Biliary Tract NeoplasmsPhase 2NCT03046862
Durvalumab(MEDI4736)/Tremelimumab in Combination With Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Chemotherapy-naïve Biliary Tract Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Durvalumab, Tremelimumab and Gemcitabine in people with Biliary Tract Neoplasms, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
<Research Hypothesis> The dynamics of immune systems by cytotoxic chemotherapy and its changes by combination with immuno-oncology agents will be uncovered. The combination of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab with gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy is feasible and efficacious in chemo-naïve biliary tract cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Biliary Tract Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Durvalumab, Tremelimumab and Gemcitabine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 25 Feb 2017to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically proven BTC, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, ampulla of vater cancer
- Unresectable or recurrent
- chemotherapy -naïve for their unresectable or recurrent cancer (Previous expose to adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed)
- should have measurable lesion
- ECOG 0, 1
- Without previous expose to immune-oncology agents including anti-CTLA4, anti-PD1, anti-PDL1, etc
Show all 9Show fewer
- Adequate organ function
- : ANC>1500/mm3, platelet>100K/mm3, HgB>9 g/Dl, bilirubin<1.5 x ULN, ALT/AST<2.5 X UNL, (in case of liver metastasis, <5 Xunl), Cr<1.5 mg/Dl
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Previous treatment for unresectable or recurrent cancer
- Under immunosuppressive agents higher than equivalent dose of prednisone 10mg/day
- Uncontrolled disease such as current active infection, congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, arrhythmia, interstitial lung disease
- Current active pulmonary tuberculosis
- Current active hepatitis B or hepatitis C (simple carrier is allowed)
- anti-HIV (+)
- Pregnant, breast-feeding women
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Biomarker-oriented Study of Durvalumab(MEDI4736)/Tremelimumab in Combination With Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Chemotherapy-naïve Biliary Tract Cancer
<Research Hypothesis> The dynamics of immune systems by cytotoxic chemotherapy and its changes by combination with immuno-oncology agents will be uncovered.
The combination of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab with gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy is feasible and efficacious in chemo-naïve biliary tract cancer.
<Purpose of the study> To assess the effect of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin on response rate (RR) in chemo-naïve advanced biliary tract cancer patients.
Read the detailed description
<Rationale for conducting this study>
- Rational #1. The incidence of biliary tract cancer (BTC) is higher in Korea than the West. (Korea: 10 new cases/100,000 population every year, the West:1-2 cases/100,100 population every year). Therefore, to conduct clinical study of BTC in Korea is very feasible and efficient.
- Rational #2 The Gemcitabine/cisplatin is the current standard of care in 1st-line treatment for advanced BTC ((N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (14): 1273-81). No one-targeted therapy has been approved in BTC, yet. The overall survival of advanced BTC with cytotoxic chemotherapy is only 8-10 months, in general. Therefore, there is a huge unmet medical need.
- Rational #3 In recent sequencing data of BTC showed the BTC patients with the worse prognosis had significant enrichment of hypermutated tumors and a characteristic elevation in the expression of immune checkpoint molecules. According, immune-modulating therapies also be potentially promising options for these patients (Nat Genet. 2015 Sep;47(9):1003-10.)
- Rational #4 In PDL1 (+) BTC, anti-PD1 Ab shows promising activity as a monotherapy (Bang YJ, et al. ECC/ESMO 2015) In one clinical study of pembrolizumab, 37 out of 89 BTC patients (41.6%) showed the PDL1 (+) tumor. Among 24 PDL1 (+) patients who were enrolled and treated with pembrolizumab, 50% were Asian, 62.5% had ECOG 1, 16.7% had gallbladder cancer, 80% were at the 3rd-line or later setting. Four patients showed PR (3 from Seoul National University Hospital), 4 patients SD, which led the overall response rate of 17.4%. A total 40% of patients showed tumor shrinkage. The decreases in tumor size were generally maintained over time. This study gives us the evidence that immune checkpoint inhibitor is working on BTC likewise other solid tumors.
- Rational #5 In recent studies have shown the combination of CTLA4 inhibitor with anti-PD1/PDL1 agents shows the enhanced clinical activities, especially, regardless of PDL1 status. This combination strategy is being actively under test in many solid tumors.
- Rational #6 Certain chemotherapeutic drugs stimulate cancer-specific immune responses by inducing immunogenic cell death and other effector mechanisms (Immunity 2013, Annu Rev Immunol 2013) With the cytotoxic chemotherapy, the PDL-1 is induced and this increased expression of PDL1 contributes the resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Successful eradication of tumors by immunogenic chemotherapy requires removal of immunosuppressive IgA+, PDL1+plasmocytes (Nature 2015). More importantly, still vast majorities of dynamic changes of immune system by cytotoxic chemotherapy are unanswered. These support that the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with immuno-oncology agents including immune checkpoint inhibitors might be efficacious and needed.
