AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive ImpairmentPATH-MCINCT03043573

Problem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Depression

A study testing PATH-MCI and Supportive Therapy in people with Cognitive Impairment and Depression, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 4 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present collaborative R01 study, between Cornell and Johns Hopkins, aims to compare Problem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitively Impaired Older Adults (PATH-MCI) vs. Supportive Therapy for Cognitively Impaired Older Adults (ST-CI) in improving cognitive, affective, and functioning outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Cognitive Impairment, Depression
What is being tested?
PATH-MCI and Supportive Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Jul 2017to 19 Sep 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Amnestic MCI as defined by Albert et al
  • Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) greater than 7 and MADRS total less than 30
  • Participants will be off antidepressants, cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine, or on a stable dosage for at least 12 weeks without any medical recommendation to adjust dosage in next 3 months (during treatment)
  • Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5 at screening
  • Subjects will have capacity to consent

Who cannot join

  • Deemed to have a significant suicide risk as assessed by site PI and clinical team
  • Deemed too unstable medically or neurologically to safely enroll in a research trial
  • Deemed too psychiatrically unstable to safely enroll in randomized trial of psychotherapy. Requiring psychiatric hospitalization at baseline for safety.
  • Current involvement in psychotherapy
  • Lack of English fluency

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United States4 sites
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21224

  • Weill Cornell Medicine

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10461

  • Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine

    White Plains, New York, 10605

Other trials in United States

About this study

The present collaborative R01 study, between Cornell and Johns Hopkins, aims to compare Problem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitively Impaired Older Adults (PATH-MCI) vs. Supportive Therapy for Cognitively Impaired Older Adults (ST-CI) in improving cognitive, affective, and functioning outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The present collaborative R01 study, between Cornell and Johns Hopkins, aims to compare Problem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitively Impaired Older Adults (PATH-MCI) vs. Supportive Therapy for Cognitively Impaired Older Adults (ST-CI) in improving cognitive, affective and functioning outcomes. Psychotherapy, also known as talking therapy, is the use of psychological methods to help a person change and overcome problems in desired ways. PATH-MCI differs from standard of care psychotherapy by offering a combination of emotion regulation techniques with the provision of environmental adaptation tools (notes, checklists, calendars, etc.), the use of the WellPATH app, and the participation of a willing and available caregiver. Supportive Therapy incorporates standard of care approaches by using non-specific techniques to provide a supportive environment and help patients to express their feelings \& focus on their strengths and abilities.

The investigators plan to randomize 80 treatment subjects, older adults (40 at Cornell and 40 at Johns Hopkins) with MCI-depression. 80 study partners may also be potentially recruited. Both sites have shown feasibility of recruitment, randomization, retention, and assessment procedures for patients with MCI. Cornell has shown evidence of administration of PATH in this population. Certified mental health clinicians in PATH-MCI and ST-CI will administer 15 in-office sessions in six months.

The investigators propose to compare the effects of 15 sessions (12 weekly in first 12 weeks and 3 monthly booster sessions afterwards) of PATH-MCI vs. ST-CI in 80 older adults (treatment subjects) with MCI-depression. Research assistants, unaware of study hypotheses and participant randomization status, will perform research assessments at baseline and at 6 (no cognitive measures), 12, 24, 36 (no cognitive measures) and 52 weeks after randomization.

There will also be optional blood draws at study entry, 12, and 52 weeks. The purpose of the blood draws is to better understand whether response to psychotherapy treatment is affected by genes, by inflammation, or by the possible memory factor called BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor). Also, all therapy sessions will be audiotaped (if the patient consents) and Dr. Shermer (a clinician outside of the Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry) will evaluate randomly selected sessions and rate the therapists' adherence and competence based on the PATH-MCI and ST Adherence Scales

The study partner will provide information about the treatment subject and participate in treatment if agreed by the treatment subject. To explore the effects of PATH-MCI on the study partner, the investigators will collect the following data from the study partner: demographic, burden (Short Zarit Burden interview), and treatment satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire).

