Degenerative Joint DiseaseR3-PASNCT03056534
R3 Delta Ceramic Acetabular System PAS U.S.
An observational study of Degenerative Joint Disease, run by Smith & Nephew, Inc. at 8 sites in United States.
Trial summary
R3 Delta Post-Approval Study U.S. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Degenerative Joint Disease
- What is being tested?
- R3 Biolox Delta Ceramic Acetabular System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 189 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Feb 2018to 31 May 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: To eliminate the potential for selection bias, Investigators should consecutively pre-screen all subjects undergoing planned total hip replacement with the R3 delta Ceramic Acetabular System.
Who may be able to join
- Patient is 18-75 years old and he/she is skeletally mature
- Patient requires primary total hip arthroplasty due to non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (degenerative joint disease) such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or traumatic arthritis.
- Patient has met an acceptable preoperative medical clearance and is free from or treated for cardiac, pulmonary, hematological, etc., conditions that would pose excessive operative risk
- Patient is willing and able to participate in required follow-up visits and to complete study procedures and questionnaires
- Patient has consented to participating in the study by signing the IRB/EC approved informed consent form
Who cannot join
- Patients with insufficient quantity or quality of bone support; metabolic bone disease; osteoporosis
- Patients with neurological or muscular conditions that would place extreme load or instability upon the hip joint
- Patients with active joint infections or chronic systemic infection
- Obese patients where obesity is defined as BMI ≥ 40
- Skeletal immaturity
- Known allergy to implant materials
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
United States8 sites
Luminis Health
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
St. David's Center for Hip and Knee Replacement
Austin, Texas, 78750
Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21215
INOV8 Healthcare
Houston, Texas, 77043
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Reno Orthopaedic Clinic Foundation
Reno, Nevada, 89503
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education
Tampa, Florida, 33637
Emory University
Tucker, Georgia, 30084
About this study
Official title: Post-Approval Study of the R3 Biolox Delta Ceramic Acetabular System - US
R3 Delta Post-Approval Study U.S.
Read the detailed description
Post-Approval Study of the R3 Biolox Delta Ceramic Acetabular System - US The R3 Ceramic Acetabular System is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients requiring primary total hip arthroplasty due to non-inflammatory arthritis (degenerative joint disease) such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or traumatic arthritis. The expected timeline for the study is a total of approximately 5 years: 6 months for site initiation, 12 months for subject enrollment, 3 years until the last subject enrolled has reached the 3 year follow-up interval.
- Conditions
- Degenerative Joint Disease
- Being tested
- R3 Biolox Delta Ceramic Acetabular System
- Keywords
- Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty, Non-Inflammatory Arthritis, Degenerative Joint Disease, R3 Delta Ceramic Acetabular Insert
- Medical subject headings
- Joint Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
R3 Biolox Delta Ceramic Acetabular SystemDevice
All study related procedures with the R3 delta Ceramic Acetabular System must be performed according to the recommended surgical technique described in the labeling and in the instructions for use (IFU).
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Study Success at 3 Years Postoperative
Number of participants with overall study success were identified as "Success" or "Failure" where success indicated all the following:
- No component revision for any reason
- Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) greater than or equal to 80 points
- No radiographic failure (Radiographic failure was defined as no radiolucencies greater than 2 millimeters (mm) in 50% or more in any of the cup or stem zones, no femoral or acetabular subsidence greater than or equal to 5 mm from baseline, and no acetabular cup inclination changes greater than 4 degrees from baseline when accompanied by a "Mild", "Moderate", "Marked" or "Disabled" mHHS pain score.)
Measured: 3 Years Postoperative
Component Revisions at 3 Years Postoperative
Number of participants component revisions identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no component revision for any reason.
Measured: 3 Years Postoperative
Number of Participants With Modified Harris Hip Score Greater Than or Equal to 80 Points
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a joint specific score that consists of 10 items covering domains of pain, function, functional activities, absence of deformity, and hip range of motion. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) includes all the same domains as the HHS except for the hip range of motion. Total mHHS scale ranges from 0 (worst) to 95 (best). The number of participants were identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as a mHHS that is greater than or equal to 80 points.
