ObesityPhase 1NCT03041792
Methodology Study To Examine 6-Week Food Intake With Liraglutide In Obese Subjects
A Phase 1 study testing Liraglutide in people with Obesity, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This will be a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, 2 arm, parallel group, methodology study to assess the effect of 6 weeks of liraglutide administration on food intake in obese subjects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity
- What is being tested?
- Liraglutide
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 61 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Feb 2017to 16 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and female subjects;
- Body Mass Index 30-40 kg/m2;
Who cannot join
- Evidence of history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurologic, or allergic disease (including drug allergises, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies at time of dosing)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Translational Research Institute for Metabolism and Diabetes
Orlando, Florida, 32804
About this study
Official title: A 6-WEEK, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, TWO-ARM, PARALLEL METHODOLOGY STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECT OF LIRAGLUTIDE ON FOOD INTAKE IN OBESE SUBJECTS
This will be a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, 2 arm, parallel group, methodology study to assess the effect of 6 weeks of liraglutide administration on food intake in obese subjects.
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Being tested
- Liraglutide, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LiraglutideDrug
Liraglutide
PlaceboOther
Placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active | Experimental | Liraglutide Receives: Drug: Liraglutide |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo comparator Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline (Visit 3) in Mean Energy Intake During Ad Libitum Lunches at Visits 4 and 5
The mean energy intake was collected to assess the effect of liraglutide on food intake in non-diabetic, obese participants. Observed food intake was measured as the total number of calories consumed during the specified time period, calculated as the difference of the total number of calories provided minus the total number of calories remaining after meals. Mean energy intakes at Visit 4 was defined as the mean values of the measurements at Study Day 20 and 21. Same definition applies to Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42). Baseline was defined as the mean of Visit 3 (Study Day -1 and 0).
Measured: Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5
Secondary outcomes (8)
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Categorical Criteria
Absolute values and changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse rate (PR) were recorded in supine position. Vital signs categorical summarization criteria were 1), blood pressure: SBP greater than or equal to (>=) 30 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) change from baseline, SBP less than (<) 90 mm Hg; DBP >=20 mm Hg change from baseline, DBP <50 mm Hg; 2), PR <40 or greater than (>) 120 beats per minute (bpm). Baseline was defined as pre-treatment measurement on Day 1.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Visit 6 (Study Day 53)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (All-Causality)
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device, regardless of its causal relationship with study treatment. An AE is considered treatment-emergent relative to a given treatment if: the event occurs for the first time during the effective duration of treatment and was not seen prior to the start of treatment (for example, during the baseline or run-in period); or the event was seen prior to the start of treatment but increased in severity during treatment.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 3) up to 31 days post last dose (75 days)
Number of Participants With Abnormal 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
ECG categorical summarization criteria: 1) PR interval (the interval between the start of the P wave and the start of the QRS complex, corresponding to the time between the onset of the atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization): absolute value greater than or equal to (>=) 300 msec, percent change >=25% if baseline was greater than (>) 200 msec, and >=50% if baseline was less than or equal to (<=) 200 msec; 2) QRS interval (time from ECG Q wave to the end of the S wave corresponding to ventricle depolarization): absolute value >=200 msec, percent change >=25% if baseline was 100 msec, and >=50% if baseline was <=100 msec; 3) QTcF interval (QT corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula): absolute value >450 to <=480 msec, >480 to <=500 msec, >500 msec, an increase from baseline >30 to <=60 msec or >60 msec. Baseline was defined as pre-treatment measurement on Day -2.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Visit 6 (Study Day 53)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)
Below parameters were evaluated:1), Hematology: hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit, erythrocytes (absolute value/mean corpuscular volume/mean corpuscular HGB/mean corpuscular HGB concentration), platelets, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, basophils, monocytes; 2), clinical chemistry: bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate, amylase, triacylglycerol lipase; 3), urinalysis: pH, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase, urine erythrocytes, urine leukocytes, hyaline casts, bacteria.
Measured: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Visit 6 (Study Day 53)
Change From Baseline in Mean 48-hour Energy Intake at Visits 4 and 5
Energy intake was measured over a period of 48 hours to assess day to day variability in food intake. Observed food intake was measured as the total number of calories consumed during the specified time period, calculated as the difference of the total number of calories provided minus the total number of calories remaining after meals. Baseline was defined as the 48 hour period at Visit 3 (Study Day -1 and 0).
Measured: Visit 3, Visit 4 (Study Day 20 and 21) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42)
Change From Baseline in Appetite Score (Mean Rating Area Under Curve From Time 30 to 120 Minutes [AUC30-120min]) for Mean Lunch at Visits 4 and 5
Appetite, satiety, fullness, hunger, and prospective consumption were measured using a validated Visual Analog scale (VAS) questionnaire. VAS was an assessment in which participants place a vertical line across a validated 100 millimeter (mm) line with the example of "Not At All Full" and "Totally Full" at either end, scoring from 0 to 100. The overall appetite score was calculated as the average of the four individual scores [satiety + fullness + (100 - prospective food consumption)+(100 - hunger)] divided by 4. The VAS questionnaire was completed by the participant immediately prior to meal administration, and at 30, 60 and 120 minutes after start of the specified meals. Baseline of Mean Rating AUC30-120min was defined as the rating for mean lunch at Visit 3 (Study Day -1 and 0).
