AzTrials
AzTrials

ObesityPhase 1NCT03041792

Methodology Study To Examine 6-Week Food Intake With Liraglutide In Obese Subjects

A Phase 1 study testing Liraglutide in people with Obesity, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This will be a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, 2 arm, parallel group, methodology study to assess the effect of 6 weeks of liraglutide administration on food intake in obese subjects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Obesity
What is being tested?
Liraglutide
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
61 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
20 Feb 2017to 16 Jan 2018
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males and female subjects;
  • Body Mass Index 30-40 kg/m2;

Who cannot join

  • Evidence of history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurologic, or allergic disease (including drug allergises, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies at time of dosing)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Translational Research Institute for Metabolism and Diabetes

    Orlando, Florida, 32804

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A 6-WEEK, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, TWO-ARM, PARALLEL METHODOLOGY STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECT OF LIRAGLUTIDE ON FOOD INTAKE IN OBESE SUBJECTS

This will be a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, 2 arm, parallel group, methodology study to assess the effect of 6 weeks of liraglutide administration on food intake in obese subjects.

Conditions
Obesity
Being tested
Liraglutide, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03041792
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ActiveExperimentalLiraglutide
Receives: Drug: Liraglutide
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo comparator
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline (Visit 3) in Mean Energy Intake During Ad Libitum Lunches at Visits 4 and 5

    The mean energy intake was collected to assess the effect of liraglutide on food intake in non-diabetic, obese participants. Observed food intake was measured as the total number of calories consumed during the specified time period, calculated as the difference of the total number of calories provided minus the total number of calories remaining after meals. Mean energy intakes at Visit 4 was defined as the mean values of the measurements at Study Day 20 and 21. Same definition applies to Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42). Baseline was defined as the mean of Visit 3 (Study Day -1 and 0).

    Measured: Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Categorical Criteria

    Absolute values and changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse rate (PR) were recorded in supine position. Vital signs categorical summarization criteria were 1), blood pressure: SBP greater than or equal to (>=) 30 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) change from baseline, SBP less than (<) 90 mm Hg; DBP >=20 mm Hg change from baseline, DBP <50 mm Hg; 2), PR <40 or greater than (>) 120 beats per minute (bpm). Baseline was defined as pre-treatment measurement on Day 1.

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Visit 6 (Study Day 53)

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (All-Causality)

    Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device, regardless of its causal relationship with study treatment. An AE is considered treatment-emergent relative to a given treatment if: the event occurs for the first time during the effective duration of treatment and was not seen prior to the start of treatment (for example, during the baseline or run-in period); or the event was seen prior to the start of treatment but increased in severity during treatment.

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 3) up to 31 days post last dose (75 days)

  3. Number of Participants With Abnormal 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    ECG categorical summarization criteria: 1) PR interval (the interval between the start of the P wave and the start of the QRS complex, corresponding to the time between the onset of the atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization): absolute value greater than or equal to (>=) 300 msec, percent change >=25% if baseline was greater than (>) 200 msec, and >=50% if baseline was less than or equal to (<=) 200 msec; 2) QRS interval (time from ECG Q wave to the end of the S wave corresponding to ventricle depolarization): absolute value >=200 msec, percent change >=25% if baseline was 100 msec, and >=50% if baseline was <=100 msec; 3) QTcF interval (QT corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula): absolute value >450 to <=480 msec, >480 to <=500 msec, >500 msec, an increase from baseline >30 to <=60 msec or >60 msec. Baseline was defined as pre-treatment measurement on Day -2.

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Visit 6 (Study Day 53)

  4. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)

    Below parameters were evaluated:1), Hematology: hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit, erythrocytes (absolute value/mean corpuscular volume/mean corpuscular HGB/mean corpuscular HGB concentration), platelets, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, basophils, monocytes; 2), clinical chemistry: bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate, amylase, triacylglycerol lipase; 3), urinalysis: pH, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase, urine erythrocytes, urine leukocytes, hyaline casts, bacteria.

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 3) up to Visit 6 (Study Day 53)

  5. Change From Baseline in Mean 48-hour Energy Intake at Visits 4 and 5

    Energy intake was measured over a period of 48 hours to assess day to day variability in food intake. Observed food intake was measured as the total number of calories consumed during the specified time period, calculated as the difference of the total number of calories provided minus the total number of calories remaining after meals. Baseline was defined as the 48 hour period at Visit 3 (Study Day -1 and 0).

    Measured: Visit 3, Visit 4 (Study Day 20 and 21) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42)

  6. Change From Baseline in Appetite Score (Mean Rating Area Under Curve From Time 30 to 120 Minutes [AUC30-120min]) for Mean Lunch at Visits 4 and 5

    Appetite, satiety, fullness, hunger, and prospective consumption were measured using a validated Visual Analog scale (VAS) questionnaire. VAS was an assessment in which participants place a vertical line across a validated 100 millimeter (mm) line with the example of "Not At All Full" and "Totally Full" at either end, scoring from 0 to 100. The overall appetite score was calculated as the average of the four individual scores [satiety + fullness + (100 - prospective food consumption)+(100 - hunger)] divided by 4. The VAS questionnaire was completed by the participant immediately prior to meal administration, and at 30, 60 and 120 minutes after start of the specified meals. Baseline of Mean Rating AUC30-120min was defined as the rating for mean lunch at Visit 3 (Study Day -1 and 0).

    Measured: Visit 3, Visit 4 (Study Day 20 and 21) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42)

  7. Change From Baseline in Satiety, Fullness, Prospective Food Consumption and Hunger Scores (Mean Rating AUC30-120min) for Mean Lunch at Visits 4 and 5

    Satiety, fullness, hunger, and prospective consumption were measured at the study site using a validated VAS questionnaire. The VAS measurement of the subcomponent scores were the same as that of the appetite score. Baseline of Mean Rating AUC30-120min was defined as the rating for mean lunch at Visit 3 (Study Day -1 and 0).The VAS was an assessment in which subjects place a vertical line across a validated 100 millimeter (mm) line to rank their response to various questions. The line was anchored by responses such as "Not At All Full" and "Totally Full" at either end. Scoring consisted of measuring the distance in mm of the vertical line from the response at the left end. The scores (total and subscale) ranged from 0 to 100. The lower values represent the better outcomes.The overall appetite score was calculated as the average of the 4 individual scores [satiety+fullness+(100-prospective food consumption)+(100-hunger)] divided by 4.

    Measured: Visit 3, Visit 4 (Study Day 20 and 21) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41 and 42)

  8. Change From Baseline in Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile of Acetaminophen for 0-60 Minutes and 0-300 Minutes (AUC0-60min and AUC0-300min) After Acetaminophen Dose at Visits 4 and 5

    A non investigational medicinal product (acetaminophen 1.5 gram [g]) was administered as a challenge agent for the assessment of gastric emptying. The blood sampling for determining acetaminophen concentrations was performed at 7 time points: prior to breakfast and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 300 minutes after intake of the acetaminophen with breakfast. Baseline was calculated at Visit 3 (Study Day -1).

    Measured: Prior to breakfast and at 30,60,90,120,180 and 300 minutes after intake of the acetaminophen with breakfast on Visit 3,Visit 4 (Study Day 20) and Visit 5 (Study Day 41)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Feb 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start20 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion16 Jan 2018
  4. Study completion16 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
61 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03041792
Sponsor's protocol ID
A9001498
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
1 Feb 2017
Last updated
26 Jul 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Liraglutide in people with Obesity, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline (Visit 3) in Mean Energy Intake During Ad Libitum Lunches at Visits 4 and 5 (time frame: Visit 3, Visit 4 and Visit 5). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in