AzTrials
AzTrials

Head Neck CancerPhase 1NCT03051269

Calcium Electroporation for Head and Neck Cancer

A Phase 1 study testing Calcium chloride and Electroporation in people with Head Neck Cancer, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In a phase I protocol to primarily investigate the safety of using calcium combined with electroporation on recurrent head and neck cancers. Secondly, to evaluate tumour response on PET/MRI (positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), clinical evaluation, biopsies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Head Neck Cancer
What is being tested?
Calcium chloride and Electroporation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
6 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
May 2016to Feb 2019
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject age > 18 years.
  • Verified cancer in the head and neck region of any histology.
  • At least one tumour lesion should be accessible for electroporation.
  • Performance status WHO <= 2.
  • Progressive and/or metastatic disease.
  • Expected survival of > 3 months.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • A treatment-free interval of more than 4 weeks since chemotherapy or radiation therapy of the treatment area.
  • The subject should have been offered the current standard treatment. If there is no further standard treatment to offer or if the subject does not want to receive the treatments offered, the subject may be included in the trial.
  • The subject should be able to understand the information for participants and be willing and able to comply with hospitalization and the agreed follow-up visits and tests.
  • Platelets ≥ 50 billion/L, INR(international normalized ratio)> 1.5. Medical correction is allowed, e.g. correction of a high INR using vitamin K.
  • Sexually active men and women who can become pregnant must use adequate contraception during this trial (pill, spiral, injection of prolonged progestin, subdermal implantation, hormone-containing vaginal devices, transdermal patches).
  • Signed informed consent.
  • -

Who cannot join

  • Patients should be excluded if they meet just one of the criteria stated below:
  • Symptomatic progression of the subject's cancer disease that requires another intervention.
  • Allergy to constituents of the planned anesthesia.
  • Coagulation disorder that cannot be corrected.
  • Chronic renal dysfunction with creatinine> 200 mmol/L will trigger a Cr-51-EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) clearance.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • If participating in other clinical trials involving experimental drugs or involved in a trial within 4 weeks prior to study drug administration.
  • Other disorders investigator finds incompatible with participation in the trial.
  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Christina C Plaschke, MD contact

+45 29 25 92 45

caroline@dadlnet.dk

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

    Copenhagen, 2100

    Christina C. Plaschke, MD, +45 29 25 92 45, caroline@dadlnet.dk

    Irene Wessel, MD, +45 35 45 83 22, irene.wessel.01@regionh.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

In a phase I protocol to primarily investigate the safety of using calcium combined with electroporation on recurrent head and neck cancers. Secondly, to evaluate tumour response on PET/MRI (positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), clinical evaluation, biopsies. Thirdly, to evaluate the effect of calcium electroporation compared to electrochemotherapy as well as the patients life-of-quality through questionnaires, EORTC QLQ C-30 and H\&N35 (european organisation for research and treatment of cancer).

Read the detailed description

Calcium electroporation. Electroporation is a technique that facilitates the transport of molecules across the cell membrane by using electric pulses. The electric field applied to the cell membrane creates a temporary destabilization. As the electric capacity of the membrane is exceeded, cracks are formed in the membrane and the molecules are free to diffuse into the cytosol of the cell. The process is reversible and the cell membrane is stabilized in a matter of minutes. While the cell membrane is permeable there is an increased influx of Ca2+ into the cell. Calcium influx may be further improved by combining calcium together with electroporation; this is called calcium electroporation.

In vivo studies have shown that when enhancing the extracellular calcium concentration before applying electroporation, a larger Ca2+ influx occurs. The large Ca2+ influx can lead to a reduction in ATP (adenosine triphosphate) levels and cell death. A fall in ATP levels is seen for two reasons: First, an increase in intracellular Ca2+ leads to a higher activity of the Ca2+-ATPase and Na+/K+-ATPase. Secondly, the high concentration of Ca2+ leads to loss of the electrochemical gradient in the mitochondrial membrane, which causes mitochondrial collapse. Upon collapse of the mitochondria, the cell can no longer produce ATP. Overall, the increased consumption and decreased production of ATP leads to lover ATP levels. Combined with other cellular processes such as activation of lipases and proteases, the cell will eventually die.

Trials objectives.

  1. Primary outcome. Evaluating the safety measures of using calcium electroporation on mucosal head and neck cancer. This is done by continuously evaluating pain by VAS-score (visual analogue scale) and side effects by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) registration into Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE). The safety of using calcium intratumourally is also evaluated by measurement of Ca2+ in blood samples after treatment.
  2. Secondary outcome. Evaluation of response by imaging: PET-MRI, Clinical photography, Biopsies from tumour site The subjects subjective evaluation of the treatment and post treatment period is evaluated through Quality of life questionnaires, EORTC QLQ-C30 and H\&N35: two different questionnaires both validated for head and neck cancer patients.
  3. Tertiary outcome. The response to treatment will be compared to the results from our current trial, where we use electrochemotherapy on mucosal head and neck tumours. The comparison will be between imaging response, VAS score and results from questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and H\&N35).

