AzTrials
AzTrials

Labor PainNCT03044392

Determination of the Optimal "Next Bolus" Interval for Programmed Intermittent Bolus Epidural Analgesia

A study testing Next Bolus Interval in people with Labor Pain, run by IWK Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The current standard of practice for the maintenance of epidural analgesia is through use of a continuous infusion pump. Enhanced technology now supports the use of programmed intermittent bolus (PIEB) administration. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Labor Pain
What is being tested?
Next Bolus Interval
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
5 Jun 2017to 30 Nov 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I-II (ASA I - Healthy, ASA II - mild and controlled systemic disease)
  • Spontaneous labour
  • Nulliparous parturient
  • Single gestations ≥ 36 weeks
  • English speaking
  • Age 18-45 years
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Vertex presentation
  • Requesting an epidural for labour analgesia
  • Cervical dilation less than 2 cm or greater than 6 cm at the time of initiation of neuraxial analgesia

Who cannot join

  • • Use of IV opioids within 1 hour of initiating the epidural
  • Use of nitrous oxide after initiating the epidural pump
  • Contraindications to neuraxial analgesia (i.e. coagulopathy, infection, neuropathy)
  • Abnormal spinal anatomy (i.e. scoliosis, spina bifida, spinal instrumentation)
  • Height < 5'0" or BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2
  • Chronic analgesics
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Diseases of pregnancy (i.e. hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes)
  • Severe maternal cardiac disease
  • Known fetal anomalies /intrauterine fetal demise
  • Physical or psychiatric condition which may impair cooperation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • IWK Health Centre

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3K 6R8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Determination of the Optimal "Next Bolus" Interval for Programmed Intermittent Bolus Epidural Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The current standard of practice for the maintenance of epidural analgesia is through use of a continuous infusion pump. Enhanced technology now supports the use of programmed intermittent bolus (PIEB) administration. This novel drug delivery system provides small boluses of local anesthetic and opioid at programmed intervals. Several studies suggest that administration of PIEB allows a more extensive spread of local anesthetic in the epidural space and provides superior labour analgesia compared to traditional continuous epidural infusions. PIEB is associated with lower anesthetic consumption, a shorter second stage of labour and greater patient satisfaction.

The authors are focusing on a PIEB setting known as the "Next Bolus". "Next Bolus" (NB) determines when the first PIEB bolus is given after the initiation of the epidural and starting the PIEB pump. Currently we set this to be 15-45 minutes. In an attempt to optimize resources, authors hope to determine the optimal NB interval that will provide adequate analgesia but limit overall drug consumption. An optimally timed next bolus should minimize drug costs and limit nurse and physician intervention by decreasing the need for manual boluses.Increased local anesthetic consumption can cause undesirable side effects such as itchiness, decreased blood pressure and motor blockade. By assigning patients to receive the NB at 15, 30 or 45 minutes the authors hope to find the interval that provides analgesia while minimizing side effects, improving patient safety. If the bolus is given too late then there may be increased pain, less patient satisfaction, and the need for more analgesia in the form of Patient Controlled Epidural Anesthesia or a manual bolus.The authors hope that determining the NB will result in an institutional change to improve patient outcomes and facilitate knowledge transfer. This information will be the first available research to help guide other obstetrical centres using PIEB technology in determining the optimal NB interval.

Read the detailed description

Background

Enhanced epidural pump technology now supports the use of automated or programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) administration. Anesthesiologists can now program pumps to deliver small, regularly timed intermittent boluses for maintenance of labour analgesia and specify "lockout" intervals to ensure patient safety.

Several studies suggest that administration of PIB may result in a more extensive spread of local anesthetic in the epidural space and provide superior labour analgesia compared to CEI. In a recently published systematic review by George et al. (1), PIB was associated with lower anesthetic consumption, a shorter second stage of labour and greater patient satisfaction compared to CEI (1).

The optimal PIB volume and dosing interval for programmed intermittent bolus has not been determined. A small volume with a short bolus interval may be associated with similar drawbacks as continuous infusion, while a large volume bolus interval may be associated with increased breakthrough pain and reduced patient satisfaction. Wong et al. showed that extending the PIB interval from 15 min to 60 min with a larger PIB volume (10 mL vs. 2.5 mL) results in decreased anesthetic consumption without affecting patient satisfaction (3). Until recently, there was not a pump that could provide PIB along with PCEA. Smith Medical now produces the CADD pump with this feature. It ensures that that there are specific limits set to not allow "stacking" of boluses and potentially unsafe administration of local anesthetics. This pump now has more variables to program and determine the quality of labour analgesia.

