Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungPhase 3NCT03052608
A Study Of Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib In First Line Treatment Of Patients With ALK-Positive NSCLC
A Phase 3 study testing Lorlatinib and Crizotinib in people with Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, run by Pfizer at 166 sites in 23 countries.
Trial summary
A phase 3 study to demonstrate whether lorlatinib given as monotherapy is superior to crizotinib alone in prolonging the progression-free survival in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients who are treatment naïve and to compare lorlatinib to crizotinib with respect to overall survival in the same population Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- What is being tested?
- Lorlatinib and Crizotinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 296 participants
- Where
- 166 sitesin 23 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Apr 2017to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC; at least 1 extracranial measurable target lesion not previously irradiated. CNS metastases allowed if asymptomatic and not currently requiring corticosteroid treatment.
- Availability of an archival FFPE tissue specimen.
- No prior systemic NSCLC treatment.
- ECOG PS 0, 1, or 2.
- Age ≥18 years .
- Adequate Bone Marrow, Liver, Renal, Pancreatic Function
- Negative pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential
Who cannot join
- Spinal cord compression unless good pain control attained
- Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
- Radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to randomization, including stereotactic or partial brain irradiation. Whole brain irradiation within 4 weeks prior to randomization
- Active bacterial, fungal, or viral infection
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease, active or within 3 months prior to enrollment. Ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation, bradycardia or congenital long QT syndrome
- Predisposing characteristics for acute pancreatitis in the last month prior to randomization.
Show all 16Show fewer
- History of extensive, disseminated, bilateral or presence of Grade 3 or 4 interstitial fibrosis or interstitial lung disease
- Active malignancy (other than NSCLC, non melanoma skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, papillary thyroid cancer, LCIS/DCIS of the breast, or localized prostate cancer) within the last 3 years prior to randomization.
- Concurrent use of any of the following food or drugs within 12 days prior to the first dose of lorlatinib or crizotinib.
- known strong CYP3A inhibitors .
- known strong CYP3A inducers
- known P gp substrates with a narrow therapeutic index
- Concurrent use of CYP3A substrates with narrow therapeutic indices within 12 days prior to the first dose of lorlatinib or crizotinib.
- Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition, including recent or active suicidal ideation or behavior, or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or interfere with the interpretation of study results
- Investigational site staff members directly involved in the conduct of the study and their family members, or Pfizer employees, including their family members, directly involved in the conduct of the study.
- Participation in other studies involving investigational drug(s) within 2 weeks prior to study entry and/or during study participation.
Trial locations and contacts
166 sites in 23 countries.
166 sites in 23 countries
United States34 sites
Florida Cancer Specialists
Altamonte Springs, Florida, 32701
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston Inc
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
The William P. Beetham Eye Institute, Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Florida Cancer Specialists
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Florida Cancer Specialists
Clearwater, Florida, 33761
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Dickson, Tennessee, 37055
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067
Florida Cancer Specialists
Gainesville, Florida, 32605
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Gallatin, Tennessee, 37066
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Hermitage, Tennessee, 37076
Florida Cancer Specialists
Largo, Florida, 33770
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Lebanon, Tennessee, 37090
Florida Cancer Specialists
Lecanto, Florida, 34461
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 37129
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
The Sarah Cannon Research Institute.
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37207
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211
Florida Cancer Specialists
Orange City, Florida, 32763
Florida Cancer Specialists
Orlando, Florida, 32806
University of Rochester Cancer Center Pharmacy
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Shelbyville, Tennessee, 37160
Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Smyrna, Tennessee, 37167
Florida Cancer Specialists
Spring Hill, Florida, 34608
Florida Cancer Specialists
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705
Florida Cancer Specialists
Tampa, Florida, 33607
Florida Cancer Specialists
Tavares, Florida, 32778
Florida Cancer Specialists
The Villages, Florida, 32159
Florida Cancer Specialists
Winter Park, Florida, 32792
Japan20 sites
National Cancer Center Hospital
Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045
Kanazawa University Hospital
Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, 920-8641
The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR
Kōtoku, 135-8550
Kurume University Hospital
Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011
National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
Matsuyama, Ehime, 791-0280
Aichi cancer center central hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 464-8681
Nagoya University Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 466-8560
Niigata Cancer Center Hospital
Niigata, 951-8566
Okayama University Hospital
Okayama, 700-8558
Osaka International Cancer Institute
Osaka, Osaka, 541-8567
Osaka City General Hospital
Osaka, 534-0021
National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 003-0804
