Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3Auriel-RANCT03052322
MSB11022 in Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 3 study testing MSB11022 and EU-Humira in people with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH at 46 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of MSB11022 and Humira® in adult participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- MSB11022 and EU-Humira
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 288 participants
- Where
- 46 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Jan 2017to 27 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis based on 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria
- At least 6 tender (of 68 assessed) and 6 swollen (of 66 assessed) joints at screening and baseline
- Must have received methotrexate for at least 12 weeks and been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first study dose
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply
Who cannot join
- Evidence of untreated or inadequately treated latent or active Tuberculosis
- Evidence of uncontrolled, clinically significant diseases
- Any second disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs must be washed out prior to the first study dose
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply
Trial locations and contacts
46 sites in 6 countries.
46 sites in 6 countries
Poland13 sites
KLIMED Marek Klimkiewicz
Bialystok, 15-765
ClinicMed Badurski i wspolnicy Spolka Jawna
Bialystok, 15-879
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im.dr J. Biziela
Bydgoszcz, 85-168
Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita
Katowice, 40-611
Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne s.c.
Krakow, 30-510
Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J.M. Jasnorzewska sp. komandytowo-akcyjna
Lodz, 90-242
KLIMED Marek Klimkiewicz
Łomża, 18-404
RCMed
Nowy Duninów, 09-505
ETYKA Osrodek Badan Klinicznych
Olsztyn, 10-117
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej "Nasz Lekarz" Praktyka Grupowa Lekarzy Rodzinnych z
Torun, 87-100
Medycyna Kliniczna
Warsaw, 00-660
Rheuma Medicus Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej
Warsaw, 02-118
Niepubliczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej "Biogenes" Sp. z o.o.
Wroclaw, 53-224
Bulgaria12 sites
MHAT "Trimontium", OOD
Plovdiv, 4000
MHAT-Plovdiv AD
Plovdiv, 4002
UMHAT "Kaspela", EOOD
Plovdiv, 4002
Medical Center "Teodora", EOOD
Rousse, 7000
MHAT - Ruse, AD
Rousse, 7002
MHAT - Shumen, AD
Shumen, 9700
MHAT "Lyulin", EAD
Sofia, 1336
Medical Center "Excelsior", OOD
Sofia, 1407
UMHAT "Sv. Ivan Rilski", EAD
Sofia, 1431
DCC 17 - Sofia EOOD
Sofia, 1504
Military Medical Academy - MHAT - Sofia
Sofia, 1606
MC "Synexus - Sofia", EOOD
Sofia, 1784
Czechia10 sites
Revmatologie Bruntal, s.r.o.
Bruntál, 792 01
Ccbr-Synarc A/S
Ostrava, 702 00
A-SHINE s.r.o.
Pilsen, 31200
CLINTRIAL s.r.o.
Prague, 100 00
Revmatologicky Ustav
Prague, 128 50
Nuselska poliklinika
Prague, 140 00
Revma Praha, s.r.o.
Prague, 158 00
Revmatologicka ambulance
Praha 4 Nusle, 140 00
MEDICAL PLUS s.r.o.
Uherské Hradiště, 686 01
PV - Medical, s.r.o.
Zlín, 760 01
Hungary7 sites
Dr. Kenessey Albert Korhaz-Rendelointezet
Balassagyarmat, 2660
Revita Reumatologiai Rendelo
Budapest, 1023
Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft.
Budapest, 1036
DRC Szekesfehervar
Székesfehérvár, 8000
Mentahaz Maganorvosi Kozpont
Székesfehérvár, 8000
Vital Medical Center
Veszprém, 8200
Synexus Magyarorszag Egeszsegugyi Szolgaltato Kft.- Zalaegerszeg AS
Zalaegerszeg, 8900
Germany2 sites
HRF Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum
Hamburg, 20095
Studienambulanz Dr. Wassenberg
Ratingen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40882
United Kingdom2 sites
Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow, Strathclyde, G4 0SF
Whipps Cross University Hospital
London, E11 1NR
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of MSB11022 Compared With Humira® in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of MSB11022 and Humira® in adult participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- Conditions
- Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- MSB11022, EU-Humira
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MSB11022Drug
Also called Adalimumab
Participants received MSB11022 (modified buffer and stabilizer) subcutaneously at dose of 40 milligram (mg) every other week from Day 1 up to Week 48.
