HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast CancerPhase 2CONCEPTNCT03048942
Pilot Study of Cabazitaxel and Paclitaxel in HER2 Negative Breast Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Cabazitaxel and Paclitaxel in people with HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust at 13 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
90 patients with HER2 negative breast cancer will be randomised to receive 18 weeks of chemotherapy treatment, either 6 cycles of 3 weekly Cabazitaxel or 6 cycles of weekly Paclitaxel to determine the difference in progression free survival between the 2 groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Cabazitaxel and Paclitaxel
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 158 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 18 Dec 2014to 19 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent
- Metastatic breast cancer fit to receive cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic disease
- Measurable disease as per RECIST 1.1
- HER2 negative defined as ICH 0+, 1+ or 2+ and FISH/SISH/CISH(ration<2.0) in the case of IHC 2+
- ECOG performance status 0 or 1
- ER+ve or ER-ve
Show all 14Show fewer
- Female age ≥18 years
- Anticipated life expectancy > 6 months
- Haemoglobin >10.0g/DL
- Absolute neutrophil count>1.5 x 10^9/L
- Platelet count>100 x 10^9/L
- ALT/SGPT<1.5 X ULN
- Serum creatinine <1.5 x ULN
- Negative pregnancy test for all women of child bearing potential
Who cannot join
- Grade ≥2 oral mucositis or peripheral or sensory neuropathy
- History of other malignancy
- History of severe hypersensitivity ≥grade 3 to polysorbate 80- containing drugs and taxanes
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- Any acute or chronic medical condition
- Acute infection requiring systemic antibiotics or antifungal medication
Show all 19Show fewer
- Sex hormones
- Administration of any live vaccine within 8 weeks
- Concurrent or planned treatment with strong inhibitors or strong inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4/5
- Participation in another clinical trial with an investigational drug within 30 days of randomisation
- Pregnant or breast feeding women
- Contraindications to the use of corticosteroid treatment
- HER2 Positive breast cancer
- Previous Paclitaxel chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting
- Previous cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic disease
- Palliative radiotherapy for metastatic disease within 4 weeks of randomisation
- Symptomatic brain metastases confirmed with CT/MRI brain
- History of other malignancy
- Grade 2
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom13 sites
Royal United Hospital
Bath
Blackpool Victoria Hospital
Blackpool
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Horfield Road
Bristol, BS2 8ED
Velindre Cancer Centre
Cardiff
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
Exeter
Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust
London, W6 8RF
Guy's Hospital
London
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle
City Hospital, Nottingham
Nottingham
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth
Musgrove Park Hospital
Taunton
Royal Cornwall and Treliske
Truro
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Worcester
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Phase II Pilot Study of 3 Weekly Cabazitaxel Versus Weekly Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in the First Line Treatment of HER2 Negative Breast Cancer
90 patients with HER2 negative breast cancer will be randomised to receive 18 weeks of chemotherapy treatment, either 6 cycles of 3 weekly Cabazitaxel or 6 cycles of weekly Paclitaxel to determine the difference in progression free survival between the 2 groups. If results at that stage suggest a potential benefit then the trial will be developed further to accrue 70 more patients.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective multicentre, randomised, open label, study comparing the efficacy and the safety of six 3-weekly cycles cabazitaxel versus 18 x weekly paclitaxel given as first line chemotherapy treatment in patients with HER2-normal metastatic breast cancer. Randomisation will be conducted by a 1:1 ratio.
- Conditions
- HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Cabazitaxel, Paclitaxel
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, HER2 negative, Cabazitaxel, Paclitaxel, Chemotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CabazitaxelDrug
Also called Jevtana
3 weekly cyctotoxic chemotherapy
PaclitaxelDrug
Weekly cyctotoxic chemotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cabazitaxel | Experimental | 6 cycles of cabazitaxel intravenous chemotherapy 25mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21 day cycle Receives: Drug: Cabazitaxel |
| Paclitaxel | Active comparator | 6 cycles of Paclitaxel intravenous chemotherapy 80mg/m2 on days 1,8 and 15 of each 21 day cycle. Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival
Duration of progression free survival
Measured: Defined as the time from randomisation to either disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years.
