AzTrials
AzTrials

Plantar FascitisPhase 1NCT03054610

Therapeutic Effect of Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis.

A Phase 1 study testing Betamethason Sodium Phosphate, Ropivacaine and Botulinum Toxins, Type A in people with Plantar Fascitis and Botulinum Toxins, Type A, run by Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon at 1 site in Mexico.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of plantar heel pain and is commonly present in people 40 years of age or older, overweight, sedentary or with intense physical activity. It is caused by the over-stretching of the plantar fascia, which is a band of connective tissue that extends to the base of the phalanges. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Plantar Fascitis, Botulinum Toxins, Type A
What is being tested?
Betamethason Sodium Phosphate, Ropivacaine and Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteMexico
Study dates
Jan 2015to Apr 2020
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with chronic pain in the heel at the insertion of the plantar fascia in the posteroinferior tuberosity of the calcaneus.
  • Patients who agreed to be part of the study and signed informed consent.
  • Patients older than 18 years.
  • Patients with two or more weeks of evolution.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with another associated pathology such as knee or ankle dysfunction, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, etc.
  • Neurological abnormalities: mental retardation or some psychiatric abnormality.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Previous surgery on the heel.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mexico1 site
  • Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

    Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of plantar heel pain and is commonly present in people 40 years of age or older, overweight, sedentary or with intense physical activity. It is caused by the over-stretching of the plantar fascia, which is a band of connective tissue that extends to the base of the phalanges. This produces micro-tears more commonly in its origin in the medial tuberosity of the calcaneus which causes an inflammatory process and pain. This pain usually occurs when the person gets up in the morning after sleeping or after sitting for a long time. That is when the fascia is stretched after being in a contraction position.

There are a great variety of treatments for this pathology, of these, one of the most common is the use of intralesional steroids, which a weighing that reduces symptomatology in many cases also has undesirable effects such as subcutaneous fat atrophy, rupture of the plantar fascia, peripheral nerve injury, muscle damage and stress fractures. Other treatments are extracorporeal shock waves, application of platelet-rich plasma and application of botulinum toxin A intralesional. All of them are accompanied by insoles, night splints and stretching exercises of the Achilles tendon and the plantar fascia.

Read more

Recent studies have shown that the application of botulinum toxin A intralesional in patients with plantar fasciitis helps to improve the symptomatology to decrease pain in both intensity and presentation time. Decreased inflammation of the plantar fascia has also been demonstrated. This is the sale of the usual form of action of the botulinum toxin, which is applied regularly in the muscles to block the release of acetylcholine in the neuromuscular plaque and obtain its relaxation and not directly in the pain points. We believe that the botulinum toxin can be applied intralesional currently, since there is information that the toxin has analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect and not just muscle relaxation.

The aim of our work demonstrate that the use of botulinum toxin A and intralesional stretching exercises is superior to intralesional steroids and stretching trying to establish a safer and less painful therapy avoiding complications prior to the application of steroid application.

Read the detailed description

Plantar fasciitis represents the most frequent cause of chronic heel pain, usually occurs in patients 40 years or older, overweight, sedentary or with intense physical activity.

The plantar fascia function is to prevent foot collapse by its anatomical orientation and by its tensile forces; It originates at the base of the calcaneus and extends distally to the phalanges. The plantar fascia stretching prevents the displacement of the calcaneus and the metatarsals and maintains the medial longitudinal arch. Simulates a cable attached to the calcaneus and metatarsophalangeal joints. The windlass mechanism described by Hicks, for the action of the plantar fascia is usually explained when a dorsiflexion of the fingers occurs, this leads to an effective shortening of the length of the plantar fascia causing an elevation of the arch. The extension of the fingers increases the arch of tension with the metatarsophalangeal joint as axis or anchor point. The shortening of the plantar fascia resulting from the dorsiflexion of the hallux is the essence of the windlass mechanism. When a fasciotomy is performed, this mechanism is lost, decreasing the stability of the arch and this does not allow a phase of stable terminal stay.

Historically the development of plantar fasciitis is attributed to biomechanical defects such as hyperpronation, this contributes to excesive mobility of the foot, which increases the stress applied to the musculofascial structures and soft tissue through an elongation of plantar fascia. There are other studies that have shown that one of the main factors for the appearance of this disease is the mechanical overload and it has been reported that the tension necessary for the rupture of the windlass mechanism ranges from 1.4 to 3.4 of the body weight of the subject.