EU-HumiraDrug
Participants received EU-Humira subcutaneously at dose of 40 mg every other week from Day 1 up to Week 48.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MSB11022 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: MSB11022 |
| EU-Humira | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: EU-Humira |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participants, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. Term Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. Hypersensitivity was the pre-defined TEAE of special Interest for this study. The percentage of participants with treatment emergent AESIs (hypersensitivity) were reported.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Secondary outcomes (22)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 12
The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: participant's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS ; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas). The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and acute-phase marker (CRP).
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) Status to Adalimumab
Percentage of participants with positive anti-Drug antibodies (ADAs) status to Adalimumab were reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) Titer Levels for Adalimumab
Titer was defined as the degree to which the antibody-serum sample could be diluted and still contained detectable amounts of antibody. Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) titers for adalimumab was reported. Data was collected using validated bioanalytical method.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb) Status to Adalimumab
Percentage of participants with confirmed neutralizing antibodies status to Adalimumab were reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 2, 4, 8, 24 and 52
The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS ; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas). The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and acute-phase marker (CRP).
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
The ACR 50 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=50 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS ; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas). The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and acute-phase marker (CRP).
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Response at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
The ACR 70 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 70 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=70 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: patient's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS ; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), patient's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (the scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas). The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and acute-phase marker (CRP).
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on a 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
DAS calculated on 28 joints is composite score derived from 4 measures: number of swollen joints (out of 28), number of tender joints (out of 28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity on visual analog scale (VAS). Overall disease activity score DAS28 was derived using following formulas from DAS28:DAS28=0.56*√(TJC28)+0.28*√(SJC28) + 0.014*GH+0.70*ln(ESR). Where: TJC28 = 28 joint count for tenderness, SJC28 = 28 joint count for swelling, ln(ESR) = natural log of ESR, GH = general health component of DAS (ie, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using scale of 1-100 where 100 is maximal activity); For analyses, GH divided by 10 \& converted to 0.5 scale, i.e, 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5. DAS28-ESR of >5.1 implies active disease, <3.2 low disease activity, \& <2.6 remission. Change of 1.2(twice measurement error)=significant change of disease activity state. Overall score ranges from 0-10 where higher score means more severe disease.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity and Remission at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Disease Activity Score calculated on 28 joints is composite score derived from 4 measures: number of swollen joints (out of 28), -number of tender joints (out of 28), -Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), -Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity on visual analog scale (VAS). Overall disease activity score DAS28 was derived using following formulas from DAS28: DAS28=0.56*√(TJC28)+0.28*√(SJC28) + 0.014*GH+0.70*ln(ESR). Where: -TJC28 = 28 joint count for tenderness, -SJC28 = 28 joint count for swelling, -ln(ESR) = natural logarithm of ESR, -GH = general health component of DAS (ie, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using scale of 1 to 100 where 100 is maximal activity); For analyses, GH was divided by 10 and converted to a 0.5 scale, i.e., 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5. DAS28-ESR of >5.1 implies active disease, <3.2 low disease activity, and <2.6 remission.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
SDAI is numerical sum of 5 outcome parameters: tender \& swollen joint count (based on 28-joint assessment), Patient's \& Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS) \& level of C-reactive protein (CRP)(milligram per deciliter (mg/dL), normal<1 mg/dL). SDAI was calculated based on following formula: SDAI = 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28)+GH+PGA+CRP Where: -GH =general health component of DAS (i.e. Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using scale of 1 to 100 where 100 is maximal activity; For analyses, GH was divided by 10 \& converted to 0.5 scale (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5).-PGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using scale of 1 to 100 where 100 is maximal activity. For analyses, PGA will be divided by 10 \& converted to 0.5 scale (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5). where [0-0.25] = 0, [0.25-0.75] = 0.5, [0.76-1.25] = 1, etc. The total score range is 0-86 \& lower score indicates less disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index (without acute-phase reactant) for assessing disease activity. The CDAI was calculated based on following formula: CDAI = 28 joint count for swelling (SJC28) + 28 joint count for tenderness (TJC28) + GH + PGA. Where, -GH = general health component of the DAS (i.e., Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, assessed using a scale of 1 to 100 where 100 is maximal activity; for analyses, GH was divided by 10 and converted to a 0.5 scale, i.e., 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 etc. where [0-0.25] = 0, [0.25-0.75] = 0.5, [0.76-1.25] = 1, etc.). -PGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed using a scale of 1 to 100 where 100 is maximal activity. For analyses, PGA was divided by 10 and converted to a 0.5 scale, ie, 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 etc. where [0-0.25] = 0, [0.25-0.75] = 0.5, [0.76-1.25] = 1, etc. The CDAI ranges from 0 to 76. Lower score indicates less disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean Remission at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
