AzTrials
AzTrials

Lower Extremities FractureNCT03051022

Comparison Between Dexamethasone and Morphine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Post-operative Analgesia

A study testing Dexamethasone 8 mg and Morphine 2 mg in people with Lower Extremities Fracture, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aimed to compare the effectivity of dexamethasone 8 mg and morphine 2 mg as an adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine 0,125% 12,5mg for post-operative analgesia in lower extremities. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Lower Extremities Fracture
What is being tested?
Dexamethasone 8 mg and Morphine 2 mg
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
64 participants
Where
1 siteIndonesia
Study dates
1 May 2016to 31 Mar 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects aged 18-60 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II and body mass index (BMI) 18,5-25 kg/m2 who were planned to undergo lower extremity surgery
  • Subjects have been explained about the study, have agreed to enroll and have signed the informed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Subjects with history of bupivacaine allergy
  • Subjects with history of morphine allergy
  • Subjects with history of urine retention
  • Subjects with history of gait disturbance or using prosthetic, Subjects with history of peptic ulcer
  • Subjects with history of long term use of corticosteroid
  • Subjects with contraindications for epidural anesthesia
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Subjects rejected to participate in the study.
  • Drop out criteria:
  • Subjects with epidural anesthesia complications (e.g. shock, anaphylactic reaction, seizures, severe respiratory disturbance)
  • Subjects with failed epidural anesthesia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Indonesia1 site
  • Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital

    Central Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, 10430

Other trials in Indonesia

About this study

Official title: The Comparison Between Dexamethasone and Morphine as an Adjuvant to Epidural Bupivacaine for Post-operative Analgesia in Lower Extremity Surgery

The study aimed to compare the effectivity of dexamethasone 8 mg and morphine 2 mg as an adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine 0,125% 12,5mg for post-operative analgesia in lower extremities.

Read the detailed description

Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study and randomized into two groups. Intravenous (IV) cannula with Ringer Lactate fluid, non-invasive blood pressure monitor, electrocardiogram (ECG) and pulse-oxymetry were set on the subjects in the operation room. Epidural catheter was inserted (4 cm depth inside the epidural space) with 1,5-2 mg IV midazolam and 50 mcg IV fentanyl as premedication. The catheter insertion was confirmed with vacuum aspiration and negative test-dose. General anesthesia induction was done by fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, and atracurium 0,5 mg/kg. Maintenance was done by sevoflurane 2vol%, fentanyl and atracurium. Surgery starts without intraoperative epidural regimen. Surgery duration, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) were recorded. For post-operative analgesia, subjects received paracetamol 1 gr IV and intermittent epidural analgesia regimen in a 10 cc syringe: Group 1 received Bupivacaine 0,125% 12,5 mg combined with dexamethasone 8 mg plus 0,9% sodium chloride (NaCl) until the volume was 10 cc; Group 2 received Bupivacaine 0,125% 12,5 mg combined with morphine 2 mg plus 0,9% NaCl until the volume was 10 cc. The injection was given by anesthesiology residents without knowing the syringe's content. Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) morphine was given in the recovery room. Data recorded were blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, visual analog scale, side effects, the time when first additional analgesia was needed by subjects, the opioid requirement within 24 hours post-operation. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, for numerical data using unpaired T-test or Mann-Whitney-U test, for categorical data using Chi-square or Fisher Exact Test. Data normality was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Significant value is p<0.05.

Being tested
Dexamethasone 8 mg, Morphine 2 mg
Keywords
Bupivacaine, adjuvant, regional anesthesia, dexamethasone, morphine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dexamethasone 8 mgDrug

    Also called 0.9 % sodium chloride, 12.5 mg of 0.125% bupivacaine

    Dexamethasone 8 mg was given via epidural catheter as an adjuvant to 12.5 mg of 0.125% bupivacaine in 10 cc syringe and added with 0.9% sodium chloride until the volume was 10 cc.

  • Morphine 2 mgDrug

    Also called 0.9% sodium chloride, 12.5 mg of 0.125% bupivacaine

    Morphine 2 mg was given via epidural catheter as an adjuvant to 12.5 mg of 0.125% bupivacaine in 10 cc syringe and added with 0.9% sodium chloride until the volume was 10 cc.