Trial design. This is a phase I, interventional, clinical trial for the safety of calcium electroporation on mucosal head and neck tumours. Subjects will have relapsed or primary head and neck cancer. Treatment is intended as palliative and not curative. All subjects will be offered standard treatment with surgery and radiotherapy before enrolment to the trial, if possible. There is no scheduled control group, meaning that all eligible patients will be offered treatment.

Electroporation and anaesthesia. The treatment is performed under general anaesthesia because the localization of head and neck tumours complicates treatment under local anaesthetic. After the patient is anaesthetized, the tumour area will be injected with calcium. After administration of calcium electrodes are inserted into the tumour and electrical pulses are generated and documented using a Cliniporator (IGEA, Capri, Italy). Overall operating time/anaesthesia time will be 1-2 hours and expected hospital stay of 3 days. Treatment is intended as a once-only treatment but measurable response on evaluation scans combined with continued cancer activity in the treated area can result in another treatment session.

Being tested
Calcium chloride, Electroporation
Keywords
Electroporation, Calcium, Head and Neck cancer
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Calcium chlorideDrug

    Also called Calcium

    Tumour site is injected with a solution of 9 mg/ml calcium chloride and afterwards the tumour site is given electroporation to facilitate calcium to enter the cell cytosol.

  • ElectroporationDevice

    Performed by single use electrodes attaches to a device called "Cliniporator" provided from IGEA, ITALY.

Study groups in NCT03051269
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
calcium chlorideExperimentalOnly one arm. All 6 enrolled patients are treated with calcium electroporation.
Receives: Drug: Calcium chloride; Device: Electroporation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]

    Evaluated by change in CTCAE (common terminology criteria for adverse events) at different timepoints.

    Measured: CTCAE are evaluated at several timepoints: 1) Baseline (before treatment). 2) 30 minutes and 6 hours after treatment. 3) Once at day 1, 2 and 3 after treatment. 4) 1 week after treatment. 5) 2 weeks after treatment. 6) 1 and 2 months after treatment.

  2. Change in Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]

    Evaluated by change in calcium levels in blood samples at different time points.

    Measured: Blood samples evaluating calcium levels are taken at 1) Baseline. 2) 30 min after treatment. 3) 6 hours after treatment. 4) At day 1, 2, and 3 after treatment.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Tumour response

    By PET/MRI imaging

    Measured: PET/MRI are performed at baseline and evaluated again at 1 and 2 months after treatment.

  2. Tumour response

    By clinical evaluation.

    Measured: Clinical evaluation is performed daily in the first 3 days post-treatment, again at week 1 and 2, and 1 and 2 months post-treatment.

  3. Tumour response

    By biopsies.

    Measured: Biopsies are performed at baseline and again at 1 and 2 months after treatment.

  4. Comparing calcium electroporation to electrochemotherapy

    The tumor response on MRI from calcium electroporation is compared to the tumor response on MRI from a previous study on a similar patient group treated with electrochemotherapy.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2017
  2. Study startMay 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
6 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03051269
Sponsor's protocol ID
HC1511
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
17 Jan 2017
Last updated
13 Feb 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Frandsen SK, Gibot L, Madi M, Gehl J, Rols MP. Calcium Electroporation: Evidence for Differential Effects in Normal and Malignant Cell Lines, Evaluated in a 3D Spheroid Model. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 3;10(12):e0144028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144028. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26633834
  • Hansen EL, Sozer EB, Romeo S, Frandsen SK, Vernier PT, Gehl J. Dose-dependent ATP depletion and cancer cell death following calcium electroporation, relative effect of calcium concentration and electric field strength. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 8;10(4):e0122973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122973. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25853661
  • Frandsen SK, Gissel H, Hojman P, Tramm T, Eriksen J, Gehl J. Direct therapeutic applications of calcium electroporation to effectively induce tumor necrosis. Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 15;72(6):1336-41. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3782. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

    PubMed 22282658
  • Plaschke CC, Gothelf A, Gehl J, Wessel I. Electrochemotherapy of mucosal head and neck tumors: a systematic review. Acta Oncol. 2016 Nov;55(11):1266-1272. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1207803. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

    PubMed 27705053

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Calcium chloride and Electroporation in people with Head Neck Cancer, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Irene Wessel, MD (+45 35 45 83 22, irene.wessel.01@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] (time frame: CTCAE are evaluated at several timepoints: 1) Baseline (before treatment). 2) 30 minutes and 6 hours after treatment. 3) Once at day 1, 2 and 3 after treatment. 4) 1 week after treatment. 5) 2 weeks after treatment. 6) 1 and 2 months after treatment.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03051269, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in