- Rational #7 The advantages of "Immunotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy" combination are; 1) can explore science on the dynamic immunologic changes by cytotoxic chemotherapy and its overcome by immunotherapy 2) easy way to be incorporated in the current clinical practice 3) can be applied to variety of tumor types such as NSCLC, urothelial cancer. 4) relatively affordable than "immunotherapy and targeted agent" combination. Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy has not been tested, especially in BTC.
<Sample Size Determination> Primary efficacy endpoint is response rate. In BTC, the response rate of 1st-line gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy is about 20% (20% in BT22 clinical trial, 25% in ABC-02 clinical trial). Therefore, we set H0 as 20%, and H1 as 40%. Using 75% of power and a-error of 0.05, a total 28 patients will be needed. When we assume the drop-out rate of 10%, a total of 31 patients will be enrolled.
- Conditions
- Biliary Tract Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Durvalumab, Tremelimumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin
- Medical subject headings
- Biliary Tract Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DurvalumabDrug
Also called MEDI4736
Durvalumab 1.12 g iv on D1 every 3 weeks
TremelimumabDrug
Tremelimumab 75mg iv on D1 every 3 weeks
GemcitabineDrug
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 iv on D1\& D8 every 3 weeks
CisplatinDrug
Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 iv on D1\& D8 every 3 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Durvalumab/Tremelimumab+chemotherapy | Experimental | Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin. Receives: Drug: Durvalumab; Drug: Tremelimumab; Drug: Gemcitabine; Drug: Cisplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Response rate
According to RECIST v1.1 criteria
Measured: 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Disease control rate
the percentage of patients who have achieved complete response, partial response and stable disease
Measured: 6 weeks
Progression-free survival
Time from randomization until disease progression or death
Measured: 6 weeks
Duration of response
Time from documentation of tumor response to disease progression
Measured: 1 year
Overall survival
Time from randomization until death from any cause
Measured: 1 year
Quality-of-life as measured by EORTC QLQ-BIL21
EORTC QLQ-BIL21
Measured: 1 year
Overall response rate
According to immune-related response criteria
Measured: 6 week
Safety and tolerability as measured by number and grade of toxicity events
CTCAE V4.1
Measured: 6 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2017 (estimated)
- Study start25 Feb 2017
- Primary completion30 May 2020
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Biliary Tract NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Do-Youn Oh, Seoul National University Hospital
- Investigators
- Do-Youn Oh, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Seoul National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03046862
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BTC-1st MEDITREME
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Oh DY, Lee KH, Lee DW, Yoon J, Kim TY, Bang JH, Nam AR, Oh KS, Kim JM, Lee Y, Guthrie V, McCoon P, Li W, Wu S, Zhang Q, Rebelatto MC, Kim JW. Gemcitabine and cisplatin plus durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an open-label, single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;7(6):522-532. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00043-7. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
PubMed 35278356
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Biomarker-oriented Study of Durvalumab(MEDI4736)/Tremelimumab in Combination With Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Chemotherapy-naïve Biliary Tract Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03046862
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BTC-1st MEDITREME
- Conditions
- Biliary Tract Neoplasms
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
<Research Hypothesis> The dynamics of immune systems by cytotoxic chemotherapy and its changes by combination with immuno-oncology agents will be uncovered.
The combination of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab with gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy is feasible and efficacious in chemo-naïve biliary tract cancer.
<Purpose of the study> To assess the effect of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin on response rate (RR) in chemo-naïve advanced biliary tract cancer patients.
Detailed description
<Rationale for conducting this study>
- Rational #1. The incidence of biliary tract cancer (BTC) is higher in Korea than the West. (Korea: 10 new cases/100,000 population every year, the West:1-2 cases/100,100 population every year). Therefore, to conduct clinical study of BTC in Korea is very feasible and efficient.
- Rational #2 The Gemcitabine/cisplatin is the current standard of care in 1st-line treatment for advanced BTC ((N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (14): 1273-81). No one-targeted therapy has been approved in BTC, yet. The overall survival of advanced BTC with cytotoxic chemotherapy is only 8-10 months, in general. Therefore, there is a huge unmet medical need.
- Rational #3 In recent sequencing data of BTC showed the BTC patients with the worse prognosis had significant enrichment of hypermutated tumors and a characteristic elevation in the expression of immune checkpoint molecules. According, immune-modulating therapies also be potentially promising options for these patients (Nat Genet. 2015 Sep;47(9):1003-10.)
- Rational #4 In PDL1 (+) BTC, anti-PD1 Ab shows promising activity as a monotherapy (Bang YJ, et al. ECC/ESMO 2015) In one clinical study of pembrolizumab, 37 out of 89 BTC patients (41.6%) showed the PDL1 (+) tumor. Among 24 PDL1 (+) patients who were enrolled and treated with pembrolizumab, 50% were Asian, 62.5% had ECOG 1, 16.7% had gallbladder cancer, 80% were at the 3rd-line or later setting. Four patients showed PR (3 from Seoul National University Hospital), 4 patients SD, which led the overall response rate of 17.4%. A total 40% of patients showed tumor shrinkage. The decreases in tumor size were generally maintained over time. This study gives us the evidence that immune checkpoint inhibitor is working on BTC likewise other solid tumors.