Kindai University Hospital
Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511
Sendai Kousei Hospital
Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0873
Sendai Kousei Hospital
Sendai, Miyagi, 981-0914
Shizuoka Cancer Center
Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777
Tokushima University Hospital
Tokushima, 770-8503
National Hospital Organization, Yamaguchi-Ube Medical Center
Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-0241
Wakayama Medical University Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Oncology
Wakayama, 641-8509
Kanagawa Cancer Center
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 241-8515
France16 sites
Hopital de Chevilly Larue
Chevilly-Larue, 94550
Centre Hospitalier du Mans
Le Mans, 72000
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Marseille, 13273
Département d'Imagerie Médicale
Marseille, 13915
Hôpital Nord
Marseille, 13915
Service Ophtalmologie
Marseille, 13915
Groupe Hospitalier Bichat Claude Bernard, AP-HP
Paris, 75018
Hopital Haut-Léveque-Centre François Magendie
Pessac, Aquitaine, 33604
CHU de Rennes Hopital Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35033
CHU de Rennes, Hopital Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35033
Hopital Foch
Suresnes, 92150
Hopital Larrey
Toulouse, 31059
Hopital Pierre Paul Riquet
Toulouse, 31059
Hôpital Larrey
Toulouse, 31059
Department d'imagerie medicale
Villejuif, 94805
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94805
Italy14 sites
AOU Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele-P.O.G. Rodolico
Catania, CT, 95123
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, MI, 20132
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan, MI, 20133
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
Milan, MI, 20141
ASST Monza - A.O. San Gerardo
Monza, MB, 20900
Azienda Ospedaliera Dei Colli Ospedale Monaldi
Naples, 80131
Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli
Naples, 80131
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Parma, PR, 43126
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia - Ospedale S. M. Misericordia
Perugia, PG, 06132
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico-IRCCS
Pordenone, PN, 33081
Ausl della Romagna- Ravenna
Ravenna, 48121
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena
Roma, RM, 00144
Az.Osp.San Camillo-Forlanini
Roma, RM, 00152
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano, MI, 20089
Spain14 sites
Hospital Teresa Herrera C.H.U.A.C.
A Coruña, 15006
Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Institut Catala d'Oncologia Girona
Girona, 17007
Institut Catala d'Oncologia L'Hospitalet
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08908
Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, 35016
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid, 28040
Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz
Madrid, 28040
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222
Complejo Hospitalario De Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Hospital Universitario La Fe
Valencia, 46026
China8 sites
The Affiliated Hospital of Military Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100071
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, 100142
Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital
Changchun, Jilin, 130012
Guangdong General Hospital
Guangzhou, 510000
Department of Respiratory,the First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200030
Germany8 sites
Uberortliche Radiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. med. Marc Amler
Dresden, 01309
Technische Universitat Dresden , Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, D-01307
Thoraxklinik Heidelberg gGmbH
Heidelberg, D-69126
Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, D-69126
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Innere Medizin V
Homburg - Saar, 66421
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes
Homburg - Saar, 66421
Universitatsklinikum Regensburg, Institut fur Rontgendiagnostik
Regensburg, 93053
Universitatsklinikum Regensburg, Klinik und Poliklinik fur Innere Medizin II
Regensburg, 93053
Russia6 sites
RBHI Kursk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Kislino, Kursk Oblast, 305 524
RBHI Kursk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Kursk, 305 035
FSBI "N.N.Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology"
Moscow, 115478
Budgetary Healthcare Institution Omsk Region "Clinical Oncological Dispensary"
Omsk, Omsk Oblast, 644013
LEC at SBIH "Saint-Petersburg Clinical Research Practical Center of specialized types of
Pesochniy Poselok, Sankt-Peterburg, 197758
Private Medical Institution "Euromedservice"
Pushkin, Sankt-Peterburg, 196603
India5 sites
Manipal Hospital
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560017
Srinivasam Cancer Care Multispeciality Hospitals India Pvt Ltd
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560072
Artemis Hospital
Gurugram, Haryana, 122001
Sahyadri Clinical Research and Development Centre
Pune, Maharashtra, 411004
Sahyadri Specialty Hospital
Pune, Maharashtra, 411004
South Korea5 sites
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 03080
Division of Medical Oncology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 03722
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505
The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincents Hospital
Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16247
Ulsan University Hospital
Ulsan, 44033
Taiwan5 sites
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Kaohsiung Branch
Kaohsiung City, 83301
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 402
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Taichung, 40705
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan ROC, 10002
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 112
Australia4 sites
Bendigo Day Surgery Collection Centre and Laboratory
Bendigo, Victoria, 3550
Bendigo Medical Imaging, Bendigo Hospital
Bendigo, Victoria, 3550
Melbourne Pathology
Bendigo, Victoria, 3550
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000
Poland4 sites
Klinika Onkologii i Radioterapii Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
Gdansk, 80-214
Med-Polonia Sp. z o.o.
Poznan, 60-693
Centrum Medyczne Dom Lekarski S.A.