There is a great variety of therapies reported for the treatment of this pathology, intralesional application of steroids, platelet-rich plasma, intralesional botulinum toxin A, treatments such as extracorporeal shock waves, all of which are assisted by stretching excercises of the gastrocnemius and sole muscles or stretching of the plantar fascia.

The clinical use of botulinum toxin A has expanded beyond the original indications by its effects on cholinergic neurons. The increased interest in the potential role to treat conditions of chronic pain is partially based on the effects of the toxin on the modulation of the release of substance P, on the calcitonin-related gene peptide and glutamate. On the other hand, the toxin has shown its effect on the inhibition of inflamatory pain and on the release of neurotransmitters from primary sensory neurons in a rat model. It also inhibits peripheral sensitization, which leads to an indirect decrease in central sensitization. It is unclear whether the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with botulinum toxin A works by causing muscle paralysis or by analgesic anti-inflamatory effects or by both mechanisms. A combined effect, induction of paresia of the muscles originating in the medial calcaneus process and direct analgesia due to analgesic anti-inflamatory properties.

We performed a previous study, where we compared the use of botulinum toxin A against intralesional steroids; The application of botulinum toxin A was performed in the twin and sole muscle wombs, while dexamethasone was applied in the area of greatest fascia pain. Patients who received botulinum toxin had a faster and more sustained improvement than patients who received steroids.

Another common form of treatment for plantar fasciitis is the application of intralesional steroids; however, there are reports of complications associated with these drugs and one of the main ones is the rupture of the plantar fascia, which ranges from 2.4% to 5.7% ; Despite pain relief due to rupture, many patients have other associated complications such as lateral plantar nerve dysfunction, stress fractures, among others, mainly after 2 applications.

Objective and originality: The aim of our study is to demonstrate that the use of botulinum toxin A for the treatment of plantar fasciitis is superior to treatment with intralesional steroids. We try to establish a safer and less painful treatment therapy for the patient, since the use of steroids is associated with complications. We believe that the botulinum toxin A can also be applied intralesional, since there is information that indicates that this toxin has analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect in its local application and not only by the action of muscle relaxation by blocking the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junctions.

General objective:

To assess the therapeutic effect of botulinum toxin A in patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis.

Hypothesis:

The application of botulinum toxin A presents better results in the treatment of plantar fascitis than the use of intralesional steroids.

Material and Methods:

All patients who are recruited for the study will be explained regarding the treatment protocol, and will also sign informed consent prior to inclusion in the study. Measurement of the plantar fascia using ultrasound and measurement of ranges of movement of ankle flexion, as well as measuring and weighing patients to know their body mass index. They will be randomized into one of three treatment groups. Group 1 (control) treatment with 5 ml of anesthetic (Ropivacaine 7.5%), Group 2 (steroids) application of 1ml of Betamethasone plus 3 ml of local anesthetic and Group 3 (botulinum toxin A) 250 U, in the insertion zone of the plantar fascia. All patients will receive a detailed explanation of the stretching exercises of the plantar fascia, as well as their frequency and duration. Afterwards, the patients will be evaluated by a blinded investigator, at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after infiltration; evaluation scales will be applied: Visual Analogue Scale (EVA), Maryland Foot \& Ankle Score, Foot \& Ankle Outcome Score (AOFAS), Foot \& Ankle Disability Index (FADI).

Being tested
Betamethason Sodium Phosphate, Ropivacaine, Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Keywords
plantar fascitis, Botulinum toxin A, Betamethason Sodium Phosphate, infiltration, plantar fascia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Betamethason Sodium PhosphateDrug

    Also called Celestone Soluspan

  • RopivacaineDrug

    Also called Ropiconest

  • Botulinum Toxins, Type ADrug

    Also called Dysport

Study groups in NCT03054610
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlActive comparator5 ml of local anesthetic (ropivacaine 7.5%)
Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine
SteroidActive comparator1ml of steroid Betamethason Sodium Phosphate (Celestone®) and local anesthetic (ropivacaine 7.5%)
Receives: Drug: Betamethason Sodium Phosphate; Drug: Ropivacaine
BTX-AExperimental200U Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Receives: Drug: Botulinum Toxins, Type A

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Foot and Ankle Disability Index

    We decided to include the FADI score because this type of pathology occurs in patients with sports activity and often causes disability in them, Values activities such as standing, walking on flat or uneven surfaces, inclined planes, time without discomfort while walking, and includes a module where sports activities are valued. Also it counts on an evaluation of the pain in foot and ankle. The best result obtained is 136 points.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Maryland Foot Score