- Rational #5 In recent studies have shown the combination of CTLA4 inhibitor with anti-PD1/PDL1 agents shows the enhanced clinical activities, especially, regardless of PDL1 status. This combination strategy is being actively under test in many solid tumors.
- Rational #6 Certain chemotherapeutic drugs stimulate cancer-specific immune responses by inducing immunogenic cell death and other effector mechanisms (Immunity 2013, Annu Rev Immunol 2013) With the cytotoxic chemotherapy, the PDL-1 is induced and this increased expression of PDL1 contributes the resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Successful eradication of tumors by immunogenic chemotherapy requires removal of immunosuppressive IgA+, PDL1+plasmocytes (Nature 2015). More importantly, still vast majorities of dynamic changes of immune system by cytotoxic chemotherapy are unanswered. These support that the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with immuno-oncology agents including immune checkpoint inhibitors might be efficacious and needed.
- Rational #7 The advantages of "Immunotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy" combination are; 1) can explore science on the dynamic immunologic changes by cytotoxic chemotherapy and its overcome by immunotherapy 2) easy way to be incorporated in the current clinical practice 3) can be applied to variety of tumor types such as NSCLC, urothelial cancer. 4) relatively affordable than "immunotherapy and targeted agent" combination. Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy has not been tested, especially in BTC.
<Sample Size Determination> Primary efficacy endpoint is response rate. In BTC, the response rate of 1st-line gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy is about 20% (20% in BT22 clinical trial, 25% in ABC-02 clinical trial). Therefore, we set H0 as 20%, and H1 as 40%. Using 75% of power and a-error of 0.05, a total 28 patients will be needed. When we assume the drop-out rate of 10%, a total of 31 patients will be enrolled.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Durvalumab/Tremelimumab+chemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Durvalumab, Drug: Tremelimumab, Drug: Gemcitabine, Drug: CisplatinDurvalumab and Tremelimumab in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Histologically proven BTC, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, ampulla of vater cancer
- Unresectable or recurrent
- chemotherapy -naïve for their unresectable or recurrent cancer (Previous expose to adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed)
- should have measurable lesion
- ECOG 0, 1
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Previous treatment for unresectable or recurrent cancer
- Under immunosuppressive agents higher than equivalent dose of prednisone 10mg/day
- Uncontrolled disease such as current active infection, congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, arrhythmia, interstitial lung disease
- Current active pulmonary tuberculosis
- Current active hepatitis B or hepatitis C (simple carrier is allowed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DurvalumabAlso: MEDI4736Durvalumab 1.12 g iv on D1 every 3 weeks | Drug | Durvalumab/Tremelimumab+chemotherapy |
| TremelimumabTremelimumab 75mg iv on D1 every 3 weeks | Drug | Durvalumab/Tremelimumab+chemotherapy |
| GemcitabineGemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 iv on D1\& D8 every 3 weeks | Drug | Durvalumab/Tremelimumab+chemotherapy |
| CisplatinCisplatin 25 mg/m2 iv on D1\& D8 every 3 weeks | Drug | Durvalumab/Tremelimumab+chemotherapy |
Primary outcome
Response rate
Time frame: 6 weeks
According to RECIST v1.1 criteria
7 secondary outcomes
Disease control rate
Time frame: 6 weeks
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 6 weeks
Duration of response
Time frame: 1 year
Overall survival
Time frame: 1 year
Quality-of-life as measured by EORTC QLQ-BIL21
Time frame: 1 year
Overall response rate
Time frame: 6 week
Safety and tolerability as measured by number and grade of toxicity events
Time frame: 6 week
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35278356Oh DY, Lee KH, Lee DW, Yoon J, Kim TY, Bang JH, Nam AR, Oh KS, Kim JM, Lee Y, Guthrie V, McCoon P, Li W, Wu S, Zhang Q, Rebelatto MC, Kim JW. Gemcitabine and cisplatin plus durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an open-label, single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;7(6):522-532. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00043-7. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Biliary Tract Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of CTX-009 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Unresectable Advanced, Metastatic or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers (COMPANION-002)
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Tissue Procurement and Natural History Study of Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma
Thymoma, Stomach Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Combination With Propranolol and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Hepatopancreabiliary Tumors (BLOCKED)
Pancreatic Cancer, Hepatocellular Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Capecitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Biliary Tract Cancer
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Do-Youn Oh, MD, PhD principal investigator
Seoul National University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Durvalumab, Tremelimumab and Gemcitabine in people with Biliary Tract Neoplasms, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Response rate (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03046862, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2024.