Measured: Visit 3, Visit 4 (Study Day 20 and 21) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42)
Change From Baseline in Satiety, Fullness, Prospective Food Consumption and Hunger Scores (Mean Rating AUC30-120min) for Mean Lunch at Visits 4 and 5
Satiety, fullness, hunger, and prospective consumption were measured at the study site using a validated VAS questionnaire. The VAS measurement of the subcomponent scores were the same as that of the appetite score. Baseline of Mean Rating AUC30-120min was defined as the rating for mean lunch at Visit 3 (Study Day -1 and 0).The VAS was an assessment in which subjects place a vertical line across a validated 100 millimeter (mm) line to rank their response to various questions. The line was anchored by responses such as "Not At All Full" and "Totally Full" at either end. Scoring consisted of measuring the distance in mm of the vertical line from the response at the left end. The scores (total and subscale) ranged from 0 to 100. The lower values represent the better outcomes.The overall appetite score was calculated as the average of the 4 individual scores [satiety+fullness+(100-prospective food consumption)+(100-hunger)] divided by 4.
Measured: Visit 3, Visit 4 (Study Day 20 and 21) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42)
Change From Baseline in Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile of Acetaminophen for 0-60 Minutes and 0-300 Minutes (AUC0-60min and AUC0-300min) After Acetaminophen Dose at Visits 4 and 5
A non investigational medicinal product (acetaminophen 1.5 gram [g]) was administered as a challenge agent for the assessment of gastric emptying. The blood sampling for determining acetaminophen concentrations was performed at 7 time points: prior to breakfast and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 300 minutes after intake of the acetaminophen with breakfast. Baseline was calculated at Visit 3 (Study Day -1).
Measured: Prior to breakfast and at 30,60,90,120,180 and 300 minutes after intake of the acetaminophen with breakfast on Visit 3,Visit 4 (Study Day 20) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2017 (estimated)
- Study start20 Feb 2017
- Primary completion16 Jan 2018
- Study completion16 Jan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 61 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03041792
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A9001498
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 6-WEEK, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, TWO-ARM, PARALLEL METHODOLOGY STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECT OF LIRAGLUTIDE ON FOOD INTAKE IN OBESE SUBJECTS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03041792
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A9001498
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 61 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This will be a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, 2 arm, parallel group, methodology study to assess the effect of 6 weeks of liraglutide administration on food intake in obese subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active | Experimental | Drug: LiraglutideLiraglutide |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboPlacebo comparator |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Males and female subjects;
- Body Mass Index 30-40 kg/m2;
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Evidence of history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurologic, or allergic disease (including drug allergises, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies at time of dosing)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LiraglutideLiraglutide | Drug | Active |
| PlaceboPlacebo | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline (Visit 3) in Mean Energy Intake During Ad Libitum Lunches at Visits 4 and 5
Time frame: Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5
The mean energy intake was collected to assess the effect of liraglutide on food intake in non-diabetic, obese participants. Observed food intake was measured as the total number of calories consumed during the specified time period, calculated as the difference of the total number of calories provided minus the total number of calories remaining after meals. Mean energy intakes at Visit 4 was defined as the mean values of the measurements at Study Day 20 and 21. Same definition applies to Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42). Baseline was defined as the mean of Visit 3 (Study Day -1 and 0).
8 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Categorical Criteria
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Visit 6 (Study Day 53)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (All-Causality)
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) up to 31 days post last dose (75 days)
Number of Participants With Abnormal 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Visit 6 (Study Day 53)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Visit 6 (Study Day 53)
Change From Baseline in Mean 48-hour Energy Intake at Visits 4 and 5
Time frame: Visit 3, Visit 4 (Study Day 20 and 21) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42)
Change From Baseline in Appetite Score (Mean Rating Area Under Curve From Time 30 to 120 Minutes [AUC30-120min]) for Mean Lunch at Visits 4 and 5
Time frame: Visit 3, Visit 4 (Study Day 20 and 21) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42)
Change From Baseline in Satiety, Fullness, Prospective Food Consumption and Hunger Scores (Mean Rating AUC30-120min) for Mean Lunch at Visits 4 and 5
Time frame: Visit 3, Visit 4 (Study Day 20 and 21) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42)
Change From Baseline in Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile of Acetaminophen for 0-60 Minutes and 0-300 Minutes (AUC0-60min and AUC0-300min) After Acetaminophen Dose at Visits 4 and 5
Time frame: Prior to breakfast and at 30,60,90,120,180 and 300 minutes after intake of the acetaminophen with breakfast on Visit 3,Visit 4 (Study Day 20) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Liraglutide in people with Obesity, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline (Visit 3) in Mean Energy Intake During Ad Libitum Lunches at Visits 4 and 5 (time frame: Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.