Study groups in NCT03051022
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dexamethasone 8 mgActive comparatorBupivacaine 0,125% 12,5 mg combined with dexamethasone 8 mg plus NaCl 0,9% until the volume was 10 cc, prepared in a 10 cc syringe.
Receives: Drug: Dexamethasone 8 mg
Morphine 2 mgActive comparatorBupivacaine 0,125% 12,5 mg combined with morphine 2 mg plus NaCl 0,9% until the volume was 10 cc, prepared in a 10 cc syringe.
Receives: Drug: Morphine 2 mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The degree of pain at 24-hours post-operative

    The degree of pain was measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Measured: 24 hours post-operative

  2. The time for first requested post-operative additional analgesia

    How long (in minutes) until the subject requested for an additional analgesics after surgery.

    Measured: 24 hours post-operative

  3. The opioid requirement with the first 24-hours post-operative

    Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) measured the opioid requirement in milligram.

    Measured: 24-hours post-operative

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Side Effects

    Side effects measured were incidences of nausea/vomiting, motoric inhibition, sedation, respiratory depression, hypotension

    Measured: 24-hours post-operative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2017
  2. Study start1 May 2016
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2016
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
64 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03051022
Sponsor's protocol ID
IndonesiaUAnes008
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
5 Feb 2017
Last updated
18 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Pakzad H, Roffey DM, Knight H, Dagenais S, Yelle JD, Wai EK. Delay in operative stabilization of spine fractures in multitrauma patients without neurologic injuries: effects on outcomes. Can J Surg. 2011 Aug;54(4):270-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008810.

    PubMed 21651838
  • Nicola R. Early Total Care versus Damage Control: Current Concepts in the Orthopedic Care of Polytrauma Patients. ISRN Orthop. 2013 Mar 21;2013:329452. doi: 10.1155/2013/329452. eCollection 2013.

    PubMed 24959356
  • Xing D, Chen Y, Ma JX, Song DH, Wang J, Yang Y, Feng R, Lu J, Ma XL. A methodological systematic review of early versus late stabilization of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Eur Spine J. 2013 Oct;22(10):2157-66. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2624-1. Epub 2012 Dec 22.

    PubMed 23263169
  • Ramsay MA. Acute postoperative pain management. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2000 Jul;13(3):244-7. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2000.11927683. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16389390
  • Voscopoulos C, Lema M. When does acute pain become chronic? Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105 Suppl 1:i69-85. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq323.

    PubMed 21148657
  • Garimella V, Cellini C. Postoperative pain control. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Sep;26(3):191-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351138.

    PubMed 24436674
  • Moraca RJ, Sheldon DG, Thirlby RC. The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practice. Ann Surg. 2003 Nov;238(5):663-73. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094300.36689.ad.

    PubMed 14578727
  • Becker DE, Reed KL. Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology. Anesth Prog. 2006 Fall;53(3):98-108; quiz 109-10. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2006)53[98:EOLAP]2.0.CO;2.

    PubMed 17175824
  • Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012 Summer;59(2):90-101; quiz 102-3. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.2.90.

    PubMed 22822998
  • Mercanoglu E, Alanoglu Z, Ekmekci P, Demiralp S, Alkis N. Comparison of intravenous morphine, epidural morphine with/ without bupivacaine or ropivacaine in post-thoracotomy pain management with patient controlled analgesia technique. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2013 Mar-Apr;63(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(13)70218-6.

    PubMed 23601264
  • Nordquist D, Halaszynski TM. Perioperative multimodal anesthesia using regional techniques in the aging surgical patient. Pain Res Treat. 2014;2014:902174. doi: 10.1155/2014/902174. Epub 2014 Jan 20.

    PubMed 24579048
  • Tomar GS, Godwin RB, Gaur N, Sethi A, Narang N, Kachhwaha V, Kriplani TC, Tiwari A. A double-blind study on analgesic effects of fentanyl combined with bupivacaine for extradural labor analgesia. Anesth Essays Res. 2011 Jul-Dec;5(2):147-52. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.94754.

    PubMed 25885378
  • George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):133-44. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182713b26. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

    PubMed 23223119
  • Gan TJ, Meyer T, Apfel CC, Chung F, Davis PJ, Eubanks S, Kovac A, Philip BK, Sessler DI, Temo J, Tramer MR, Watcha M; Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center. Consensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jul;97(1):62-71, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000068580.00245.95.

    PubMed 12818945
  • Hefni AF, Mahmoud MS, Al Alim AA. Epidural dexamethasone for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy: A dose ranging and safety evaluation study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;8(3):323-7. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.136420.

    PubMed 25191180

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dexamethasone 8 mg and Morphine 2 mg in people with Lower Extremities Fracture, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The degree of pain at 24-hours post-operative (time frame: 24 hours post-operative). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03051022, which also lists 16 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in