or previously cared for at Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Diagnosed with EGPA/HASM according to clinicians

Who cannot join

  • Medical notes not obtainable

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Queen Alexandra Hospital

    Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO6 3LY

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

EGPA (Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis, previously Churg-Strauss syndrome) is a rare vasculitis, characterised by asthma, rhinosinusitis and eosinophilia. There has previously been confusion around diagnostic criteria, with multiple sets of classification criteria being used inappropriately for diagnosis. The ERS formed a taskforce to produce specific diagnostic criteria, and these divided the Churg-Strauss Syndrome cohort into two groups - vasculitic EGPA and tissular Hypereosinophilic Asthma with Systemic Manifestations (HASM). It is not known if the groups separated by the diagnostic criteria are also separated in clinical symptomatology, or if their disease course varies, and this could have significant impact on management and further research.

Read the detailed description

Background Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA, previously Churg-Strauss Syndrome) is a rare, idiopathic, ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV), alongside Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA). It is an eosinophilic small/medium vessel vasculitis characterised by asthma, rhinosinusitis and eosinophilia. Patients can also suffer renal, cardiac, gastrointestinal and neurological involvement. First described by Churg and Strauss in 1951, exact epidemiology remains difficult because of a lack of clear diagnostic criteria. It appears to have a prevalence of around 11-13 per million population with a mean age of 50 years old and represents 10% of diagnosed vasculitides.

Following Churg and Strauss' original paper, the first attempt to provide diagnostic clarity was provided by John Lanham in 1984. Lanham listed symptoms seen in a set of patients with EGPA and suggested which symptoms were required for the disease and which symptoms were "additional". The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1990 published a list of 6 symptoms to assist with classification of vasculitides, created by comparing 20 patients with EGPA with 787 patients with other forms of vasculitis. This was frequently used for diagnosis despite being intended for classification. In 1994, and revised in 2012, the International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference produced a nomenclature and definition for vasculitides, again frequently incorrectly used as diagnostic criteria. Finally, in 2014, diagnostic criteria were provided by the European Respiratory Society Churg Strauss Syndrome (ERS-CSS) taskforce; however published literature still uses a variety of criteria.

EGPA is recognised as a Th2 predominant disease with elevated levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IgE according to a number of case control studies and case reports. Association between IL-10 levels and ANCA negative EGPA has been reported. Th17 responses also seem to be elevated with raised serum IL-25 reported, potentiating Th2 cytokine release. Eosinophil products are detectable in serum, BAL, urine and biopsies with varying time-courses. Roles of other cells such as regulatory T cells, memory T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, ILCs and others are being investigated.

Previous work within the investigators' unit has demonstrated disturbances in the coagulation system in patients with asthma. The investigators have demonstrated that, while moderate asthma appears to favour fibrinolysis, severe asthma is a fibrinogenic condition. Deposition of fibrin within the airways in fatal asthma has been previously recognised, but a case study demonstrated strong activation of the coagulation system five days prior to an exacerbation. Another case study has demonstrated increased activation of the coagulation system in a patient with active EGPA which normalised on remission, but more in depth work has not been done.

It has been previously recognised that ANCA positive patients often have a different disease phenotype to those who are ANCA negative, suffering with more vasculitic symptoms and renal disease but less cardiac involvement. In 2014 the ERS-CSS taskforce provided diagnostic criteria for these two main phenotypes - separating the vasculitic phenotype which remains called Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA), from the ANCA negative tissular phenotype called Hypereosinophilic Asthma with Systemic Manifestations (HASM). It is currently unclear if this distinction matches biological endotypes, or whether different treatment strategies are advisable between the two groups. It is possible that HASM is a precursor state to full vasculitic EGPA, however the increased incidence of cardiac manifestations within this group would point away from this, as would the differing prevalence of genetic markers such as IL-10 promoter activation.

Prior to the advent of corticosteroid use, prognosis of EGPA was poor with a mortality rate of 50% at 3 months. Treatment primarily consists of immunosuppression with corticosteroids, with induction therapy using cyclophosphamide in severe cases. Rituximab is approved for use in GPA and MPA, while case reports demonstrate a good effect in patients with severe, refractory EGPA, uncontrolled on other therapy. Those who suffer from CSS can be exposed to prolonged steroid therapy with the majority of patients experiencing side effects of their medication such as weight gain, osteopaenia, impaired glucose tolerance, cataracts and skin atrophy. Steroid sparing agents such as azathioprine and mycophenolate are used with variable effect. Treatment is primarily guided by eosinophil count and symptom scores such as the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) as there are not currently any diagnostic tests or EGPA-specific biomarkers. Presence of a specific biomarker would allow more accurate alterations in patients' mediation, as non-specific symptoms can imitate EGPA and prompt increases in steroid doses.

Research questions Do the ERS-CSS diagnostic criteria divide the PHT cohort into groups with distinct clinical characteristics? How do the EGPA and HASM groups differ in clinical and physiological characteristics and how do these change over time?

Potential impact If the investigators confirm that EGPA and HASM represent distinct clinical entities within our cohort, further research into biological mechanisms and treatment options is needed, and this work will help to guide further studies.

Medical subject headings
Churg-Strauss Syndrome

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnosis according to various diagnostic criteria

    The diagnosis of each participant according to different diagnostic or classification criteria (ERS-CSS, Chapel Hill, ACR, Lanham) based on all test results available between the point of diagnosis and 60 months later

    Measured: From date of diagnosis for 5 years

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Corticosteroid dose

    Stable doses (taken for ≥4 weeks) of oral and inhaled corticosteroids at diagnosis and 12 monthly up to 5 years

    Measured: From date of diagnosis for 5 years

  2. Immunosuppressive medication

    Which additional immunosuppressive medication had been given and when

    Measured: From date of diagnosis for 5 years

  3. Comorbid conditions

    List of comorbidities

    Measured: From date of diagnosis for 5 years

  4. Biopsy findings

    List of Biopsy results

    Measured: From date of diagnosis for 5 years

  5. Relapse rates

    Rate of relapses or flares

    Measured: From date of diagnosis for 5 years

  6. Peak disease activity

    maximum disease activity from diagnosis to 5 years as defined by BVAS score and VDI score

    Measured: From date of diagnosis for 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start10 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03036670
Sponsor's protocol ID
PHT/2015/130
Acronym
EGPA Cohort
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
26 Sep 2016
Last updated
7 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Churg-Strauss Syndrome, run by Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnosis according to various diagnostic criteria (time frame: From date of diagnosis for 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in