According to Boolean-based definition of remission of ACR/EULAR, a participant must satisfy all of the following: tender joint count <= 1, swollen joint count <= 1, CRP <= 1 mg/dL, and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity <= 1 (0 to 10 VAS). PGA was assessed on a 10 mm VAS ranging from 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), where higher scores indicate worse health condition.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and TEAEs Leading to Death
Adverse event(AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participants which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. A serious adverse event(SAE) was AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Term TEAE is defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. All abnormal physical examinations occurring during the study have been reported as Adverse events. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 69
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Differences in Vital Signs
Vital signs including body temperature, respiratory rate, and heart rate (after 5-minute rest) were measured. Percentage of participants with clinically meaningful abnormalities in vital signs were reported. Clinical meaningful was determined by the investigator.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Differences in Laboratory Values
Laboratory parameters including hematology, urinalysis, and biochemistry analysis were analyzed.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Values for 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) at Week 12, 24, and 52
Percentage of participants with clinically significant abnormal values for 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at week 12, 24, and 52 were reported.
Measured: Week 12, 24, and 52
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Nuclear Antibody (ANA) and Anti Double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (Anti-dsDNA) at Baseline, Week 24 and 52
For ANA, positivity is defined as any participant with ANA titer greater than (>) 1:160 and negativity is defined as ANA titer less than (<) 1:160. For anti-ds DNA, positivity is defined as any participant with adsDNA > 15 units per milliliter (U/mL), intermediate category is defined as value between 10 U/mL to 15 U/mL and negativity is defined as adsDNA < 10 U/mL. Percentage of participants with anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) and anti double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (Anti-dsDNA) at baseline, week 24 and 52 were reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24 and 52
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score at Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52
The HAQ-DI is a participant-reported questionnaire that is commonly used in RA to measure disease associated disability (assessment of physical function). It consists of several questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. HAQ-DI scores range from 0 to 3. The disability section of the questionnaire scores the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52
Short-Form Health Survey- 36 Items (SF-36) at Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a validated 36-item, patient-reported indication of overall health status not specific to any age, disease or Treatment group. The SF-36 questionnaire contains 36 questions pertaining to eight subscales of health status. These eight subscales were summarized as relating to either physical health or mental health. Physical component summary (PCS) is based primarily on physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health scales and mental component summary (MCS) encompasses vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health scales. Score from mental health, role emotional, social functioning, and vitality domains were averaged to calculate MCS. Total score range for MCS was 0-100 (100=highest level of mental functioning). Score from physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and general health domains were averaged to calculate PCS. Total score range for PCS was 0-100 (100=highest level of physical functioning).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
Euro-Quality of Life - 5 Dimension-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Index Score at Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. The participant was asked to indicate his/her current health state by selecting the most appropriate level in each of the 5 dimensions. Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score 0 (0.0- worst health state) to 1 (1.0- better health state) representing the general health status of the individual based on the UK scoring algorithm.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
Euro-Quality of Life - 5 Dimension-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
EQ-5D-5L: Standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of participant's health state 5 dimensions:
mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. Responses to 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into single preference-weighted health utility index score 0 (worst health state) to 1 (better health state). EQ-VAS: Self-rated health status using a vertical VAS. EQ-VAS records participant's perceptions of their own current overall health in range from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 4) in Injection Site Pain as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 6 and 8
The participant's reported perception of pain was measured on a VAS where the slash drawn by the participant represents pain of increasing intensity. VAS score ranges from 0-10 millimeter [mm], where; 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain. The first 2 injections was administered by qualified personnel. The next three doses of IMP (3-5) will be self-administered by the participant and injection site pain was assessed. Pain was recorded immediately after, 15 minutes after, and 1 hour after the injections received by the participants.
