AzTrials
AzTrials

Streptococcal InfectionsNCT03055728

Rapid Strep Testing in Children With Recent Streptococcal Pharyngitis

An observational study of Streptococcal Infections, run by Georgetown University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the rapid antigen detection test for Group A streptococcal pharyngitis diagnosis might yield higher rates of false positive results in patients who have been treated for GAS pharyngitis within 28 days of the test. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 20 years
Conditions the study is for
Streptococcal Infections
What is being tested?
Rapid strep antigen detection test and throat culture
How many people
600 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
9 May 2013to 16 Jan 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 20 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: The participants in the study will include 600 children, aged 2 to 20 years old, selected from a private practice in Northern Virginia who present to the practice with signs or symptoms suggestive of acute pharyngitis. Potential subjects who have been treated with less than 10 days of antibiotic therapy, patients who report non-compliance with previous antibiotic therapy, patients who have already been included in the study and children with evidence of GAS carrier status will be excluded.

Who may be able to join

  • 2-20 years old
  • Current signs and symptoms suggestive of acute pharyngitis, including sore throat, fever, abdominal pain and cervical lymphadenitis.

Who cannot join

  • Potential subjects who have been treated with less than 10 days of antibiotic therapy
  • Patients who report non-compliance with previous antibiotic therapy
  • Patients who have already been included in the study and children with evidence of GAS carrier status

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Northern Virginia Pediatrics

    Falls Church, Virginia, 22046

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine if the rapid antigen detection test for Group A streptococcal pharyngitis diagnosis might yield higher rates of false positive results in patients who have been treated for GAS pharyngitis within 28 days of the test.

Read the detailed description

Strep pharyngitis, or strep throat, is a common infection afflicting children, aged 2 and above. Testing for strep pharyngitis consists of a rapid test and/or a throat culture. However, it has been observed that rapid testing may not be accurate in children with a recent history of strep pharyngitis. Therefore, this study aims to determine the accuracy of rapid strep testing in children who are presenting with symptoms of strep throat, who also have a recent history of and treatment for strep pharyngitis. By demonstrating an inaccuracy in rapid strep testing in patients with a recent history of strep pharyngitis, unnecessary testing and antibiotic use may be decreased, thereby reducing costs, overuse of antibiotics, and antibiotic resistance.

The participants in the study will include 600 children, aged 2 to 20 years old, selected from a private practice in Northern Virginia who present to the practice with signs or symptoms suggestive of acute pharyngitis. Subjects are children who are presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute pharyngitis by the Centor criteria, including sore throat, fever, abdominal pain and cervical lymphadenitis. Any child with above presenting symptoms who is to undergo Streptococcus rapid antigen testing will be recruited to participate in the study.

A letter of consent will be provided to the parents and guardians of the involved child, stating that the study will be voluntary and confidential, and that all results will be kept in a safe environment.

Investigators will be testing the difference between two proportions, the false positive rate in previously treated compared to those not treated.

Being tested
Rapid strep antigen detection test, throat culture
Keywords
streptococcal infections, rapid strep testing, rapid antigen detection test
Medical subject headings
Streptococcal Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rapid strep antigen detection testDiagnostic test

    Also called rapid strep

    Pharyngeal swab for rapid antigen detection of streptococcus

  • throat cultureDiagnostic test

    Pharyngeal swab for culture for bacteria (specifically streptococcus) presence

Study groups in NCT03055728
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1 / Study GroupSubjects presenting with signs or symptoms of acute pharyngitis, with a history of culture-proven GAS infection and subsequent 10-day antibiotic treatment within the preceding 28 days. Subjects will have a rapid strep antigen detection test and a throat culture to determine presence of strep.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Rapid strep antigen detection test; Diagnostic Test: throat culture
Group 2 / Control GroupSubjects presenting with signs or symptoms of acute pharyngitis, without a recent history of GAS infection. Subjects will have a rapid strep antigen detection test and a throat culture to determine presence of strep.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Rapid strep antigen detection test; Diagnostic Test: throat culture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of false positives and false negatives in rapid antigen testing compared to throat culture

    The primary objective is to use rapid antigen test results to compare the sensitivity and specificity of rapid antigen testing in children with symptoms of pharyngitis with and without a recent history of Group A streptococcus pharyngitis.

    Measured: 48-72 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Feb 2017
  2. Study start9 May 2013
  3. Primary completion16 Jan 2018
  4. Study completion16 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
600 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03055728
Sponsor's protocol ID
2013-0388
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
9 Feb 2017
Last updated
7 Jun 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sheeler RD, Houston MS, Radke S, Dale JC, Adamson SC. Accuracy of rapid strep testing in patients who have had recent streptococcal pharyngitis. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002 Jul-Aug;15(4):261-5.

    PubMed 12150457
  • Edmonson MB, Farwell KR. Relationship between the clinical likelihood of group a streptococcal pharyngitis and the sensitivity of a rapid antigen-detection test in a pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):280-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0907.

    PubMed 15687433
  • McIsaac WJ, White D, Tannenbaum D, Low DE. A clinical score to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in patients with sore throat. CMAJ. 1998 Jan 13;158(1):75-83.

    PubMed 9475915
  • Llor C, Calvino O, Hernandez S, Crispi S, Perez-Bauer M, Fernandez Y, Martinez T, Gomez FF, Cots JM. Repetition of the rapid antigen test in initially negative supposed streptococcal pharyngitis is not necessary in adults. Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Sep;63(9):1340-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02048.x.

    PubMed 19691618
  • Leung AK, Newman R, Kumar A, Davies HD. Rapid antigen detection testing in diagnosing group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2006 Sep;6(5):761-6. doi: 10.1586/14737159.6.5.761.

    PubMed 17009909

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Streptococcal Infections, run by Georgetown University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of false positives and false negatives in rapid antigen testing compared to throat culture (time frame: 48-72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03055728, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jun 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in