Measured: 3 Years postoperative
Overall Radiographic Success at 3 Years Postoperative
Number of participants with overall radiographic success identified as "Success" or "Failure" where success indicated all of the following:
- No radiolucencies greater than 2 millimeters (mm) in 50% or more in any of the cup or stem zones
- No femoral or acetabular subsidence greater than or equal to 5 mm from baseline
- No acetabular cup inclination changes greater than 4 degrees from baseline when accompanied by a "Mild", "Moderate", "Marked" or "Disabled" mHHS pain score
Measured: 3 Years Postoperative
Number of Participants With Absence of Radiolucency at 3 Years Postoperative
Number of participants identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no radiolucencies greater than 2 millimeters (mm) in 50% or more in any of the cup or stem zones
Measured: 3 Years postoperative
Number of Participants With Absence of Femoral Subsidence or Acetabular Migration at 3 Years Postoperative
Number of participants identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no femoral subsidence or acetabular migration greater than or equal to 5 millimeters (mm) from baseline.
Measured: 3 Years postoperative
Number of Participants With Absence of Acetabular Cup Inclination Changes Greater Than 4 Degrees From Baseline at 3 Years Postoperative
Number of participants identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no acetabular cup inclination changes greater than 4 degrees from baseline when accompanied by a "Mild", "Moderate", "Marked" or "Disabled" mHHS pain score.
Measured: 3 Years postoperative
Secondary outcomes (5)
Modified Hip Harris Score (mHHS)
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a joint specific score that consists of 10 items covering domains of pain, function, functional activities, absence of deformity, and hip range of motion. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) includes all the same domains as the HHS except for the hip range of motion. Total mHHS scale ranges from 0 (worst) to 95 (best).
Measured: Preoperative, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Radiographic Findings: Number of Participants With Absence of Radiolucency
The number of participants identified as either "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no radiolucencies greater than 2 millimeters (mm) in 50% or more in any of the cup or stem zones when accompanied by a "Mild", "Moderate", "Marked" or "Disabled" pain modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).
Measured: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Radiographic Findings: Number of Participants With Absence of Femoral Subsidence or Acetabular Migration
The number of participants identified as either "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no femoral subsidence or acetabular migration greater than or equal to 5 millimeters (mm) from baseline when accompanied by a "Mild", "Moderate", "Marked" or "Disabled" pain modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).
Measured: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Radiographic Findings: Number of Participants With Absence of Acetabular Cup Inclination Changes
Number of participants identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no acetabular cup inclination changes greater than 4 degrees from baseline when accompanied by a "Mild", "Moderate", "Marked" or "Disabled" pain modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).
Measured: 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Implant Survivorship Kaplan-Meier Estimate
The Kaplan-Meier estimate of implant survivorship was measured from date of surgery to date of final visit with survival defined as no revision for any reason. A revision indicated reoperation was needed where any component (acetabular cup, acetabular liner, femoral head, or femoral stem) was replaced.
Measured: Postoperatively, up to 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2017
- Study start7 Feb 2018
- Primary completion31 May 2023
- Study completion31 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Degenerative Joint DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 189 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03056534
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-4565-10
- Acronym
- R3-PAS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Post-Approval Study of the R3 Biolox Delta Ceramic Acetabular System - US
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03056534
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R3-PAS / 16-4565-10
- Conditions
- Degenerative Joint Disease
- Keywords
- Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty, Non-Inflammatory Arthritis, Degenerative Joint Disease, R3 Delta Ceramic Acetabular Insert
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 189 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 Apr 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
R3 Delta Post-Approval Study U.S.
Detailed description
Post-Approval Study of the R3 Biolox Delta Ceramic Acetabular System - US The R3 Ceramic Acetabular System is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients requiring primary total hip arthroplasty due to non-inflammatory arthritis (degenerative joint disease) such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or traumatic arthritis. The expected timeline for the study is a total of approximately 5 years: 6 months for site initiation, 12 months for subject enrollment, 3 years until the last subject enrolled has reached the 3 year follow-up interval.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- To eliminate the potential for selection bias, Investigators should consecutively pre-screen all subjects undergoing planned total hip replacement with the R3 delta Ceramic Acetabular System.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient is 18-75 years old and he/she is skeletally mature
- Patient requires primary total hip arthroplasty due to non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (degenerative joint disease) such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or traumatic arthritis.