A variable that has not received any research attention is the "Next Bolus" (Figure 5). "Next Bolus" (NB) determines when the first PIB bolus is given after the initiation of the epidural and starting of the pump. Currently we set this to be 15-45 minutes depending on the clinician. Determining the optimal timing of the NB is important because if the bolus is given too late there may be increased pain and less patient satisfaction. This could lead to earlier initiation of PCEA, more frequent PCEA attempts and possibly the need for physician intervention for a manual bolus. As more local anesthetic is delivered, the patient may have a decrease in blood pressure or greater motor blockade (i.e. leg weakness) than desired.

Design \& Procedure Potential participants will be identified by research personnel by communicating with the attending anesthesiologist on the Birth Unit and the Clinical Leader of Operations for the Birth Unit at the IWK Health Centre. Birth Unit nurses will receive an educational session and training provided by the research coordinator prior to study commencement. Birth unit nurses will be notified by the Clinical Leader of Operations if their patient meets study inclusion criteria. The patient's nurse will review options for labour pain relief with the patient. These options include non-pharmacological measures (baths, massage, hypnosis etc.), inhaled nitrous oxide, opioid injections, or an epidural. When labour pain management options are introduced, the nurse will provide the patient with a brochure that includes basic study information. If an epidural is requested for labour analgesia, nurses who have received education regarding the study, will ask the patient if they would be willing to speak with research staff. With their consent, participants will be approached by study personnel and informed, written consent will be obtained. As standard care in the birth unit, upon request of labour analgesia, the cervix will be measured and a baseline pain score and blood pressure will be determined.

A staff anesthesiologist will use a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique to initiate labour analgesia. As per standard practice at the IWK, an IV catheter will be in place before initiation of the technique. With the patient in the sitting position, the epidural space will be identified at the L3-4 or L2-3 interspace with a 17G, 9 cm Tuohy epidural needle using a loss of resistance to air or saline (< 1 mL) technique. A 27G, 12 cm Whitacre spinal needle will be placed into the shaft of the epidural needle and the presence of cerebrospinal fluid in the hub of the spinal needle will confirm dural puncture. Bupivicaine 0.25% 0.8 mL (2 mg) + Fentanyl 10 mcg (total 1 mL) will be injected into the intrathecal space.

Each participant will be randomly allocated (using a computer generated randomization table) to one of three groups. Group assignments will be sealed in sequentially numbered envelopes that will be opened by study personnel following the consent process. The pump will be programmed by an unblinded member of the anesthesia team (anesthesiologist or anaesthesia assistant) and maintenance epidural analgesia will be initiated in accordance with IWK policies when the epidural procedure is complete. The individual programming the pump will not be collecting data. The start time of the pump will be recorded on the envelope and the sealed envelope will be given to the study personnel. The pump will be connected and initiated once the epidural procedure is complete and will start the infusion exactly 5 minutes after the intrathecal injection. Each participant will have the same PIB settings (PIB bolus 8 mL, PIB interval 45 minutes). Group A will be assigned a NB of 15 minutes, group B 30 minutes and group C 45 minutes.

The data collection will take place in the patient's assigned labour room in the IWK Birth Unit. The CADD Solis Ambulatory Infusion System (Smiths Medical ASD, Inc., St Paul MN) will be used to administer the programmed intermittent epidural bolus doses and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). The current IWK labour analgesia standard ensures each labour room is equipped with a Smith Medical CADD pump, epidural infusion tubing and an epidural procedure tray. No new or additional supplies or personnel will be required for the study. Prior to study commencement, the research assistant will be trained by one of the investigators (anesthesiologist) on how to complete a dermatome sensory evaluation and Bromage score. In addition, the research assistant will receive training from the anesthesiologist regarding how to instruct patients to use the PCEA device. For all groups the PCEA will remain standardized. If after two confirmed PCEA doses that participant's pain is not suitably controlled the anesthesiologist will be consulted to provide a manual bolus (0.1% ropivacaine 10 mL). The patient and research personnel recording data will be blinded to the group assignment.

Data to be collected Demographic data and health history Medical record number, maternal age, height, weight, BMI.

