TuberculosisNCT03042754
Improve Treatment Outcomes for Tuberculosis Infection in Tertiary Care Hospitals
A study testing XpertMTB/RIF in people with Tuberculosis, run by The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration at 4 sites in Thailand.
Trial summary
Early diagnosis can contribute to good treatment outcomes and isolate infection control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tuberculosis
- What is being tested?
- XpertMTB/RIF
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesThailand
- Study dates
- 6 Jun 2011to 1 Dec 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients with suspected TB
- patients that can give us sputum and urine specimens
Who cannot join
- refuse to provide written informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Thailand4 sites
Chulalongkorn University
Bangkok, 10330
HIV-NAT, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre
Bangkok, 10330
Rajavithi Hospital
Bangkok
Bamrasnaradura Institute
Nonthaburi, 11000
About this study
Early diagnosis can contribute to good treatment outcomes and isolate infection control.
Read the detailed description
This study is conducted into 2 parts: prospective and retrospective.
The prospective study evaluated the use of Xpert MTB/RIF. The study was conducted at three large tertiary care hospitals: the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Rajavithi Hospital and Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute. Only pulmonologists and infectious disease physicians with extensive experience in TB participated in the study. Patients who had suspected PTB were enrolled into the study. Expectorated sputum were collected and transferred to the central laboratory, Chulalongkorn Research Center (CRC) Laboratory, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Each sample was divided into two parts; one part for the Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid) and another part for mycobacterial culture. Drug susceptibility tests for streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol were performed with rapid qualitative procedure (BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 SIRE Kit) and semi-automated system (BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 System). Discordant results of MGIT and Xpert were retested with the rpoB gene sequencing system. All PTB patients were promptly treated with anti-TB drug regimens as WHO's recommendation. All patients had HIV testing done and CD4 cell counts were obtained for all HIV-infected patients. Antiretroviral treatment and prophylaxis for opportunistic infections were prescribed as standard treatment guideline for patients with HIV/TB co-infection. The patients were followed until completion of TB treatment or change in the diagnosis. The WHO definitions for cure, completed treatment, dead, default or treatment failure were used to define the outcome of treatment.
The authors , therefore, evaluated the utility of Xpert MTB/RIF in Thailand, prior to nation-wide implementation. In summary, our real-life cohort study use Xpert MTB/RIF for early diagnosis of PTB and rifampicin resistance in high TB burden country outside of the African region. The results may be beneficial for guiding the policy makers, especially the National Tuberculosis Programme (NTP) to control TB transmission, as the country move towards universal use of Xpert MTB/RIF.
The retrospective study assessed the urine LAM test which has not been evaluated in non-HIV-infected immunocompromised Asians with disseminated TB and non-disseminated TB (TB located in one organ) but has a poor sensitivity and specificity for detecting pulmonary TB patients without HIV infection. On that account, the authors evaluated the applicability and efficacy of TB diagnosis by using the urine from confirmed cultured TB cases with various immune response conditions, such as HIV-infected, non-HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected immunocompromised patients. The authors found that the sensitivity of the urine LAM in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients were similar to previous reports. This confirmed that the urine LAM cannot be used alone to screen for TB. However, it can be used in conjunction with the culture and AFB smear test for patients co-infected with HIV with very low CD4 count. The urine LAM test is especially helpful in cases where the smear is negative in probable-TB patients. For this reason, the urine LAM test is attractive because it is not invasive, and the samples needed can be easily collected from these types of disseminated patients with and without HIV.
Aside from that, the urine LAM test can be used in those severely ill patients, regardless of HIV infection, where it is difficult to physically collect the sputum and paucibacillary samples. The PPV was over 80% for those infected with HIV and up to 100% in non-HIV-infected patients. For physicians, the PPV is more useful than the sensitivity and specificity of the assay because it will answer the question how likely the patient with a positive result from the urine LAM test will have TB or not. A high PPV can accurately guide the physicians to confidentially prescribe the TB medications which are crucial, especially among co-infected patients that are severely ill. For this reason, the urine LAM test seems to be a great point-of-care test that can easily be incorporated with the AFB smear and culture test for the Asian population. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that a positive urine LAM test result was significantly associated with death, especially those with HIV infection. This association is much stronger in patients with very low CD4 counts. The findings from this study suggest the possible use of the urine LAM test with the AFB smear and culture in resource-limited countries in diagnosing TB in advanced HIV and non-HIV-infected patients with TB. This promising diagnostic tool can increase the yield of TB diagnosis and predict the mortality rate of TB infection, particularly in advanced HIV patients.
- Conditions
- Tuberculosis
- Being tested
- XpertMTB/RIF
- Keywords
- LAM, XpertMTB/RIF, treatment outcome, Microbacterial tuberculosis
- Medical subject headings
- Tuberculosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
XpertMTB/RIFDiagnostic test
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| suspected TB | Other | Patients suspected with TB will be sent for XpertMTB/RIF and urine LAM test Receives: Diagnostic Test: XpertMTB/RIF |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity of sputum from patients suspected with TB
Measured: 2 years
Sensitivity of urine LAM from patients suspected with TB
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2017 (estimated)
- Study start6 Jun 2011
- Primary completion1 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for TuberculosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chulalongkorn University, Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Department of Medical Services Ministry of Public Health of Thailand
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gompol Suwanpimolkul, MD, Principal investigator, Chulalongkorn UniversityKamon Kawkitinarong, MD, Principal investigator, Chulalongkorn University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03042754
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TB NRU
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: only for auditing/monitoring process as needed
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improve Treatment Outcomes for Tuberculosis Infection in Tertiary Care Hospitals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03042754
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TB NRU
- Conditions
- Tuberculosis
- Keywords
- LAM, XpertMTB/RIF, treatment outcome, Microbacterial tuberculosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research CollaborationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chulalongkorn University, Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Department of Medical Services Ministry of Public Health of Thailand
- Study start
- 6 Jun 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Early diagnosis can contribute to good treatment outcomes and isolate infection control.