- Patient has met an acceptable preoperative medical clearance and is free from or treated for cardiac, pulmonary, hematological, etc., conditions that would pose excessive operative risk
- Patient is willing and able to participate in required follow-up visits and to complete study procedures and questionnaires
- Patient has consented to participating in the study by signing the IRB/EC approved informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with insufficient quantity or quality of bone support; metabolic bone disease; osteoporosis
- Patients with neurological or muscular conditions that would place extreme load or instability upon the hip joint
- Patients with active joint infections or chronic systemic infection
- Obese patients where obesity is defined as BMI ≥ 40
- Skeletal immaturity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| R3 Biolox Delta Ceramic Acetabular SystemAll study related procedures with the R3 delta Ceramic Acetabular System must be performed according to the recommended surgical technique described in the labeling and in the instructions for use (IFU). | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Overall Study Success at 3 Years Postoperative
Time frame: 3 Years Postoperative
Number of participants with overall study success were identified as "Success" or "Failure" where success indicated all the following: * No component revision for any reason * Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) greater than or equal to 80 points * No radiographic failure (Radiographic failure was defined as no radiolucencies greater than 2 millimeters (mm) in 50% or more in any of the cup or stem zones, no femoral or acetabular subsidence greater than or equal to 5 mm from baseline, and no acetabular cup inclination changes greater than 4 degrees from baseline when accompanied by a "Mild", "Moderate", "Marked" or "Disabled" mHHS pain score.)
Component Revisions at 3 Years Postoperative
Time frame: 3 Years Postoperative
Number of participants component revisions identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no component revision for any reason.
Number of Participants With Modified Harris Hip Score Greater Than or Equal to 80 Points
Time frame: 3 Years postoperative
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a joint specific score that consists of 10 items covering domains of pain, function, functional activities, absence of deformity, and hip range of motion. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) includes all the same domains as the HHS except for the hip range of motion. Total mHHS scale ranges from 0 (worst) to 95 (best). The number of participants were identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as a mHHS that is greater than or equal to 80 points.
Overall Radiographic Success at 3 Years Postoperative
Time frame: 3 Years Postoperative
Number of participants with overall radiographic success identified as "Success" or "Failure" where success indicated all of the following: * No radiolucencies greater than 2 millimeters (mm) in 50% or more in any of the cup or stem zones * No femoral or acetabular subsidence greater than or equal to 5 mm from baseline * No acetabular cup inclination changes greater than 4 degrees from baseline when accompanied by a "Mild", "Moderate", "Marked" or "Disabled" mHHS pain score
Number of Participants With Absence of Radiolucency at 3 Years Postoperative
Time frame: 3 Years postoperative
Number of participants identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no radiolucencies greater than 2 millimeters (mm) in 50% or more in any of the cup or stem zones
Number of Participants With Absence of Femoral Subsidence or Acetabular Migration at 3 Years Postoperative
Time frame: 3 Years postoperative
Number of participants identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no femoral subsidence or acetabular migration greater than or equal to 5 millimeters (mm) from baseline.
Number of Participants With Absence of Acetabular Cup Inclination Changes Greater Than 4 Degrees From Baseline at 3 Years Postoperative
Time frame: 3 Years postoperative
Number of participants identified as "Success" or "Failure" with success defined as no acetabular cup inclination changes greater than 4 degrees from baseline when accompanied by a "Mild", "Moderate", "Marked" or "Disabled" mHHS pain score.
5 secondary outcomes
Modified Hip Harris Score (mHHS)
Time frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Radiographic Findings: Number of Participants With Absence of Radiolucency
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Radiographic Findings: Number of Participants With Absence of Femoral Subsidence or Acetabular Migration
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Radiographic Findings: Number of Participants With Absence of Acetabular Cup Inclination Changes
Time frame: 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Implant Survivorship Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Time frame: Postoperatively, up to 3 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Degenerative Joint Disease
Not yet recruiting
Study Comparing Osteoarthritis Programs
Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Daily Knee Sleeve Use Versus No Use in Older Adults With Chronic Knee Pain
Knee Arthritis, Osteoarthritis
RecruitingObservational study
SVF Cellular Composition, Secretome, and Responses in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Recruiting
Pharmacist-physiotherapist Collaborative Management for Early Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee, Physiotherapy
Recruiting
Outpatient Physiotherapy vs. mHealth Exercise and Self-Management for Knee Osteoarthritis (MOKneeTOR)
Knee Osteoarthristis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Degenerative Joint Disease, run by Smith & Nephew, Inc. at 8 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Study Success at 3 Years Postoperative (time frame: 3 Years Postoperative). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2025.