Secondary outcomes (8)
Clinical Benefit Rate
Defined as stable disease rate + partial response rate+complete response rate according to RECIST 1.1 criteria
Measured: At the completion of 6 cycles of chemotherapy, which is after 18 weeks
Objective Response Rate
Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT scan every 6 weeks. Tumours were assessed at baseline and compared to the response seen at the completion of treatment. Only responses seen within the 6 cycles of treatment e.g. up to and including the end of treatment tumour assessment are included in this measure.
CR - Disappearance of all target lesions; PR >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
Measured: At completion of 6 cycles of chemotherapy, which is after 18 weeks.
Overall Survival
Survival duration from randomisation to date of death.
Measured: Determined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause. Average survival rates for this population may be approximately 18 months.
Time to Next Chemotherapy Treatment
time from randomisation to another chemotherapy treatment after confirmed progression.
Measured: Measured from from the date of the last day of trial treatment. approximately after progression which on average would be after 12 months.
Time to Response
Time taken for tumour burden to respond to treatment
Measured: Determined by time from randomisation to radiological partial response. This was sometimes seen after treatment end but all responses occurred by 8 months from randomisation therefore within 32 weeks.
Assessment of EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
EQ-5D-5L will be assessed at baseline, prior to cycle 3 and cycle 5 and at the end of treatment. The patients answer 5 questions which have 5 possible answers from no issue to extreme issue. The answers are given a code, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 with 1 for no issue through to 5 for extreme issues which results in a 5 digit 'health state' for that time point. Using a formula this is translated into the 'EQ-5D index value' where 1 is full health and 0 is the worst health. This is what is presented here, the lower the score the worse the quality of life.
Measured: EQ5D-5L and FACT B will be completed at baseline, prior to cycle 3 (approximately Day 63), prior to cycle 5 (approximately Day 105) and at the end of treatment visit, (approximately 21 weeks)
Assessment of EQ-5D-5L VAS Score
EQ-5D-5L VAS score was assessed at baseline, prior to cycle 3 and 5 and at the end of treatment. Patients are asked to score their health on a scale 0-100, the higher the score the better they are feeling.
Measured: EQ5D-5L and FACT B will be completed at baseline, prior to cycle 3 (approximately Day 63), prior to cycle 5 (approximately Day 105) and at the end of treatment visit, (approximately 21 weeks)
Assessment of FACT-B Questionnaire
FACT-B will be assessed at baseline, prior to cycle 3 and cycle 5 and at the end of treatment. The patients answer 37 questions which have 5 possible answers from not at all to very much. The answers are given a code, 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 with 0 for not at all through to 4 for very much. The scores are reversed and then totalled to give a value out of 148. This is what is presented here, the higher the score the better the quality of life.
Measured: EQ5D-5L and FACT B will be completed at baseline, prior to cycle 3 (approximately Day 63), prior to cycle 5 (approximately Day 105) and at the end of treatment visit, (approximately 21 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2017 (estimated)
- Study start18 Dec 2014
- Primary completion26 Apr 2021
- Study completion19 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Amit K Bahl, Principal investigator, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03048942
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ON/2012/4234
- Acronym
- CONCEPT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Phase II Pilot Study of 3 Weekly Cabazitaxel Versus Weekly Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in the First Line Treatment of HER2 Negative Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03048942
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CONCEPT / ON/2012/4234
- Conditions
- HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, HER2 negative, Cabazitaxel, Paclitaxel, Chemotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Jul 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
90 patients with HER2 negative breast cancer will be randomised to receive 18 weeks of chemotherapy treatment, either 6 cycles of 3 weekly Cabazitaxel or 6 cycles of weekly Paclitaxel to determine the difference in progression free survival between the 2 groups. If results at that stage suggest a potential benefit then the trial will be developed further to accrue 70 more patients.
