Head Neck CancerPhase 1NCT03051269
Calcium Electroporation for Head and Neck Cancer
A Phase 1 study testing Calcium chloride and Electroporation in people with Head Neck Cancer, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
In a phase I protocol to primarily investigate the safety of using calcium combined with electroporation on recurrent head and neck cancers. Secondly, to evaluate tumour response on PET/MRI (positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), clinical evaluation, biopsies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Head Neck Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Calcium chloride and Electroporation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- May 2016to Feb 2019
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject age > 18 years.
- Verified cancer in the head and neck region of any histology.
- At least one tumour lesion should be accessible for electroporation.
- Performance status WHO <= 2.
- Progressive and/or metastatic disease.
- Expected survival of > 3 months.
Show all 13Show fewer
- A treatment-free interval of more than 4 weeks since chemotherapy or radiation therapy of the treatment area.
- The subject should have been offered the current standard treatment. If there is no further standard treatment to offer or if the subject does not want to receive the treatments offered, the subject may be included in the trial.
- The subject should be able to understand the information for participants and be willing and able to comply with hospitalization and the agreed follow-up visits and tests.
- Platelets ≥ 50 billion/L, INR(international normalized ratio)> 1.5. Medical correction is allowed, e.g. correction of a high INR using vitamin K.
- Sexually active men and women who can become pregnant must use adequate contraception during this trial (pill, spiral, injection of prolonged progestin, subdermal implantation, hormone-containing vaginal devices, transdermal patches).
- Signed informed consent.
- -
Who cannot join
- Patients should be excluded if they meet just one of the criteria stated below:
- Symptomatic progression of the subject's cancer disease that requires another intervention.
- Allergy to constituents of the planned anesthesia.
- Coagulation disorder that cannot be corrected.
- Chronic renal dysfunction with creatinine> 200 mmol/L will trigger a Cr-51-EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) clearance.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Show all 9Show fewer
- If participating in other clinical trials involving experimental drugs or involved in a trial within 4 weeks prior to study drug administration.
- Other disorders investigator finds incompatible with participation in the trial.
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Copenhagen, 2100
Christina C. Plaschke, MD, +45 29 25 92 45, caroline@dadlnet.dk
Irene Wessel, MD, +45 35 45 83 22, irene.wessel.01@regionh.dk
About this study
In a phase I protocol to primarily investigate the safety of using calcium combined with electroporation on recurrent head and neck cancers. Secondly, to evaluate tumour response on PET/MRI (positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), clinical evaluation, biopsies. Thirdly, to evaluate the effect of calcium electroporation compared to electrochemotherapy as well as the patients life-of-quality through questionnaires, EORTC QLQ C-30 and H\&N35 (european organisation for research and treatment of cancer).
Read the detailed description
Calcium electroporation. Electroporation is a technique that facilitates the transport of molecules across the cell membrane by using electric pulses. The electric field applied to the cell membrane creates a temporary destabilization. As the electric capacity of the membrane is exceeded, cracks are formed in the membrane and the molecules are free to diffuse into the cytosol of the cell. The process is reversible and the cell membrane is stabilized in a matter of minutes. While the cell membrane is permeable there is an increased influx of Ca2+ into the cell. Calcium influx may be further improved by combining calcium together with electroporation; this is called calcium electroporation.
In vivo studies have shown that when enhancing the extracellular calcium concentration before applying electroporation, a larger Ca2+ influx occurs. The large Ca2+ influx can lead to a reduction in ATP (adenosine triphosphate) levels and cell death. A fall in ATP levels is seen for two reasons: First, an increase in intracellular Ca2+ leads to a higher activity of the Ca2+-ATPase and Na+/K+-ATPase. Secondly, the high concentration of Ca2+ leads to loss of the electrochemical gradient in the mitochondrial membrane, which causes mitochondrial collapse. Upon collapse of the mitochondria, the cell can no longer produce ATP. Overall, the increased consumption and decreased production of ATP leads to lover ATP levels. Combined with other cellular processes such as activation of lipases and proteases, the cell will eventually die.
Trials objectives.