Szczecin, 70-784
Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie-Panstwowy Instytut Badawczy
Warsaw, 02-781
Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
Cukurova University Medical Faculty
Adana, 01330
Istanbul University Oncology Institute
Istanbul, 34093
Marmara Univ Pendik Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34899
Ege University Medical Faculty
Izmir, 35100
Hong Kong3 sites
The University of Hong Kong, Department of Clinical Oncology
Hong Kong
The University of Hong Kong, Department of Medicine
Hong Kong
Tuen Mun Hospital
Hong Kong
Mexico3 sites
Médicos Especialistas en Cancer S.C. / San Peregrino.
Aguascalientes, 20230
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia
Distrito Federal, 14080
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosio Villegas
Distrito Federal, 14080
United Kingdom3 sites
Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Birmingham, WEST Midlands, B9 5SS
The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust
Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4 5PD
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, M20 4BX
Argentina2 sites
Centro Medico Austral
CABA, C1019ABS
Centro de Investigacion Pergamino SA
Pergamino, Buenos Aires, B2700CPM
Canada2 sites
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Czechia2 sites
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc, Klinika plicnich nemoci a tuberkulozy
Olomouc, 779 00
Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
Prague, 128 08
Singapore2 sites
National University Hospital
Singapore, 119074
Raffles Hospital
Singapore, 188770
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL STUDY OF LORLATINIB (PF-06463922) MONOTHERAPY VERSUS CRIZOTINIB MONOTHERAPY IN THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED ALK-POSITIVE NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
A phase 3 study to demonstrate whether lorlatinib given as monotherapy is superior to crizotinib alone in prolonging the progression-free survival in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients who are treatment naïve and to compare lorlatinib to crizotinib with respect to overall survival in the same population
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Being tested
- Lorlatinib, Crizotinib
- Keywords
- ALK; anaplastic lymphoma kinase; Non-Small-Cell Lung cancer; NSCLC
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LorlatinibDrug
Also called PF-06463922
ALK-positive NSCL treatment
CrizotinibDrug
Also called Xalkori
ALK-positive NSCL treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lorlatinib | Experimental | Lorlatinib single agent, 100 mg (4 x 25 mg) oral tables, QD, continuously Receives: Drug: Lorlatinib |
| Crizotinib | Active comparator | Crizotinib single agent, 250 mg (1 x 250) oral capsules, BID, continuously Receives: Drug: Crizotinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease as assessed by the independent radiologist or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS (in months) was calculated as (date of event or censoring-randomization+1)/30.4375. Progressive disease is defined per RECIST version 1.1, as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Secondary outcomes (27)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death or censoring - start date +1)/30.4375. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator's Assessment
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease as assessed by investigator or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS (in months) was calculated as (date of event or censoring-randomization+1)/30.4375. Progressive disease is defined per RECIST version 1.1, as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Based on BICR Assessment
ORR was the percentage of participants with objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.1 recorded from randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis <10 mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Based on Investigator's Assessment
ORR was the percentage of participants with objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.1 recorded from randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis <10 mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Intracranial Objective Response Rate (IC-ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Intracranial Objective Response (IC-OR) Based on BICR Assessment
IC-ORR was the percentage of participant with intracranial objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on intracranial disease in the subset of participants with at least 1 intracranial lesion per RECIST version 1.1 (modified) recorded from randomization until disease progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis <10 mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Intracranial Time to Progression (IC-TTP) Based on BICR Assessment
IC-TTP based on BICR assessment was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progression of intracranial disease, based on either new brain metastases or progression of existing brain metastases.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Duration of Response (DR) Based on BICR Assessment
DR was defined, for participants with a confirmed objective response (OR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1, as the time from the first documentation of OR to the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis <10 mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Intracranial Duration of Response (IC-DR) Based on BICR Assessment
IC-DR was defined, for participants with a confirmed intracranial objective response (OR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1, as the time from the first documentation of intracranial OR to the first documentation of intracranial progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis <10 mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Based on BICR Assessment
TTR based on BICR assessment was defined, for participants with a confirmed objective response, as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of objective response (complete response or partial response) which was subsequently confirmed. Complete response was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis <10 mm). Partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Intracranial Time to Tumor Response (IC-TTR) Based on BICR Assessment
IC-TTR was defined, for participants with a confirmed intracranial objective response, as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of intracranial objective response (complete response or partial response) which was subsequently confirmed. Complete response was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis <10 mm). Partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
PFS2 Based on Investigator's Assessment
PFS2 was defined as the time from randomization to the date of progression of disease on first subsequent systemic anti-cancer therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 45 months
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All-Causality and Treatment-Related)
An AE was an untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening experience, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. All AEs in the table below were treatment-emergent AEs. Grade 3 and 4 AEs in the table below indicated severe AE and life-threatening consequences respectively; Grade 5 indicated death due to AE. Treatment-related AEs were determined by investigators.
