AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT03059225

rTMS in Aphasic Patients With Neuroimage Assessments

A study testing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in people with Stroke and Aphasia, run by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The refinement of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has highlighted its merit in terms of learning programs as a treatment for aftereffect augmentation. Nevertheless, the efficacy of synchronous rTMS protocol integrated with computer-integrated speech training is not well understood. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Aphasia
What is being tested?
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
18 Feb 2017to 23 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aphasic stroke in chronic stage (over 3 months)

Who cannot join

  • No seizure history, no brain surgery history, no electronic device in brain or chest, no dementia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Po-Yi Tsai, MD contact

886-228757293

pytsai@vghtpe.gov.tw

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Synchronous rTMS and Computer-integrated Speech Training Applied in Aphasic Patients

The refinement of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has highlighted its merit in terms of learning programs as a treatment for aftereffect augmentation. Nevertheless, the efficacy of synchronous rTMS protocol integrated with computer-integrated speech training is not well understood. It is also not clear regarding the efficacy of compound bi-hemispheric stimulation protocol. The aim of the study is to investigate language response to these new strategies and to determine the longevity of the therapeutic outcome. Advanced MR neuroimaging techniques, such as fMRI and DTI, are powerful tools to evaluate the concomitant nervous changes after rTMS treatment on aphasic patients. The knowledge from fMRI and DTI microstructural evolution provides insight into underlined mechanism operating the language improvement.

Read the detailed description

The efficacy of synchronous rTMS protocol integrated with computer-integrated speech training is not well understood. It is also not clear regarding the efficacy of inhibitory or excitatory stimulation protocol. The aim of the study is to investigate language response to these new strategies and to determine the longevity of the therapeutic outcome. Advanced MR neuroimaging techniques, such as fMRI and DTI, are powerful tools to evaluate the concomitant nervous changes after rTMS treatment on aphasic patients. The knowledge from fMRI and DTI microstructural evolution provides insight into underlined mechanism operating the language improvement

Conditions
Stroke, Aphasia
Being tested
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Sham stimulation
Keywords
Stroke, Aphasia, rTMS, Functional MRI, Speech training
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Aphasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)Device

    undergo contralesional 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) or high frequency ipsilesional rTMS for 10 daily sessions

  • Sham stimulationDevice

    2-week inhibitory non-dominate hemisphere rTMS program

Study groups in NCT03059225
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExperimentalExperimentalrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) intervention of contralesional 1Hz-rTMS for 10 daily sessions.
Receives: Device: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Sham stimulationSham comparatorSham treatment for 2-week inhibitory non-dominate hemisphere rTMS program.
Receives: Device: Sham stimulation
High frequency rTMSExperimentalHigh-frequency rTMS to ipsilesional region for 10 daily sessions.
Receives: Device: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in aphasia level on the Concise Chinese Aphasia Test (CCAT) at 2 Weeks

    linguistic function assessment

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change from Baseline in the concomitant nervous status on the Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 2 weeks

    brain activity change in fMRI

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Feb 2017
  2. Study start18 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion23 Dec 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion23 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03059225
Sponsor's protocol ID
2014-05-003A
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
16 Jan 2017
Last updated
8 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Tsai PY, Wang CP, Ko JS, Chung YM, Chang YW, Wang JX. The persistent and broadly modulating effect of inhibitory rTMS in nonfluent aphasic patients: a sham-controlled, double-blind study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Oct;28(8):779-87. doi: 10.1177/1545968314522710. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

    PubMed 24526709
  • Chou TY, Wang JC, Lin MY, Tsai PY. Low-Frequency vs. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia in Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jan 14;13:800377. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.800377. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 35095477
  • Lee IT, Huang CC, Hsu PC, Lin CP, Tsai PY. Resting-State Network Changes Following Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Aphasia-A Randomized Controlled Study. Neuromodulation. 2022 Jun;25(4):528-537. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Dec 18.

    PubMed 35088736

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in people with Stroke and Aphasia, run by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Po-Yi Tsai, MD (886-228757293, pytsai@vghtpe.gov.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in aphasia level on the Concise Chinese Aphasia Test (CCAT) at 2 Weeks (time frame: Up to 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03059225, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in