- Primary outcome. Evaluating the safety measures of using calcium electroporation on mucosal head and neck cancer. This is done by continuously evaluating pain by VAS-score (visual analogue scale) and side effects by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) registration into Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE). The safety of using calcium intratumourally is also evaluated by measurement of Ca2+ in blood samples after treatment.
- Secondary outcome. Evaluation of response by imaging: PET-MRI, Clinical photography, Biopsies from tumour site The subjects subjective evaluation of the treatment and post treatment period is evaluated through Quality of life questionnaires, EORTC QLQ-C30 and H\&N35: two different questionnaires both validated for head and neck cancer patients.
- Tertiary outcome. The response to treatment will be compared to the results from our current trial, where we use electrochemotherapy on mucosal head and neck tumours. The comparison will be between imaging response, VAS score and results from questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and H\&N35).
Trial design. This is a phase I, interventional, clinical trial for the safety of calcium electroporation on mucosal head and neck tumours. Subjects will have relapsed or primary head and neck cancer. Treatment is intended as palliative and not curative. All subjects will be offered standard treatment with surgery and radiotherapy before enrolment to the trial, if possible. There is no scheduled control group, meaning that all eligible patients will be offered treatment.
Electroporation and anaesthesia. The treatment is performed under general anaesthesia because the localization of head and neck tumours complicates treatment under local anaesthetic. After the patient is anaesthetized, the tumour area will be injected with calcium. After administration of calcium electrodes are inserted into the tumour and electrical pulses are generated and documented using a Cliniporator (IGEA, Capri, Italy). Overall operating time/anaesthesia time will be 1-2 hours and expected hospital stay of 3 days. Treatment is intended as a once-only treatment but measurable response on evaluation scans combined with continued cancer activity in the treated area can result in another treatment session.
- Conditions
- Head Neck Cancer
- Being tested
- Calcium chloride, Electroporation
- Keywords
- Electroporation, Calcium, Head and Neck cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Calcium chlorideDrug
Also called Calcium
Tumour site is injected with a solution of 9 mg/ml calcium chloride and afterwards the tumour site is given electroporation to facilitate calcium to enter the cell cytosol.
ElectroporationDevice
Performed by single use electrodes attaches to a device called "Cliniporator" provided from IGEA, ITALY.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| calcium chloride | Experimental | Only one arm. All 6 enrolled patients are treated with calcium electroporation. Receives: Drug: Calcium chloride; Device: Electroporation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Evaluated by change in CTCAE (common terminology criteria for adverse events) at different timepoints.
Measured: CTCAE are evaluated at several timepoints: 1) Baseline (before treatment). 2) 30 minutes and 6 hours after treatment. 3) Once at day 1, 2 and 3 after treatment. 4) 1 week after treatment. 5) 2 weeks after treatment. 6) 1 and 2 months after treatment.
Change in Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Evaluated by change in calcium levels in blood samples at different time points.
Measured: Blood samples evaluating calcium levels are taken at 1) Baseline. 2) 30 min after treatment. 3) 6 hours after treatment. 4) At day 1, 2, and 3 after treatment.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Tumour response
By PET/MRI imaging
Measured: PET/MRI are performed at baseline and evaluated again at 1 and 2 months after treatment.
Tumour response
By clinical evaluation.
Measured: Clinical evaluation is performed daily in the first 3 days post-treatment, again at week 1 and 2, and 1 and 2 months post-treatment.
Tumour response
By biopsies.
Measured: Biopsies are performed at baseline and again at 1 and 2 months after treatment.