Measured: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Number of Participants With Changes in Hematology Laboratory Parameters From Baseline Maximum NCI-CTCAE Grade Lower Than 3 to Postbaseline Maximum Grade 3 or Grade 4
Laboratory test results were graded according to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grades 1 and 2 indicate mild and moderate AE, respectively; Grades 3 and 4 indicate severe AE and life-threatening consequences respectively; Grade 5 indicates death due to AE. Participants with laboratory test abnormalities were summarized according to the worst grade for each laboratory test result. All participants meeting the postbaseline grade criteria in the table below had baseline maximum grades lower than 3.
Measured: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participants With Changes in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters From Baseline Maximum NCI-CTCAE Grade Lower Than 3 to Postbaseline Maximum Grade 3 or Grade 4
Laboratory test results were graded according to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grades 1 and 2 indicate mild and moderate AE, respectively; Grades 3 and 4 indicate severe AE and life-threatening consequences respectively; Grade 5 indicates death due to AE. Participants with laboratory test abnormalities were summarized according to the worst grade for each laboratory test result. All participants meeting the postbaseline grade criteria in the table below had baseline maximum grades lower than 3.
Measured: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participants With Changes in Lipid Laboratory Parameters From Baseline Maximum NCI-CTCAE Grade Lower Than 3 to Postbaseline Maximum Grade 3 or Grade 4
Laboratory test results were graded according to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grades 1 and 2 indicate mild and moderate AE, respectively; Grades 3 and 4 indicate severe AE and life-threatening consequences respectively; Grade 5 indicates death due to AE. Participants with laboratory test abnormalities were summarized according to the worst grade for each laboratory test result. All participants meeting the postbaseline grade criteria in the table below had baseline maximum grades lower than 3.
Measured: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participant With Vital Signs and Body Weight Data Meeting Pre-defined Criteria
Vital signs data included pulse, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. Measurements were only provided once per timepoint. If multiple assessments were provided per timepoint, the maximum value were used for reporting. The pre-defined criteria of vital sign and body weight data were as follows: maximum pulse rate >120 beats per minute (bpm); minimum pulse rate <50 bpm; maximum increase in pulse rate ≥30 bpm; maximum decrease in pulse rate ≥30 bpm; increase in systolic blood Pressure ≥40 mmHg; decrease in systolic blood pressure ≥40 mmHg; decrease in systolic blood pressure ≥60 mmHg; increase in diastolic blood pressure ≥20 mmHg; decrease in diastolic blood pressure ≥20 mmHg; decrease in diastolic blood pressure ≥40 mmHg; increase in body weight ≥10%; increase in body weight ≥20%; decrease in body weight ≥10%.
Measured: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participant With Maximum Increase From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-defined Criteria
Baseline was defined as the last assessment performed on or prior to date of the first dose of study treatment. Triplicate ECGs were collected in the study and the average of the replicate assessments were used for summary analysis. The pre-defined criteria of ECG data were as follows: change from baseline in QTcF ≥60 msec, ≥30 msec but <60 msec, <30 msec; change from baseline in QTcB ≥60 msec, ≥30 msec but <60 msec, <30 msec; PR change ≥50% if absolute baseline value was <200 msec; PR change ≥25% if absolute baseline value was ≥200 msec; QRS change ≥50% if absolute baseline value was <100 msec; QRS change ≥25% if absolute baseline value was ≥100 msec.
Measured: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participants With Maximum Decrease From Baseline Greater Than or Equal to 20 Points in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Percentage
In this outcome measure, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of study treatment. Decrease from baseline was an absolute difference between baseline and observed value.
Measured: From Baseline up to 33 months
Change From Baseline in Total Scores of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)-II (Mood Assessment) Across Time
BDI-II (Mood Assessment) is a 21 item self-reported scale, with each item rated by participants on a 4-point scale (ranging from 0-3). The scale includes items capturing mood, (loss of pleasure, sadness, and irritability), suicidal ideation, and cognitive signs (punitive thoughts, self-criticism, self-dislike pessimism, poor concentration) as well as somatic signs (appetite, sleep, fatigue, libido). Scores were obtained by adding up the total points from the series of answers. The total score ranged from 0 to 63, with higher total scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The standardized cutoffs are as follows: 0-13: minimal depression; 14-19: mild depression; 20-28: moderate depression; 29-63: severe depression.
Measured: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1), C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C8D1, C10D1, C12D1, C14D1, C16D1, C18D1, C20D1, C22D1, C24D1, C26D1, C28D1, C30D1, C32D1, C34D1, C36D1, C38D1 and End of Treatment
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior Across Time
Suicidal ideation and behaviors were assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). The C-SSRS is a unique, simple and short method of assessing both behavior and ideation that tracks all suicidal events and provides a summary of suicidality. It assesses the lethality of attempts and other features of ideation (frequency, duration, controllability, reasons for ideation, and deterrents), all of which are significantly predictive of completed suicide.
