Thyroid NoduleNCT03057925
Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Benign Thyroid Nodules
A study testing Microwave Ablation in people with Thyroid Nodule, run by Wenjun Wu at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Percutaneous microwave ablation(MWA) was reported as an effective modality for the management of thyroid nodules(TNs). This study aims to validate MWA as a feasible approach for patients with TNs for whom surgery is contraindicated or refused. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Thyroid Nodule
- What is being tested?
- Microwave Ablation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2017to 31 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age>18 years
- benign thyroid nodules(TYP 2)
- solid or predominantly solid(colloid component<30%)large (>3.0ml) thyroid nodules
- refusal and/or inefficacy of surgery
Who cannot join
- pregnancy
- malignant or suspicious thyroid nodules
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000
Wenjun Wu, 86-0577-55579381, wwju127@126.com
Xiaojun Chen
About this study
Percutaneous microwave ablation(MWA) was reported as an effective modality for the management of thyroid nodules(TNs). This study aims to validate MWA as a feasible approach for patients with TNs for whom surgery is contraindicated or refused. Two groups of subjects with TNs(one group to treat with MWA and the other group to receive regular ultrasonic follow-up without any treatment) will be evaluated in term of TN volume, ultrasonic image and clinical symptoms.
- Conditions
- Thyroid Nodule
- Being tested
- Microwave Ablation
- Keywords
- thyroid nodule, microwave ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Thyroid Nodule
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Microwave AblationDevice
Also called Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation
Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | MWA Percutaneous Microwave Ablation intervention procedure: Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Receives: Device: Microwave Ablation |
| Group B | No intervention | untreated no treatment; regular ultrasonic image follow-up |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of the thyroid nodule volume assessed by ultrasonography after treatment vs simple clinical observation
Change of the thyroid nodule volume assessed by using ultrasonography, the volume reduction ratio(VRR) was calculated by the equation: VRR%=[(initial volume-final volume)*100]/initial volume
Measured: From time to treatment until 12 months. Time point evaluations at 1,3,6,12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Improved score on TN-related symptoms
Evaluation of TN-related neck symptoms scored separately as follow:0(absent),1(moderate),2(severe). The sum of the individual scores generates a final score(SYS score) ranging from 0 to 6
Measured: From time to treatment until 12 months. Time point evaluations at 1,3,6,12 months
Improved cosmetic grading score
Cosmetic problem evaluated by grading score(1,no palpable mass;2, no cosmetic problem but palpable mass; 3, a cosmetic problem on swallowing only; and 4, a readily detected cosmetic problem
Measured: From time to treatment until 12 months. Time point evaluations at 1,3,6,12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2017
- Study start1 Jul 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Thyroid NoduleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wenjun Wu
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Wenjun Wu, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
- Investigators
- Xiaojun Chen, Principal investigator, Thyroid Center of The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03057925
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- wwju127
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2017
- Last updated
- 20 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wu W, Gong X, Zhou Q, Chen X, Chen X. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Solid Benign Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of MWA versus Control Group. Int J Endocrinol. 2017;2017:9724090. doi: 10.1155/2017/9724090. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
PubMed 29333159
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Benign Thyroid Nodules
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03057925
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- wwju127
- Conditions
- Thyroid Nodule
- Keywords
- thyroid nodule, microwave ablation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Wenjun WuUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Percutaneous microwave ablation(MWA) was reported as an effective modality for the management of thyroid nodules(TNs). This study aims to validate MWA as a feasible approach for patients with TNs for whom surgery is contraindicated or refused. Two groups of subjects with TNs(one group to treat with MWA and the other group to receive regular ultrasonic follow-up without any treatment) will be evaluated in term of TN volume, ultrasonic image and clinical symptoms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Device: Microwave AblationMWA Percutaneous Microwave Ablation intervention procedure: Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation |
| Group B | No intervention | –untreated no treatment; regular ultrasonic image follow-up |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age>18 years
- benign thyroid nodules(TYP 2)
- solid or predominantly solid(colloid component<30%)large (>3.0ml) thyroid nodules
- refusal and/or inefficacy of surgery
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- pregnancy
- malignant or suspicious thyroid nodules
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Microwave AblationAlso: Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave AblationUltrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation | Device | Group A |
Primary outcome
Change of the thyroid nodule volume assessed by ultrasonography after treatment vs simple clinical observation
Time frame: From time to treatment until 12 months. Time point evaluations at 1,3,6,12 months
Change of the thyroid nodule volume assessed by using ultrasonography, the volume reduction ratio(VRR) was calculated by the equation: VRR%=[(initial volume-final volume)*100]/initial volume
2 secondary outcomes
Improved score on TN-related symptoms
Time frame: From time to treatment until 12 months. Time point evaluations at 1,3,6,12 months
Improved cosmetic grading score
Time frame: From time to treatment until 12 months. Time point evaluations at 1,3,6,12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jun 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29333159Wu W, Gong X, Zhou Q, Chen X, Chen X. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Solid Benign Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of MWA versus Control Group. Int J Endocrinol. 2017;2017:9724090. doi: 10.1155/2017/9724090. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Thyroid Nodule
Recruiting
NIRAF-Guided Parathyroid Identification During Thyroidectomy
Hypocalcemia, Hypoparathyroidism
Recruiting
Evaluation of DNA Methylation Signatures for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules
Thyroid Gland Carcinoma
Recruiting
Thyroid Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Compressive Goiters.
Thyroid Nodules
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Serum Treg/Th17-Related Cytokines and Systemic Inflammatory Indices in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC), Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Recruiting
Radiofrequency Ablation Study in LatinX Patients
Thyroid Nodule
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xiaojun Chen principal investigator
Thyroid Center of The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Microwave Ablation in people with Thyroid Nodule, run by Wenjun Wu at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zimiao Chen (86-0577-88069715, zimiaochen@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of the thyroid nodule volume assessed by ultrasonography after treatment vs simple clinical observation (time frame: From time to treatment until 12 months. Time point evaluations at 1,3,6,12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03057925, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2017.