Comparing calcium electroporation to electrochemotherapy
The tumor response on MRI from calcium electroporation is compared to the tumor response on MRI from a previous study on a similar patient group treated with electrochemotherapy.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2017
- Study startMay 2016
- Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Head Neck CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Herlev Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Irene Wessel, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Investigators
- Irene Wessel, Principal investigator, Rigshospitalet, Dept. of Head and Neck Surgery, Copenhagen, Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03051269
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HC1511
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Frandsen SK, Gibot L, Madi M, Gehl J, Rols MP. Calcium Electroporation: Evidence for Differential Effects in Normal and Malignant Cell Lines, Evaluated in a 3D Spheroid Model. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 3;10(12):e0144028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144028. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26633834Hansen EL, Sozer EB, Romeo S, Frandsen SK, Vernier PT, Gehl J. Dose-dependent ATP depletion and cancer cell death following calcium electroporation, relative effect of calcium concentration and electric field strength. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 8;10(4):e0122973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122973. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25853661Frandsen SK, Gissel H, Hojman P, Tramm T, Eriksen J, Gehl J. Direct therapeutic applications of calcium electroporation to effectively induce tumor necrosis. Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 15;72(6):1336-41. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3782. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
PubMed 22282658Plaschke CC, Gothelf A, Gehl J, Wessel I. Electrochemotherapy of mucosal head and neck tumors: a systematic review. Acta Oncol. 2016 Nov;55(11):1266-1272. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1207803. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
PubMed 27705053
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Calcium Electroporation for Head and Neck Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03051269
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HC1511
- Conditions
- Head Neck Cancer
- Keywords
- Electroporation, Calcium, Head and Neck cancer
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Herlev Hospital
- Study start
- May 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In a phase I protocol to primarily investigate the safety of using calcium combined with electroporation on recurrent head and neck cancers. Secondly, to evaluate tumour response on PET/MRI (positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), clinical evaluation, biopsies. Thirdly, to evaluate the effect of calcium electroporation compared to electrochemotherapy as well as the patients life-of-quality through questionnaires, EORTC QLQ C-30 and H\&N35 (european organisation for research and treatment of cancer).
Detailed description
Calcium electroporation. Electroporation is a technique that facilitates the transport of molecules across the cell membrane by using electric pulses. The electric field applied to the cell membrane creates a temporary destabilization. As the electric capacity of the membrane is exceeded, cracks are formed in the membrane and the molecules are free to diffuse into the cytosol of the cell. The process is reversible and the cell membrane is stabilized in a matter of minutes. While the cell membrane is permeable there is an increased influx of Ca2+ into the cell. Calcium influx may be further improved by combining calcium together with electroporation; this is called calcium electroporation.
In vivo studies have shown that when enhancing the extracellular calcium concentration before applying electroporation, a larger Ca2+ influx occurs. The large Ca2+ influx can lead to a reduction in ATP (adenosine triphosphate) levels and cell death. A fall in ATP levels is seen for two reasons: First, an increase in intracellular Ca2+ leads to a higher activity of the Ca2+-ATPase and Na+/K+-ATPase. Secondly, the high concentration of Ca2+ leads to loss of the electrochemical gradient in the mitochondrial membrane, which causes mitochondrial collapse. Upon collapse of the mitochondria, the cell can no longer produce ATP. Overall, the increased consumption and decreased production of ATP leads to lover ATP levels. Combined with other cellular processes such as activation of lipases and proteases, the cell will eventually die.
Trials objectives.
- Primary outcome. Evaluating the safety measures of using calcium electroporation on mucosal head and neck cancer. This is done by continuously evaluating pain by VAS-score (visual analogue scale) and side effects by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) registration into Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE). The safety of using calcium intratumourally is also evaluated by measurement of Ca2+ in blood samples after treatment.
- Secondary outcome. Evaluation of response by imaging: PET-MRI, Clinical photography, Biopsies from tumour site The subjects subjective evaluation of the treatment and post treatment period is evaluated through Quality of life questionnaires, EORTC QLQ-C30 and H\&N35: two different questionnaires both validated for head and neck cancer patients.
- Tertiary outcome. The response to treatment will be compared to the results from our current trial, where we use electrochemotherapy on mucosal head and neck tumours. The comparison will be between imaging response, VAS score and results from questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and H\&N35).
Trial design. This is a phase I, interventional, clinical trial for the safety of calcium electroporation on mucosal head and neck tumours. Subjects will have relapsed or primary head and neck cancer. Treatment is intended as palliative and not curative. All subjects will be offered standard treatment with surgery and radiotherapy before enrolment to the trial, if possible. There is no scheduled control group, meaning that all eligible patients will be offered treatment.
