Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 1NCT03045497
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Treatment Response in Patients With Liver Cancer Receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization With Drug Eluting Beads
A Phase 1 study testing Perflutren Lipid Microspheres, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging and Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University.
Trial summary
This pilot clinical trial compares the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced magnetic response imaging (MRI), the current clinical standard, in predicting treatment response in patients with liver cancer receiving transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Perflutren Lipid Microspheres, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging and Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 12 Dec 2012to 5 Dec 2013
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be scheduled for a transarterial chemoembolization using drug eluting beads for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
- Be medically stable
- If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test
- Have signed Informed Consent to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Females who are pregnant or nursing
- Patients who are medically unstable, patients who are seriously or terminally ill, and patients whose clinical course is unpredictable; for example:
- Patients on life support or in a critical care unit
- Patients with unstable occlusive disease (eg, crescendo angina)
- Patients with clinically unstable cardiac arrhythmias, such as recurrent ventricular tachycardia
- Patients with uncontrolled congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class IV)
Show all 15Show fewer
- Patients with recent cerebral hemorrhage
- Patients with clinically significant and unstable renal disease (eg, transplant recipients in rejection)
- Patients who have undergone surgery within 24 hours prior to the study sonographic examination
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to perflutren
- Patients who have received any contrast medium (x-ray, MRI, computed tomography [CT], or ultrasound [US]) in the 24 hours prior to the research US exam
- Patients with cardiac shunts
- Patients with congenital heart defects
- Patients with severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, or a history of pulmonary emboli
- Patients with respiratory distress syndrome
About this study
Official title: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Transarterial Chemoembolization With Drug Eluting Beads
This pilot clinical trial compares the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced magnetic response imaging (MRI), the current clinical standard, in predicting treatment response in patients with liver cancer receiving transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads. Comparing results of diagnostic procedures before and after transarterial chemoembolization may help doctors predict a patient's response to treatment and help plan the best treatment. It is not yet known if contrast-enhanced ultrasound works better than contrast-enhanced MRI in predicting treatment response in patients with liver cancer.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Evaluate if contrast-enhanced ultrasound of hepatocellular carcinomas at one to two weeks and one month correlate with the clinical evaluation standard of a contrast-enhanced MRI at one month (the current clinical standard) in patients who have undergone transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Establish whether changes in quantitative blood flow parameters relative to baseline correlate with effective embolization.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Perflutren Lipid Microspheres, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging, Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Perflutren Lipid MicrospheresDrug
Also called Definity
Given IV
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound ImagingDevice
Undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingDevice
Also called Contrast-enhanced MRI
Undergo contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) | Experimental | Patients receive perflutren lipid microspheres IV and then undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging over approximately 1 hour prior to transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads, at 1-2 weeks and 1 month post transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads. Patients also undergo contrast-enhanced MRI at 1 month post-treatment per standard of care. Receives: Drug: Perflutren Lipid Microspheres; Device: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging; Device: Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict response to transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of hepatocellular carcinomas at one month will be evaluated to see if it correlates with the clinical evaluation standard of a contrast-enhanced MRI at one month. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test. Inter- and intra-observer variability will also be calculated.
Measured: Up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in quantitative blood flow parameters
Whether changes in quantitative blood flow parameters relative to baseline correlate with effective embolization will be established.
Measured: Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Quantitative parameters of tumor vascularity
Measured: Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Changes in perfusion
Measured: Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Changes in contrast fill time
Measured: Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Feb 2017 (estimated)
- Study start12 Dec 2012
- Primary completion5 Dec 2013
- Study completion5 Dec 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Flemming Forsberg, PhD, Principal investigator, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03045497
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12D.614
- Other IDs
- JT 2999
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 2 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Transarterial Chemoembolization With Drug Eluting Beads
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03045497
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12D.614
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Dec 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Feb 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This pilot clinical trial compares the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to contrast-enhanced magnetic response imaging (MRI), the current clinical standard, in predicting treatment response in patients with liver cancer receiving transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads. Comparing results of diagnostic procedures before and after transarterial chemoembolization may help doctors predict a patient's response to treatment and help plan the best treatment. It is not yet known if contrast-enhanced ultrasound works better than contrast-enhanced MRI in predicting treatment response in patients with liver cancer.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Evaluate if contrast-enhanced ultrasound of hepatocellular carcinomas at one to two weeks and one month correlate with the clinical evaluation standard of a contrast-enhanced MRI at one month (the current clinical standard) in patients who have undergone transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Establish whether changes in quantitative blood flow parameters relative to baseline correlate with effective embolization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) | Experimental | Drug: Perflutren Lipid Microspheres, Device: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging, Device: Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingPatients receive perflutren lipid microspheres IV and then undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging over approximately 1 hour prior to transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads, at 1-2 weeks and 1 month post transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads. Patients also undergo contrast-enhanced MRI at 1 month post-treatment per standard of care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Be scheduled for a transarterial chemoembolization using drug eluting beads for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
- Be medically stable
- If a female of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test
- Have signed Informed Consent to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Females who are pregnant or nursing
- Patients who are medically unstable, patients who are seriously or terminally ill, and patients whose clinical course is unpredictable; for example:
- Patients with recent cerebral hemorrhage
- Patients with clinically significant and unstable renal disease (eg, transplant recipients in rejection)
- Patients who have undergone surgery within 24 hours prior to the study sonographic examination
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Perflutren Lipid MicrospheresAlso: DefinityGiven IV | Drug | Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) |
| Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound ImagingUndergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging | Device | Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) |
| Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlso: Contrast-enhanced MRIUndergo contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Device | Diagnostic (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) |
Primary outcome
Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict response to transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads
Time frame: Up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of hepatocellular carcinomas at one month will be evaluated to see if it correlates with the clinical evaluation standard of a contrast-enhanced MRI at one month. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value will be calculated for the contrast-enhanced ultrasound exam. Correlations between these findings and both contrast-enhanced MRI findings and patient outcomes will be compared using the Fisher exact test. Inter- and intra-observer variability will also be calculated.
4 secondary outcomes
Change in quantitative blood flow parameters
Time frame: Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Quantitative parameters of tumor vascularity
Time frame: Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Changes in perfusion
Time frame: Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Changes in contrast fill time
Time frame: Baseline to up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 May 2025.
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer CenterLink provided by the sponsor.
- Thomas Jefferson University HospitalLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Flemming Forsberg, PhD principal investigator
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Perflutren Lipid Microspheres, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging and Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict response to transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads (time frame: Up to 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2025.