Measured: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1), C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C8D1, C10D1, C12D1, C14D1, C16D1, C18D1, C20D1, C22D1, C24D1, C26D1, C28D1, C30D1, C32D1, C34D1, C36D1, C38D1 and End of Treatment
Change From Baseline in Global Quality of Life (QOL), Functional Scales and Symptoms Scales as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) During Overall Treatment
The EORTC QLQ C30 consists of 30 questions and includes 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health status/global quality of life scale; 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting); and 6 single items that assess additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, and diarrhea) and financial impact. All scales and single item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the functional scales represent higher levels of functioning. Higher scores on the global health status/quality of life scale represent higher health status/quality of life. Higher scores on symptom scales/items represent a greater presence of symptoms.
Measured: From Baseline up to Cycle 38 Day 1
Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptoms as Assessed by the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ- LC13) During Overall Treatment
The EORTC QLQ LC13 consists of 13 questions and includes 1 multi-item scale and 9 single items assessing symptoms (dyspnea, cough, haemoptysis, and site-specific pain), side effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia), and pain medication use. The scale scores rang from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
Measured: From Baseline up to Cycle 38 Day 1
Change From Baseline in Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Across Time
The EuroQol EQ-5D-5L is a participant-completed questionnaire designed to assess health status. There are 2 components to the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L: a descriptive system in which individuals rate their level of problems (none, slight, moderate, severe, extreme/unable) in 5 areas (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a VAS. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state) and higher scores indicate better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of all cycles from Cycle 2 to Cycle 38, and End of Treatment
Change From Baseline in Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) - Index Across Time
The EuroQol EQ-5D-5L is a participant-completed questionnaire designed to assess health status. There are 2 components to the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L: a descriptive system in which individuals rate their level of problems (none, slight, moderate, severe, extreme/unable) in 5 areas (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a VAS in which participants rate their overall health status from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). EQ-5D summary index is obtained with a formula that weights each level of the 5 dimensions. The index-based score is interpreted along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health).
Measured: Baseline, Day 1 of all cycles from Cycle 2 to Cycle 38, and End of Treatment
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Participant Reported Pain in Chest, Dyspnea, or Cough From QLQ-LC13
The EORTC QLQ LC13 consists of 13 questions and includes 1 multi-item scale and 9 single items assessing symptoms (dyspnea, cough, haemoptysis, and site-specific pain), side effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia), and pain medication use. The scale scores rang from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher ("worse") level of symptoms. TTD in pain in chest, dyspnea, or cough was defined as the time from randomization to the first time the participant's score showed a 10 point or greater increase after baseline in any of the 3 symptoms. TTD in months was calculated as (date of deterioration or censoring - randomization date +1)/30.4375.
Measured: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participant With ALK Domain Mutation in Plasma Circulating Nucleic Acid (CNA) Analysis at Screening, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 7 Day 1
The analysis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) domain mutation in plasma CNA was performed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the number of participants with one or more ALK mutations at Screening, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 7 Day 1 is presented here.
Measured: at Screening, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 7 Day 1
Number of Participant With ALK Fusion Variant in Plasma Circulating Nucleic Acid (CNA) Analysis at Screening, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 7 Day 1
The analysis of ALK fusion variant in plasma CNA was performed by NGS and the number of participants with fusion variants at Screening, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 7 Day 1 is presented here. In the table below, EML4-ALK is the abbreviation of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 anaplastic lymphoma kinase.
Measured: at Screening, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 7 Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Feb 2017
- Study start27 Apr 2017
- Primary completion20 Mar 2020
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 296 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03052608
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B7461006
- Other IDs
- 2023-509169-19-00, 2023
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Shaw AT, Solomon BJ, Felip E, Bauer TM, Liu G, Goto Y, Wu YL, Soo RA, Mazieres J, Kim DW, Montague D, Pronsati N, Wang IM, Paolini J, Polli A, Rifi N, Al-Hashimi A, Toffalorio F, Mok TSK. A plain language summary of the 7-year results from the CROWN study: lorlatinib compared with crizotinib in people with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2026 Oct 14:1-17. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2026.2734063. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42872552Lu SL, Chang YC, Liang CH, Chiang PL, Maresca K, Pollom E, Wilner K, Lu JT, Toffalorio F, Giaccone G, Duan C. Artificial intelligence-enabled early intracranial volumetric response predicts systemic progression-free survival in the phase III CROWN study. Neurooncol Adv. 2026 Sep 7;8(1):vdag236. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdag236. eCollection 2026 Jan-Dec.