Labour Information Gestational age, cervical dilation at initiation of CSE analgesia, duration of labour (initiation of analgesia to delivery), maximum oxytocin infusion rate during labour, mode of delivery, time from initiation of analgesia to delivery.

Analgesia Data Maintenance epidural solution volume administered from programmed intermittent bolus pump, time of first administered PCEA bolus request, number of PCEA bolus requests and delivered doses, PCEA ropivacaine dose, time to first request for manual bolus, number of manual bolus doses, manual bolus ropivacaine dose, total ropivacaine dose, highest thoracic dermatome sensory level to pin prick at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes, along with a modified Bromage score, hypotension, need for vasopressors.

Satisfaction Scores Overall maternal satisfaction scores (NRS) will be sought within one day of delivery. Patients will be asked "On a scale from 0 to 100, how satisfied were you with the pain control provided by the epidural during your labour?"

Data Collection In keeping with CONSORT guidelines all participants enrolled will be included in an intention to treat analysis. Descriptive statistics will be expressed as mean +/- standard deviation. The Student's t-test will be used for comparison of the means of continuous, normally distributed data. Two-way ANOVA or Friedman test will be used for variable differences in groups, and Bonferroni or Tukey HSD test will be used for multiple comparisons. Categorical data are to be analyzed using χ2 test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. The investigators will perform the statistical analysis, with the assistance of collaborating statistician. An interim analysis will not be conducted and α set at 0.05 for significance. A sample size of 26 per group will have an 80 % power to detect a reduction in the time to first administered PCEA request by 20 minutes at alpha=0.05. To account for any dropouts, we will aim to recruit 35 patients per group.

Conditions
Labor Pain
Being tested
Next Bolus Interval
Keywords
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus, Labour Analgesia, Pain
Medical subject headings
Labor Pain, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Next Bolus IntervalOther

    Also called Time from start of epidural pump to first dose of medication

    Next Bolus Interval 15, 30, or 45 minutes

Study groups in NCT03044392
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Next Bolus Interval 15 minutesActive comparatorNext Bolus Interval 15 minutes
Receives: Other: Next Bolus Interval
Next Bolus Interval 30 minutesActive comparatorNext Bolus Interval 30 minutes
Receives: Other: Next Bolus Interval
Next Bolus Interval 45 minutesActive comparatorNext Bolus Interval 45 minutes
Receives: Other: Next Bolus Interval

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to first administered Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) request

    The time from the start of the epidural pump to the first administered request for a PCEA bolus (in minutes).

    Measured: 360 minutes

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Pain scores

    Pain Scores (NRS 0-10) - measured at baseline, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes.

    Measured: 360 minutes

  2. Number of PCEA bolus attempts

    The number of times the patient presses a button requesting a PCEA bolus in the first 360 minutes or until delivery.

    Measured: 360 minutes

  3. Number of PCEA bolus received

    The number of PCEA boluses actually administered by the pump in the first 360 minutes or until delivery.

    Measured: 360 minutes

  4. Number of manual bolus doses administered by the anesthesiologist

    The number of times an anesthesiologist had to administer a manual bolus because pain was inadequately controlled with PCEA in the first 360 minutes or until delivery.

    Measured: 360 minutes

  5. Total local anesthetic consumption after pump initiation

    mg of ropivicaine 0.1% calculated by the CADD pump in the first 360 minutes or until delivery.

    Measured: 360 minutes

  6. Highest thoracic dermatome sensory level

    Measured by pin-prick at 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes.

    Measured: 360 minutes

  7. Modified Bromage scores measured at 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes

    Measures motor blockade, recorded at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes

    Measured: 360 minutes

  8. Maternal satisfaction with labour analgesia

    0-100%, measured within 24 hours of delivery.

    Measured: 360 minutes

  9. Occurrence of hypotension

    Defined as a 20% drop of blood pressure from baseline. Measured at baseline, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes.

    Measured: 360 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start5 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2018

Why it stopped: Another study was started using the same population and answered the same research question using more robust methodology. The new study (NCT03044392) required less research personnel time as a mathematical model was utilized.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03044392
Sponsor's protocol ID
1021552
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
23 Jan 2017
Last updated
8 May 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Next Bolus Interval in people with Labor Pain, run by IWK Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Another study was started using the same population and answered the same research question using more robust methodology. The new study (NCT03044392) required less research personnel time as a mathematical model was utilized.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to first administered Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) request (time frame: 360 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in