Electroporation and anaesthesia. The treatment is performed under general anaesthesia because the localization of head and neck tumours complicates treatment under local anaesthetic. After the patient is anaesthetized, the tumour area will be injected with calcium. After administration of calcium electrodes are inserted into the tumour and electrical pulses are generated and documented using a Cliniporator (IGEA, Capri, Italy). Overall operating time/anaesthesia time will be 1-2 hours and expected hospital stay of 3 days. Treatment is intended as a once-only treatment but measurable response on evaluation scans combined with continued cancer activity in the treated area can result in another treatment session.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| calcium chloride | Experimental | Drug: Calcium chloride, Device: ElectroporationOnly one arm. All 6 enrolled patients are treated with calcium electroporation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Subject age > 18 years.
- Verified cancer in the head and neck region of any histology.
- At least one tumour lesion should be accessible for electroporation.
- Performance status WHO <= 2.
- Progressive and/or metastatic disease.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Symptomatic progression of the subject's cancer disease that requires another intervention.
- Allergy to constituents of the planned anesthesia.
- Coagulation disorder that cannot be corrected.
- Chronic renal dysfunction with creatinine> 200 mmol/L will trigger a Cr-51-EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) clearance.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Calcium chlorideAlso: CalciumTumour site is injected with a solution of 9 mg/ml calcium chloride and afterwards the tumour site is given electroporation to facilitate calcium to enter the cell cytosol. | Drug | calcium chloride |
| ElectroporationPerformed by single use electrodes attaches to a device called "Cliniporator" provided from IGEA, ITALY. | Device | calcium chloride |
Primary outcome
Change in Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time frame: CTCAE are evaluated at several timepoints: 1) Baseline (before treatment). 2) 30 minutes and 6 hours after treatment. 3) Once at day 1, 2 and 3 after treatment. 4) 1 week after treatment. 5) 2 weeks after treatment. 6) 1 and 2 months after treatment.
Evaluated by change in CTCAE (common terminology criteria for adverse events) at different timepoints.
Change in Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time frame: Blood samples evaluating calcium levels are taken at 1) Baseline. 2) 30 min after treatment. 3) 6 hours after treatment. 4) At day 1, 2, and 3 after treatment.
Evaluated by change in calcium levels in blood samples at different time points.
4 secondary outcomes
Tumour response
Time frame: PET/MRI are performed at baseline and evaluated again at 1 and 2 months after treatment.
Tumour response
Time frame: Clinical evaluation is performed daily in the first 3 days post-treatment, again at week 1 and 2, and 1 and 2 months post-treatment.
Tumour response
Time frame: Biopsies are performed at baseline and again at 1 and 2 months after treatment.
Comparing calcium electroporation to electrochemotherapy
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2017.
- Background: PubMed 26633834Frandsen SK, Gibot L, Madi M, Gehl J, Rols MP. Calcium Electroporation: Evidence for Differential Effects in Normal and Malignant Cell Lines, Evaluated in a 3D Spheroid Model. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 3;10(12):e0144028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144028. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 25853661Hansen EL, Sozer EB, Romeo S, Frandsen SK, Vernier PT, Gehl J. Dose-dependent ATP depletion and cancer cell death following calcium electroporation, relative effect of calcium concentration and electric field strength. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 8;10(4):e0122973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122973. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 22282658Frandsen SK, Gissel H, Hojman P, Tramm T, Eriksen J, Gehl J. Direct therapeutic applications of calcium electroporation to effectively induce tumor necrosis. Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 15;72(6):1336-41. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3782. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
- Background: PubMed 27705053Plaschke CC, Gothelf A, Gehl J, Wessel I. Electrochemotherapy of mucosal head and neck tumors: a systematic review. Acta Oncol. 2016 Nov;55(11):1266-1272. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1207803. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Head Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Irene Wessel principal investigator
Rigshospitalet, Dept. of Head and Neck Surgery, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Calcium chloride and Electroporation in people with Head Neck Cancer, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Irene Wessel, MD (+45 35 45 83 22, irene.wessel.01@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] (time frame: CTCAE are evaluated at several timepoints: 1) Baseline (before treatment). 2) 30 minutes and 6 hours after treatment. 3) Once at day 1, 2 and 3 after treatment. 4) 1 week after treatment. 5) 2 weeks after treatment. 6) 1 and 2 months after treatment.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03051269, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2017.