PubMed 42781551Liu G, Solomon BJ, Mazieres J, Kim DW, Cortinovis D, Inoue T, Sharma R, Thurm H, Polli A, Bauer TM. Kinetics and management of adverse events associated with lorlatinib after 5 years of follow-up in the CROWN study. Oncologist. 2025 Oct 1;30(10):oyaf287. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf287.
PubMed 41124598Wu YL, Kim HR, Soo RA, Zhou Q, Akamatsu H, Chang GC, Chiu CH, Hayashi H, Kim SW, Goto Y, Kato T, Zhou J, Lee VH, Nishio M, Han B, Kim DW, Lu S, Polli A, Martini JF, Toffalorio F, Wong CH, Mok T. First-Line Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC: Five-Year Outcomes From the CROWN Study. J Thorac Oncol. 2025 Jul;20(7):955-968. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2025.02.021. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
PubMed 40024442Solomon BJ, Liu G, Felip E, K Mok TS, Soo RA, Mazieres J, Shaw AT, Marinis F, Goto Y, Wu YL, Kim DW, Martini JF, Messina R, Paolini J, Polli A, Thomaidou D, Toffalorio F, Bauer TM. Plain language summary: 5-year results from the CROWN study of lorlatinib vs crizotinib in non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2024 Dec;20(40):3377-3387. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2406117. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
PubMed 39360949Solomon BJ, Liu G, Felip E, Mok TSK, Soo RA, Mazieres J, Shaw AT, de Marinis F, Goto Y, Wu YL, Kim DW, Martini JF, Messina R, Paolini J, Polli A, Thomaidou D, Toffalorio F, Bauer TM. Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 10;42(29):3400-3409. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00581. Epub 2024 May 31.
PubMed 38819031Soo RA, Martini JF, van der Wekken AJ, Teraoka S, Ferrara R, Shaw AT, Shepard D, Calella AM, Polli A, Toffalorio F, Tomasini P, Chiu CH, Kowalski DM, Kim HR, Solomon BJ. Early Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics and Efficacy of Lorlatinib in Patients With Treatment-Naive, Advanced, ALK-Positive NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Nov;18(11):1568-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.05.021. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
PubMed 37295609Solomon BJ, Bauer TM, Mok TSK, Liu G, Mazieres J, de Marinis F, Goto Y, Kim DW, Wu YL, Jassem J, Lopez FL, Soo RA, Shaw AT, Polli A, Messina R, Iadeluca L, Toffalorio F, Felip E. Efficacy and safety of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated analysis of data from the phase 3, randomised, open-label CROWN study. Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Apr;11(4):354-366. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00437-4. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
PubMed 36535300Solomon BJ, Bauer TM, Ignatius Ou SH, Liu G, Hayashi H, Bearz A, Penkov K, Wu YL, Arrieta O, Jassem J, Calella AM, Peltz G, Polli A, Thurm H, Mok T. Post Hoc Analysis of Lorlatinib Intracranial Efficacy and Safety in Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer From the Phase III CROWN Study. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;40(31):3593-3602. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02278. Epub 2022 May 23.
PubMed 35605188Solomon BJ, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, Felip E, Goto Y, Liu G, Mazieres J, Kim DW, Mok T, Polli A, Thurm H, Calella AM, Peltz G, Shaw AT. Plain language summary of the CROWN study comparing lorlatinib with crizotinib for people with untreated non-small cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;17(34):4649-4656. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0904. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
PubMed 34585621Shaw AT, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, Felip E, Goto Y, Liu G, Mazieres J, Kim DW, Mok T, Polli A, Thurm H, Calella AM, Peltz G, Solomon BJ; CROWN Trial Investigators. First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 19;383(21):2018-2029. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027187.
PubMed 33207094Shaw AT, Felip E, Bauer TM, Besse B, Navarro A, Postel-Vinay S, Gainor JF, Johnson M, Dietrich J, James LP, Clancy JS, Chen J, Martini JF, Abbattista A, Solomon BJ. Lorlatinib in non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK or ROS1 rearrangement: an international, multicentre, open-label, single-arm first-in-man phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1590-1599. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30680-0. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
PubMed 29074098Gainor JF, Shaw AT. J-ALEX: alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive lung cancer. Lancet. 2017 Jul 1;390(10089):3-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31074-7. Epub 2017 May 10. No abstract available.
PubMed 28501139
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL STUDY OF LORLATINIB (PF-06463922) MONOTHERAPY VERSUS CRIZOTINIB MONOTHERAPY IN THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED ALK-POSITIVE NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03052608
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B7461006
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Keywords
- ALK; anaplastic lymphoma kinase; Non-Small-Cell Lung cancer; NSCLC
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 296 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 Apr 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A phase 3 study to demonstrate whether lorlatinib given as monotherapy is superior to crizotinib alone in prolonging the progression-free survival in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients who are treatment naïve and to compare lorlatinib to crizotinib with respect to overall survival in the same population
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lorlatinib | Experimental | Drug: LorlatinibLorlatinib single agent, 100 mg (4 x 25 mg) oral tables, QD, continuously |
| Crizotinib | Active comparator | Drug: CrizotinibCrizotinib single agent, 250 mg (1 x 250) oral capsules, BID, continuously |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC; at least 1 extracranial measurable target lesion not previously irradiated. CNS metastases allowed if asymptomatic and not currently requiring corticosteroid treatment.