Being tested
PATH-MCI, Supportive Therapy
Medical subject headings
Cognitive Dysfunction, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PATH-MCIBehavioural

    Problem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitively Impaired Adults (PATH-MCI) differs from standard of care psychotherapy by offering a combination of emotion regulation techniques with the provision of environmental adaptation tools (notes, checklists, calendars, etc.), the use of the WellPATH app, and the participation of a willing and available caregiver.

  • Supportive TherapyBehavioural

    Also called ST

    ST focuses on: 1. facilitating expression of affect; 2. conveying to the patient that he or she is understood; 3. offering empathy; and 4. highlighting positive experiences. The ST manual aims to standardize nonspecific therapeutic factors.

Study groups in NCT03043573
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PATH-MCIExperimentalProblem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitively Impaired Adults (PATH-MCI) differs from standard of care psychotherapy by offering a combination of emotion regulation techniques with the provision of environmental adaptation tools (notes, checklists, calendars, etc.), the use of the WellPATH app, and the participation of a willing and available caregiver.
Receives: Behavioral: PATH-MCI
Supportive TherapyActive comparatorSupportive Therapy focuses on: 1. Facilitating expression of affect; 2. Conveying to the patient that he or she is understood; 3. Offering empathy; and 4. Highlighting positive experiences. The ST manual aims to standardize nonspecific therapeutic factors.
Receives: Behavioral: Supportive Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Global Cognition Assessed by RBANS

    Global cognition will be assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Total Score (RBANS). The total score represents the simple sum of the five cognitive domain index scores (Immediate Memory, Visuospatial/Constructional, Language, Attention, and Delayed Memory). Total raw scores are converted based on the subjects age and a RBANS scoring manual. Higher scores indicate better functionality. The total scores range from 200 to 800.

    Measured: Baseline, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in Disability Function Assessed With WHODAS-II

    The 12-item WHODAS-II (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule) assesses functional impairment across six domains of daily living. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (No difficulty), 1 (Mild Difficulty), 2 (Moderate Difficulty), 3 (Severe Difficulty) and 4 (Extreme difficulty or cannot do). Each individual item has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 4. The total raw score is computed by summing all 12 items, resulting in a possible score range of 0 to 48. Higher score reflect greater functional impairment. Lower scores indicate better functional status and less reported difficulty with daily activities.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 Weeks

  2. Change in Depression Assessed by MADRS

    Depression assessed by Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score. The MADRS is a 10 item questionnaire assessing severity of depression by scoring participants on mood, anxiety, sleep, concentration, appetite, and suicidal thoughts. The lowest score is 0, no depression symptoms, and the highest possible score is 60, severe depression symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 Weeks

  3. Change in Episodic Memory Assessed by Delayed Recall Subscale of RBANS

    The Delayed Recall subscale of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) assesses memory function across multiple tasks. It includes the following components: List Recall Total Score (range: 0-10), List Recognition Total Score (range: 0-20), Story Recall Total Score (range: 0-12), and Figure Recall Total Score (range: 0-20). The raw scores from these four components are summed to yield a Delayed Memory Index raw total score ranging from 0 to 62, with higher scores indicating better memory performance.

    To facilitate standardized interpretation, raw total scores are converted to age-adjusted Index Scores using normative data provided in the RBANS manual. These Index Scores have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, and are normed by decade (e.g., 60-69, 70-79, 80-89). Higher Index Scores reflect better memory functioning relative to age-matched peers.

    Measured: Baseline, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks

  4. Change in Executive Function Assessed by Trail Making Test

    Trail Making Test is a neuropsychological assessment where raw scores are converted into a scaled score range from 1 to 25. Participants with scores between 1 - 8 have impaired performance; Mid range scores typically fall between 10 - 16, and subjects who fair the best on this measure have scores ranging from 20 - 25.

    Measured: Baseline, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Feb 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jul 2017
  3. Primary completion19 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion19 Sep 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03043573
Sponsor's protocol ID
1603017114
Other IDs
1R01AG050514
Acronym
PATH-MCI
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
27 Jan 2017
Last updated
12 Aug 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data will be available as per NIH's data sharing policy.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PATH-MCI and Supportive Therapy in people with Cognitive Impairment and Depression, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 4 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Aug 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Global Cognition Assessed by RBANS (time frame: Baseline, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in