Detailed description
This study is conducted into 2 parts: prospective and retrospective.
The prospective study evaluated the use of Xpert MTB/RIF. The study was conducted at three large tertiary care hospitals: the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Rajavithi Hospital and Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute. Only pulmonologists and infectious disease physicians with extensive experience in TB participated in the study. Patients who had suspected PTB were enrolled into the study. Expectorated sputum were collected and transferred to the central laboratory, Chulalongkorn Research Center (CRC) Laboratory, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Each sample was divided into two parts; one part for the Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid) and another part for mycobacterial culture. Drug susceptibility tests for streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol were performed with rapid qualitative procedure (BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 SIRE Kit) and semi-automated system (BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 System). Discordant results of MGIT and Xpert were retested with the rpoB gene sequencing system. All PTB patients were promptly treated with anti-TB drug regimens as WHO's recommendation. All patients had HIV testing done and CD4 cell counts were obtained for all HIV-infected patients. Antiretroviral treatment and prophylaxis for opportunistic infections were prescribed as standard treatment guideline for patients with HIV/TB co-infection. The patients were followed until completion of TB treatment or change in the diagnosis. The WHO definitions for cure, completed treatment, dead, default or treatment failure were used to define the outcome of treatment.
The authors , therefore, evaluated the utility of Xpert MTB/RIF in Thailand, prior to nation-wide implementation. In summary, our real-life cohort study use Xpert MTB/RIF for early diagnosis of PTB and rifampicin resistance in high TB burden country outside of the African region. The results may be beneficial for guiding the policy makers, especially the National Tuberculosis Programme (NTP) to control TB transmission, as the country move towards universal use of Xpert MTB/RIF.
The retrospective study assessed the urine LAM test which has not been evaluated in non-HIV-infected immunocompromised Asians with disseminated TB and non-disseminated TB (TB located in one organ) but has a poor sensitivity and specificity for detecting pulmonary TB patients without HIV infection. On that account, the authors evaluated the applicability and efficacy of TB diagnosis by using the urine from confirmed cultured TB cases with various immune response conditions, such as HIV-infected, non-HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected immunocompromised patients. The authors found that the sensitivity of the urine LAM in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients were similar to previous reports. This confirmed that the urine LAM cannot be used alone to screen for TB. However, it can be used in conjunction with the culture and AFB smear test for patients co-infected with HIV with very low CD4 count. The urine LAM test is especially helpful in cases where the smear is negative in probable-TB patients. For this reason, the urine LAM test is attractive because it is not invasive, and the samples needed can be easily collected from these types of disseminated patients with and without HIV.
Aside from that, the urine LAM test can be used in those severely ill patients, regardless of HIV infection, where it is difficult to physically collect the sputum and paucibacillary samples. The PPV was over 80% for those infected with HIV and up to 100% in non-HIV-infected patients. For physicians, the PPV is more useful than the sensitivity and specificity of the assay because it will answer the question how likely the patient with a positive result from the urine LAM test will have TB or not. A high PPV can accurately guide the physicians to confidentially prescribe the TB medications which are crucial, especially among co-infected patients that are severely ill. For this reason, the urine LAM test seems to be a great point-of-care test that can easily be incorporated with the AFB smear and culture test for the Asian population. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that a positive urine LAM test result was significantly associated with death, especially those with HIV infection. This association is much stronger in patients with very low CD4 counts. The findings from this study suggest the possible use of the urine LAM test with the AFB smear and culture in resource-limited countries in diagnosing TB in advanced HIV and non-HIV-infected patients with TB. This promising diagnostic tool can increase the yield of TB diagnosis and predict the mortality rate of TB infection, particularly in advanced HIV patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| suspected TB | Other | Diagnostic Test: XpertMTB/RIFPatients suspected with TB will be sent for XpertMTB/RIF and urine LAM test |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patients with suspected TB
- patients that can give us sputum and urine specimens
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- refuse to provide written informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| XpertMTB/RIF | Diagnostic test | suspected TB |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity of sputum from patients suspected with TB
Time frame: 2 years
Sensitivity of urine LAM from patients suspected with TB
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2026.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. only for auditing/monitoring process as needed
Related trials for Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 4
Short-term Antibiotic Therapy in Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease
Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Paradoxical Tuberculosis Reactions in Patients Without HIV Infection
Tuberculosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Re-evaluating the Duration in Children of TB Treatment
Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Daily Rifapentine Combined With Isoniazid (1HP) for Tuberculosis Prevention in Children Less Than 13 Years of Age With and Without HIV
Tuberculosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Protecting Households On Exposure to Newly Diagnosed Index Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients
Tuberculosis, MDR
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gompol Suwanpimolkul, MD principal investigator
Chulalongkorn University
Kamon Kawkitinarong, MD principal investigator
Chulalongkorn University
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing XpertMTB/RIF in people with Tuberculosis, run by The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration at 4 sites in Thailand.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity of sputum from patients suspected with TB (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2026.