- Availability of an archival FFPE tissue specimen.
- No prior systemic NSCLC treatment.
- ECOG PS 0, 1, or 2.
- Age ≥18 years .
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Spinal cord compression unless good pain control attained
- Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
- Radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to randomization, including stereotactic or partial brain irradiation. Whole brain irradiation within 4 weeks prior to randomization
- Active bacterial, fungal, or viral infection
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease, active or within 3 months prior to enrollment. Ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation, bradycardia or congenital long QT syndrome
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LorlatinibAlso: PF-06463922ALK-positive NSCL treatment | Drug | Lorlatinib |
| CrizotinibAlso: XalkoriALK-positive NSCL treatment | Drug | Crizotinib |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease as assessed by the independent radiologist or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS (in months) was calculated as (date of event or censoring-randomization+1)/30.4375. Progressive disease is defined per RECIST version 1.1, as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
27 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator's Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Based on BICR Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Based on Investigator's Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Intracranial Objective Response Rate (IC-ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Intracranial Objective Response (IC-OR) Based on BICR Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Intracranial Time to Progression (IC-TTP) Based on BICR Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Duration of Response (DR) Based on BICR Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Intracranial Duration of Response (IC-DR) Based on BICR Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Based on BICR Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Intracranial Time to Tumor Response (IC-TTR) Based on BICR Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
PFS2 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 45 months
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs; All-Causality and Treatment-Related)
Time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months
Number of Participants With Changes in Hematology Laboratory Parameters From Baseline Maximum NCI-CTCAE Grade Lower Than 3 to Postbaseline Maximum Grade 3 or Grade 4
Time frame: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participants With Changes in Chemistry Laboratory Parameters From Baseline Maximum NCI-CTCAE Grade Lower Than 3 to Postbaseline Maximum Grade 3 or Grade 4
Time frame: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participants With Changes in Lipid Laboratory Parameters From Baseline Maximum NCI-CTCAE Grade Lower Than 3 to Postbaseline Maximum Grade 3 or Grade 4
Time frame: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participant With Vital Signs and Body Weight Data Meeting Pre-defined Criteria
Time frame: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participant With Maximum Increase From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-defined Criteria
Time frame: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participants With Maximum Decrease From Baseline Greater Than or Equal to 20 Points in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Percentage
Time frame: From Baseline up to 33 months
Change From Baseline in Total Scores of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)-II (Mood Assessment) Across Time
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1), C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C8D1, C10D1, C12D1, C14D1, C16D1, C18D1, C20D1, C22D1, C24D1, C26D1, C28D1, C30D1, C32D1, C34D1, C36D1, C38D1 and End of Treatment
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior Across Time
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1), C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C8D1, C10D1, C12D1, C14D1, C16D1, C18D1, C20D1, C22D1, C24D1, C26D1, C28D1, C30D1, C32D1, C34D1, C36D1, C38D1 and End of Treatment
Change From Baseline in Global Quality of Life (QOL), Functional Scales and Symptoms Scales as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) During Overall Treatment
Time frame: From Baseline up to Cycle 38 Day 1
Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptoms as Assessed by the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ- LC13) During Overall Treatment
Time frame: From Baseline up to Cycle 38 Day 1
Change From Baseline in Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Across Time
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of all cycles from Cycle 2 to Cycle 38, and End of Treatment
Change From Baseline in Health Status as Assessed by EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) - Index Across Time
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of all cycles from Cycle 2 to Cycle 38, and End of Treatment
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Participant Reported Pain in Chest, Dyspnea, or Cough From QLQ-LC13
Time frame: From Baseline up to 33 months
Number of Participant With ALK Domain Mutation in Plasma Circulating Nucleic Acid (CNA) Analysis at Screening, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 7 Day 1
Time frame: at Screening, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 7 Day 1
Number of Participant With ALK Fusion Variant in Plasma Circulating Nucleic Acid (CNA) Analysis at Screening, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 7 Day 1
Time frame: at Screening, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 7 Day 1
