AzTrials
AzTrials

Tension-Type HeadacheNCT03056131

Diacutaneous Fibrolysis, Effects on Tension Type Headache

A study testing Diacutaneous Fibrolysis in people with Tension-Type Headache, run by Sara Cabanillas Barea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Tension Type Headache (TTH) is a frecuent type of headache disorder (about 1 person in 5 worldwide). Individuals with TTH typically present pericraneal tenderness and an increased cervical muscle tone. The most common treatment in primary care consists mainly on analgesic medication. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tension-Type Headache
What is being tested?
Diacutaneous Fibrolysis
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
82 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2015to May 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of Tension-Type Headache according to the criteria of ICDH-III.

Who cannot join

  • Currently undergoing physiotherapy treatment for headache
  • Modification of pharmacological treatment in the last month
  • Presence of red flags

About this study

Tension Type Headache (TTH) is a frecuent type of headache disorder (about 1 person in 5 worldwide). Individuals with TTH typically present pericraneal tenderness and an increased cervical muscle tone.

The most common treatment in primary care consists mainly on analgesic medication. However, different techniques of manual therapy have been shown to be effective in the treatment of these patients. Diacutaneous fibrolysis shows clinical benefits in relieving symptoms of tension type headache, but there is no scientific evidence that analyzes this effects.

Read more

The hypothesis of this study was that adding treatment with diacutaneous fibrolysis to the usual conservative treatment has beneficial effects on different variables of the headache.

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of diacutaneous fibrolisis on intensity, frequency, duration of headache and cervical function in patients with tension type headache.

A randomized controlled clinical trial has been designed to evaluate the effectiveness of diacutaneous fibrolysis technique compared to usual general practicioner care in patientes with tension type headache.

The study protocol has been approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee from the Aragon Community and all patients provided written consent.

Eighty-two people with clinical diagnosis of TTH were randomized into a intervention group or a control group. Intervention group received three sessions of Diacutaneous Fibrolysis, while control group was advised to maintain their usual pharmacologic treatment. Pain intensity (VAS), frecuency, location, cervical range of motion, head forward position and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were measured at baseline, postintervention, and 1 month follow-up after treatment. The Spanish version of the HIT-6 Questionnaire was used to measure disability/function at baseline and follow-up.

Being tested
Diacutaneous Fibrolysis
Medical subject headings
Tension-Type Headache

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Diacutaneous FibrolysisDevice

    Diacutaneous Fibrolysis is a non invasive physiotherapeutic technique applied by means a set of metallic hooks having the advantage of allowing a deeper and more precise application, which could not be achieved manually

Study groups in NCT03056131
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Diacutaneous Fibrolysis TreatmentExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Diacutaneous Fibrolysis
Control GroupNo interventionNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Pain Intensity

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Measured: 10 days

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in Pain Frequency

    Measured: 10 days

  2. Pressure Pain Threshold

    Pressure algometry

    Measured: 10 days

  3. Pericraneal tenderness

    Manual assessment

    Measured: 10 days

  4. Cervical Range of motion

    Cervical Range of Motion (CROM)

    Measured: 10 days

  5. Dissability

    HIT-6 Questionnaire

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Feb 2017
  2. Study startOct 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2017
  4. Study completionMay 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
82 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03056131
Sponsor's protocol ID
PI15/0229
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
13 Feb 2017
Last updated
2 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cabanillas-Barea S, Perez-Guillen S, Lopez-de-Celis C, Rodriguez-Sanz J, Fanlo-Mazas P, Carrasco-Uribarren A. Effects of diacutaneous fibrolysis in patients with tension-type headache: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Mar 27;18(3):e0273877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273877. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 36972231

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Diacutaneous Fibrolysis in people with Tension-Type Headache, run by Sara Cabanillas Barea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Pain Intensity (time frame: 10 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03056131, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in