Measured: Immediately, 15 minutes and 1 hour post-injection on Baseline (Week 4), Week 6 and 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Feb 2017
- Study start31 Jan 2017
- Primary completion28 May 2018
- Study completion27 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 288 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Responsible, Study director, Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03052322
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MS200588-0004
- Other IDs
- 2016-002852-26, 2016
- Acronym
- Auriel-RA
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 20 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Huizinga TWJ, Torii Y, Muniz R. Adalimumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Biosimilarity. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):41-61. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00259-8. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
PubMed 33263165
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of MSB11022 Compared With Humira® in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03052322
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Auriel-RA / MS200588-0004
- Conditions
- Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 288 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbHIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 23 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of MSB11022 and Humira® in adult participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MSB11022 | Experimental | Drug: MSB11022 |
| EU-Humira | Active comparator | Drug: EU-Humira |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis based on 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria
- At least 6 tender (of 68 assessed) and 6 swollen (of 66 assessed) joints at screening and baseline
- Must have received methotrexate for at least 12 weeks and been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the first study dose
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Evidence of untreated or inadequately treated latent or active Tuberculosis
- Evidence of uncontrolled, clinically significant diseases
- Any second disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs must be washed out prior to the first study dose
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MSB11022Also: AdalimumabParticipants received MSB11022 (modified buffer and stabilizer) subcutaneously at dose of 40 milligram (mg) every other week from Day 1 up to Week 48. | Drug | MSB11022 |
| EU-HumiraParticipants received EU-Humira subcutaneously at dose of 40 mg every other week from Day 1 up to Week 48. | Drug | EU-Humira |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participants, which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. Term Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. Hypersensitivity was the pre-defined TEAE of special Interest for this study. The percentage of participants with treatment emergent AESIs (hypersensitivity) were reported.
22 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) Status to Adalimumab
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) Titer Levels for Adalimumab
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb) Status to Adalimumab
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 2, 4, 8, 24 and 52
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology 70 (ACR70) Response at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on a 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Low Disease Activity and Remission at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Total Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean Remission at Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and TEAEs Leading to Death
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 69
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Differences in Vital Signs
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Differences in Laboratory Values
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Values for 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) at Week 12, 24, and 52
Time frame: Week 12, 24, and 52
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Nuclear Antibody (ANA) and Anti Double-stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (Anti-dsDNA) at Baseline, Week 24 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 and 52
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score at Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52
Short-Form Health Survey- 36 Items (SF-36) at Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
Euro-Quality of Life - 5 Dimension-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Index Score at Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
Euro-Quality of Life - 5 Dimension-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24 and 52
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 4) in Injection Site Pain as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 6 and 8
Time frame: Immediately, 15 minutes and 1 hour post-injection on Baseline (Week 4), Week 6 and 8
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Dec 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33263165Huizinga TWJ, Torii Y, Muniz R. Adalimumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Biosimilarity. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):41-61. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00259-8. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
Related trials for Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Nipocalimab in Moderate to Severe Sjogren's Disease
Sjogrens Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Platform Study of Targeted Therapies for Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Prospective Observational Study of Filgotinib in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of RO7790121 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Not Responded to or Who Cannot Tolerate Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) and/or Janus Kinase (JAK Inhibitors)
Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingObservational study
A Comparison Study of Persistence of UPadacitinib vs. TNF-inhibitoRs In a German Real-world SettING
Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Responsible study director
Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH
46 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing MSB11022 and EU-Humira in people with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH at 46 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 46 sites in Poland, Bulgaria, Czechia, Hungary, Germany and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) (time frame: Up to Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03052322, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2019.