Detailed description
This is a prospective multicentre, randomised, open label, study comparing the efficacy and the safety of six 3-weekly cycles cabazitaxel versus 18 x weekly paclitaxel given as first line chemotherapy treatment in patients with HER2-normal metastatic breast cancer. Randomisation will be conducted by a 1:1 ratio.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cabazitaxel | Experimental | Drug: Cabazitaxel6 cycles of cabazitaxel intravenous chemotherapy 25mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21 day cycle |
| Paclitaxel | Active comparator | Drug: Paclitaxel6 cycles of Paclitaxel intravenous chemotherapy 80mg/m2 on days 1,8 and 15 of each 21 day cycle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Written informed consent
- Metastatic breast cancer fit to receive cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic disease
- Measurable disease as per RECIST 1.1
- HER2 negative defined as ICH 0+, 1+ or 2+ and FISH/SISH/CISH(ration<2.0) in the case of IHC 2+
- ECOG performance status 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Grade ≥2 oral mucositis or peripheral or sensory neuropathy
- History of other malignancy
- History of severe hypersensitivity ≥grade 3 to polysorbate 80- containing drugs and taxanes
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- Any acute or chronic medical condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CabazitaxelAlso: Jevtana3 weekly cyctotoxic chemotherapy | Drug | Cabazitaxel |
| PaclitaxelWeekly cyctotoxic chemotherapy | Drug | Paclitaxel |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: Defined as the time from randomisation to either disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years.
Duration of progression free survival
8 secondary outcomes
Clinical Benefit Rate
Time frame: At the completion of 6 cycles of chemotherapy, which is after 18 weeks
Objective Response Rate
Time frame: At completion of 6 cycles of chemotherapy, which is after 18 weeks.
Overall Survival
Time frame: Determined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause. Average survival rates for this population may be approximately 18 months.
Time to Next Chemotherapy Treatment
Time frame: Measured from from the date of the last day of trial treatment. approximately after progression which on average would be after 12 months.
Time to Response
Time frame: Determined by time from randomisation to radiological partial response. This was sometimes seen after treatment end but all responses occurred by 8 months from randomisation therefore within 32 weeks.
Assessment of EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: EQ5D-5L and FACT B will be completed at baseline, prior to cycle 3 (approximately Day 63), prior to cycle 5 (approximately Day 105) and at the end of treatment visit, (approximately 21 weeks)
Assessment of EQ-5D-5L VAS Score
Time frame: EQ5D-5L and FACT B will be completed at baseline, prior to cycle 3 (approximately Day 63), prior to cycle 5 (approximately Day 105) and at the end of treatment visit, (approximately 21 weeks)
Assessment of FACT-B Questionnaire
Time frame: EQ5D-5L and FACT B will be completed at baseline, prior to cycle 3 (approximately Day 63), prior to cycle 5 (approximately Day 105) and at the end of treatment visit, (approximately 21 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of CSF Samples From Participants With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ Breast Cancer With no Prior History Nor Active Radiographically Detectable Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Effects of GDC-4198 in Combination With Letrozole, Fulvestrant, or Giredestrant in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negatve Breast Cancer
Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Inavolisib in Participants With Endocrine-resistant, PIK3CA-mutated, Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Phase 3 Study of RLY-2608 + Fulvestrant vs Capivasertib + Fulvestrant as Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic PIK3CA-mutant HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer
PIK3CA Mutation, HER2- Negative Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Prospective Study to Evaluate the Clinical Utility of ctDNA Tumor Fraction (TF) for Detection of Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1) Mutations in (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)
Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amit K Bahl principal investigator
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cabazitaxel and Paclitaxel in people with HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust at 13 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jul 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (time frame: Defined as the time from randomisation to either disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.