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42872552Shaw AT, Solomon BJ, Felip E, Bauer TM, Liu G, Goto Y, Wu YL, Soo RA, Mazieres J, Kim DW, Montague D, Pronsati N, Wang IM, Paolini J, Polli A, Rifi N, Al-Hashimi A, Toffalorio F, Mok TSK. A plain language summary of the 7-year results from the CROWN study: lorlatinib compared with crizotinib in people with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2026 Oct 14:1-17. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2026.2734063. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42781551Lu SL, Chang YC, Liang CH, Chiang PL, Maresca K, Pollom E, Wilner K, Lu JT, Toffalorio F, Giaccone G, Duan C. Artificial intelligence-enabled early intracranial volumetric response predicts systemic progression-free survival in the phase III CROWN study. Neurooncol Adv. 2026 Sep 7;8(1):vdag236. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdag236. eCollection 2026 Jan-Dec.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41124598Liu G, Solomon BJ, Mazieres J, Kim DW, Cortinovis D, Inoue T, Sharma R, Thurm H, Polli A, Bauer TM. Kinetics and management of adverse events associated with lorlatinib after 5 years of follow-up in the CROWN study. Oncologist. 2025 Oct 1;30(10):oyaf287. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf287.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40024442Wu YL, Kim HR, Soo RA, Zhou Q, Akamatsu H, Chang GC, Chiu CH, Hayashi H, Kim SW, Goto Y, Kato T, Zhou J, Lee VH, Nishio M, Han B, Kim DW, Lu S, Polli A, Martini JF, Toffalorio F, Wong CH, Mok T. First-Line Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC: Five-Year Outcomes From the CROWN Study. J Thorac Oncol. 2025 Jul;20(7):955-968. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2025.02.021. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39360949Solomon BJ, Liu G, Felip E, K Mok TS, Soo RA, Mazieres J, Shaw AT, Marinis F, Goto Y, Wu YL, Kim DW, Martini JF, Messina R, Paolini J, Polli A, Thomaidou D, Toffalorio F, Bauer TM. Plain language summary: 5-year results from the CROWN study of lorlatinib vs crizotinib in non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2024 Dec;20(40):3377-3387. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2406117. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38819031Solomon BJ, Liu G, Felip E, Mok TSK, Soo RA, Mazieres J, Shaw AT, de Marinis F, Goto Y, Wu YL, Kim DW, Martini JF, Messina R, Paolini J, Polli A, Thomaidou D, Toffalorio F, Bauer TM. Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 10;42(29):3400-3409. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00581. Epub 2024 May 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37295609Soo RA, Martini JF, van der Wekken AJ, Teraoka S, Ferrara R, Shaw AT, Shepard D, Calella AM, Polli A, Toffalorio F, Tomasini P, Chiu CH, Kowalski DM, Kim HR, Solomon BJ. Early Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics and Efficacy of Lorlatinib in Patients With Treatment-Naive, Advanced, ALK-Positive NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Nov;18(11):1568-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.05.021. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36535300Solomon BJ, Bauer TM, Mok TSK, Liu G, Mazieres J, de Marinis F, Goto Y, Kim DW, Wu YL, Jassem J, Lopez FL, Soo RA, Shaw AT, Polli A, Messina R, Iadeluca L, Toffalorio F, Felip E. Efficacy and safety of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated analysis of data from the phase 3, randomised, open-label CROWN study. Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Apr;11(4):354-366. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00437-4. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35605188Solomon BJ, Bauer TM, Ignatius Ou SH, Liu G, Hayashi H, Bearz A, Penkov K, Wu YL, Arrieta O, Jassem J, Calella AM, Peltz G, Polli A, Thurm H, Mok T. Post Hoc Analysis of Lorlatinib Intracranial Efficacy and Safety in Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer From the Phase III CROWN Study. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;40(31):3593-3602. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02278. Epub 2022 May 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34585621Solomon BJ, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, Felip E, Goto Y, Liu G, Mazieres J, Kim DW, Mok T, Polli A, Thurm H, Calella AM, Peltz G, Shaw AT. Plain language summary of the CROWN study comparing lorlatinib with crizotinib for people with untreated non-small cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;17(34):4649-4656. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0904. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33207094Shaw AT, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, Felip E, Goto Y, Liu G, Mazieres J, Kim DW, Mok T, Polli A, Thurm H, Calella AM, Peltz G, Solomon BJ; CROWN Trial Investigators. First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 19;383(21):2018-2029. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027187.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29074098Shaw AT, Felip E, Bauer TM, Besse B, Navarro A, Postel-Vinay S, Gainor JF, Johnson M, Dietrich J, James LP, Clancy JS, Chen J, Martini JF, Abbattista A, Solomon BJ. Lorlatinib in non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK or ROS1 rearrangement: an international, multicentre, open-label, single-arm first-in-man phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1590-1599. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30680-0. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
166 sites in 23 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lorlatinib and Crizotinib in people with Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, run by Pfizer at 166 sites in 23 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 166 sites in United States, Japan, France, Italy, Spain and 18 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Apr 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment (time frame: From time of Study Start up to 33 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03052608, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2025.