    Is divided into several sections where pain is assessed, giving 45 points when there is no pain and 0 when there is inability to work, a function that is divided into two sections, walking and daily activities; And a section that evaluates the shape of the foot, the best score is 100, which means that there is no problem with the foot, and the lowest score is 0.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Ankle-Hindfoot Scale

    American Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Society

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Visual Analogue scale

    Values the pain on a numerical scale of 0-10, where 0 means no pain and 10 greater degree of pain experienced by the patient, it is also complemented by a color scale, where green is equal to painless and red is the more intense pain the patient has had.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Measurement of the plantar fascia using ultrasound

    Measure the thickness of the plantar fascia at the beginning and end of the protocol, placing the transducer at the insertion site of the plantar fascia.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Body Mass Index

    Measure height and weight of patients at the beginning of the protocol.

    Measured: 15 minutes

  6. Measure degrees of dorsiflexion

    Use a goniometer as a tool to measure degrees of dorsiflexion.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Feb 2017
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2020
  4. Study completionApr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03054610
Sponsor's protocol ID
OR15-001
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
13 Feb 2017
Last updated
27 May 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Irving DB, Cook JL, Menz HB. Factors associated with chronic plantar heel pain: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2006 May;9(1-2):11-22; discussion 23-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.02.004. Epub 2006 Apr 3.

    PubMed 16584917
  • Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2002 Apr;36(2):95-101. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.36.2.95.

    PubMed 11916889
  • May TJ, Judy TA, Conti M, Cowan JE. Current treatment of plantar fasciitis. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2002 Oct;1(5):278-84. doi: 10.1249/00149619-200210000-00005.

    PubMed 12831690
  • Kim C, Cashdollar MR, Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Fuge L. Incidence of plantar fascia ruptures following corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010 Dec;3(6):335-7. doi: 10.1177/1938640010378530. Epub 2010 Sep 3.

    PubMed 20817847
  • Acevedo JI, Beskin JL. Complications of plantar fascia rupture associated with corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Feb;19(2):91-7. doi: 10.1177/107110079801900207.

    PubMed 9498581
  • Glazer JL. An approach to the diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Phys Sportsmed. 2009 Jun;37(2):74-9. doi: 10.3810/psm.2009.06.1712.

    PubMed 20048512
  • Sampson S, Gerhardt M, Mandelbaum B. Platelet rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008 Dec;1(3-4):165-74. doi: 10.1007/s12178-008-9032-5.

    PubMed 19468902
  • Rompe JD, Cacchio A, Weil L Jr, Furia JP, Haist J, Reiners V, Schmitz C, Maffulli N. Plantar fascia-specific stretching versus radial shock-wave therapy as initial treatment of plantar fasciopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2514-22. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01651.

    PubMed 21048171
  • Soomekh DJ. Current concepts for the use of platelet-rich plasma in the foot and ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2011 Jan;28(1):155-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2010.09.001.

    PubMed 21276524
  • Digiovanni BF, Nawoczenski DA, Malay DP, Graci PA, Williams TT, Wilding GE, Baumhauer JF. Plantar fascia-specific stretching exercise improves outcomes in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. A prospective clinical trial with two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1775-81. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01281.

    PubMed 16882901
  • Tsai WC, Hsu CC, Chen CP, Chen MJ, Yu TY, Chen YJ. Plantar fasciitis treated with local steroid injection: comparison between sonographic and palpation guidance. J Clin Ultrasound. 2006 Jan;34(1):12-6. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20177.

    PubMed 16353228
  • Placzek R, Deuretzbacher G, Meiss AL. Treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with Botulinum toxin A: preliminary clinical results. Clin J Pain. 2006 Feb;22(2):190-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000169674.34191.0e.

    PubMed 16428954
  • Seyler TM, Smith BP, Marker DR, Ma J, Shen J, Smith TL, Mont MA, Kolaski K, Koman LA. Botulinum neurotoxin as a therapeutic modality in orthopaedic surgery: more than twenty years of experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90 Suppl 4:133-45. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00901. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18984726
  • Elizondo-Rodriguez J, Araujo-Lopez Y, Moreno-Gonzalez JA, Cardenas-Estrada E, Mendoza-Lemus O, Acosta-Olivo C. A comparison of botulinum toxin a and intralesional steroids for the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized, double-blinded study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):8-14. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460215.

    PubMed 23386757

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Betamethason Sodium Phosphate, Ropivacaine and Botulinum Toxins, Type A in people with Plantar Fascitis and Botulinum Toxins, Type A, run by Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon at 1 site in Mexico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Foot and Ankle Disability Index (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03054610, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in